2025-2026 Season — Page 15 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 701 | RootsVBA 14-Ashvale | 1746 | 21-24 | 47% | 14 | KS |
| 702 | ACAD Boys 17-Blue | 1746 | 32-9 | 78% | 17 | NY |
| 703 | Carolina ICE 18-1 | 1746 | 43-20 | 68% | 18 | SC |
| 704 | Orlando Gold 18-Gold | 1746 | 12-13 | 48% | 18 | FL |
| 705 | CJVA Boys 18-Black | 1746 | 17-18 | 49% | 18 | NJ |
| 706 | Pure Aloha 17 Ohana | 1746 | 26-19 | 58% | 17 | HI |
| 707 | WinMan Strike 18 | 1745 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 708 | AOT Elite 18-2 | 1745 | 14-9 | 61% | 18 | AZ |
| 709 | CCVA 14 Elite | 1745 | 27-10 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 710 | SCVC 18 Nap | 1745 | 15-8 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 711 | OVC B18 | 1744 | 31-10 | 76% | 18 | WI |
| 712 | TNT Boys 18-Colossus | 1744 | 24-17 | 59% | 18 | PA |
| 713 | Core 18 National | 1744 | 27-46 | 37% | 18 | CA |
| 714 | Aspire 18-Captain america | 1744 | 21-19 | 53% | 18 | AZ |
| 715 | OVC 16-1 | 1744 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | VA |
| 716 | RVA Boys 18 Colleen | 1743 | 44-31 | 59% | 18 | WI |
| 717 | ECVBA 14-1 anthony | 1743 | 17-7 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 718 | Beach Cities 18-Black | 1743 | 17-2 | 89% | 18 | CA |
| 719 | Academy 14-O under armour | 1743 | 20-38 | 34% | 14 | IN |
| 720 | BAVC 15-1 boys | 1743 | 40-25 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 721 | DNA 16-Blue | 1743 | 18-15 | 55% | 16 | FL |
| 722 | OPVC 14-Purple | 1742 | 31-22 | 58% | 14 | OH |
| 723 | MVP BOS 16-Black | 1742 | 16-14 | 52% | 16 | MA |
| 724 | Boys BSVBC 16-Black | 1742 | 20-26 | 43% | 16 | IL |
| 725 | PW 118 16-Danny | 1742 | 10-1 | 91% | 16 | CA |
| 726 | OVC 17 Neptune | 1741 | 35-15 | 70% | 17 | VA |
| 727 | BeachCities 16-Black | 1741 | 42-22 | 66% | 16 | CA |
| 728 | GSL 16-Elect jeremiah | 1741 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | UT |
| 729 | Cinci Attack 16 Gold | 1740 | 48-19 | 72% | 16 | OH |
| 730 | Tropics Boys 18-S elite | 1740 | 9-13 | 41% | 18 | FL |
| 731 | CCVA Boys 18-Elite | 1739 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | CA |
| 732 | VCN 16-Elite | 1739 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | |
| 733 | Adversity VBC 17-Purple | 1739 | 43-39 | 52% | 17 | IL |
| 734 | OCVC 17 Slunks | 1739 | 12-22 | 35% | 17 | CA |
| 735 | KC United 18 Navy | 1738 | 33-16 | 67% | 18 | MO |
| 736 | OPVC 17-Purple | 1738 | 27-25 | 52% | 17 | OH |
| 737 | SynergyForce 17-1 natl | 1738 | 45-29 | 61% | 17 | CA |
| 738 | OZP 16-Platinum | 1737 | 14-7 | 67% | 16 | |
| 739 | MVC 15-Michael | 1737 | 42-29 | 59% | 15 | WI |
| 740 | AZ LEGACY 15 APEX | 1737 | 31-35 | 47% | 15 | AZ |
| 741 | Red Rock 14-Harley - redwood city | 1737 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 742 | 315 VC 14-1 | 1737 | 14-3 | 78% | 14 | NY |
| 743 | VAQUEROS 14-M perez | 1736 | 11-6 | 65% | 14 | PR |
| 744 | PVA BOYS 15 NATIONAL | 1736 | 22-18 | 55% | 15 | PA |
| 745 | NF 16 Cobalt | 1736 | 25-26 | 49% | 16 | NY |
| 746 | MVVC B 18-Black | 1736 | 38-31 | 55% | 18 | CA |
| 747 | RCVA Boys 16-National | 1736 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | VA |
| 748 | KUIKAHI 16-Red roshambo | 1735 | 26-16 | 62% | 16 | HI |
| 749 | 417 Boys 18 National | 1735 | 35-13 | 73% | 18 | MO |
| 750 | Balboa Bay 13-Blue | 1735 | 32-33 | 49% | 13 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.