2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | OT 16-T jp | 2309 | 51-21 | 71% | 16 | FL |
| 102 | Munciana 16 Nighthawks | 2307 | 60-22 | 73% | 16 | IN |
| 103 | 1United 14-N blue | 2307 | 46-17 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 104 | DYNASTY 17-Black | 2306 | 50-17 | 75% | 17 | KS |
| 105 | Tstreet 15-Chandler | 2303 | 43-23 | 65% | 15 | CA |
| 106 | PineappleHP 16U | 2301 | 41-29 | 59% | 16 | IN |
| 107 | Madfrog 12-N green | 2300 | 63-2 | 97% | 12 | TX |
| 108 | Kairos 16 Alpha | 2300 | 43-24 | 64% | 16 | SD |
| 109 | A5 14 MoBetty | 2298 | 76-14 | 84% | 14 | GA |
| 110 | PineappleHP 14U | 2298 | 41-28 | 59% | 14 | IN |
| 111 | Academy 16 Diamond | 2296 | 61-20 | 75% | 16 | NC |
| 112 | COAST 14-1 said | 2293 | 35-18 | 66% | 14 | CA |
| 113 | Elevation 15-Edie dani | 2291 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | GA |
| 114 | MADFROG 17-N green | 2291 | 51-17 | 75% | 17 | TX |
| 115 | Vision 15-Gold | 2288 | 56-23 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 116 | Tri-State Elite 16-Blue | 2287 | 52-19 | 73% | 16 | KY |
| 117 | TAV 13-Black jon | 2287 | 41-16 | 72% | 13 | TX |
| 118 | Triangle 17-Black | 2287 | 48-20 | 71% | 17 | NC |
| 119 | TAV 16-Black josh | 2285 | 47-24 | 66% | 16 | TX |
| 120 | PineappleHP 17U | 2285 | 53-18 | 75% | 17 | IN |
| 121 | A5 16-Stephen | 2285 | 73-19 | 79% | 16 | GA |
| 122 | A5 18 Marc | 2280 | 55-11 | 83% | 18 | GA |
| 123 | OMNI 16 National | 2280 | 63-30 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 124 | Triangle 15-Black | 2278 | 49-25 | 66% | 15 | NC |
| 125 | 1st Alliance 15 Gold | 2276 | 38-25 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 126 | Tstreet Volleyball Club 17-Hayden | 2276 | 39-18 | 68% | 17 | CA |
| 127 | HPSTL 17 Royal | 2275 | 41-27 | 59% | 17 | MO |
| 128 | UNION 16-Black | 2274 | 64-22 | 74% | 16 | IN |
| 129 | MKE Sting 17-Gold | 2272 | 52-26 | 67% | 17 | WI |
| 130 | Tribe 17-Vktry cardinal | 2272 | 58-18 | 76% | 17 | FL |
| 131 | KIVA 12-Red | 2271 | 74-7 | 91% | 12 | KY |
| 132 | Club V 16-Prodigy reed | 2270 | 61-31 | 66% | 16 | UT |
| 133 | Northern Lights 17-1 | 2270 | 62-28 | 69% | 17 | MN |
| 134 | MAVS 16-Elite | 2269 | 33-21 | 61% | 16 | KS |
| 135 | CoJrs 15-Shannon | 2267 | 54-18 | 75% | 15 | CO |
| 136 | KC Power 14-1 | 2266 | 34-18 | 65% | 14 | KS |
| 137 | NYC Volleyball Academy 17-Westside | 2265 | 79-13 | 86% | 17 | NY |
| 138 | WPVC 14-Armour black | 2265 | 60-32 | 65% | 14 | FL |
| 139 | FH 14-1 ikaika ac/as | 2264 | 41-14 | 75% | 14 | TX |
| 140 | HJV 14-Elite | 2263 | 48-26 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 141 | FaR Out 17-J | 2263 | 13-6 | 68% | 17 | MI |
| 142 | NLVA 15-Girouard | 2262 | 45-25 | 64% | 15 | MO |
| 143 | VCNebraska 17 Elite | 2261 | 44-16 | 73% | 17 | NE |
| 144 | Academy 17-O tsunami | 2260 | 51-27 | 65% | 17 | IN |
| 145 | Stars 16 ZAmy | 2260 | 67-21 | 76% | 16 | SC |
| 146 | MiElite 16-Mizuno | 2259 | 47-24 | 66% | 16 | MI |
| 147 | KC Power 16-1 | 2259 | 37-26 | 59% | 16 | KS |
| 148 | Tri-State Elite 17-Blue | 2259 | 53-17 | 76% | 17 | KY |
| 149 | TPV 16-Maverick | 2258 | 63-14 | 82% | 16 | TN |
| 150 | Omni 15-N1 | 2256 | 54-21 | 72% | 15 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.