Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 18 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
851 347 18 1711 16-14 53% 18 AZ
852 NorthEast Volleyball Club 14-1 1711 38-11 78% 14 CT
853 SMASH Boys 18-Surge 1710 27-21 56% 18 MA
854 NJ RONIN 16 SWORD 1710 23-23 50% 16 NJ
855 Vanguard 18-Gold tuttle 1710 30-22 58% 18 OH
856 Cyclones Boys 18-B 1710 34-38 45% 18 IL
857 FPVC 15-B ren 1710 22-11 67% 15 CA
858 CCVA Boys 16-Elite 1709 5-0 100% 16 CA
859 NW Jrs 14-Ua slate 1709 21-10 68% 14 WA
860 Future 16-Elite 1709 20-51 28% 16 IL
861 HEAT 18-Travel boo 1708 9-2 82% 18 CA
862 Dallas Premier VBC 17-Platinum 1708 5-2 71% 17 TX
863 OMNI 17-1 national 1708 37-43 46% 17 CA
864 OVC 14 Neptune 1708 28-10 74% 14 VA
865 MVP BOS 18-Black 1708 22-25 47% 18 MA
866 Victory 17-Black 1706 10-0 100% 17 AZ
867 SG Elite 16 Elite 1706 21-21 50% 16 CA
868 MPV 18 Dan 1706 24-21 53% 18 UT
869 630 Volleyball 16-3 1706 56-21 73% 16 IL
870 DallasOne 18-Black 1706 28-31 47% 18 TX
871 Playeros Ponce 16u 1705 12-12 50% 16 PR
872 Slainte 16-Platinum 1705 43-25 63% 16 CA
873 WSA Gators 17-Elite boys 1705 31-19 62% 17 FL
874 DigThis! Ohana 12-Black 1705 6-0 100% 12 NV
875 SC Legends 17-Elite 1705 18-19 49% 17 CA
876 Hurricanes 15-1 1705 5-1 83% 15 ON
877 TUVA Boys 15-Elite 1705 32-16 67% 15 NC
878 South County 18 Napoleon 1705 25-13 66% 18 UT
879 FRVBC 16-1 1704 17-8 68% 16 CO
880 SPORTIME 17-2 1704 21-25 46% 17 NY
881 FAV 18 Maverick 1704 14-11 56% 18 CA
882 417 Missouri Juniors 18-Red 1703 4-3 57% 18 MO
883 FPVC 16-B ren 1703 22-22 50% 16 CA
884 Elevate Athletics 18-1 1703 4-4 50% 18 UT
885 Team Momentum B16 Navy 1703 30-29 51% 16 MO
886 Hurricanes 14-1 1702 4-2 67% 14 ON
887 HVA 14-Young guns red 1702 33-20 62% 14 TX
888 A'o a Koa Volleyball 12-B 1702 13-8 62% 12 HI
889 Michigan Volleyball Academy 15-Titanium 1702 8-6 57% 15 MI
890 Winman Volleyball Club 16 Winman Wild 1702 4-1 80% 16
891 Johnston 18-Boys national 1701 20-13 61% 18 IA
892 RCVA 17 National 1701 31-32 49% 17 VA
893 BAVC 17-1 andre 1701 4-4 50% 17 CA
894 TAMPA UNITED VBA BOYS 18-Black 1700 10-13 43% 18 FL
895 Cinci Attack 17-Red 1700 29-35 45% 17 OH
896 PalShore 18-1 1700 32-20 62% 18 SC
897 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 18-Cooper 1700 6-13 32% 18 NJ
898 630 Volleyball 18-2 1699 25-26 49% 18 IL
899 Lomanview 10-M ileana 1699 6-0 100% 10 PR
900 NC Coastal 18-John 1699 22-6 79% 18 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.