Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1 Balboa Bay 16-Blue 2373 49-7 88% 16 CA
2 C2 Attack 17-1 2370 76-8 90% 17 TN
3 Triangle Boys 18-Black 2343 72-9 89% 18 NC
4 MB Surf 18-Asics 2329 38-6 86% 18 CA
5 949 B18-Black 2326 36-8 82% 18 CA
6 Balboa Bay 18-Blue 2313 36-6 86% 18 CA
7 Indoor 15 2308 59-8 88% 15 CA
8 Cinci Attack 16-Black 2294 55-12 82% 16 OH
9 Team Rockstar 18 Matt 2284 37-8 82% 18 CA
10 Balboa Bay 14-Blue 2284 53-6 90% 14 CA
11 Bay to Bay 17-1 2281 51-15 77% 17 CA
12 Team Rockstar 16 Angel 2279 46-6 88% 16 CA
13 MB Surf 16-Asics 2279 42-11 79% 16 CA
14 HPSTL 17-Royal 2269 65-12 84% 17 MO
15 Pipeline 16-1 2262 60-18 77% 16 IL
16 WPVC Boys 18-Armour black 2259 58-11 84% 18 FL
17 COAST 16-1 dave/nick 2259 47-9 84% 16 CA
18 MB Surf 14-1 asics 2258 48-10 83% 14 CA
19 MVVC B 16-Red 2252 60-18 77% 16 CA
20 Warren Sixpack 16-1 2250 39-11 78% 16 NJ
21 SouthCoastVolleyball 18 2249 44-6 88% 18 PR
22 630 Volleyball 18-1 2249 56-19 75% 18 IL
23 Bay to Bay 16-1 2241 40-16 71% 16 CA
24 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-1m 2241 28-4 88% 14 PR
25 MVC 18-North shore 2238 68-16 81% 18 WI
26 SPVB B18 Elite 2237 54-16 77% 18 IL
27 Team Rockstar 17 Jason 2237 39-6 87% 17 CA
28 Aspire 17-Iron man 2230 55-10 85% 17 AZ
29 COAST 18-1 pat 2230 36-8 82% 18 CA
30 COAST 15-1 chris/ian 2230 52-13 80% 15 CA
31 COAST 17-1 victor/berkeley 2224 39-6 87% 17 CA
32 MVVC B 18-Red 2219 67-10 87% 18 CA
33 Adversity South 18 Adidas 2218 55-27 67% 18 IL
34 MOD B14-Blue 2217 75-9 89% 14 IL
35 C2 Attack 18-1 elite 2216 60-14 81% 18 TN
36 Adversity VBC 16 Adidas 2216 62-25 71% 16 IL
37 MKE Sting 16-1 2214 57-23 71% 16 WI
38 SASVBC B 15-Maya 2210 31-8 79% 15 HI
39 Bay to Bay 14-1 2209 44-16 73% 14 CA
40 Milwaukee Sting 18-1 2204 44-21 68% 18 WI
41 PAC 17 McKay 2202 34-9 79% 17 CA
42 Team Rockstar 14 Anjinho 2199 41-20 67% 14 CA
43 HPSTL 16-Royal 2197 47-23 67% 16 MO
44 SBVC Boys 17-1 2196 12-0 100% 17 CA
45 Pulse 15 Isaac 2185 44-12 79% 15 CA
46 Aspire 16 Spiderman 2183 39-18 68% 16 AZ
47 SASVBC B 18-Jordan 2182 27-4 87% 18 HI
48 Miami United 16-National matt 2180 28-13 68% 16 FL
49 Team Rockstar 15 Hawk 2179 49-13 79% 15 CA
50 Vanguard 18-Gold webb 2176 35-17 67% 18 OH
1234Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.