2025-2026 Season — Page 7 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 301 | Aspire 15-Black panther | 1904 | 31-33 | 48% | 15 | AZ |
| 302 | Boys BSVBC 17-Black | 1904 | 22-22 | 50% | 17 | IL |
| 303 | SC Legends 15-Elite | 1904 | 27-28 | 49% | 15 | CA |
| 304 | RCVA Boys 15-National | 1904 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | VA |
| 305 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1m | 1903 | 23-7 | 77% | 12 | PR |
| 306 | Miami United 14-National Danny | 1902 | 43-17 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 307 | SPVB 18-Bravo | 1902 | 55-12 | 82% | 18 | IL |
| 308 | VUVC B16-BLACK | 1901 | 15-9 | 63% | 16 | NV |
| 309 | HPSTL 13-Royal | 1901 | 40-14 | 74% | 13 | MO |
| 310 | GSL 18-Elect - ben | 1900 | 36-14 | 72% | 18 | UT |
| 311 | MVC 16-Black | 1900 | 38-26 | 59% | 16 | AZ |
| 312 | Bay to Bay 14-Club | 1900 | 55-10 | 85% | 14 | CA |
| 313 | SG ELITE 15-Elite boys | 1899 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | CA |
| 314 | PREVAIL Boys 18-Platinum | 1898 | 29-18 | 62% | 18 | PA |
| 315 | Warren Sixpack 17-1 | 1897 | 31-18 | 63% | 17 | NJ |
| 316 | WPVC Boys 17-Armour black | 1897 | 33-35 | 49% | 17 | FL |
| 317 | UNION B16-Black | 1897 | 28-32 | 47% | 16 | IN |
| 318 | WLDGT 12 Elite | 1896 | 56-7 | 89% | 12 | |
| 319 | Adversity South 17 Adidas | 1896 | 47-37 | 56% | 17 | IL |
| 320 | SASVBC B 16-Brook | 1896 | 16-14 | 53% | 16 | HI |
| 321 | NorCal Boys 18-1 | 1896 | 40-28 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 322 | SCB 15-Salty rob | 1894 | 24-26 | 48% | 15 | LA |
| 323 | MVP 15-Black | 1894 | 29-26 | 53% | 15 | MD |
| 324 | JJVA Boys 14-Teal | 1894 | 60-17 | 78% | 14 | FL |
| 325 | Pure Aloha 18-Og | 1892 | 11-6 | 65% | 18 | HI |
| 326 | Team Rockstar 13 Keegan | 1892 | 32-18 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 327 | Ultimate B16 Gold | 1891 | 35-29 | 55% | 16 | IL |
| 328 | Tyrants 16-Black | 1891 | 33-28 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 329 | MVVC B 13-Red | 1890 | 53-25 | 68% | 13 | CA |
| 330 | Team'Sota 18-1 national | 1890 | 28-31 | 47% | 18 | MN |
| 331 | Elevation 18-Peak boys | 1890 | 32-20 | 62% | 18 | CO |
| 332 | Hawaiian Style Boys 16-Black | 1890 | 24-10 | 71% | 16 | HI |
| 333 | Miami United 16-National thews | 1889 | 45-20 | 69% | 16 | FL |
| 334 | Juggernaut 18-National 1 | 1888 | 31-15 | 67% | 18 | CO |
| 335 | WAVE 18 Darrell | 1887 | 16-22 | 42% | 18 | CA |
| 336 | MVVC B 16-Black | 1887 | 53-25 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 337 | WPVC Boys 18-Armour orange | 1887 | 27-30 | 47% | 18 | FL |
| 338 | MOD B15 Gold | 1885 | 38-29 | 57% | 15 | IL |
| 339 | SMASH Boys 17 Chaos | 1885 | 35-16 | 69% | 17 | MA |
| 340 | Yorktowne 17-Blue | 1884 | 21-20 | 51% | 17 | PA |
| 341 | PAC 17 JMay | 1884 | 34-14 | 71% | 17 | CA |
| 342 | Seaside 14-Black | 1884 | 27-22 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 343 | VORTEX VBC 18-1 chad | 1884 | 19-8 | 70% | 18 | UT |
| 344 | Velocity 16 National | 1883 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | PA |
| 345 | PW 118 17-Aaron | 1883 | 3-6 | 33% | 17 | CA |
| 346 | Central Cal 17 Benji | 1882 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 347 | Mintonette Sports 16-1 | 1882 | 39-30 | 57% | 16 | OH |
| 348 | CCVA 17 Jay | 1882 | 33-7 | 83% | 17 | CA |
| 349 | Yorktowne 16-Blue | 1881 | 24-25 | 49% | 16 | PA |
| 350 | SoCal VBC 16-Beacons | 1880 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.