2025-2026 Season — Page 17 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 801 | AJAXVB 16-1 gold | 1721 | 26-10 | 72% | 16 | OR |
| 802 | SMASH Boys 16-Fire | 1721 | 23-31 | 43% | 16 | MA |
| 803 | GSL 18-Elect - les | 1721 | 22-18 | 55% | 18 | UT |
| 804 | SAS Ho'oikaika VBC 13-1 | 1721 | 7-1 | 88% | 13 | HI |
| 805 | Playeros Ponce 17-Gray | 1721 | 10-8 | 56% | 17 | PR |
| 806 | The St. James Boys 16-W | 1721 | 31-23 | 57% | 16 | VA |
| 807 | Gigantes 16-Angel | 1721 | 18-2 | 90% | 16 | FL |
| 808 | Elevation 17-Peak boys | 1720 | 31-20 | 61% | 17 | CO |
| 809 | PEVA Boys 16 Elite | 1720 | 41-14 | 75% | 16 | PA |
| 810 | Kali 13-M jose | 1720 | 15-4 | 79% | 13 | PR |
| 811 | SMASH Boys 17-Shock | 1720 | 30-20 | 60% | 17 | MA |
| 812 | Legacy Volleyball Club 16-National | 1720 | 24-27 | 47% | 16 | NY |
| 813 | Ignite Volleyball Club 16-National | 1720 | 36-27 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 814 | Kinnect 18 Forest | 1719 | 25-13 | 66% | 18 | CA |
| 815 | #951 Elite Boys 16-1 | 1719 | 39-13 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 816 | LVC 14-Black | 1719 | 31-19 | 62% | 14 | NY |
| 817 | Slainte 17-Platinum | 1719 | 47-24 | 66% | 17 | CA |
| 818 | AZ Legacy 17 Crimson | 1718 | 41-18 | 69% | 17 | AZ |
| 819 | Tropics Boys 16-S elite | 1718 | 26-14 | 65% | 16 | FL |
| 820 | SKY 16-1 | 1718 | 8-0 | 100% | 16 | OH |
| 821 | Sports Academy 14-Premier | 1718 | 7-3 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 822 | MADFROG 14-Boys | 1717 | 27-15 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 823 | Warren Sixpack 18-2 | 1717 | 25-18 | 58% | 18 | NJ |
| 824 | Husky 18.1 | 1717 | 27-25 | 52% | 18 | CT |
| 825 | Phoenix 15 Thoma | 1717 | 34-21 | 62% | 15 | OH |
| 826 | NCWVBC Boys 18-1 gold | 1717 | 16-9 | 64% | 18 | WA |
| 827 | Niagara Athletics Volleyball Club 15 Athletics ATTACK | 1717 | 7-3 | 70% | 15 | |
| 828 | Crown City 16 Kings | 1716 | 33-13 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 829 | GSL 17-Elect davis | 1716 | 9-6 | 60% | 17 | UT |
| 830 | Pulse 16 Mike | 1716 | 39-14 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 831 | Accuracy 14-Champ | 1716 | 34-23 | 60% | 14 | NJ |
| 832 | Absolute 16-Blue | 1715 | 34-32 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 833 | Sting VC 16-1 | 1715 | 11-1 | 92% | 16 | CA |
| 834 | CCVA 18 Elite | 1715 | 20-3 | 87% | 18 | CA |
| 835 | CJVA Boys 17-Black | 1715 | 15-16 | 48% | 17 | NJ |
| 836 | High Flyers 17-Red | 1714 | 20-19 | 51% | 17 | NE |
| 837 | AZ LEGACY 17 APEX | 1714 | 21-39 | 35% | 17 | AZ |
| 838 | SG Elite 15 Select | 1714 | 28-13 | 68% | 15 | CA |
| 839 | LIVEWIRE 17 Monster | 1714 | 9-13 | 41% | 17 | AZ |
| 840 | A-10 Boys 18-Red | 1714 | 10-1 | 91% | 18 | PA |
| 841 | Balboa Bay 15-White | 1714 | 36-27 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 842 | NYC Impact 16-Travel | 1713 | 19-4 | 83% | 16 | NY |
| 843 | Steel City 17-Black | 1713 | 25-8 | 76% | 17 | PA |
| 844 | CCVA Boys 14-Elite | 1713 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | CA |
| 845 | WAVE 12 Nicole | 1712 | 29-24 | 55% | 12 | CA |
| 846 | 630 Volleyball 16-2 | 1712 | 33-35 | 49% | 16 | IL |
| 847 | Coastal 15 Tony | 1712 | 44-24 | 65% | 15 | VA |
| 848 | MB Surf ASICS 12-Mike | 1711 | 3-7 | 30% | 12 | CA |
| 849 | OMNI 16-2 elite | 1711 | 41-25 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 850 | RAGE 17 CARL | 1711 | 35-25 | 58% | 17 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.