College Club Women's State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
1 California 86.46 36 51 13 UC-Berkeley
2 Florida 75.48 11 18 5 U Florida
3 Texas 75.13 20 29 6 Texas A&M
4 Wisconsin 68.67 13 23 4 UW-Madison
5 Pennsylvania 66.25 15 17 5 Temple U
6 North Carolina 65.87 12 20 3 U North Carolina-Chapel Hill
7 Ohio 64.74 15 23 3 Ohio St U
8 New York 64.29 26 30 5 BinghamtonU
9 Iowa 62.64 4 7 3 U Iowa
10 Utah 62.35 4 6 2 Utah Valley
11 Minnesota 62.17 6 9 3 MSU-Mankato
12 Colorado 59.52 12 17 3 Colorado Sch Mines
13 Massachusetts 59.31 16 17 3 Boston
14 Michigan 57.45 10 15 3 Grand Valley St U
15 Missouri 55.28 10 13 2 U Missouri
16 Maryland 54.64 2 4 2 U Maryland
17 Georgia 52.18 8 11 2 Georgia Tech
18 Kansas 51.97 5 6 2 U Kansas
19 Washington 51.46 9 11 2 U Washington
20 Oklahoma 50.81 4 5 2 U Oklahoma
21 Virginia 50.62 8 10 2 Virginia Tech U
22 Oregon 49.78 7 8 2 Oregon St U
23 Arkansas 49 1 2 1 U Arkansas
24 Delaware 45.01 1 2 1 U Delaware
25 Illinois 44.74 11 14 1 U Illinois
1234Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.