2025-2026 Season — Page 11 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | Academy 17-E blue | 1810 | 33-39 | 46% | 17 | IN |
| 502 | AFVBC 14 Apex | 1810 | 29-20 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 503 | Vaqueros 18-M pablo | 1810 | 16-7 | 70% | 18 | PR |
| 504 | A-10 Boys 17-Black | 1808 | 27-32 | 46% | 17 | PA |
| 505 | Lakas 14-S jigi | 1808 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 506 | CCVC / 16-TANNER | 1807 | 18-4 | 82% | 16 | |
| 507 | EXCEL 12-Red | 1807 | 20-11 | 63% | 12 | TX |
| 508 | Beach Cities 13-Black | 1807 | 37-28 | 57% | 13 | CA |
| 509 | Coastal 16 Scott | 1807 | 29-30 | 49% | 16 | MA |
| 510 | A4 Volley Boys 17-Jon | 1806 | 25-17 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 511 | AVA 17-Boys | 1806 | 33-20 | 62% | 17 | VA |
| 512 | Empowered B16-Black | 1805 | 44-23 | 66% | 16 | IN |
| 513 | Bay to Bay 16-Club | 1805 | 48-17 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 514 | 315 VC 18 USA | 1805 | 31-3 | 91% | 18 | NY |
| 515 | Phoenix 18 Jennings | 1805 | 35-24 | 59% | 18 | OH |
| 516 | A'o a Koa Volleyball 16-B | 1804 | 26-13 | 67% | 16 | HI |
| 517 | DallasOne 15-Black | 1804 | 37-20 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 518 | PV Boys 18-1 | 1803 | 22-18 | 55% | 18 | MA |
| 519 | NYC Impact 16-National | 1803 | 20-9 | 69% | 16 | NY |
| 520 | VAQUE 17-1 | 1802 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | |
| 521 | Lakas 16-S jmj | 1802 | 43-28 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 522 | Aspire 12 Thanos | 1802 | 34-19 | 64% | 12 | AZ |
| 523 | Uno Boys 16 Elite | 1802 | 42-27 | 61% | 16 | IL |
| 524 | Central Cal 17 Jay | 1802 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 525 | AVA 14 Hanalei | 1801 | 28-3 | 90% | 14 | HI |
| 526 | Team Colorado 18-Black | 1800 | 24-13 | 65% | 18 | CO |
| 527 | Momentum 18-Orange | 1799 | 33-27 | 55% | 18 | OH |
| 528 | Eclipse Boys 14-S | 1799 | 40-12 | 77% | 14 | CA |
| 529 | Sanger 14 | 1799 | 37-12 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 530 | SF Elite 15 Will | 1798 | 41-27 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 531 | SASVBC B 16-Erika | 1797 | 21-11 | 66% | 16 | HI |
| 532 | Hot Shots 14-National | 1797 | 29-13 | 66% | 14 | NY |
| 533 | Bay to Bay 17-Club | 1797 | 42-16 | 72% | 17 | CA |
| 534 | Steel City 18-Black | 1797 | 22-3 | 88% | 18 | PA |
| 535 | VUVC B18-BLACK | 1797 | 6-8 | 43% | 18 | NV |
| 536 | 808 Athletic Club 17-Royce | 1797 | 24-8 | 75% | 17 | HI |
| 537 | Evolution 18 Elite | 1796 | 20-14 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 538 | HEAT 14-Travel boo | 1796 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 539 | OPVC 18-Purple | 1795 | 32-21 | 60% | 18 | OH |
| 540 | Southport B16-Blue | 1795 | 56-20 | 74% | 16 | WI |
| 541 | MDJRS 17-Boys | 1794 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | MD |
| 542 | JAX SKYLINE 18-B royal | 1793 | 23-19 | 55% | 18 | FL |
| 543 | Next 18-Black | 1793 | 35-31 | 53% | 18 | OH |
| 544 | Tribe 16-B premier cardinal | 1793 | 38-17 | 69% | 16 | FL |
| 545 | VUVC B17-BLACK | 1793 | 5-9 | 36% | 17 | NV |
| 546 | MOD B17-Black | 1792 | 49-23 | 68% | 17 | IL |
| 547 | Annapolis 14U | 1792 | 48-23 | 68% | 14 | MD |
| 548 | Absol SubZero 18-Romer | 1792 | 4-7 | 36% | 18 | WA |
| 549 | TVA Top-Tier 15-Mint | 1791 | 26-5 | 84% | 15 | CA |
| 550 | A5 Boys 17 Karson | 1791 | 32-27 | 54% | 17 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.