Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 516 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25751 ARVC 15-Teal adidas 1454 22-23 46% 15 NM
25752 Chicago Sky 15-Black 1454 26-25 50% 15 IL
25753 Momentum 14-Angelina 1454 2-5 29% 14 NV
25754 K1 Bayamon 14-20 1454 7-10 41% 14 PR
25755 NM Cactus 13-R 1454 21-16 57% 13 NM
25756 MJVA 14-National bl-so 1454 15-19 43% 14 TN
25757 ENVY Volleyball Club 18 18 BLACK 1454 4-5 44% 18 IA
25758 Legacy Volleyball Club 12-Elite 1454 14-13 52% 12 NY
25759 ProPlay 14-Amelia 1454 15-20 43% 14 CA
25760 Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 13-Kelly 1454 16-16 46% 13 VA
25761 Flashes 14-1 1454 11-13 46% 14 CA
25762 SEIVB 15-Elite 1454 13-15 46% 15 IN
25763 Avoli 14-F juan 1454 3-4 43% 14 PR
25764 316VBC 15-3 1454 11-9 46% 15 KS
25765 Invasion VBC 18-National 1454 3-4 43% 18 MO
25766 NCISVBC 16-1 1454 23-34 40% 16 IN
25767 Alliance 14-1 nashville 1454 2-3 40% 14 TN
25768 Pelican State 13-Blue 1454 17-18 49% 13 LA
25769 Topeka Saints 12-2 1454 5-8 29% 12 KS
25770 New Heights Volleyball Club 14 New Heights VC 1454 2-3 40% 14 WY
25771 1United 18-Elite blue 1454 10-21 31% 18 TX
25772 Slainte 17-Black 1454 15-22 41% 17 CA
25773 Aspire 13-2 pink 1454 21-20 51% 13 AB
25774 MVP Club 17-2 1454 1-3 25% 17 WI
25775 H Skyline 13-Onyx 1454 14-9 61% 13 TX
25776 Gonzales Revolution 13-1 1454 1-2 33% 13 TX
25777 TAV Houston 13-Blue 1454 18-39 32% 13 TX
25778 Clarksville VBC 15 Bre 1454 26-22 54% 15 TN
25779 JCBC 16-Select 1454 2-3 40% 16 IA
25780 ARVC 12-Blue adidas 1454 21-20 51% 12 NM
25781 STMA 13-Ext 1454 2-2 50% 13 MN
25782 Peak VA 15-White 1454 21-19 48% 15 TX
25783 Hot Shots 18 1454 12-12 41% 18 NY
25784 ABC Apollo 16-2 white 1454 15-16 48% 16 OR
25785 NWI Premier NWI 12-Blue 1454 3-3 50% 12 IA
25786 Iowa Elite 17-S 1454 1-3 25% 17 IA
25787 Junior Orioles 11 1454 15-19 44% 11 IN
25788 Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 12 1454 25-47 33% 12 VA
25789 Colorado Nationals 14 1454 19-17 53% 14 CO
25790 Vantage 14-Blue smack 1454 22-19 54% 14 OH
25791 NEPA ELITE 16-Wildfire 1454 13-13 46% 16 PA
25792 NVA 17-Navy 1454 1-2 33% 17 NE
25793 PREVAIL Girls 14-Purple 1454 8-8 50% 14 PA
25794 Metro Volleyball Club 15-East 1454 33-26 54% 15 DC
25795 Volitude 13-Blue 1454 21-20 51% 13 CA
25796 KPV 17-Pink-carlee 1454 27-29 48% 17 KY
25797 SVE 16-2 1454 23-29 44% 16 GA
25798 Xcel 15-Elite red 1454 23-30 43% 15 NC
25799 PRIME 15-1 1454 9-9 47% 15 UT
25800 Extreme 16 1454 9-11 45% 16 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.