Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 10 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
451 SMASH Boys 18-Surge 1707 22-16 58% 18 MA
452 Tropics Boys 18-S elite 1707 18-14 56% 18 FL
453 Momentum 18-Orange 1707 22-21 51% 18 CO
454 Ultimate B14 Gold 1706 21-19 51% 14 IL
455 AZ LEGACY 15 APEX 1705 25-19 57% 15 AZ
456 Academy 15-O under armour 1705 20-23 47% 15 IN
457 Coastal 16 Scott 1705 21-16 57% 16 MA
458 DNA 16-Blue 1705 18-15 55% 16 FL
459 TUVA Boys 17 Elite 1705 21-20 51% 17 NC
460 Urban Volleyball 14 Gold 1704 23-7 77% 14 TX
461 Volley Next 14U 1704 22-4 85% 14 MI
462 315VB 18-Usa 1704 20-1 95% 18 NY
463 Velocity 18-1 national 1704 8-10 44% 18 PA
464 PEVA Boys 17 Elite 1704 23-10 70% 17 PA
465 Maverick 16 Goose 1703 23-15 61% 16 OH
466 OCC 16-1 1703 17-5 77% 16 HI
467 DallasOne 16-Blue 1703 23-16 59% 16 TX
468 Drive Boys 18-Blue 1703 37-29 53% 18 IL
469 CCVA 17 Jay 1703 21-2 91% 17 CA
470 MN Select Boys 15-1 1702 38-15 72% 15 MN
471 Blue Royals 18 National 1702 13-6 68% 18 WA
472 Bay to Bay 17-Club 1702 35-13 73% 17 CA
473 Mintonette Sports 13-1 1701 40-12 77% 13 OH
474 Lakas 18-S b2f 1701 24-18 57% 18 CA
475 PSVC 18 Josh 1701 12-12 50% 18 SC
476 PV Boys 18-1 1701 14-15 48% 18 MA
477 118 17-Aaron 1700 16-13 55% 17 CA
478 LIV 17-Royal 1700 22-5 81% 17 CA
479 HVA 13-Young guns 1700 24-1 96% 13 TX
480 KC United 18 Navy 1700 21-9 70% 18 MO
481 HPSTL B16-Orange 1700 29-19 60% 16 MO
482 GSL 14-Elect jackie 1700 20-10 67% 14 UT
483 SMASH Boys 16-Fire 1700 21-22 49% 16 MA
484 Tyrants 16-Black 1700 22-22 50% 16 CA
485 Xtreme 18-National kelly 1700 14-4 78% 18 NJ
486 Next 16-Black 1699 26-20 57% 16 OH
487 TAMPA UNITED VBA BOYS 18-Black 1699 10-13 43% 18 FL
488 Surge Boys 18-Black 1699 17-10 63% 18 PA
489 SVC 17-1 boys 1699 19-4 83% 17 FL
490 NEVBC Boys 15.1 1698 23-10 70% 15 CT
491 Bay to Bay 12-1 1698 31-21 60% 12 CA
492 Evolution 18 Elite 1698 22-10 69% 18 FL
493 CCVA 17 Benji 1698 20-3 87% 17 CA
494 Downstate (B) 18-Black 1697 22-11 67% 18 NY
495 Beach Cities 18-Black 1697 24-4 86% 18 CA
496 Team'Sota 18-1 national 1697 18-23 43% 18 MN
497 VV 16-1 1697 25-7 78% 16 CA
498 Pinnacle 18 Rory 1697 14-3 82% 18 AZ
499 JAX SKYLINE 17-B royal 1697 19-13 59% 17 FL
500 Westside VBC 16-Green 1696 23-9 72% 16 CA
← Previous12345678910111213Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.