Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 17 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
801 AOT Elite 18-1 1720 23-20 53% 18 AZ
802 Elevation 17-Peak boys 1720 31-20 61% 17 CO
803 Steel City 16-Black 1720 16-10 62% 16 PA
804 Team Rockstar 17 Morte 1720 11-21 34% 17 CA
805 A-10 Boys 18-Black 1719 19-20 49% 18 PA
806 AJAXVB 16-1 gold 1719 26-10 72% 16 OR
807 Coastal 15 Tony 1719 44-24 65% 15 MA
808 EXILE 18-Red 1719 25-6 81% 18 PA
809 SKY 16-1 1719 8-0 100% 16 IL
810 NYC Impact 16-Travel 1718 22-6 79% 16 NY
811 Gigantes 16-Angel 1718 18-2 90% 16
812 #951 Elite Boys 16-1 1718 39-13 75% 16 CA
813 Absolute 16-Blue 1718 34-32 52% 16 CA
814 LVC 14-Black 1717 31-19 62% 14 NY
815 Boston United Boys 17-National 1 1717 18-16 53% 17 MA
816 WAVE 12 Nicole 1717 29-24 55% 12 CA
817 SMASH Boys 18-Surge 1717 27-21 56% 18 MA
818 High Flyers 17-Red 1716 20-19 51% 17 NE
819 AZ Legacy 17 Crimson 1716 41-18 69% 17 AZ
820 SMASH Boys 16-Fire 1716 23-31 43% 16 MA
821 CCVA Boys 14-Elite 1716 6-0 100% 14 CA
822 Sports Academy 14-Premier 1715 7-3 70% 14 CA
823 PEVA Boys 16 Elite 1714 41-14 75% 16 PA
824 Vanguard 18-Gold tuttle 1713 30-22 58% 18 OH
825 RAGE 17 CARL 1713 35-25 58% 17 CA
826 GSL 14-Elect - jackie 1713 5-4 56% 14 UT
827 Phoenix 15 Thoma 1712 34-21 62% 15 OH
828 Slainte 17-Platinum 1712 47-24 66% 17 CA
829 Victory 17-Black 1712 10-0 100% 17 AZ
830 Ignite Boys 16 National 1711 36-27 57% 16 AZ
831 Meraki 18 1711 8-10 44% 18
832 CCVA 18 Elite 1711 20-3 87% 18 CA
833 OMNI 16-2 elite 1711 41-25 62% 16 CA
834 NCWVBC Boys 18-1 gold 1711 16-9 64% 18 WA
835 MADFROG 14-Boys 1711 27-15 63% 14 TX
836 Steel City 17-Black 1711 25-8 76% 17 PA
837 FPVC 15-B ren 1711 22-11 67% 15 CA
838 FRVBC 16-1 1710 17-8 68% 16 CO
839 630 Volleyball 16-2 1710 33-35 49% 16 IL
840 A-10 Boys 18-Red 1710 10-1 91% 18 PA
841 MB Surf ASICS 12-Mike 1710 3-7 30% 12 CA
842 CCVA Boys 16-Elite 1709 5-0 100% 16 CA
843 Crown City 16 Kings 1709 33-13 72% 16 CA
844 NYC VBA 18 Riverside 1709 25-29 46% 18 NY
845 630 Volleyball 16-3 1709 56-21 73% 16 IL
846 South County 18 Napoleon 1708 25-13 66% 18 RI
847 347 18 1707 16-14 53% 18 AZ
848 NJ RONIN 16 SWORD 1707 23-23 50% 16 NJ
849 NW Jrs 14-Ua slate 1707 21-10 68% 14 WA
850 Sportime 15-1 1706 11-15 42% 15 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.