2025-2026 Season — Page 8 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | Mountain 18-1 | 1886 | 26-2 | 93% | 18 | CA |
| 352 | MVVC B 16-Black | 1886 | 53-25 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 353 | GOLDENBULLS 18-B black | 1886 | 35-11 | 76% | 18 | FL |
| 354 | Blue Royals 18 National | 1886 | 20-19 | 51% | 18 | WA |
| 355 | SMASH Boys 17 Chaos | 1885 | 35-16 | 69% | 17 | MA |
| 356 | Seaside 14-Black | 1885 | 27-22 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 357 | Balboa Bay 17-White | 1884 | 30-7 | 81% | 17 | CA |
| 358 | Cap City 17-Blue | 1881 | 34-14 | 71% | 17 | PA |
| 359 | South County Juniors Boys 18-Blue | 1881 | 28-8 | 78% | 18 | RI |
| 360 | Apex 18-1 | 1881 | 7-5 | 58% | 18 | VA |
| 361 | 118 16-Danny | 1881 | 48-5 | 91% | 16 | CA |
| 362 | Yorktowne 16-Blue | 1879 | 24-25 | 49% | 16 | PA |
| 363 | Miami United 16-National thews | 1879 | 45-20 | 69% | 16 | FL |
| 364 | SoCal VBC 16-Beacons | 1879 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 365 | A5 Boys 18-1 syd | 1878 | 41-23 | 64% | 18 | GA |
| 366 | LIV 17-Royal bhrycen | 1878 | 11-8 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 367 | Unity Volleyball Club 18 Unity Bushido | 1877 | 8-4 | 67% | 18 | MA |
| 368 | PVC Sandlot 15-Blue | 1875 | 22-4 | 85% | 15 | PA |
| 369 | Cincy Elite 17 Dreher | 1875 | 37-23 | 62% | 17 | OH |
| 370 | SMBC West 18-Molten h | 1875 | 25-18 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 371 | Pulse 17 Glenn | 1871 | 20-20 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 372 | SG Elite 14 Elite | 1870 | 24-19 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 373 | Pipeline 16-2 | 1870 | 35-33 | 51% | 16 | IL |
| 374 | NYC Impact 18-National | 1870 | 16-5 | 76% | 18 | NY |
| 375 | DIGS Volleyball Club 16-Red | 1870 | 24-6 | 80% | 16 | NJ |
| 376 | ID Strike 18-Black | 1868 | 22-4 | 85% | 18 | ID |
| 377 | MOD B13-Blue | 1868 | 47-30 | 61% | 13 | IL |
| 378 | NCVC 15-Mizuno | 1868 | 33-36 | 48% | 15 | CA |
| 379 | PAC 18 Rory | 1867 | 31-17 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 380 | HPSTL B14-Orange | 1866 | 43-18 | 70% | 14 | MO |
| 381 | Ultimate B17-Blue | 1865 | 48-26 | 65% | 17 | IL |
| 382 | GSL 18-Elect les | 1864 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | UT |
| 383 | OVC 16 Neptune | 1863 | 39-18 | 68% | 16 | VA |
| 384 | EXCEL 16-N red | 1863 | 34-29 | 54% | 16 | TX |
| 385 | CA Volley 18-1 | 1862 | 16-24 | 40% | 18 | CA |
| 386 | TLP/ACT Volleyball Club 18-Henry | 1862 | 24-11 | 69% | 18 | CA |
| 387 | Ultimate B15 Gold | 1862 | 30-38 | 44% | 15 | IL |
| 388 | Preds 16-Boys fire | 1862 | 11-14 | 44% | 16 | OH |
| 389 | A5 Boys 16 Gary | 1862 | 43-16 | 73% | 16 | GA |
| 390 | Red Rock 16-Salomon - redwood city | 1861 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 391 | HVA 15-Performance red | 1860 | 43-28 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 392 | WC Aces - 16-Spades | 1860 | 49-22 | 69% | 16 | IL |
| 393 | SPVB 16-Alpha | 1859 | 43-21 | 67% | 16 | IL |
| 394 | Spanish Fork 18 | 1859 | 23-5 | 82% | 18 | UT |
| 395 | SC Legends 13-Elite | 1858 | 26-34 | 43% | 13 | CA |
| 396 | MVP 17-Black | 1858 | 21-33 | 39% | 17 | MD |
| 397 | Preds 16-Boys ice | 1858 | 14-13 | 52% | 16 | OH |
| 398 | MOD B14 Gold | 1857 | 36-28 | 56% | 14 | IL |
| 399 | Sidewinder 16-1 | 1857 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | AZ |
| 400 | Northern Lights 16-1 boys | 1856 | 33-16 | 67% | 16 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.