2025-2026 Season — Page 10 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 451 | PVC Sandlot 16-Blue | 1829 | 30-12 | 71% | 16 | PA |
| 452 | NEVBC Boys 17.1 | 1829 | 28-28 | 50% | 17 | CT |
| 453 | Digs Boys 18-Red | 1828 | 23-14 | 62% | 18 | NJ |
| 454 | The St. James Boys 15 N | 1827 | 26-26 | 50% | 15 | VA |
| 455 | Ultimate B14 Gold | 1827 | 47-30 | 60% | 14 | IL |
| 456 | MOD B14 Gold | 1825 | 36-28 | 56% | 14 | IL |
| 457 | SMASH Boys 18-Force | 1825 | 26-21 | 55% | 18 | MA |
| 458 | SF Elite 16 Manalo | 1825 | 54-13 | 81% | 16 | CA |
| 459 | VV 15-1 | 1823 | 41-14 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 460 | HPSTL 12-Royal | 1823 | 38-11 | 78% | 12 | MO |
| 461 | LHV Boys 18-1 rafiki | 1823 | 23-17 | 57% | 18 | MA |
| 462 | Victory 18-Black | 1823 | 10-12 | 45% | 18 | AZ |
| 463 | SG ELITE BOYS 17-Elite | 1823 | 8-3 | 73% | 17 | CA |
| 464 | PEVA Boys 17 Elite | 1822 | 41-16 | 72% | 17 | PA |
| 465 | Elevation 15-Peak boys | 1822 | 34-31 | 52% | 15 | CO |
| 466 | Tool City 18-Black | 1821 | 15-5 | 75% | 18 | PA |
| 467 | Ocean Bay 18-Quiksilver | 1821 | 28-29 | 49% | 18 | FL |
| 468 | Aspire 17 Falcon | 1821 | 30-18 | 63% | 17 | AZ |
| 469 | Cinci Attack 16-Red | 1821 | 34-26 | 57% | 16 | OH |
| 470 | SC Legends 14-Elite | 1821 | 30-26 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 471 | NorCal Boys 15-1 | 1820 | 39-22 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 472 | Volley Next 18-1 | 1819 | 25-10 | 71% | 18 | MI |
| 473 | Maverick 18 Hangman | 1819 | 16-8 | 67% | 18 | AZ |
| 474 | MCVC 16 | 1819 | 14-5 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 475 | Adversity VBC 16-Purple | 1819 | 38-43 | 47% | 16 | IL |
| 476 | SynergyForce 16-1 natl | 1818 | 34-39 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 477 | Kaizen Boys 18-Black | 1818 | 29-15 | 66% | 18 | OK |
| 478 | HAVC 16-Red | 1818 | 42-25 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 479 | PAC 16 Drake | 1817 | 23-34 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 480 | GSL 15-Elect - andy | 1817 | 46-9 | 84% | 15 | UT |
| 481 | Ohana 18-National boys | 1817 | 21-10 | 68% | 18 | IA |
| 482 | CORE Boys 17-Platinum | 1817 | 26-15 | 63% | 17 | NJ |
| 483 | Tyrants 15-Black | 1816 | 27-38 | 42% | 15 | CA |
| 484 | Vandal 18-1 | 1815 | 43-18 | 68% | 18 | NY |
| 485 | Annapolis 18-1 | 1814 | 40-29 | 57% | 18 | MD |
| 486 | NorthU 17-1 | 1814 | 25-8 | 76% | 17 | PA |
| 487 | HPSTL B16-Orange | 1814 | 40-24 | 63% | 16 | MO |
| 488 | Sky High Adidas B15-1 | 1814 | 44-42 | 51% | 15 | IL |
| 489 | CORE Boys 15-Platinum | 1814 | 26-10 | 72% | 15 | NJ |
| 490 | Apex 18-Select boys | 1814 | 27-24 | 53% | 18 | MO |
| 491 | SCB 13-Salty jj | 1812 | 12-13 | 48% | 13 | LA |
| 492 | WAVE 15 Q | 1812 | 23-32 | 42% | 15 | CA |
| 493 | MDJRS 15-Boys black | 1812 | 43-29 | 59% | 15 | MD |
| 494 | Mamba 17-Black | 1812 | 42-37 | 53% | 17 | WI |
| 495 | Victory 15-Black | 1812 | 14-8 | 64% | 15 | AZ |
| 496 | HVA 18-Performance natl | 1811 | 43-21 | 65% | 18 | TX |
| 497 | MKE Sting 14-2 | 1811 | 48-22 | 69% | 14 | WI |
| 498 | MB Surf 17-Ascis rowdy | 1811 | 13-19 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 499 | DallasOne 16-Blue | 1810 | 37-26 | 59% | 16 | TX |
| 500 | MKE Sting 18-3 | 1810 | 41-9 | 82% | 18 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.