2025-2026 Season — Page 14 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 651 | COAST 16-2 connor | 1763 | 30-22 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 652 | Academy Boys West 17-1 | 1763 | 39-18 | 68% | 17 | CA |
| 653 | Forza - Boys 14-Blk | 1761 | 66-25 | 72% | 14 | IL |
| 654 | Tidewater Volleyball Association 17-Boys | 1761 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | VA |
| 655 | SPVC 16-1 | 1761 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | CA |
| 656 | CA Volley 14 | 1761 | 23-27 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 657 | Team Rockstar 14 Joey | 1760 | 39-14 | 74% | 14 | CA |
| 658 | Durham Attack 15 Extreme | 1760 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | PA |
| 659 | BeachCities 16-Black | 1760 | 42-22 | 66% | 16 | CA |
| 660 | Faucons 16-Boys 1 | 1760 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | MA |
| 661 | UVA 14 Allen | 1760 | 30-6 | 83% | 14 | CA |
| 662 | Pakmen 16 Gold | 1760 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | ON |
| 663 | WinMan Strike 18 | 1759 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 664 | NYC Impact Volleyball Club 18-National | 1759 | 5-5 | 50% | 18 | NJ |
| 665 | VC United 17-1 elite | 1759 | 37-18 | 65% | 17 | IL |
| 666 | SVC 15-1 boys | 1759 | 36-15 | 71% | 15 | NY |
| 667 | MVVC B 11-Red | 1759 | 54-20 | 73% | 11 | CA |
| 668 | K2 18-Elite boys | 1758 | 36-18 | 67% | 18 | TN |
| 669 | Red Rock 14-Harley - redwood city | 1758 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 670 | Spike Milwaukee B17 | 1757 | 39-18 | 68% | 17 | WI |
| 671 | GSL 18-Elect ben | 1757 | 10-5 | 67% | 18 | UT |
| 672 | 674 Manati 15-1 m indio | 1757 | 13-2 | 87% | 15 | PR |
| 673 | SMASH Boys 14-1 | 1756 | 32-22 | 59% | 14 | MA |
| 674 | BAVC 14-1 boys | 1756 | 34-24 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 675 | Inferno 15-1 national | 1756 | 41-22 | 65% | 15 | WI |
| 676 | WPVC Boys 17-Armour orange | 1756 | 24-35 | 41% | 17 | FL |
| 677 | Tropics 17-Elite marc | 1756 | 2-7 | 22% | 17 | FL |
| 678 | FRVBC 18-1 boys | 1756 | 18-22 | 45% | 18 | CO |
| 679 | AZ LEGACY 15 APEX | 1755 | 31-35 | 47% | 15 | AZ |
| 680 | Velocity 18-1 national | 1755 | 14-21 | 40% | 18 | PA |
| 681 | I AM VBC Boys 12-1 | 1755 | 35-4 | 90% | 12 | WI |
| 682 | South Elite 18-Carlos | 1755 | 10-4 | 71% | 18 | PR |
| 683 | NYC Impact Volleyball Club 16-National | 1754 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | NJ |
| 684 | Vegas Aces 14-1 | 1754 | 20-9 | 69% | 14 | NV |
| 685 | Drive Boys 18-Blue | 1754 | 46-32 | 56% | 18 | IL |
| 686 | Sporting Albany Boys 16u | 1754 | 43-16 | 70% | 16 | NY |
| 687 | RootsVBA 14-Ashvale | 1754 | 21-24 | 47% | 14 | MO |
| 688 | Empowered B18-Black | 1754 | 43-21 | 67% | 18 | IN |
| 689 | RUVBC 16 Phoenix | 1753 | 35-42 | 45% | 16 | IL |
| 690 | Volley Next 14U | 1753 | 22-4 | 85% | 14 | IL |
| 691 | Evolution 15 Elite | 1753 | 37-14 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 692 | Urban Volleyball 14 Gold | 1753 | 23-7 | 77% | 14 | CA |
| 693 | Beach Elite 16-Lucas | 1752 | 34-15 | 69% | 16 | UT |
| 694 | Tropics Boys 18-S elite | 1752 | 9-13 | 41% | 18 | FL |
| 695 | Beach Cities 18-Black | 1752 | 17-2 | 89% | 18 | CA |
| 696 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1752 | 25-24 | 51% | 16 | CT |
| 697 | VAQUEROS 12-M jan | 1752 | 16-1 | 94% | 12 | PR |
| 698 | Orlando Gold 16-Gold | 1752 | 25-17 | 60% | 16 | FL |
| 699 | BORINQUEN COQUI 17-1m | 1751 | 5-8 | 38% | 17 | PR |
| 700 | The St. James Boys 14 N | 1751 | 19-21 | 46% | 14 | VA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.