2025-2026 Season — Page 10 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 451 | Balboa Bay 14-White | 1837 | 39-23 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 452 | Bay to Bay 12-1 | 1836 | 42-27 | 61% | 12 | CA |
| 453 | PAC 16 Drake | 1836 | 23-34 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 454 | Warren Sixpack 16-2 | 1836 | 33-15 | 69% | 16 | NJ |
| 455 | Vanguard 17-Gold attia | 1835 | 18-17 | 51% | 17 | OH |
| 456 | CCVA 16 Elite | 1835 | 25-9 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 457 | CORE Boys 15-Platinum | 1835 | 26-10 | 72% | 15 | NJ |
| 458 | NorCal Boys 15-1 | 1835 | 39-22 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 459 | Westside VBC 16-Green | 1835 | 45-12 | 79% | 16 | CA |
| 460 | PVC Sandlot 16-Blue | 1835 | 30-12 | 71% | 16 | PA |
| 461 | MB Surf 16-Ascis chris | 1835 | 24-20 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 462 | SG Elite 17 Elite | 1834 | 13-13 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 463 | Tyrants 15-Black | 1834 | 27-38 | 42% | 15 | CA |
| 464 | The St. James Boys 15 N | 1834 | 26-26 | 50% | 15 | VA |
| 465 | E3 18-Excel - boys | 1833 | 7-9 | 44% | 18 | NM |
| 466 | MKE Sting 14-2 | 1833 | 48-22 | 69% | 14 | WI |
| 467 | Ultimate B14 Gold | 1833 | 47-30 | 60% | 14 | IL |
| 468 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1832 | 28-28 | 50% | 17 | CT |
| 469 | Ohana 18-National boys | 1830 | 21-10 | 68% | 18 | IA |
| 470 | Victory 18-Black | 1829 | 10-12 | 45% | 18 | AZ |
| 471 | WAVE 15 Q | 1829 | 23-32 | 42% | 15 | CA |
| 472 | Ocean Bay 18-Quiksilver | 1828 | 28-29 | 49% | 18 | FL |
| 473 | Sky High Adidas B15-1 | 1828 | 44-42 | 51% | 15 | IL |
| 474 | OVC 15 Neptune | 1828 | 30-16 | 65% | 15 | VA |
| 475 | VRTXVB 18-National - chad | 1827 | 22-17 | 56% | 18 | UT |
| 476 | Vegas Aces 17-1 | 1827 | 27-19 | 59% | 17 | NV |
| 477 | VV 15-1 | 1827 | 41-14 | 75% | 15 | VA |
| 478 | MVC 17-Sydney | 1827 | 45-31 | 58% | 17 | WI |
| 479 | MDJRS 15-Boys black | 1826 | 47-34 | 57% | 15 | MD |
| 480 | SCB 14-Salty aaron | 1826 | 22-11 | 67% | 14 | UT |
| 481 | HPSTL 12-Royal | 1826 | 38-11 | 78% | 12 | MO |
| 482 | Cinci Attack 16-Red | 1825 | 34-26 | 57% | 16 | OH |
| 483 | Hot Shots 14-National | 1824 | 29-13 | 66% | 14 | NY |
| 484 | NYC Impact 16-National | 1824 | 8-5 | 62% | 16 | NY |
| 485 | PEVA Boys 17 Elite | 1823 | 41-16 | 72% | 17 | PA |
| 486 | Kaizen Boys 18-Black | 1823 | 29-15 | 66% | 18 | OK |
| 487 | Aspire 17 Falcon | 1823 | 30-18 | 63% | 17 | AZ |
| 488 | Tool City 18-Black | 1823 | 15-5 | 75% | 18 | PA |
| 489 | DIGS Volleyball Club 18-Red | 1822 | 19-11 | 63% | 18 | NJ |
| 490 | SC Legends 14-Elite | 1822 | 30-26 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 491 | HPSTL B16-Orange | 1821 | 40-24 | 63% | 16 | MO |
| 492 | Vaqueros 18-M pablo | 1821 | 16-7 | 70% | 18 | PR |
| 493 | MB Surf VBC 17-Ascis rowdy | 1820 | 13-19 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 494 | Apex 18-Select boys | 1820 | 27-24 | 53% | 18 | SC |
| 495 | Maverick 18 Hangman | 1820 | 16-8 | 67% | 18 | AZ |
| 496 | SMASH Boys 18-Force | 1820 | 26-21 | 55% | 18 | MA |
| 497 | Fox Valley Performance 17 FVP B17/18 National (BG) | 1819 | 24-15 | 62% | 17 | WI |
| 498 | Volley Next 18-1 | 1819 | 25-10 | 71% | 18 | IL |
| 499 | Pursuit Volley 18 Pursuit Volley Canada (CA) | 1819 | 7-4 | 64% | 18 | |
| 500 | Mamba 17-Black | 1818 | 42-37 | 53% | 17 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.