Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 15 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
701 OVC B18 1751 31-10 76% 18 WI
702 OPVC 14-Purple 1751 31-22 58% 14 OH
703 Academy 14-O under armour 1750 20-38 34% 14 IN
704 FRVBC 17-1 boys 1750 19-15 56% 17 CO
705 Boys BSVBC 16-Black 1750 20-26 43% 16 IL
706 Core 18 National 1749 27-46 37% 18 CA
707 Orlando Gold 18-Gold 1749 12-13 48% 18 FL
708 Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Kennedy 1749 10-2 83% 14 AZ
709 VC United 18-1 elite 1748 30-13 70% 18 IL
710 BAVC 15-1 boys 1748 40-25 62% 15 CA
711 Carolina ICE 18-1 1748 43-20 68% 18 SC
712 LHV Boys 18-1 rafiki 1748 35-24 59% 18 MA
713 TVC 16-1 1748 16-10 62% 16 AZ
714 Maverick 16 Wolfman 1748 13-7 65% 16 AZ
715 CCVA 14 Elite 1747 27-10 73% 14 CA
716 The HBC 16-BLACK 1747 17-32 35% 16 CA
717 LIV 15-Royal 1747 29-17 63% 15 CA
718 OCVC 17 Slunks 1746 12-22 35% 17 CA
719 OMNI 15-1 national 1746 38-46 45% 15 CA
720 Pure Aloha 17 Ohana 1746 26-19 58% 17 HI
721 ECVBA 14-1 anthony 1746 17-7 71% 14 CA
722 RVA Boys 18 Colleen 1746 44-31 59% 18 WI
723 AZ LEGACY 16 APEX 1745 28-45 38% 16 AZ
724 ACAD Boys 17-Blue 1745 32-9 78% 17 NY
725 WAVE 18 Andy 1745 10-8 56% 18 CA
726 RCVA 18 National 1745 31-42 42% 18 VA
727 OVC 17 Neptune 1745 37-20 65% 17 VA
728 Dallas Premier VBC 18-Platinum 1744 4-3 57% 18 TX
729 Boys BSVBC 18-Black 1744 25-20 56% 18 IL
730 Balboa Bay 13-Blue 1744 32-33 49% 13 CA
731 DNA 16-Blue 1744 18-15 55% 16 FL
732 Maverick 15 Iceman 1744 28-14 67% 15 AZ
733 HI Bred Volleyball Club 18 Mento 1743 6-0 100% 18 HI
734 SynergyForce 17-1 natl 1743 45-29 61% 17 CA
735 Xtreme 18-National kelly 1743 17-5 77% 18 NJ
736 TNT Boys 18-Colossus 1742 24-17 59% 18 PA
737 Aspire 18-Captain america 1742 21-19 53% 18 AZ
738 315 VC 14-1 1742 14-3 78% 14 NY
739 Cinci Attack 16 Gold 1742 48-19 72% 16 OH
740 KC United 18 Navy 1742 33-16 67% 18 MO
741 PVA BOYS 15 NATIONAL 1741 22-18 55% 15 PA
742 315 Volleyball Club 18-Usa 1741 25-3 89% 18 NY
743 Cyclones Boys 16-B 1741 50-36 58% 16 IL
744 MVC 15-Michael 1741 42-29 59% 15 WI
745 VAQUEROS 14-M perez 1741 11-6 65% 14 PR
746 Beach Cities 17-Black 1740 18-8 69% 17 CA
747 Surge Boys 18-Black 1740 21-14 60% 18 NJ
748 Stars 16 Lion 1740 32-18 64% 16 SC
749 OPVC 17-Purple 1739 27-25 52% 17 OH
750 TLP/ACT Volleyball Club 17-Noah 1739 18-5 78% 17 CA
← Previous123456789101112131415161718Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.