Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 18 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
851 HEAT 18-Travel boo 1706 9-2 82% 18 CA
852 NEVBC Boys 14.1 1705 38-11 78% 14 CT
853 SMBC North 16 Molten 1705 37-11 77% 16 CA
854 Slainte 16-Platinum 1705 43-25 63% 16 CA
855 WSA Gators 17-Elite boys 1704 31-19 62% 17 FL
856 OMNI 17-1 national 1704 37-43 46% 17 CA
857 SG ELITE BOYS 18-Elite 1704 5-6 45% 18 CA
858 Playeros Ponce 16u 1703 12-12 50% 16 PR
859 Johnston 18-Boys national 1703 20-13 61% 18 IA
860 SG Elite 15 Select 1703 28-13 68% 15 CA
861 Vegas Aces 15-1 1703 29-19 60% 15 NV
862 Sideout 18-Cooper 1703 12-19 39% 18 NJ
863 TUVA Boys 15-Elite 1703 32-16 67% 15 NC
864 Legends 16-2 julio 1702 16-6 73% 16 PR
865 Preds 15-Boys altius 1702 5-1 83% 15
866 Hurricanes 14-1 1702 4-2 67% 14 ON
867 FPVC 16-B ren 1702 22-22 50% 16 CA
868 LIVEWIRE 17 Monster 1702 9-13 41% 17 AZ
869 HVA 14-Young guns red 1702 33-20 62% 14 TX
870 NEVBC Boys 15.1 1702 19-12 61% 15 CT
871 Team Momentum B16 Navy 1702 30-29 51% 16 MO
872 Legacy Boys 18 National 1701 22-40 35% 18 NY
873 CUVC 16-1 boys 1701 41-31 57% 16 NC
874 #951 Elite Boys 18-1 1701 14-17 45% 18 CA
875 PalShore 18-1 1701 32-20 62% 18 MI
876 A'o a Koa Volleyball 12-B 1701 13-8 62% 12 HI
877 GSL 17-Elect - davis 1701 32-24 57% 17 UT
878 Sportime 18-2 1701 24-16 60% 18 NY
879 MVC 15-Black 1700 27-20 57% 15 AZ
880 Spanish Fork 18 1699 4-4 50% 18 UT
881 NC Coastal 18-John 1699 22-6 79% 18 NC
882 Lomanview 10-M ileana 1699 6-0 100% 10
883 Defensa 17-Taylor 1699 3-2 60% 17
884 Cyclones Boys 18-B 1699 34-38 45% 18 IL
885 Controlled Chaos 14 1699 6-3 67% 14 TX
886 Future 15-Elite 1699 22-41 35% 15 IL
887 LHV Boys 16-1 valiants 1699 23-14 62% 16 MA
888 DallasOne 18-Black 1699 28-31 47% 18 TX
889 SPORTIME 17-2 1699 21-25 46% 17 NY
890 FVP B18 National 1699 26-10 72% all WI
891 Legacy Boys 16 National 1698 25-34 42% 16 NY
892 630 Volleyball 18-2 1698 25-26 49% 18 IL
893 NY Strangers 16 1698 18-17 51% 16 NY
894 SC Legends 17-Elite 1698 18-19 49% 17 CA
895 DigThis! Ohana 12-Black 1697 6-0 100% 12
896 Accuracy 14-Champ 1697 34-23 60% 14 NJ
897 MKE Sting 13-1 1697 61-29 68% 13 WI
898 SCVC 15-Mike 1697 7-1 88% 15 CA
899 TUVA Boys 14-Elite 1696 25-6 81% 14 NC
900 Atlantic Coast 16-1 1696 7-6 54% 16 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.