Youth Boys State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

Rankings last updated:

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
1 California 87.94 159 880 59 MB Surf
2 Illinois 77.12 49 379 19 MOD
3 New York 70.53 36 181 12 Roch PaceBootleggr
4 Arizona 69.67 30 139 10 Aspire Volleyball Club
5 Florida 69.15 39 177 11 WPVC
6 Ohio 67.74 24 142 8 Cinci Attack
7 Pennsylvania 67.56 34 147 11 Yorktowne
8 Wisconsin 66.09 22 120 7 MVC (Milwaukee, WI)
9 New Jersey 65.93 23 111 7 Warren Sixpack
10 Hawaii 65.58 23 79 7 SASVBC
11 Massachusetts 64.01 14 105 5 SMASH Boys
12 PR 62.68 32 112 6 BORINQUEN COQUI
13 Texas 58.68 34 117 4 HVA
14 Colorado 58.37 14 91 4 Elevation Volleyball Club
16 Virginia 56.67 22 84 4 The St. James Boys
15 Missouri 56.67 29 108 3 HPSTL
17 Indiana 55.07 13 92 3 Academy
18 Maryland 54.21 13 54 3 MVP
19 Nevada 53.24 18 63 3 Vegas Aces
20 North Carolina 53.06 18 45 3 Triangle Boys
21 Michigan 50.57 10 44 3 L2
22 Minnesota 47.17 24 75 2 MN Select Boys
23 Washington 46.92 20 67 2 SNVF
24 Utah 46.58 25 84 2 GSL
25 Connecticut 46.51 6 30 2 NEVBC Boys
1234Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.