2025-2026 Season — Page 4 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 151 | Balboa Bay 16-White | 2023 | 50-13 | 79% | 16 | CA |
| 152 | Ocean Bay 17-Quiksilver | 2019 | 38-19 | 67% | 17 | FL |
| 153 | Triangle Boys 16-Black | 2016 | 53-24 | 69% | 16 | NC |
| 154 | SCB 16-Salty jj | 2015 | 33-16 | 67% | 16 | LA |
| 155 | Vegas United B 17-Black | 2015 | 20-9 | 69% | 17 | NV |
| 156 | Team Rockstar 15 Sabryn | 2014 | 47-17 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 157 | Pulse 14 Daniel | 2013 | 32-18 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 158 | Sidewinder 17-1 | 2012 | 35-22 | 61% | 17 | AZ |
| 159 | GSL 17-Elect colby | 2011 | 5-4 | 56% | 17 | UT |
| 160 | MAVS 16-Red | 2009 | 33-14 | 70% | 16 | KS |
| 161 | SASVBC 14-Keali'i | 2009 | 26-16 | 62% | 14 | HI |
| 162 | JAX SKYLINE 16-B royal | 2006 | 43-17 | 72% | 16 | FL |
| 163 | Cinci Attack 17-Black | 2005 | 39-24 | 62% | 17 | OH |
| 164 | Team Rockstar 16 Devon | 2005 | 30-20 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 165 | Kaizen Boys 14-Black | 2004 | 35-15 | 70% | 14 | OK |
| 166 | TUVA Boys 18-Elite | 2004 | 47-13 | 78% | 18 | NC |
| 167 | MOD B15-Blue | 2001 | 40-28 | 59% | 15 | IL |
| 168 | Gentlemen of Kiwi 15 | 2001 | 49-10 | 83% | 15 | FL |
| 169 | Academy Boys West 15-1 | 2000 | 38-30 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 170 | WPVC Boys 16-Armour black | 1999 | 34-32 | 52% | 16 | FL |
| 171 | AZ Fear 15-Black | 1999 | 44-18 | 71% | 15 | AZ |
| 172 | CORE Boys 14-Platinum | 1999 | 35-7 | 83% | 14 | NJ |
| 173 | MOD B16-Black | 1997 | 63-10 | 86% | 16 | IL |
| 174 | MVVC B 14-Red | 1996 | 45-28 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 175 | Cinci Attack 18-Black | 1994 | 41-23 | 64% | 18 | OH |
| 176 | ACAD Boys 16-Red | 1992 | 29-18 | 62% | 16 | NY |
| 177 | MTRX 16-1 | 1991 | 48-18 | 73% | 16 | AZ |
| 178 | 513VB Boys 14-1 | 1991 | 39-25 | 61% | 14 | OH |
| 179 | Roch PaceBootleggr 17-Blk | 1991 | 39-17 | 68% | 17 | NY |
| 180 | MDJRS 17-Boys black | 1990 | 49-21 | 69% | 17 | MD |
| 181 | C2 Attack 15-1 elite | 1990 | 51-24 | 68% | 15 | TN |
| 182 | Future 18-Elite | 1989 | 33-32 | 51% | 18 | IL |
| 183 | MKE Sting 14-1 | 1989 | 90-23 | 80% | 14 | WI |
| 184 | Evolution 14-Elite kalea | 1987 | 42-24 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 185 | MVC 16-Joe | 1987 | 39-32 | 55% | 16 | WI |
| 186 | VAQUEROS 17-M carlos | 1987 | 20-9 | 69% | 17 | PR |
| 187 | SAVC 16-1 | 1987 | 9-3 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 188 | Sportime 16-1 | 1984 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | NY |
| 189 | MVVC B 12-Red | 1984 | 60-22 | 73% | 12 | CA |
| 190 | CUVC 17-1 boys | 1984 | 57-19 | 75% | 17 | NC |
| 191 | Academy Boys West 16-1 | 1982 | 31-26 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 192 | RCVA Boys 18-National | 1982 | 7-9 | 44% | 18 | VA |
| 193 | Sportime 18-1 | 1982 | 31-15 | 67% | 18 | NY |
| 194 | Uno Boys 18-Elite | 1982 | 48-24 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 195 | Roch PaceBootlegger 18 | 1982 | 33-20 | 61% | 18 | NY |
| 196 | EXCEL 18-N red | 1979 | 27-22 | 54% | 18 | TX |
| 197 | Gentlemen of Kiwi 17 | 1979 | 47-17 | 73% | 17 | FL |
| 198 | SMBC West 17 Molten | 1978 | 16-16 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 199 | MAVS 17-Red | 1978 | 31-20 | 61% | 17 | KS |
| 200 | CORE Boys 16-Platinum | 1978 | 26-11 | 70% | 16 | NJ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.