Youth Boys State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
1 California 85.99 154 799 48 MB Surf
2 Illinois 78.06 45 347 18 MOD
3 New Jersey 73.62 23 137 10 Warren Sixpack
4 Ohio 72.48 49 251 14 Cinci Attack
5 New York 71.37 42 185 12 Roch PaceBootleggr
6 Florida 71.14 46 186 12 Miami United
7 Massachusetts 70.71 14 101 7 SMASH Boys
8 Arizona 67.58 28 121 8 Aspire Volleyball Club
9 Wisconsin 67.05 22 120 7 MVC (Milwaukee, WI)
10 Pennsylvania 65.93 33 143 8 PVC Sandlot
11 Colorado 64.02 15 96 6 Elevation Volleyball Club
12 Texas 63.12 37 132 6 HVA
13 PR 60.79 5 45 3 BORINQUEN COQUI
14 Hawaii 60.1 20 86 5 SASVBC
15 North Carolina 59.16 14 44 4 Triangle Boys
16 Indiana 58.47 14 87 4 Academy
17 Connecticut 58.32 7 40 3 NEVBC Boys
18 Maryland 55.27 12 44 3 MVP
19 Missouri 52.97 27 102 2 HPSTL
20 Tennessee 51.37 8 28 2 C2 Attack
21 Nevada 51.36 17 51 3 Vegas Aces
22 Virginia 49.77 18 61 2 The St. James Boys
23 Minnesota 49.12 21 69 2 MN Select Boys
24 Kentucky 49.1 6 36 2 NKYVC
25 Utah 47.55 21 82 2 GSL
1234Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.