Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 18 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
851 Aspire 15 Venom 1625 21-17 55% 15 AZ
852 FRVBC 17-1 1625 8-6 57% 17 CO
853 Miami United 17-National kylee 1625 21-15 58% 17 FL
854 SVA Boys 18-S 1625 18-11 62% 18 WA
855 LI Fury 15-1 1625 18-7 72% 15 NY
856 Red Rock 14-Harley - redwood city 1624 6-6 50% 14 CA
857 HPSTL B16-White 1624 31-18 63% 16 MO
858 Chicago Elite B 17 Elite 1624 18-31 35% 17 IL
859 Central Cal 16 TJ 1624 4-3 57% 16 CA
860 OVC B15 1624 27-10 73% 15 WI
861 Warren Sixpack 18-3 1623 22-11 65% 18 NJ
862 APEX1 15-A1BLACK 1623 16-13 55% 15 CA
863 Mayhem 18-1 1623 10-18 36% 18 KS
864 Chicago Elite B 16 Elite 1623 26-20 53% 16 IL
865 Bay to Bay 15-Club 1623 25-20 56% 15 CA
866 MN Select Boys 18-2 1623 20-15 57% 18 MN
867 TLP/ACT 15 Ethan 1623 21-10 68% 15 CA
868 Legends 15-1 erik 1623 6-5 55% 15 CA
869 RCVA Boys 18-National 1622 4-4 50% 18 VA
870 Vegas Aces 14-1 1622 20-10 67% 14 NV
871 SF Elite 12 Saga 1622 20-10 67% 12 CA
872 Synergy Boys 18-Fire 1622 17-19 47% 18 CA
873 NCWVBC Boys 18-1 gold 1621 14-4 78% 18 WA
874 HVA 14-Young guns red 1621 21-14 60% 14 TX
875 MVC 18-White 1621 10-12 45% 18 AZ
876 OVC 15 Neptune 1621 19-13 59% 15 NJ
877 CVC 14-1 1621 29-17 63% 14 OH
878 SKY 16-1 1621 8-0 100% 16 IL
879 MVP 12-Black 1620 16-4 80% 12 MD
880 Academy Boys West 12-1 1620 24-12 67% 12 CA
881 A'o a Koa Volleyball 16-B 1620 10-6 63% 16 HI
882 Momentum 17-Yellow 1620 26-20 57% 17 CO
883 Boys BSVBC 17-Blue 1620 18-15 55% 17 IL
884 SG Elite 16 Elite 1620 15-12 56% 16 CA
885 SynergyForce 18-1 natl 1620 27-27 50% 18 CA
886 MVA BOYS 17-S 1619 15-6 68% 17 MD
887 CCVBC 14-1 1618 16-5 76% 14 CA
888 FIVA Boys 18-1 1618 12-10 55% 18 FL
889 314 VBC 18-B 1618 11-4 73% 18 MO
890 PVC Sandlot 14-Blue 1618 17-8 68% 14 PA
891 RCVA Boys 16-National 1618 4-3 57% 16 VA
892 GSL 17-Elect - davis 1618 21-16 57% 17 UT
893 TAMPA UNITED VBA BOYS 18-Red 1618 19-14 58% 18 FL
894 Upontop Boys 16-Elite 1618 18-14 56% 16 FL
895 Uno Boys 18 National 1618 27-20 57% 18 IL
896 Colorado Elite VBC 18 1618 9-0 100% 18 CO
897 MVP Academy BOS 16-Black 1617 10-6 63% 16 MA
898 AZ LEGACY 18-Crimson 1617 17-16 52% 18 AZ
899 ECC South Boys 16 1617 16-10 57% 16 NJ
900 KeAloha 18-2 mavericks 1617 20-24 43% 18 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.