Youth Boys State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

Rankings last updated:

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
1 California 86 154 813 46 MB Surf
2 Illinois 78.41 45 356 18 MOD
3 New Jersey 74.45 23 139 10 Warren Sixpack
4 New York 73.91 43 193 14 Roch PaceBootleggr
5 Ohio 71.33 49 253 12 Cinci Attack
6 Florida 70.86 47 205 11 Tribe Volleyball Club, LLC
7 Arizona 68.71 28 121 8 AZ Fear
8 Massachusetts 68.66 14 101 6 SMASH Boys
9 Pennsylvania 67.47 33 143 9 PVC Sandlot
10 Wisconsin 66.96 22 120 7 MVC (Milwaukee, WI)
11 Texas 65.06 37 130 7 HVA
12 Colorado 64.62 15 97 6 Elevation Volleyball Club
13 Hawaii 64.39 20 93 6 SASVBC
14 PR 63.95 5 46 3 BORINQUEN COQUI
15 North Carolina 62.23 14 44 5 Triangle Boys
16 Missouri 57.86 27 106 3 HPSTL
17 Connecticut 57.75 7 40 3 NEVBC Boys
18 Maryland 56.11 12 52 3 MVP
19 Indiana 55.48 14 87 3 Academy
20 Nevada 52.88 17 51 3 Vegas Aces
21 Tennessee 52.01 8 28 2 C2 Attack
22 Virginia 51.28 18 70 2 The St. James Boys
23 Minnesota 49.14 21 69 2 MN Select Boys
24 Utah 48.43 21 82 2 GSL
25 Washington 48.16 20 69 2 SNVF
1234Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.