2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | NPJ 18 Forefront | 2310 | 66-6 | 92% | 18 | |
| 102 | OT 16-T jp | 2306 | 51-21 | 71% | 16 | FL |
| 103 | PVA 16 ELITE | 2305 | 38-25 | 60% | 16 | MO |
| 104 | DYNASTY 17-Black | 2303 | 50-17 | 75% | 17 | KS |
| 105 | Munciana 16 Nighthawks | 2303 | 60-22 | 73% | 16 | IN |
| 106 | Tstreet 15-Chandler | 2303 | 43-23 | 65% | 15 | CA |
| 107 | Madfrog 12-N green | 2302 | 63-2 | 97% | 12 | TX |
| 108 | Kairos 16 Alpha | 2298 | 43-24 | 64% | 16 | SD |
| 109 | Academy 16 Diamond | 2293 | 61-20 | 75% | 16 | NC |
| 110 | PineappleHP 16U | 2292 | 41-29 | 59% | 16 | IN |
| 111 | PineappleHP 14U | 2292 | 41-28 | 59% | 14 | IN |
| 112 | A5 14 MoBetty | 2292 | 76-14 | 84% | 14 | GA |
| 113 | KIVA 12-Red | 2292 | 70-5 | 93% | 12 | KY |
| 114 | COAST 14-1 said | 2289 | 35-18 | 66% | 14 | CA |
| 115 | TAV 13-Black jon | 2289 | 41-16 | 72% | 13 | TX |
| 116 | Elevation 15-Edie dani | 2289 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | CO |
| 117 | Tri-State Elite 16-Blue | 2287 | 52-19 | 73% | 16 | OH |
| 118 | Triangle 17-Black | 2284 | 48-20 | 71% | 17 | NC |
| 119 | TAV 16-Black josh | 2284 | 47-24 | 66% | 16 | TX |
| 120 | MADFROG 17-N green | 2283 | 51-17 | 75% | 17 | TX |
| 121 | Vision 15-Gold | 2283 | 56-23 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 122 | PineappleHP 17U | 2281 | 53-18 | 75% | 17 | IN |
| 123 | OMNI 16 National | 2281 | 63-30 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 124 | A5 18 Marc | 2280 | 55-11 | 83% | 18 | GA |
| 125 | MKE Sting 17-Gold | 2279 | 52-26 | 67% | 17 | WI |
| 126 | Triangle 15-Black | 2277 | 49-25 | 66% | 15 | NC |
| 127 | A5 16-Stephen | 2277 | 70-17 | 80% | 16 | GA |
| 128 | Tribe 17-Vktry cardinal | 2273 | 58-18 | 76% | 17 | FL |
| 129 | 1st Alliance 15 Gold | 2273 | 38-25 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 130 | Tri-State Elite 17-Blue | 2271 | 53-17 | 76% | 17 | OH |
| 131 | UNION 16-Black | 2270 | 64-22 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 132 | Club V 16-Prodigy reed | 2269 | 61-31 | 66% | 16 | UT |
| 133 | NYC VBA 17-Westside | 2269 | 88-13 | 87% | 17 | NY |
| 134 | HPSTL 17 Royal | 2268 | 41-27 | 59% | 17 | MO |
| 135 | Northern Lights 17-1 | 2268 | 57-27 | 68% | 17 | MN |
| 136 | Tstreet 17-Hayden | 2266 | 39-18 | 68% | 17 | CA |
| 137 | MAVS 16-Elite | 2264 | 33-21 | 61% | 16 | KS |
| 138 | WPVC 14-Armour black | 2264 | 60-32 | 65% | 14 | FL |
| 139 | KC Power 14-1 | 2264 | 34-18 | 65% | 14 | KS |
| 140 | Academy 17-O tsunami | 2262 | 51-27 | 65% | 17 | IN |
| 141 | CoJrs 15-Shannon | 2259 | 41-17 | 71% | 15 | CO |
| 142 | NLVA 15-Girouard | 2259 | 45-25 | 64% | 15 | MO |
| 143 | KC Power 16-1 | 2258 | 37-26 | 59% | 16 | KS |
| 144 | HJV 14-Elite | 2258 | 48-26 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 145 | Stars 16 ZAmy | 2257 | 67-21 | 76% | 16 | SC |
| 146 | VCNebraska 17 Elite | 2257 | 44-16 | 73% | 17 | NE |
| 147 | MiElite 16-Mizuno | 2257 | 47-24 | 66% | 16 | MI |
| 148 | TPV 16-Maverick | 2255 | 63-14 | 82% | 16 | |
| 149 | FaR Out 17-J | 2254 | 13-6 | 68% | 17 | MI |
| 150 | Absolute 17-Black | 2253 | 55-16 | 77% | 17 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.