Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 19 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
901 #951 Elite Boys 18-1 1699 14-17 45% 18 CA
902 MKE Sting 13-1 1699 48-21 70% 13 WI
903 Controlled Chaos 14 1699 6-3 67% 14 PA
904 Pipeline 17-Black 1699 46-18 72% 17 IL
905 MVC 15-Black 1699 27-20 57% 15 AZ
906 NYC Volleyball Academy 15-Nomad 1698 24-15 62% 15 NY
907 Defensa 17-Taylor 1698 3-2 60% 17 ON
908 COAST 15-2 lindsey 1698 31-19 62% 15 CA
909 CUVC 16-1 boys 1698 41-31 57% 16 NC
910 MOD B16-White 1697 47-10 82% 16 IL
911 LVC 16-Blue 1697 34-17 67% 16 NY
912 Pulse 15 Jeff 1697 44-15 75% 15 CA
913 Legends 16-2 julio 1697 16-6 73% 16 PR
914 NorthEast Volleyball Club 15-1 1696 19-12 61% 15 CT
915 Maverick Volleyball Club 17 Maverick Rangers 1696 5-1 83% 17 ON
916 Atlantic Coast 16-1 1696 7-6 54% 16 PA
917 Warren Sixpack 16-3 1696 27-14 66% 16 NJ
918 TUVA Boys 14-Elite 1696 25-6 81% 14 NC
919 Tool City 18-Orange 1696 4-6 40% 18 PA
920 Beach Elite Boys 16-Lucas 1696 8-0 100% 16 CA
921 H Skyline Boys 16 Royal 1695 28-29 49% 16 TX
922 Chicago Elite B 16-Elite 1695 40-29 56% 16 IL
923 Chicago Elite B 17-Elite 1695 31-42 41% 17 IL
924 IMPACT PINK 12 1695 6-0 100% 12 HI
925 Buckeye Volleyball Club 18-National 1694 3-5 38% 18 OH
926 Warren Sixpack 17-2 1694 25-23 52% 17 NJ
927 Mamba 18-Black 1693 27-46 37% 18 WI
928 Hive 18 Gold 1693 23-29 44% 18 UT
929 HAVC 18-Red 1693 24-21 53% 18 IL
930 Urban Volleyball 17 Gold 1693 23-12 66% 17 CA
931 SG Elite 18 Elite 1693 12-21 36% 18 CA
932 Inferno 18-1 national 1692 26-34 43% 18 WI
933 Meraki 18 1692 8-10 44% 18 NH
934 Johnston 16-Boys national 1692 18-14 56% 16 IA
935 NJ RONIN 18 SWORD 1692 22-19 54% 18 NJ
936 Slam VBC 18-1 1692 0-0 0% 18 MA
937 Tstreet 14-Kyla 1692 6-0 100% 14 CA
938 Hurricanes 18-1 1691 7-4 64% 18 ON
939 Downstate (B) 18-Black 1691 28-16 64% 18 NY
940 Sidewinder 18-1 1691 26-16 62% 18 AZ
941 Spike Milwaukee B18 1690 21-17 55% 18 WI
942 APEX1 15-A1BLACK 1690 26-19 58% 15 CA
943 SKY 17-1 1690 8-6 57% 17 OH
944 GSEVC 16-Boys premier 1690 21-14 60% 16 NJ
945 Forest City 17 Hyperion 1690 4-2 67% 17 OH
946 HSJ 15-1 1690 0-0 0% 15 NY
947 GSL 18-Elite - mariah 1689 7-7 50% 18 UT
948 OVC B16 1689 43-19 69% 16 WI
949 AOT Elite 17-1 1689 11-13 46% 17 AZ
950 Legacy Boys 17 National 1689 31-31 50% 17 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.