Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 14 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
651 VRTXVB 18-National - chad 1758 17-13 57% 18
652 HPSTL B15-Orange 1758 38-26 59% 15 MO
653 K2 18-Elite boys 1758 36-18 67% 18 TN
654 Durham Attack 15 Extreme 1757 5-3 63% 15 ON
655 Forza - Boys 14-Blk 1757 66-25 72% 14 IL
656 Ocean Point 13-Maverick 1757 34-26 57% 13 CA
657 Bravo 18-X 1757 23-5 82% 18 KY
658 Team Rockstar 14 Joey 1757 39-14 74% 14 CA
659 Vaqueros 16-M frank 1757 12-8 60% 16 PR
660 Pilipaa 15 1756 16-10 62% 15 HI
661 Evolution 15 Elite 1755 37-14 73% 15 CA
662 VC United 17-1 elite 1755 37-18 65% 17 IL
663 I AM VBC Boys 12-1 1755 35-4 90% 12 WI
664 Central Cal 18-1 1755 4-4 50% 18 CA
665 Spike Milwaukee B17 1755 39-18 68% 17 WI
666 Academy Boys West 17-1 1754 39-18 68% 17 CA
667 Drive Boys 18-Blue 1754 46-32 56% 18 IL
668 Volley Next 14U 1753 22-4 85% 14 MI
669 Sportime 14-1 1753 26-13 67% 14 NY
670 VAQUEROS 12-M jan 1753 16-1 94% 12 PR
671 OVC 15 Neptune 1752 24-14 63% 15 VA
672 The St. James Boys 14 N 1752 19-21 46% 14 VA
673 WPVC Boys 17-Armour orange 1752 24-35 41% 17 FL
674 VC United 18-1 elite 1752 30-13 70% 18 IL
675 CA Volley 14 1752 23-27 46% 14 CA
676 South Elite 18-Carlos 1752 10-4 71% 18 PR
677 Tropics 17-Elite marc 1752 2-7 22% 17 FL
678 Orlando Gold 16-Gold 1752 25-17 60% 16 FL
679 BAVC 14-1 boys 1751 34-24 59% 14 CA
680 SMASH Boys 14-1 1751 32-22 59% 14 MA
681 Sporting Albany Boys 16u 1750 43-16 70% 16 NY
682 NEVBC Boys 16.1 1750 25-24 51% 16 CT
683 RUVBC 16 Phoenix 1750 35-42 45% 16 IL
684 SVC 15-1 boys 1750 36-15 71% 15 NY
685 674 Manati 15-1 m indio 1750 13-2 87% 15 PR
686 BORINQUEN COQUI 17-1m 1749 5-8 38% 17 PR
687 FRVBC 17-1 boys 1749 19-15 56% 17 CO
688 Vegas United B 18-Black 1749 14-14 50% 18 NV
689 Maverick 16 Wolfman 1749 13-7 65% 16 AZ
690 Inferno 15-1 national 1749 41-22 65% 15 WI
691 NYC Impact 17U National 1749 20-11 65% 17 NY
692 SAVBC 16-1 1749 14-19 42% 16 CA
693 TVC 16-1 1749 16-10 62% 16 AZ
694 Boys BSVBC 18-Black 1748 25-20 56% 18 IL
695 The HBC 16-BLACK 1748 17-32 35% 16 CA
696 Tyrants 17-Black 1747 25-36 41% 17 CA
697 Empowered B18-Black 1747 43-21 67% 18 IN
698 Xtreme 18-National kelly 1747 17-5 77% 18 NJ
699 Surge Boys 18-Black 1746 21-14 60% 18 PA
700 Maverick 15 Iceman 1746 28-14 67% 15 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.