Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 11 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
501 Bay to Bay 16-Club 1818 48-17 74% 16 CA
502 Vandal 18-1 1818 43-18 68% 18 NY
503 Annapolis 18-1 1817 40-29 57% 18 MD
504 PV Boys 18-1 1817 22-18 55% 18 MA
505 Academy 17-E blue 1816 33-39 46% 17 IN
506 SynergyForce 16-1 natl 1816 34-39 47% 16 CA
507 Lakas 14-S jigi 1815 15-6 71% 14 CA
508 Next Level Academy 18 1815 6-2 75% 18 PR
509 AFVBC 14 Apex 1815 29-20 59% 14 CA
510 CORE Volleyball 17-Platinum 1814 21-13 62% 17 NJ
511 DallasOne 16-Blue 1814 37-26 59% 16 TX
512 A4 Volley Boys 17-Jon 1813 25-17 60% 17 CA
513 MKE Sting 18-3 1813 41-9 82% 18 WI
514 MVVC B 15-Black 1812 40-33 55% 15 CA
515 GSL 15-Elect andy 1812 12-5 71% 15 UT
516 GSL 16-Elite - maddy 1812 14-8 64% 16 UT
517 A-10 Boys 17-Black 1812 27-32 46% 17 PA
518 Lakas 16-S jmj 1811 43-28 61% 16 CA
519 Victory 15-Black 1811 14-8 64% 15 AZ
520 DallasOne 15-Black 1811 37-20 65% 15 TX
521 Coastal 16 Scott 1810 29-30 49% 16 VA
522 Phoenix 18 Jennings 1810 35-24 59% 18 OH
523 SF Elite 15 Will 1810 41-27 60% 15 CA
524 VUVC B18-BLACK 1810 20-22 48% 18 NV
525 NorthU 17-1 1810 25-8 76% 17 PA
526 Team Colorado 17-Black 1809 15-19 44% 17 CO
527 Beach Cities 13-Black 1809 37-28 57% 13 CA
528 L2 Volleyball Club 16-Hudson 1808 6-2 75% 16 MI
529 Evolution 18 Elite 1808 20-14 59% 18 CA
530 HVA 18-Performance natl 1808 43-21 65% 18 TX
531 CCVC / 16-TANNER 1807 18-4 82% 16 CA
532 WAVE 13 Jed 1807 29-31 48% 13 CA
533 Idaho Strike 18-Black 1807 19-10 66% 18 ID
534 A'o a Koa Volleyball 16-B 1806 26-13 67% 16 HI
535 Venom Volleyball Club 14 Venom Mayhem 1806 5-2 71% 14 ON
536 VAQUE 17-1 1806 0-0 0% 17 PR
537 Bay to Bay 17-Club 1804 42-16 72% 17 CA
538 Central Cal 18-1 1804 4-4 50% 18 CA
539 Momentum 18-Orange 1804 33-27 55% 18 OH
540 HAVC 16-Red 1802 42-25 63% 16 IL
541 OPVC 18-Purple 1802 32-21 60% 18 OH
542 Aspire 12 Thanos 1802 34-19 64% 12 AZ
543 JAX SKYLINE 18-B royal 1801 23-19 55% 18 FL
544 808 Athletic Club 17-Royce 1801 24-8 75% 17 HI
545 Adversity VBC 16-Purple 1801 38-43 47% 16 IL
546 VVA 17-Clarke 1801 25-38 40% 17 CA
547 Southport B16-Blue 1800 56-20 74% 16 WI
548 A5 Boys 17 Karson 1800 32-27 54% 17 GA
549 Team Colorado 18-Black 1800 24-13 65% 18 CO
550 APEX1 16-A1BLACK 1800 41-14 75% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.