College Club Women's State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

Rankings last updated:

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
1 California 86.07 36 51 12 Cal Poly SLO
2 Florida 76.85 11 18 5 U Florida
3 Ohio 74.76 15 23 5 Ohio St U
4 Texas 73.98 20 29 5 Texas A&M
5 Wisconsin 68.67 13 23 4 UW-Madison
6 North Carolina 68.4 12 20 3 U North Carolina-Chapel Hill
7 Pennsylvania 67.16 15 17 4 Penn St
8 Virginia 66.27 8 10 4 James Madison U
9 Michigan 65.99 10 15 4 Michigan St U
10 Utah 64.99 4 6 2 Utah Valley
11 Colorado 60.09 12 17 3 Colorado Sch Mines
12 Iowa 58.83 4 7 2 U Iowa
13 Maryland 58.02 2 4 2 U Maryland
14 Massachusetts 57.59 16 17 2 Boston
15 Minnesota 56.36 6 9 2 MSU-Mankato
16 Georgia 55.33 8 11 2 Georgia Tech
17 South Carolina 53.33 5 7 2 Clemson
18 Illinois 53.2 11 14 2 U Illinois
19 Alabama 53.08 5 7 2 Auburn U
20 Oklahoma 52.89 4 5 2 U Oklahoma
21 Arkansas 52.89 1 2 1 U Arkansas
22 Oregon 51.75 7 8 2 Oregon St U
23 Missouri 51.09 10 13 1 U Missouri
24 Arizona 47.23 5 8 1 U Arizona
25 New York 46.87 26 30 1 SUNY-Cortland
1234Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.