2025-2026 Season — Page 7 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 301 | GSL 16-Elect jeremiah | 1911 | 15-1 | 94% | 16 | UT |
| 302 | UVA 15 Allen | 1911 | 47-19 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 303 | Boys BSVBC 14-Black | 1911 | 39-22 | 64% | 14 | IL |
| 304 | Aspire 15-Black panther | 1910 | 31-33 | 48% | 15 | AZ |
| 305 | Pure Aloha 18-1 boys | 1910 | 6-3 | 67% | 18 | HI |
| 306 | Boys BSVBC 17-Black | 1910 | 22-22 | 50% | 17 | IL |
| 307 | MN Select Boys 14-1 | 1909 | 35-18 | 66% | 14 | MN |
| 308 | SASVBC B 16-Brook | 1908 | 16-14 | 53% | 16 | HI |
| 309 | Pursuit Boys 17 National | 1908 | 46-10 | 82% | 17 | MO |
| 310 | Team Rockstar 12 Alec | 1907 | 45-14 | 76% | 12 | CA |
| 311 | Bay to Bay 14-Club | 1906 | 55-10 | 85% | 14 | CA |
| 312 | PSA Power 17 | 1906 | 14-2 | 88% | 17 | TX |
| 313 | Future 17-Elite | 1905 | 35-30 | 54% | 17 | IL |
| 314 | Elevation 18-Peak boys | 1905 | 32-20 | 62% | 18 | CO |
| 315 | WAVE 18 Darrell | 1904 | 16-22 | 42% | 18 | CA |
| 316 | WPVC Boys 17-Armour black | 1904 | 33-35 | 49% | 17 | FL |
| 317 | Garden State Elite Volleyball Club 18-Boys premier | 1903 | 20-11 | 65% | 18 | NJ |
| 318 | Adversity South 17 Adidas | 1902 | 47-37 | 56% | 17 | IL |
| 319 | MVVC B 13-Red | 1901 | 53-25 | 68% | 13 | CA |
| 320 | Team'Sota 18-1 national | 1901 | 28-31 | 47% | 18 | MN |
| 321 | Warren Sixpack 17-1 | 1900 | 31-18 | 63% | 17 | NJ |
| 322 | Pure Aloha 18-Og | 1900 | 11-6 | 65% | 18 | HI |
| 323 | PREVAIL Boys 18-Platinum | 1899 | 29-18 | 62% | 18 | PA |
| 324 | Miami United 14-National Danny | 1899 | 43-17 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 325 | Coastal 17 Chris | 1899 | 47-21 | 69% | 17 | VA |
| 326 | SPVB 18-Bravo | 1899 | 55-12 | 82% | 18 | IL |
| 327 | Dallas Premier VBC 16-Platinum | 1898 | 8-0 | 100% | 16 | TX |
| 328 | VORTEX VBC 18-1 chad | 1898 | 19-8 | 70% | 18 | UT |
| 329 | Team Rockstar 13 Keegan | 1898 | 32-18 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 330 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1m | 1898 | 23-7 | 77% | 12 | PR |
| 331 | UNION B16-Black | 1897 | 28-32 | 47% | 16 | IN |
| 332 | Juggernaut 18-National 1 | 1897 | 31-15 | 67% | 18 | CO |
| 333 | Tyrants 16-Black | 1897 | 33-28 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 334 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1896 | 29-18 | 62% | 18 | CT |
| 335 | SPORTIME 17-1 | 1896 | 25-13 | 66% | 17 | NY |
| 336 | Ultimate B16 Gold | 1896 | 35-29 | 55% | 16 | IL |
| 337 | Velocity 16 National | 1894 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | PA |
| 338 | WPVC Boys 18-Armour orange | 1893 | 27-30 | 47% | 18 | FL |
| 339 | PAC 17 JMay | 1892 | 34-14 | 71% | 17 | CA |
| 340 | NorCal Boys 18-1 | 1892 | 40-28 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 341 | GSL 14-Elect jackie | 1891 | 39-11 | 78% | 14 | UT |
| 342 | Yorktowne 17-Blue | 1891 | 21-20 | 51% | 17 | PA |
| 343 | CCVA 17 Jay | 1890 | 33-7 | 83% | 17 | CA |
| 344 | SCB 13-Salty jj | 1890 | 26-14 | 65% | 13 | UT |
| 345 | Maverick 16 Goose | 1890 | 41-23 | 64% | 16 | AZ |
| 346 | Pulse 18 Brandon | 1889 | 14-25 | 36% | 18 | CA |
| 347 | Mintonette Sports 16-1 | 1889 | 39-30 | 57% | 16 | OH |
| 348 | WLDGT 12 Elite | 1888 | 56-7 | 89% | 12 | MO |
| 349 | Kaizen Boys 16-Black | 1887 | 23-32 | 42% | 16 | OK |
| 350 | Forza - Boys 15-Blk | 1887 | 46-30 | 61% | 15 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.