Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 10 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
451 Balboa Bay 14-White 1837 39-23 63% 14 CA
452 Bay to Bay 12-1 1836 42-27 61% 12 CA
453 PAC 16 Drake 1836 23-34 40% 16 CA
454 Warren Sixpack 16-2 1836 33-15 69% 16 NJ
455 Vanguard 17-Gold attia 1835 18-17 51% 17 OH
456 CCVA 16 Elite 1835 25-9 74% 16 CA
457 CORE Boys 15-Platinum 1835 26-10 72% 15 NJ
458 NorCal Boys 15-1 1835 39-22 64% 15 CA
459 Westside VBC 16-Green 1835 45-12 79% 16 CA
460 PVC Sandlot 16-Blue 1835 30-12 71% 16 PA
461 MB Surf 16-Ascis chris 1835 24-20 55% 16 CA
462 SG Elite 17 Elite 1834 13-13 50% 17 CA
463 Tyrants 15-Black 1834 27-38 42% 15 CA
464 The St. James Boys 15 N 1834 26-26 50% 15 VA
465 E3 18-Excel - boys 1833 7-9 44% 18 NM
466 MKE Sting 14-2 1833 48-22 69% 14 WI
467 Ultimate B14 Gold 1833 47-30 60% 14 IL
468 NorthEast Volleyball Club 17-1 1832 28-28 50% 17 CT
469 Ohana 18-National boys 1830 21-10 68% 18 IA
470 Victory 18-Black 1829 10-12 45% 18 AZ
471 WAVE 15 Q 1829 23-32 42% 15 CA
472 Ocean Bay 18-Quiksilver 1828 28-29 49% 18 FL
473 Sky High Adidas B15-1 1828 44-42 51% 15 IL
474 OVC 15 Neptune 1828 30-16 65% 15 VA
475 VRTXVB 18-National - chad 1827 22-17 56% 18 UT
476 Vegas Aces 17-1 1827 27-19 59% 17 NV
477 VV 15-1 1827 41-14 75% 15 VA
478 MVC 17-Sydney 1827 45-31 58% 17 WI
479 MDJRS 15-Boys black 1826 47-34 57% 15 MD
480 SCB 14-Salty aaron 1826 22-11 67% 14 UT
481 HPSTL 12-Royal 1826 38-11 78% 12 MO
482 Cinci Attack 16-Red 1825 34-26 57% 16 OH
483 Hot Shots 14-National 1824 29-13 66% 14 NY
484 NYC Impact 16-National 1824 8-5 62% 16 NY
485 PEVA Boys 17 Elite 1823 41-16 72% 17 PA
486 Kaizen Boys 18-Black 1823 29-15 66% 18 OK
487 Aspire 17 Falcon 1823 30-18 63% 17 AZ
488 Tool City 18-Black 1823 15-5 75% 18 PA
489 DIGS Volleyball Club 18-Red 1822 19-11 63% 18 NJ
490 SC Legends 14-Elite 1822 30-26 54% 14 CA
491 HPSTL B16-Orange 1821 40-24 63% 16 MO
492 Vaqueros 18-M pablo 1821 16-7 70% 18 PR
493 MB Surf VBC 17-Ascis rowdy 1820 13-19 41% 17 CA
494 Apex 18-Select boys 1820 27-24 53% 18 SC
495 Maverick 18 Hangman 1820 16-8 67% 18 AZ
496 SMASH Boys 18-Force 1820 26-21 55% 18 MA
497 Fox Valley Performance 17 FVP B17/18 National (BG) 1819 24-15 62% 17 WI
498 Volley Next 18-1 1819 25-10 71% 18 IL
499 Pursuit Volley 18 Pursuit Volley Canada (CA) 1819 7-4 64% 18
500 Mamba 17-Black 1818 42-37 53% 17 WI
← Previous12345678910111213Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.