Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 17 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
801 AJAXVB 16-1 gold 1721 26-10 72% 16 OR
802 SMASH Boys 16-Fire 1721 23-31 43% 16 MA
803 GSL 18-Elect - les 1721 22-18 55% 18 UT
804 SAS Ho'oikaika VBC 13-1 1721 7-1 88% 13 HI
805 Playeros Ponce 17-Gray 1721 10-8 56% 17 PR
806 The St. James Boys 16-W 1721 31-23 57% 16 VA
807 Gigantes 16-Angel 1721 18-2 90% 16 FL
808 Elevation 17-Peak boys 1720 31-20 61% 17 CO
809 PEVA Boys 16 Elite 1720 41-14 75% 16 PA
810 Kali 13-M jose 1720 15-4 79% 13 PR
811 SMASH Boys 17-Shock 1720 30-20 60% 17 MA
812 Legacy Volleyball Club 16-National 1720 24-27 47% 16 NY
813 Ignite Volleyball Club 16-National 1720 36-27 57% 16 CA
814 Kinnect 18 Forest 1719 25-13 66% 18 CA
815 #951 Elite Boys 16-1 1719 39-13 75% 16 CA
816 LVC 14-Black 1719 31-19 62% 14 NY
817 Slainte 17-Platinum 1719 47-24 66% 17 CA
818 AZ Legacy 17 Crimson 1718 41-18 69% 17 AZ
819 Tropics Boys 16-S elite 1718 26-14 65% 16 FL
820 SKY 16-1 1718 8-0 100% 16 OH
821 Sports Academy 14-Premier 1718 7-3 70% 14 CA
822 MADFROG 14-Boys 1717 27-15 63% 14 TX
823 Warren Sixpack 18-2 1717 25-18 58% 18 NJ
824 Husky 18.1 1717 27-25 52% 18 CT
825 Phoenix 15 Thoma 1717 34-21 62% 15 OH
826 NCWVBC Boys 18-1 gold 1717 16-9 64% 18 WA
827 Niagara Athletics Volleyball Club 15 Athletics ATTACK 1717 7-3 70% 15
828 Crown City 16 Kings 1716 33-13 72% 16 CA
829 GSL 17-Elect davis 1716 9-6 60% 17 UT
830 Pulse 16 Mike 1716 39-14 74% 16 CA
831 Accuracy 14-Champ 1716 34-23 60% 14 NJ
832 Absolute 16-Blue 1715 34-32 52% 16 CA
833 Sting VC 16-1 1715 11-1 92% 16 CA
834 CCVA 18 Elite 1715 20-3 87% 18 CA
835 CJVA Boys 17-Black 1715 15-16 48% 17 NJ
836 High Flyers 17-Red 1714 20-19 51% 17 NE
837 AZ LEGACY 17 APEX 1714 21-39 35% 17 AZ
838 SG Elite 15 Select 1714 28-13 68% 15 CA
839 LIVEWIRE 17 Monster 1714 9-13 41% 17 AZ
840 A-10 Boys 18-Red 1714 10-1 91% 18 PA
841 Balboa Bay 15-White 1714 36-27 57% 15 CA
842 NYC Impact 16-Travel 1713 19-4 83% 16 NY
843 Steel City 17-Black 1713 25-8 76% 17 PA
844 CCVA Boys 14-Elite 1713 6-0 100% 14 CA
845 WAVE 12 Nicole 1712 29-24 55% 12 CA
846 630 Volleyball 16-2 1712 33-35 49% 16 IL
847 Coastal 15 Tony 1712 44-24 65% 15 VA
848 MB Surf ASICS 12-Mike 1711 3-7 30% 12 CA
849 OMNI 16-2 elite 1711 41-25 62% 16 CA
850 RAGE 17 CARL 1711 35-25 58% 17 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.