Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 8 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
351 Mountain 18-1 1886 26-2 93% 18 CA
352 MVVC B 16-Black 1886 53-25 68% 16 CA
353 GOLDENBULLS 18-B black 1886 35-11 76% 18 FL
354 Blue Royals 18 National 1886 20-19 51% 18 WA
355 SMASH Boys 17 Chaos 1885 35-16 69% 17 MA
356 Seaside 14-Black 1885 27-22 55% 14 CA
357 Balboa Bay 17-White 1884 30-7 81% 17 CA
358 Cap City 17-Blue 1881 34-14 71% 17 PA
359 South County Juniors Boys 18-Blue 1881 28-8 78% 18 RI
360 Apex 18-1 1881 7-5 58% 18 VA
361 118 16-Danny 1881 48-5 91% 16 CA
362 Yorktowne 16-Blue 1879 24-25 49% 16 PA
363 Miami United 16-National thews 1879 45-20 69% 16 FL
364 SoCal VBC 16-Beacons 1879 26-20 57% 16 CA
365 A5 Boys 18-1 syd 1878 41-23 64% 18 GA
366 LIV 17-Royal bhrycen 1878 11-8 58% 17 CA
367 Unity Volleyball Club 18 Unity Bushido 1877 8-4 67% 18 MA
368 PVC Sandlot 15-Blue 1875 22-4 85% 15 PA
369 Cincy Elite 17 Dreher 1875 37-23 62% 17 OH
370 SMBC West 18-Molten h 1875 25-18 58% 18 CA
371 Pulse 17 Glenn 1871 20-20 50% 17 CA
372 SG Elite 14 Elite 1870 24-19 56% 14 CA
373 Pipeline 16-2 1870 35-33 51% 16 IL
374 NYC Impact 18-National 1870 16-5 76% 18 NY
375 DIGS Volleyball Club 16-Red 1870 24-6 80% 16 NJ
376 ID Strike 18-Black 1868 22-4 85% 18 ID
377 MOD B13-Blue 1868 47-30 61% 13 IL
378 NCVC 15-Mizuno 1868 33-36 48% 15 CA
379 PAC 18 Rory 1867 31-17 65% 18 CA
380 HPSTL B14-Orange 1866 43-18 70% 14 MO
381 Ultimate B17-Blue 1865 48-26 65% 17 IL
382 GSL 18-Elect les 1864 10-6 63% 18 UT
383 OVC 16 Neptune 1863 39-18 68% 16 VA
384 EXCEL 16-N red 1863 34-29 54% 16 TX
385 CA Volley 18-1 1862 16-24 40% 18 CA
386 TLP/ACT Volleyball Club 18-Henry 1862 24-11 69% 18 CA
387 Ultimate B15 Gold 1862 30-38 44% 15 IL
388 Preds 16-Boys fire 1862 11-14 44% 16 OH
389 A5 Boys 16 Gary 1862 43-16 73% 16 GA
390 Red Rock 16-Salomon - redwood city 1861 4-4 50% 16 CA
391 HVA 15-Performance red 1860 43-28 61% 15 TX
392 WC Aces - 16-Spades 1860 49-22 69% 16 IL
393 SPVB 16-Alpha 1859 43-21 67% 16 IL
394 Spanish Fork 18 1859 23-5 82% 18 UT
395 SC Legends 13-Elite 1858 26-34 43% 13 CA
396 MVP 17-Black 1858 21-33 39% 17 MD
397 Preds 16-Boys ice 1858 14-13 52% 16 OH
398 MOD B14 Gold 1857 36-28 56% 14 IL
399 Sidewinder 16-1 1857 32-23 58% 16 AZ
400 Northern Lights 16-1 boys 1856 33-16 67% 16 MN
← Previous1234567891011Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.