Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 11 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
501 Academy 17-E blue 1810 33-39 46% 17 IN
502 AFVBC 14 Apex 1810 29-20 59% 14 CA
503 Vaqueros 18-M pablo 1810 16-7 70% 18 PR
504 A-10 Boys 17-Black 1808 27-32 46% 17 PA
505 Lakas 14-S jigi 1808 15-6 71% 14 CA
506 CCVC / 16-TANNER 1807 18-4 82% 16
507 EXCEL 12-Red 1807 20-11 63% 12 TX
508 Beach Cities 13-Black 1807 37-28 57% 13 CA
509 Coastal 16 Scott 1807 29-30 49% 16 MA
510 A4 Volley Boys 17-Jon 1806 25-17 60% 17 CA
511 AVA 17-Boys 1806 33-20 62% 17 VA
512 Empowered B16-Black 1805 44-23 66% 16 IN
513 Bay to Bay 16-Club 1805 48-17 74% 16 CA
514 315 VC 18 USA 1805 31-3 91% 18 NY
515 Phoenix 18 Jennings 1805 35-24 59% 18 OH
516 A'o a Koa Volleyball 16-B 1804 26-13 67% 16 HI
517 DallasOne 15-Black 1804 37-20 65% 15 TX
518 PV Boys 18-1 1803 22-18 55% 18 MA
519 NYC Impact 16-National 1803 20-9 69% 16 NY
520 VAQUE 17-1 1802 0-0 0% 17
521 Lakas 16-S jmj 1802 43-28 61% 16 CA
522 Aspire 12 Thanos 1802 34-19 64% 12 AZ
523 Uno Boys 16 Elite 1802 42-27 61% 16 IL
524 Central Cal 17 Jay 1802 0-0 0% 17 CA
525 AVA 14 Hanalei 1801 28-3 90% 14 HI
526 Team Colorado 18-Black 1800 24-13 65% 18 CO
527 Momentum 18-Orange 1799 33-27 55% 18 OH
528 Eclipse Boys 14-S 1799 40-12 77% 14 CA
529 Sanger 14 1799 37-12 76% 14 CA
530 SF Elite 15 Will 1798 41-27 60% 15 CA
531 SASVBC B 16-Erika 1797 21-11 66% 16 HI
532 Hot Shots 14-National 1797 29-13 66% 14 NY
533 Bay to Bay 17-Club 1797 42-16 72% 17 CA
534 Steel City 18-Black 1797 22-3 88% 18 PA
535 VUVC B18-BLACK 1797 6-8 43% 18 NV
536 808 Athletic Club 17-Royce 1797 24-8 75% 17 HI
537 Evolution 18 Elite 1796 20-14 59% 18 CA
538 HEAT 14-Travel boo 1796 6-5 55% 14 CA
539 OPVC 18-Purple 1795 32-21 60% 18 OH
540 Southport B16-Blue 1795 56-20 74% 16 WI
541 MDJRS 17-Boys 1794 3-4 43% 17 MD
542 JAX SKYLINE 18-B royal 1793 23-19 55% 18 FL
543 Next 18-Black 1793 35-31 53% 18 OH
544 Tribe 16-B premier cardinal 1793 38-17 69% 16 FL
545 VUVC B17-BLACK 1793 5-9 36% 17 NV
546 MOD B17-Black 1792 49-23 68% 17 IL
547 Annapolis 14U 1792 48-23 68% 14 MD
548 Absol SubZero 18-Romer 1792 4-7 36% 18 WA
549 TVA Top-Tier 15-Mint 1791 26-5 84% 15 CA
550 A5 Boys 17 Karson 1791 32-27 54% 17 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.