2025-2026 Season — Page 4 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 151 | EXCEL 14-N red | 2027 | 41-10 | 80% | 14 | TX |
| 152 | SCB 16-Salty jj | 2025 | 47-18 | 72% | 16 | UT |
| 153 | VUVC B17-BLACK | 2023 | 25-18 | 58% | 17 | NV |
| 154 | Balboa Bay 16-White | 2021 | 50-13 | 79% | 16 | CA |
| 155 | Pulse 14 Daniel | 2019 | 32-18 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 156 | Bay to Bay 16-Premier | 2019 | 34-24 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 157 | MOD B15-Blue | 2017 | 40-28 | 59% | 15 | IL |
| 158 | TUVA Boys 18-Elite | 2017 | 47-13 | 78% | 18 | NC |
| 159 | Sidewinder 17-1 | 2016 | 35-22 | 61% | 17 | AZ |
| 160 | GSL 17-Elect colby | 2015 | 14-1 | 93% | 17 | UT |
| 161 | Cinci Attack 18-Black | 2015 | 41-23 | 64% | 18 | OH |
| 162 | Team Rockstar 16 Devon | 2014 | 30-20 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 163 | Triangle Boys 16-Black | 2014 | 53-24 | 69% | 16 | NC |
| 164 | MAVS 16-Red | 2014 | 33-14 | 70% | 16 | KS |
| 165 | Cinci Attack 17-Black | 2011 | 39-24 | 62% | 17 | OH |
| 166 | JAX SKYLINE 16-B royal | 2010 | 43-17 | 72% | 16 | FL |
| 167 | Academy Boys West 15-1 | 2010 | 38-30 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 168 | Kaizen Boys 14-Black | 2009 | 35-15 | 70% | 14 | OK |
| 169 | C2 Attack 15-1 elite | 2008 | 51-24 | 68% | 15 | TN |
| 170 | SASVBC 14-Keali'i | 2006 | 26-16 | 62% | 14 | HI |
| 171 | WPVC Boys 16-Armour black | 2006 | 34-32 | 52% | 16 | FL |
| 172 | VUVC B16-BLACK | 2006 | 30-22 | 58% | 16 | NV |
| 173 | AZ Fear 15-Black | 2005 | 44-18 | 71% | 15 | AZ |
| 174 | CORE Boys 14-Platinum | 2005 | 35-7 | 83% | 14 | NJ |
| 175 | Gentlemen of Kiwi 15 | 2002 | 49-10 | 83% | 15 | FL |
| 176 | MTRX 16-1 | 2002 | 48-18 | 73% | 16 | AZ |
| 177 | MOD B16-Black | 2002 | 63-10 | 86% | 16 | IL |
| 178 | Roch PaceBootleggr 17-Blk | 1998 | 39-17 | 68% | 17 | NY |
| 179 | MDJRS 17-Boys black | 1998 | 52-25 | 67% | 17 | MD |
| 180 | Future 18-Elite | 1997 | 33-32 | 51% | 18 | IL |
| 181 | MKE Sting 14-1 | 1996 | 54-16 | 77% | 14 | WI |
| 182 | 513VB Boys 14-1 | 1995 | 39-25 | 61% | 14 | OH |
| 183 | ACAD Boys 16-Red | 1995 | 29-18 | 62% | 16 | NY |
| 184 | Roch PaceBootlegger 18 | 1995 | 33-20 | 61% | 18 | NY |
| 185 | MVC 16-Joe | 1994 | 39-32 | 55% | 16 | WI |
| 186 | Outrigger U15 | 1990 | 31-9 | 78% | 15 | HI |
| 187 | Academy Boys West 16-1 | 1990 | 31-26 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 188 | GSL 16-Elect - jeremiah | 1990 | 28-27 | 51% | 16 | UT |
| 189 | MVVC B 14-Red | 1990 | 45-28 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 190 | EXCEL 18-N red | 1990 | 27-22 | 54% | 18 | TX |
| 191 | Orlando Gold 18-Black | 1989 | 31-22 | 58% | 18 | FL |
| 192 | Sportime 18-1 | 1989 | 31-15 | 67% | 18 | NY |
| 193 | Evolution 14-Elite kalea | 1986 | 42-24 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 194 | VAQUEROS 17-M carlos | 1986 | 20-9 | 69% | 17 | PR |
| 195 | Uno Boys 18-Elite | 1984 | 48-24 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 196 | MVVC B 12-Red | 1984 | 60-22 | 73% | 12 | CA |
| 197 | CUVC 17-1 boys | 1983 | 57-19 | 75% | 17 | NC |
| 198 | Gentlemen of Kiwi 17 | 1982 | 47-17 | 73% | 17 | FL |
| 199 | A4 Volley Boys 18-Tyler | 1980 | 15-25 | 38% | 18 | CA |
| 200 | MAVS 17-Red | 1980 | 31-20 | 61% | 17 | KS |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.