Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1 Balboa Bay 16-Blue 2364 49-7 88% 16 CA
2 C2 Attack 17-1 2357 76-8 90% 17 TN
3 Triangle Boys 18-Black 2328 72-9 89% 18 NC
4 MB Surf 18-Asics 2313 38-6 86% 18 CA
5 949 B18-Black 2305 36-8 82% 18 CA
6 Balboa Bay 14-Blue 2299 53-6 90% 14 CA
7 Balboa Bay 18-Blue 2296 36-6 86% 18 CA
8 Indoor 15 2294 59-8 88% 15 CA
9 Cinci Attack 16-Black 2287 55-12 82% 16 OH
10 MB Surf 16-Asics 2271 42-11 79% 16 CA
11 Bay to Bay 17-1 2270 51-15 77% 17 CA
12 Team Rockstar 16 Angel 2265 46-6 88% 16 CA
13 Team Rockstar 18 Matt 2264 37-8 82% 18 CA
14 MB Surf 14-1 asics 2263 48-10 83% 14 CA
15 HPSTL 17-Royal 2257 65-12 84% 17 MO
16 Pipeline 16-1 2255 60-18 77% 16 IL
17 Warren Sixpack 16-1 2246 39-11 78% 16 NJ
18 COAST 16-1 dave/nick 2246 47-9 84% 16 CA
19 MVVC B 16-Red 2243 60-18 77% 16 CA
20 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-1m 2242 28-4 88% 14 PR
21 WPVC Boys 18-Armour black 2241 58-11 84% 18 FL
22 SouthCoastVolleyball 18 2234 44-6 88% 18 CA
23 Bay to Bay 16-1 2231 40-16 71% 16 CA
24 630 Volleyball 18-1 2228 56-19 75% 18 IL
25 Team Rockstar 17 Jason 2225 39-6 87% 17 CA
26 SPVB B18 Elite 2222 54-16 77% 18 IL
27 Aspire 17-Iron man 2219 55-10 85% 17 AZ
28 MVC 18-North shore 2217 68-16 81% 18 WI
29 MOD B14-Blue 2215 75-9 89% 14 IL
30 COAST 18-1 pat 2215 36-8 82% 18 CA
31 COAST 15-1 chris/ian 2213 52-13 80% 15 CA
32 COAST 17-1 victor/berkeley 2210 39-6 87% 17 CA
33 Adversity VBC 16 Adidas 2209 62-25 71% 16 IL
34 Bay to Bay 14-1 2208 44-16 73% 14 CA
35 MVVC B 18-Red 2204 67-10 87% 18 CA
36 MKE Sting 16-1 2203 68-24 74% 16 WI
37 C2 Attack 18-1 elite 2202 60-14 81% 18 TN
38 Adversity South 18 Adidas 2200 55-27 67% 18 IL
39 Team Rockstar 14 Anjinho 2196 41-20 67% 14 CA
40 HPSTL 16-Royal 2194 47-23 67% 16 MO
41 SASVBC B 15-Maya 2193 31-8 79% 15 HI
42 PAC 17 McKay 2188 34-9 79% 17 CA
43 MKE Sting 18-1 2183 52-34 60% 18 WI
44 SBVC Boys 17-1 2182 12-0 100% 17 CA
45 TORRI 14-1 2179 14-4 78% 14 PR
46 Aspire 16 Spiderman 2176 39-18 68% 16 AZ
47 Pulse 15 Isaac 2175 44-12 79% 15 CA
48 Miami United 16-National matt 2173 28-13 68% 16 FL
49 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-1m 2171 27-7 79% 16 PR
50 SASVBC B 18-Jordan 2165 27-4 87% 18 HI
1234Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.