Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 8 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
351 Kaizen Boys 16-Black 1879 23-32 42% 16 OK
352 Cap City 17-Blue 1878 34-14 71% 17 PA
353 Boston United Boys 15 National 1877 15-2 88% 15 MA
354 SPORTIME 17-1 1877 25-13 66% 17 NY
355 SG ELITE BOYS 14-Elite 1875 8-2 80% 14 CA
356 Digs Boys 16-Red 1873 30-7 81% 16 NJ
357 LIV 17-Royal bhrycen 1873 11-8 58% 17 CA
358 Pulse 18 Brandon 1873 14-25 36% 18 CA
359 Forza - Boys 15-Blk 1872 46-30 61% 15 IL
360 Pipeline 16-2 1871 35-33 51% 16 IL
361 GOLDENBULLS 18-B black 1870 35-11 76% 18 FL
362 Pure Aloha 18-1 boys 1870 6-3 67% 18 HI
363 Preds 16-Boys ice 1869 14-13 52% 16
364 Balboa Bay 17-White 1869 30-7 81% 17 CA
365 NYC Impact 18 National 1868 21-10 68% 18 NY
366 PVC Sandlot 15-Blue 1868 22-4 85% 15 PA
367 Preds 16-Boys fire 1867 11-14 44% 16
368 Maverick 16 Goose 1866 41-23 64% 16 AZ
369 Pulse 17 Glenn 1866 20-20 50% 17 CA
370 NCVC 15-Mizuno 1864 33-36 48% 15 CA
371 MOD B13-Blue 1863 47-30 61% 13 IL
372 118 16-Danny 1862 38-4 90% 16 CA
373 PAC 18 Rory 1862 31-17 65% 18 CA
374 Ultimate B17-Blue 1861 48-26 65% 17 IL
375 HPSTL B14-Orange 1861 43-18 70% 14 MO
376 Cincy Elite 17 Dreher 1861 37-23 62% 17 OH
377 Blue Royals 18 National 1861 20-19 51% 18 WA
378 SPVB 16-Alpha 1860 43-21 67% 16 IL
379 WC Aces - 16-Spades 1859 49-22 69% 16 IL
380 EXCEL 16-N red 1859 34-29 54% 16 TX
381 ID Strike 18-Black 1859 22-4 85% 18 ID
382 PREVA 13-Carlos 1857 13-8 62% 13 PR
383 OVC 15-1 1857 6-2 75% 15 VA
384 BEVBC 16-1 - lucas 1857 14-5 74% 16 CA
385 A5 Boys 18-1 syd 1856 41-23 64% 18 GA
386 A5 Boys 14 Umar 1856 40-8 83% 14 GA
387 Red Rock 16-Salomon - redwood city 1856 4-4 50% 16 CA
388 HVA 15-Performance red 1855 43-28 61% 15 TX
389 Northern Lights 16-1 boys 1855 33-16 67% 16 MN
390 SMBC West 18-Molten h 1855 25-18 58% 18 CA
391 OVC 16 Neptune 1854 37-14 73% 16 VA
392 TLP/ACT 18 Henry 1854 24-11 69% 18 CA
393 A5 Boys 16 Gary 1853 43-16 73% 16 GA
394 MVP 17-Black 1853 21-33 39% 17 MD
395 Husky 17.1 1853 34-17 67% 17 CT
396 JAX SKYLINE 17-B royal 1852 29-19 60% 17 FL
397 OMNI 14-1 national 1852 55-30 65% 14 CA
398 L2 16-1 boys 1852 32-21 60% 16 MI
399 Academy 16-E blue 1850 38-32 54% 16 IN
400 Sidewinder 16-1 1850 32-23 58% 16 AZ
← Previous1234567891011Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.