2025-2026 Season — Page 14 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 651 | VRTXVB 18-National - chad | 1758 | 17-13 | 57% | 18 | |
| 652 | HPSTL B15-Orange | 1758 | 38-26 | 59% | 15 | MO |
| 653 | K2 18-Elite boys | 1758 | 36-18 | 67% | 18 | TN |
| 654 | Durham Attack 15 Extreme | 1757 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | ON |
| 655 | Forza - Boys 14-Blk | 1757 | 66-25 | 72% | 14 | IL |
| 656 | Ocean Point 13-Maverick | 1757 | 34-26 | 57% | 13 | CA |
| 657 | Bravo 18-X | 1757 | 23-5 | 82% | 18 | KY |
| 658 | Team Rockstar 14 Joey | 1757 | 39-14 | 74% | 14 | CA |
| 659 | Vaqueros 16-M frank | 1757 | 12-8 | 60% | 16 | PR |
| 660 | Pilipaa 15 | 1756 | 16-10 | 62% | 15 | HI |
| 661 | Evolution 15 Elite | 1755 | 37-14 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 662 | VC United 17-1 elite | 1755 | 37-18 | 65% | 17 | IL |
| 663 | I AM VBC Boys 12-1 | 1755 | 35-4 | 90% | 12 | WI |
| 664 | Central Cal 18-1 | 1755 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 665 | Spike Milwaukee B17 | 1755 | 39-18 | 68% | 17 | WI |
| 666 | Academy Boys West 17-1 | 1754 | 39-18 | 68% | 17 | CA |
| 667 | Drive Boys 18-Blue | 1754 | 46-32 | 56% | 18 | IL |
| 668 | Volley Next 14U | 1753 | 22-4 | 85% | 14 | MI |
| 669 | Sportime 14-1 | 1753 | 26-13 | 67% | 14 | NY |
| 670 | VAQUEROS 12-M jan | 1753 | 16-1 | 94% | 12 | PR |
| 671 | OVC 15 Neptune | 1752 | 24-14 | 63% | 15 | VA |
| 672 | The St. James Boys 14 N | 1752 | 19-21 | 46% | 14 | VA |
| 673 | WPVC Boys 17-Armour orange | 1752 | 24-35 | 41% | 17 | FL |
| 674 | VC United 18-1 elite | 1752 | 30-13 | 70% | 18 | IL |
| 675 | CA Volley 14 | 1752 | 23-27 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 676 | South Elite 18-Carlos | 1752 | 10-4 | 71% | 18 | PR |
| 677 | Tropics 17-Elite marc | 1752 | 2-7 | 22% | 17 | FL |
| 678 | Orlando Gold 16-Gold | 1752 | 25-17 | 60% | 16 | FL |
| 679 | BAVC 14-1 boys | 1751 | 34-24 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 680 | SMASH Boys 14-1 | 1751 | 32-22 | 59% | 14 | MA |
| 681 | Sporting Albany Boys 16u | 1750 | 43-16 | 70% | 16 | NY |
| 682 | NEVBC Boys 16.1 | 1750 | 25-24 | 51% | 16 | CT |
| 683 | RUVBC 16 Phoenix | 1750 | 35-42 | 45% | 16 | IL |
| 684 | SVC 15-1 boys | 1750 | 36-15 | 71% | 15 | NY |
| 685 | 674 Manati 15-1 m indio | 1750 | 13-2 | 87% | 15 | PR |
| 686 | BORINQUEN COQUI 17-1m | 1749 | 5-8 | 38% | 17 | PR |
| 687 | FRVBC 17-1 boys | 1749 | 19-15 | 56% | 17 | CO |
| 688 | Vegas United B 18-Black | 1749 | 14-14 | 50% | 18 | NV |
| 689 | Maverick 16 Wolfman | 1749 | 13-7 | 65% | 16 | AZ |
| 690 | Inferno 15-1 national | 1749 | 41-22 | 65% | 15 | WI |
| 691 | NYC Impact 17U National | 1749 | 20-11 | 65% | 17 | NY |
| 692 | SAVBC 16-1 | 1749 | 14-19 | 42% | 16 | CA |
| 693 | TVC 16-1 | 1749 | 16-10 | 62% | 16 | AZ |
| 694 | Boys BSVBC 18-Black | 1748 | 25-20 | 56% | 18 | IL |
| 695 | The HBC 16-BLACK | 1748 | 17-32 | 35% | 16 | CA |
| 696 | Tyrants 17-Black | 1747 | 25-36 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 697 | Empowered B18-Black | 1747 | 43-21 | 67% | 18 | IN |
| 698 | Xtreme 18-National kelly | 1747 | 17-5 | 77% | 18 | NJ |
| 699 | Surge Boys 18-Black | 1746 | 21-14 | 60% | 18 | PA |
| 700 | Maverick 15 Iceman | 1746 | 28-14 | 67% | 15 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.