Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 7 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
301 Aspire 15-Black panther 1904 31-33 48% 15 AZ
302 Boys BSVBC 17-Black 1904 22-22 50% 17 IL
303 SC Legends 15-Elite 1904 27-28 49% 15 CA
304 RCVA Boys 15-National 1904 6-2 75% 15 VA
305 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1m 1903 23-7 77% 12 PR
306 Miami United 14-National Danny 1902 43-17 72% 14 FL
307 SPVB 18-Bravo 1902 55-12 82% 18 IL
308 VUVC B16-BLACK 1901 15-9 63% 16 NV
309 HPSTL 13-Royal 1901 40-14 74% 13 MO
310 GSL 18-Elect - ben 1900 36-14 72% 18 UT
311 MVC 16-Black 1900 38-26 59% 16 AZ
312 Bay to Bay 14-Club 1900 55-10 85% 14 CA
313 SG ELITE 15-Elite boys 1899 7-2 78% 15 CA
314 PREVAIL Boys 18-Platinum 1898 29-18 62% 18 PA
315 Warren Sixpack 17-1 1897 31-18 63% 17 NJ
316 WPVC Boys 17-Armour black 1897 33-35 49% 17 FL
317 UNION B16-Black 1897 28-32 47% 16 IN
318 WLDGT 12 Elite 1896 56-7 89% 12
319 Adversity South 17 Adidas 1896 47-37 56% 17 IL
320 SASVBC B 16-Brook 1896 16-14 53% 16 HI
321 NorCal Boys 18-1 1896 40-28 59% 18 CA
322 SCB 15-Salty rob 1894 24-26 48% 15 LA
323 MVP 15-Black 1894 29-26 53% 15 MD
324 JJVA Boys 14-Teal 1894 60-17 78% 14 FL
325 Pure Aloha 18-Og 1892 11-6 65% 18 HI
326 Team Rockstar 13 Keegan 1892 32-18 64% 13 CA
327 Ultimate B16 Gold 1891 35-29 55% 16 IL
328 Tyrants 16-Black 1891 33-28 54% 16 CA
329 MVVC B 13-Red 1890 53-25 68% 13 CA
330 Team'Sota 18-1 national 1890 28-31 47% 18 MN
331 Elevation 18-Peak boys 1890 32-20 62% 18 CO
332 Hawaiian Style Boys 16-Black 1890 24-10 71% 16 HI
333 Miami United 16-National thews 1889 45-20 69% 16 FL
334 Juggernaut 18-National 1 1888 31-15 67% 18 CO
335 WAVE 18 Darrell 1887 16-22 42% 18 CA
336 MVVC B 16-Black 1887 53-25 68% 16 CA
337 WPVC Boys 18-Armour orange 1887 27-30 47% 18 FL
338 MOD B15 Gold 1885 38-29 57% 15 IL
339 SMASH Boys 17 Chaos 1885 35-16 69% 17 MA
340 Yorktowne 17-Blue 1884 21-20 51% 17 PA
341 PAC 17 JMay 1884 34-14 71% 17 CA
342 Seaside 14-Black 1884 27-22 55% 14 CA
343 VORTEX VBC 18-1 chad 1884 19-8 70% 18 UT
344 Velocity 16 National 1883 22-13 63% 16 PA
345 PW 118 17-Aaron 1883 3-6 33% 17 CA
346 Central Cal 17 Benji 1882 0-0 0% 17 CA
347 Mintonette Sports 16-1 1882 39-30 57% 16 OH
348 CCVA 17 Jay 1882 33-7 83% 17 CA
349 Yorktowne 16-Blue 1881 24-25 49% 16 PA
350 SoCal VBC 16-Beacons 1880 26-20 57% 16 CA
← Previous12345678910Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.