2025-2026 Season — Page 19 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 901 | Meraki VB 18-1 | 1696 | 15-19 | 44% | 18 | NH |
| 902 | SKY 17-1 | 1696 | 8-6 | 57% | 17 | IL |
| 903 | SCVC 16-Sarah | 1696 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 904 | LVC 16-Blue | 1695 | 34-17 | 67% | 16 | NY |
| 905 | Pulse 16 Mike | 1695 | 39-14 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 906 | IMPACT PINK 12 | 1695 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | |
| 907 | H Skyline Boys 16 Royal | 1695 | 28-29 | 49% | 16 | TX |
| 908 | HAVC 18-Red | 1695 | 24-21 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 909 | MN Select Boys 15-1 | 1695 | 40-24 | 63% | 15 | MN |
| 910 | Chicago Elite B 17-Elite | 1695 | 31-42 | 41% | 17 | IL |
| 911 | HEAT 13-Black | 1695 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | CA |
| 912 | BAVC 16-1 sal | 1694 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 913 | TVS 10 Sophie | 1694 | 8-2 | 80% | 10 | |
| 914 | Pipeline 17-Black | 1694 | 46-18 | 72% | 17 | IL |
| 915 | Cinci Attack 17-Red | 1694 | 29-35 | 45% | 17 | OH |
| 916 | CCVA Boys 17-Jay | 1693 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | CA |
| 917 | RCVA Boys 17-National | 1693 | 3-5 | 38% | 17 | VA |
| 918 | MOD B16-White | 1693 | 47-10 | 82% | 16 | IL |
| 919 | AZ LEGACY 17 APEX | 1693 | 21-39 | 35% | 17 | AZ |
| 920 | BAVC 17-1 andre | 1693 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 921 | COAST 15-2 lindsey | 1693 | 31-19 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 922 | Ultimate B18 Gold | 1693 | 27-27 | 49% | 18 | IL |
| 923 | 808 Athletic Club 16-Kolten | 1693 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | HI |
| 924 | Chicago Elite B 16-Elite | 1692 | 40-29 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 925 | Tstreet 14-Kyla | 1692 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 926 | RCVA 18 National | 1692 | 24-33 | 42% | 18 | VA |
| 927 | GSL 15-Elite - earle | 1692 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | UT |
| 928 | Urban Volleyball 17 Gold | 1692 | 23-12 | 66% | 17 | TX |
| 929 | Slam VBC 18-1 | 1692 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | TX |
| 930 | Volley Next 18-2 | 1691 | 42-27 | 61% | 18 | MI |
| 931 | Salt City Boys 18-S bryan | 1691 | 13-8 | 62% | 18 | UT |
| 932 | Spike Milwaukee B18 | 1691 | 21-17 | 55% | 18 | WI |
| 933 | RCVA 17 National | 1691 | 28-27 | 51% | 17 | VA |
| 934 | Pacific Rim 17-1 | 1691 | 31-18 | 63% | 17 | CA |
| 935 | Balboa Bay 15-White | 1691 | 36-27 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 936 | Sidewinder 18-1 | 1691 | 26-16 | 62% | 18 | AZ |
| 937 | KVC 18 Forest | 1690 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | TN |
| 938 | Juggernaut 16-National 1 | 1690 | 23-29 | 44% | 16 | CO |
| 939 | Forest City 17 Hyperion | 1690 | 4-2 | 67% | 17 | |
| 940 | Downstate (B) 18-Black | 1690 | 28-16 | 64% | 18 | NY |
| 941 | Inferno 18-1 national | 1690 | 26-34 | 43% | 18 | WI |
| 942 | MVC 18-White | 1689 | 10-12 | 45% | 18 | AZ |
| 943 | AOT Elite 17-1 | 1689 | 11-13 | 46% | 17 | AZ |
| 944 | Balboa Bay 17-Red | 1689 | 20-15 | 57% | 17 | CA |
| 945 | Johnston 16-Boys national | 1688 | 18-14 | 56% | 16 | IA |
| 946 | Kinnect 18 Forest | 1688 | 22-8 | 73% | 18 | CA |
| 947 | NYC VBA 15 Nomad | 1688 | 24-15 | 62% | 15 | NY |
| 948 | Pulse 15 Jeff | 1688 | 44-15 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 949 | OVC B16 | 1687 | 43-19 | 69% | 16 | WI |
| 950 | Warren Sixpack 16-3 | 1687 | 27-14 | 66% | 16 | NJ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.