Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
101 OT 16-T jp 2309 51-21 71% 16 FL
102 Munciana 16 Nighthawks 2307 60-22 73% 16 IN
103 1United 14-N blue 2307 46-17 73% 14 TX
104 DYNASTY 17-Black 2306 50-17 75% 17 KS
105 Tstreet 15-Chandler 2303 43-23 65% 15 CA
106 PineappleHP 16U 2301 41-29 59% 16 IN
107 Madfrog 12-N green 2300 63-2 97% 12 TX
108 Kairos 16 Alpha 2300 43-24 64% 16 SD
109 A5 14 MoBetty 2298 76-14 84% 14 GA
110 PineappleHP 14U 2298 41-28 59% 14 IN
111 Academy 16 Diamond 2296 61-20 75% 16 NC
112 COAST 14-1 said 2293 35-18 66% 14 CA
113 Elevation 15-Edie dani 2291 7-2 78% 15 GA
114 MADFROG 17-N green 2291 51-17 75% 17 TX
115 Vision 15-Gold 2288 56-23 71% 15 CA
116 Tri-State Elite 16-Blue 2287 52-19 73% 16 KY
117 TAV 13-Black jon 2287 41-16 72% 13 TX
118 Triangle 17-Black 2287 48-20 71% 17 NC
119 TAV 16-Black josh 2285 47-24 66% 16 TX
120 PineappleHP 17U 2285 53-18 75% 17 IN
121 A5 16-Stephen 2285 73-19 79% 16 GA
122 A5 18 Marc 2280 55-11 83% 18 GA
123 OMNI 16 National 2280 63-30 68% 16 CA
124 Triangle 15-Black 2278 49-25 66% 15 NC
125 1st Alliance 15 Gold 2276 38-25 60% 15 IL
126 Tstreet Volleyball Club 17-Hayden 2276 39-18 68% 17 CA
127 HPSTL 17 Royal 2275 41-27 59% 17 MO
128 UNION 16-Black 2274 64-22 74% 16 IN
129 MKE Sting 17-Gold 2272 52-26 67% 17 WI
130 Tribe 17-Vktry cardinal 2272 58-18 76% 17 FL
131 KIVA 12-Red 2271 74-7 91% 12 KY
132 Club V 16-Prodigy reed 2270 61-31 66% 16 UT
133 Northern Lights 17-1 2270 62-28 69% 17 MN
134 MAVS 16-Elite 2269 33-21 61% 16 KS
135 CoJrs 15-Shannon 2267 54-18 75% 15 CO
136 KC Power 14-1 2266 34-18 65% 14 KS
137 NYC Volleyball Academy 17-Westside 2265 79-13 86% 17 NY
138 WPVC 14-Armour black 2265 60-32 65% 14 FL
139 FH 14-1 ikaika ac/as 2264 41-14 75% 14 TX
140 HJV 14-Elite 2263 48-26 65% 14 TX
141 FaR Out 17-J 2263 13-6 68% 17 MI
142 NLVA 15-Girouard 2262 45-25 64% 15 MO
143 VCNebraska 17 Elite 2261 44-16 73% 17 NE
144 Academy 17-O tsunami 2260 51-27 65% 17 IN
145 Stars 16 ZAmy 2260 67-21 76% 16 SC
146 MiElite 16-Mizuno 2259 47-24 66% 16 MI
147 KC Power 16-1 2259 37-26 59% 16 KS
148 Tri-State Elite 17-Blue 2259 53-17 76% 17 KY
149 TPV 16-Maverick 2258 63-14 82% 16 TN
150 Omni 15-N1 2256 54-21 72% 15 AZ
← Previous123456Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.