Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is MADFROG 15-N green with a 2441 Elo rating and 62-9 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
101 AZ REV 17 Premier 2202 45-16 74% 17 AZ
102 Ozark Juniors 16 Premier 2201 49-19 72% 16 AR
103 Stars 16 ZAmy 2200 58-14 81% 16 SC
104 FaR Out 14-Black 2197 44-12 79% 14 MI
105 Metro 14-Travel 2197 51-11 82% 14 DC
106 MKE Sting 16-Gold 2196 47-20 70% 16 WI
107 MAVS 16-Elite 2195 28-12 70% 16 MO
108 BSVBC 16-Black 2195 44-11 80% 16 IL
109 FH 14-1 ikaika ac/as 2194 32-7 82% 14 TX
110 Skyline 15-Royal ryan 2194 16-1 94% 15 TX
111 PVA 14-Elite 2193 35-16 69% 14 PA
112 GJ 15 ADIDAS 2193 44-12 79% 15 FL
113 Paramount VBC 16 Maureen 2192 48-13 79% 16 VA
114 LOVB 17-Angel 2192 26-6 81% 17 MI
115 Legacy 16-1 adidas 2191 32-16 67% 16 MI
116 Club V 16-Prodigy reed 2191 50-21 70% 16 UT
117 Surfside 13-Pv elite 2191 41-11 79% 13 CA
118 HPSTL 16 Royal 2190 36-18 65% 16 MO
119 Dallas Skyline 15-Royal-ryan 2189 9-0 100% 15 TX
120 A5 15-Kelly 2189 43-17 72% 15 GA
121 Arizona Storm 17-Thunder 2189 18-2 90% 17 AZ
122 OPU 15-1 2188 58-9 87% 15 FL
123 ONE Volleyball 13-1 2188 59-17 78% 13 GA
124 Metro 17-Travel 2188 48-12 80% 17 DC
125 Top Select 16 Elite 2187 50-24 68% 16 FL
126 Paramount VBC 17 Nick 2187 56-13 81% 17 VA
127 Nebraska ONE 17 Synergy 2187 31-8 79% 17 NE
128 Drive Nation 17-Red 2186 24-14 63% 17 TX
129 KC Power 13-1 2185 31-17 65% 13 KS
130 HEAT 15-Elite 2184 55-17 76% 15 FL
131 PVA 16 ELITE 2184 28-19 60% 16 PA
132 PVA 17 ELITE 2184 31-18 63% 17 PA
133 KIVA 12-Red 2183 54-3 95% 12 KY
134 Tribe 16-Vktry cardinal 2179 37-18 67% 16 FL
135 COAST 17-1 2179 6-2 75% 17 CA
136 EXCEL 14-National white 2179 47-3 94% 14 TX
137 Jax Skyline 15-Royal 2178 46-26 64% 15 FL
138 TPV 16-Maverick 2176 44-12 79% 16
139 NYC VBA 17-Westside 2176 71-9 89% 17 NY
140 MN Select 16-1 2175 52-14 79% 16 MN
141 A5 17-Calvin 2172 31-25 55% 17 GA
142 WAVE 14-Juliana 2171 33-6 85% 14 CA
143 TAV 16-Black josh 2171 42-19 69% 16 TX
144 Houston Skyline 15-Royal 2170 9-0 100% 15
145 Jax Skyline 14-Royal 2169 53-24 69% 14 FL
146 Stars 14-Sean 2168 52-15 78% 14 SC
147 HPSTL 12 Royal 2168 56-8 88% 12 MO
148 KC Power 18-1 2167 31-12 72% 18 KS
149 Absolute 14-Black 2167 39-14 74% 14 CA
150 MAVS 13-Elite 2167 24-16 60% 13 MO
← Previous123456Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.