College Club Women's State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

Rankings last updated:

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
1 California 88.72 36 45 9 Cal Poly SLO
2 Ohio 77.07 16 28 7 Ohio St U
3 Florida 72.42 10 19 7 U Florida
4 Texas 71.22 21 30 4 Texas A&M
5 Wisconsin 67 14 25 5 UW-Madison
6 Pennsylvania 64.7 18 23 4 Penn St U
7 North Carolina 64 13 22 3 U North Carolina-Chapel Hill
8 Minnesota 60.09 10 15 3 MSU-Mankato
9 Missouri 60.03 8 13 3 U Missouri
10 Michigan 58.4 13 20 3 Michigan St U
11 Colorado 57.77 11 17 3 U Colorado
12 Indiana 57.26 9 14 2 Purdue U
13 Illinois 55.07 11 15 3 U Illinois
14 Washington 54.06 7 11 3 U Washington
15 Georgia 53.42 8 11 2 U Georgia
16 Arizona 52.68 5 8 2 U Arizona
17 Massachusetts 52.08 16 17 1 Boston
18 Virginia 52.07 9 11 2 Virginia Tech U
19 Utah 50.94 4 6 2 Utah State U
20 Maryland 50.39 5 8 2 Towson U
21 South Carolina 49.51 4 7 2 Clemson
22 Oklahoma 46.68 3 5 2 U Oklahoma
23 Iowa 45.12 4 7 2 U Iowa
24 New York 43.67 26 30 1 SUNY-Cortland
25 Delaware 43.54 1 2 1 U Delaware
1234Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.