Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 7 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
301 GSL 16-Elect jeremiah 1911 15-1 94% 16 UT
302 UVA 15 Allen 1911 47-19 71% 15 CA
303 Boys BSVBC 14-Black 1911 39-22 64% 14 IL
304 Aspire 15-Black panther 1910 31-33 48% 15 AZ
305 Pure Aloha 18-1 boys 1910 6-3 67% 18 HI
306 Boys BSVBC 17-Black 1910 22-22 50% 17 IL
307 MN Select Boys 14-1 1909 35-18 66% 14 MN
308 SASVBC B 16-Brook 1908 16-14 53% 16 HI
309 Pursuit Boys 17 National 1908 46-10 82% 17 MO
310 Team Rockstar 12 Alec 1907 45-14 76% 12 CA
311 Bay to Bay 14-Club 1906 55-10 85% 14 CA
312 PSA Power 17 1906 14-2 88% 17 TX
313 Future 17-Elite 1905 35-30 54% 17 IL
314 Elevation 18-Peak boys 1905 32-20 62% 18 CO
315 WAVE 18 Darrell 1904 16-22 42% 18 CA
316 WPVC Boys 17-Armour black 1904 33-35 49% 17 FL
317 Garden State Elite Volleyball Club 18-Boys premier 1903 20-11 65% 18 NJ
318 Adversity South 17 Adidas 1902 47-37 56% 17 IL
319 MVVC B 13-Red 1901 53-25 68% 13 CA
320 Team'Sota 18-1 national 1901 28-31 47% 18 MN
321 Warren Sixpack 17-1 1900 31-18 63% 17 NJ
322 Pure Aloha 18-Og 1900 11-6 65% 18 HI
323 PREVAIL Boys 18-Platinum 1899 29-18 62% 18 PA
324 Miami United 14-National Danny 1899 43-17 72% 14 FL
325 Coastal 17 Chris 1899 47-21 69% 17 VA
326 SPVB 18-Bravo 1899 55-12 82% 18 IL
327 Dallas Premier VBC 16-Platinum 1898 8-0 100% 16 TX
328 VORTEX VBC 18-1 chad 1898 19-8 70% 18 UT
329 Team Rockstar 13 Keegan 1898 32-18 64% 13 CA
330 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1m 1898 23-7 77% 12 PR
331 UNION B16-Black 1897 28-32 47% 16 IN
332 Juggernaut 18-National 1 1897 31-15 67% 18 CO
333 Tyrants 16-Black 1897 33-28 54% 16 CA
334 NorthEast Volleyball Club 18-1 1896 29-18 62% 18 CT
335 SPORTIME 17-1 1896 25-13 66% 17 NY
336 Ultimate B16 Gold 1896 35-29 55% 16 IL
337 Velocity 16 National 1894 22-13 63% 16 PA
338 WPVC Boys 18-Armour orange 1893 27-30 47% 18 FL
339 PAC 17 JMay 1892 34-14 71% 17 CA
340 NorCal Boys 18-1 1892 40-28 59% 18 CA
341 GSL 14-Elect jackie 1891 39-11 78% 14 UT
342 Yorktowne 17-Blue 1891 21-20 51% 17 PA
343 CCVA 17 Jay 1890 33-7 83% 17 CA
344 SCB 13-Salty jj 1890 26-14 65% 13 UT
345 Maverick 16 Goose 1890 41-23 64% 16 AZ
346 Pulse 18 Brandon 1889 14-25 36% 18 CA
347 Mintonette Sports 16-1 1889 39-30 57% 16 OH
348 WLDGT 12 Elite 1888 56-7 89% 12 MO
349 Kaizen Boys 16-Black 1887 23-32 42% 16 OK
350 Forza - Boys 15-Blk 1887 46-30 61% 15 IL
← Previous12345678910Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.