Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 14 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
651 COAST 16-2 connor 1763 30-22 58% 16 CA
652 Academy Boys West 17-1 1763 39-18 68% 17 CA
653 Forza - Boys 14-Blk 1761 66-25 72% 14 IL
654 Tidewater Volleyball Association 17-Boys 1761 6-2 75% 17 VA
655 SPVC 16-1 1761 7-2 78% 16 CA
656 CA Volley 14 1761 23-27 46% 14 CA
657 Team Rockstar 14 Joey 1760 39-14 74% 14 CA
658 Durham Attack 15 Extreme 1760 5-3 63% 15 PA
659 BeachCities 16-Black 1760 42-22 66% 16 CA
660 Faucons 16-Boys 1 1760 7-1 88% 16 MA
661 UVA 14 Allen 1760 30-6 83% 14 CA
662 Pakmen 16 Gold 1760 5-2 71% 16 ON
663 WinMan Strike 18 1759 6-0 100% 18
664 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 18-National 1759 5-5 50% 18 NJ
665 VC United 17-1 elite 1759 37-18 65% 17 IL
666 SVC 15-1 boys 1759 36-15 71% 15 NY
667 MVVC B 11-Red 1759 54-20 73% 11 CA
668 K2 18-Elite boys 1758 36-18 67% 18 TN
669 Red Rock 14-Harley - redwood city 1758 6-6 50% 14 CA
670 Spike Milwaukee B17 1757 39-18 68% 17 WI
671 GSL 18-Elect ben 1757 10-5 67% 18 UT
672 674 Manati 15-1 m indio 1757 13-2 87% 15 PR
673 SMASH Boys 14-1 1756 32-22 59% 14 MA
674 BAVC 14-1 boys 1756 34-24 59% 14 CA
675 Inferno 15-1 national 1756 41-22 65% 15 WI
676 WPVC Boys 17-Armour orange 1756 24-35 41% 17 FL
677 Tropics 17-Elite marc 1756 2-7 22% 17 FL
678 FRVBC 18-1 boys 1756 18-22 45% 18 CO
679 AZ LEGACY 15 APEX 1755 31-35 47% 15 AZ
680 Velocity 18-1 national 1755 14-21 40% 18 PA
681 I AM VBC Boys 12-1 1755 35-4 90% 12 WI
682 South Elite 18-Carlos 1755 10-4 71% 18 PR
683 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 16-National 1754 12-4 75% 16 NJ
684 Vegas Aces 14-1 1754 20-9 69% 14 NV
685 Drive Boys 18-Blue 1754 46-32 56% 18 IL
686 Sporting Albany Boys 16u 1754 43-16 70% 16 NY
687 RootsVBA 14-Ashvale 1754 21-24 47% 14 MO
688 Empowered B18-Black 1754 43-21 67% 18 IN
689 RUVBC 16 Phoenix 1753 35-42 45% 16 IL
690 Volley Next 14U 1753 22-4 85% 14 IL
691 Evolution 15 Elite 1753 37-14 73% 15 CA
692 Urban Volleyball 14 Gold 1753 23-7 77% 14 CA
693 Beach Elite 16-Lucas 1752 34-15 69% 16 UT
694 Tropics Boys 18-S elite 1752 9-13 41% 18 FL
695 Beach Cities 18-Black 1752 17-2 89% 18 CA
696 NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-1 1752 25-24 51% 16 CT
697 VAQUEROS 12-M jan 1752 16-1 94% 12 PR
698 Orlando Gold 16-Gold 1752 25-17 60% 16 FL
699 BORINQUEN COQUI 17-1m 1751 5-8 38% 17 PR
700 The St. James Boys 14 N 1751 19-21 46% 14 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.