Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 15 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
701 RootsVBA 14-Ashvale 1746 21-24 47% 14 KS
702 ACAD Boys 17-Blue 1746 32-9 78% 17 NY
703 Carolina ICE 18-1 1746 43-20 68% 18 SC
704 Orlando Gold 18-Gold 1746 12-13 48% 18 FL
705 CJVA Boys 18-Black 1746 17-18 49% 18 NJ
706 Pure Aloha 17 Ohana 1746 26-19 58% 17 HI
707 WinMan Strike 18 1745 6-0 100% 18
708 AOT Elite 18-2 1745 14-9 61% 18 AZ
709 CCVA 14 Elite 1745 27-10 73% 14 CA
710 SCVC 18 Nap 1745 15-8 65% 18 CA
711 OVC B18 1744 31-10 76% 18 WI
712 TNT Boys 18-Colossus 1744 24-17 59% 18 PA
713 Core 18 National 1744 27-46 37% 18 CA
714 Aspire 18-Captain america 1744 21-19 53% 18 AZ
715 OVC 16-1 1744 2-4 33% 16 VA
716 RVA Boys 18 Colleen 1743 44-31 59% 18 WI
717 ECVBA 14-1 anthony 1743 17-7 71% 14 CA
718 Beach Cities 18-Black 1743 17-2 89% 18 CA
719 Academy 14-O under armour 1743 20-38 34% 14 IN
720 BAVC 15-1 boys 1743 40-25 62% 15 CA
721 DNA 16-Blue 1743 18-15 55% 16 FL
722 OPVC 14-Purple 1742 31-22 58% 14 OH
723 MVP BOS 16-Black 1742 16-14 52% 16 MA
724 Boys BSVBC 16-Black 1742 20-26 43% 16 IL
725 PW 118 16-Danny 1742 10-1 91% 16 CA
726 OVC 17 Neptune 1741 35-15 70% 17 VA
727 BeachCities 16-Black 1741 42-22 66% 16 CA
728 GSL 16-Elect jeremiah 1741 3-4 43% 16 UT
729 Cinci Attack 16 Gold 1740 48-19 72% 16 OH
730 Tropics Boys 18-S elite 1740 9-13 41% 18 FL
731 CCVA Boys 18-Elite 1739 6-0 100% 18 CA
732 VCN 16-Elite 1739 8-1 89% 16
733 Adversity VBC 17-Purple 1739 43-39 52% 17 IL
734 OCVC 17 Slunks 1739 12-22 35% 17 CA
735 KC United 18 Navy 1738 33-16 67% 18 MO
736 OPVC 17-Purple 1738 27-25 52% 17 OH
737 SynergyForce 17-1 natl 1738 45-29 61% 17 CA
738 OZP 16-Platinum 1737 14-7 67% 16
739 MVC 15-Michael 1737 42-29 59% 15 WI
740 AZ LEGACY 15 APEX 1737 31-35 47% 15 AZ
741 Red Rock 14-Harley - redwood city 1737 6-6 50% 14 CA
742 315 VC 14-1 1737 14-3 78% 14 NY
743 VAQUEROS 14-M perez 1736 11-6 65% 14 PR
744 PVA BOYS 15 NATIONAL 1736 22-18 55% 15 PA
745 NF 16 Cobalt 1736 25-26 49% 16 NY
746 MVVC B 18-Black 1736 38-31 55% 18 CA
747 RCVA Boys 16-National 1736 4-3 57% 16 VA
748 KUIKAHI 16-Red roshambo 1735 26-16 62% 16 HI
749 417 Boys 18 National 1735 35-13 73% 18 MO
750 Balboa Bay 13-Blue 1735 32-33 49% 13 CA
← Previous123456789101112131415161718Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.