Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2026-2027 Season · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Aspire 18-Thor with a 2048 Elo rating and 16-0 record. Rankings reflect the 2026-2027 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1 Aspire 18-Thor 2048 16-0 100% 18 AZ
2 AZ Fear 16-Black 1991 12-4 75% 16 AZ
3 Aspire 17-Iron man 1974 12-4 75% 17 AZ
4 AZ Fear 18-Black 1971 12-4 75% 18 AZ
5 AZ Fear 16-1 west 1942 16-0 100% 16 AZ
6 Aspire 16-Hawkeye 1924 15-1 94% 16 AZ
7 Salt City Boys 17-Salty reed 1908 8-0 100% 17 UT
8 Aspire 16-Spiderman 1892 11-5 69% 16 AZ
9 Eclipse Boys 14-S solar 1885 14-0 100% 14 CA
10 AZ Fear 17-1 west 1875 10-6 63% 17 AZ
11 Az Fear 18-Blue 1874 8-8 50% 18 AZ
12 Aspire 15-Black panther 1853 10-6 63% 15 AZ
13 Salt City Boys 18-Salty shane 1853 7-0 100% 18 UT
14 Maverick 17-Stealth 1848 15-5 71% 17 AZ
15 AZ Fear 15-Black 1848 8-8 50% 15 AZ
16 AZ Fear 14-Black 1842 15-1 94% 14 AZ
17 Victory 16-Black 1837 9-7 56% 16 AZ
18 MVC 16-Elite 1837 9-7 56% 16 AZ
19 Victory 18-Black 1828 9-7 56% 18 AZ
20 UCVC 16-Mccall 1825 12-0 100% 16
21 C2 Attack 18-1 elite 1821 6-0 100% 18 TN
22 Nova 18-Boys 1820 13-3 76% 18 AZ
23 Team Rockstar 18-Milan 1819 11-1 92% 18 CA
24 Club GSL National 17-1 1813 15-3 83% 17
25 Team Colorado 17-Black 1812 11-0 100% 17 CO
26 Club GSL St. George 18-Alaina 1811 14-2 88% 18 UT
27 Vortex 18-National - des 1809 19-0 100% 18 UT
28 Tribe 16-B elite cardinal 1800 6-0 100% 16 FL
29 NCVC 16-Mizuno 1798 13-1 93% 16 CA
30 Salt City Boys 16-Salty kris 1797 8-0 100% 16 UT
31 MVC 17-Elite 1795 8-8 50% 17 AZ
32 Cinci Attack 17-Black 1790 6-0 100% 17 OH
33 Maverick 17-Rooster 1789 12-8 57% 17 AZ
34 Cinci Attack 16-Red 1782 5-1 83% 16 OH
35 ATOMIC 18-Black 1781 6-10 38% 18 AZ
36 Club GSL National 18-1 1780 12-4 75% 18
37 Tribe 18-B elite cardinal 1779 6-0 100% 18 FL
38 AOT 16-1 1775 16-5 76% 16 AZ
39 Zona VBC 17-Slunks 1775 8-8 50% 17 AZ
40 Maverick 16-Goose 1775 13-8 62% 16 AZ
41 South County 18-Jemesa/trent 1775 7-1 88% 18 UT
42 OMNI 14-1 national 1772 12-2 86% 14 CA
43 Miami United 18-National sebi 1770 8-2 80% 18 FL
44 Premier 18-Tiger 1769 12-1 92% 18 OH
45 Salt City Boys 14-Salty jj 1764 7-1 88% 14 UT
46 Maverick 16-Wolfman 1763 7-9 44% 16 AZ
47 South County 16-Nap/zack 1757 11-3 79% 16 UT
48 Club GSL National 16-1 1756 11-5 69% 16
49 Deer Creek 18-1 1756 11-2 85% 18 UT
50 AZ LEGACY 18-Apex 1756 12-9 55% 18 AZ
1234Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.