2025-2026 Season — Page 8 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | Kaizen Boys 16-Black | 1879 | 23-32 | 42% | 16 | OK |
| 352 | Cap City 17-Blue | 1878 | 34-14 | 71% | 17 | PA |
| 353 | Boston United Boys 15 National | 1877 | 15-2 | 88% | 15 | MA |
| 354 | SPORTIME 17-1 | 1877 | 25-13 | 66% | 17 | NY |
| 355 | SG ELITE BOYS 14-Elite | 1875 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | CA |
| 356 | Digs Boys 16-Red | 1873 | 30-7 | 81% | 16 | NJ |
| 357 | LIV 17-Royal bhrycen | 1873 | 11-8 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 358 | Pulse 18 Brandon | 1873 | 14-25 | 36% | 18 | CA |
| 359 | Forza - Boys 15-Blk | 1872 | 46-30 | 61% | 15 | IL |
| 360 | Pipeline 16-2 | 1871 | 35-33 | 51% | 16 | IL |
| 361 | GOLDENBULLS 18-B black | 1870 | 35-11 | 76% | 18 | FL |
| 362 | Pure Aloha 18-1 boys | 1870 | 6-3 | 67% | 18 | HI |
| 363 | Preds 16-Boys ice | 1869 | 14-13 | 52% | 16 | |
| 364 | Balboa Bay 17-White | 1869 | 30-7 | 81% | 17 | CA |
| 365 | NYC Impact 18 National | 1868 | 21-10 | 68% | 18 | NY |
| 366 | PVC Sandlot 15-Blue | 1868 | 22-4 | 85% | 15 | PA |
| 367 | Preds 16-Boys fire | 1867 | 11-14 | 44% | 16 | |
| 368 | Maverick 16 Goose | 1866 | 41-23 | 64% | 16 | AZ |
| 369 | Pulse 17 Glenn | 1866 | 20-20 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 370 | NCVC 15-Mizuno | 1864 | 33-36 | 48% | 15 | CA |
| 371 | MOD B13-Blue | 1863 | 47-30 | 61% | 13 | IL |
| 372 | 118 16-Danny | 1862 | 38-4 | 90% | 16 | CA |
| 373 | PAC 18 Rory | 1862 | 31-17 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 374 | Ultimate B17-Blue | 1861 | 48-26 | 65% | 17 | IL |
| 375 | HPSTL B14-Orange | 1861 | 43-18 | 70% | 14 | MO |
| 376 | Cincy Elite 17 Dreher | 1861 | 37-23 | 62% | 17 | OH |
| 377 | Blue Royals 18 National | 1861 | 20-19 | 51% | 18 | WA |
| 378 | SPVB 16-Alpha | 1860 | 43-21 | 67% | 16 | IL |
| 379 | WC Aces - 16-Spades | 1859 | 49-22 | 69% | 16 | IL |
| 380 | EXCEL 16-N red | 1859 | 34-29 | 54% | 16 | TX |
| 381 | ID Strike 18-Black | 1859 | 22-4 | 85% | 18 | ID |
| 382 | PREVA 13-Carlos | 1857 | 13-8 | 62% | 13 | PR |
| 383 | OVC 15-1 | 1857 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | VA |
| 384 | BEVBC 16-1 - lucas | 1857 | 14-5 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 385 | A5 Boys 18-1 syd | 1856 | 41-23 | 64% | 18 | GA |
| 386 | A5 Boys 14 Umar | 1856 | 40-8 | 83% | 14 | GA |
| 387 | Red Rock 16-Salomon - redwood city | 1856 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 388 | HVA 15-Performance red | 1855 | 43-28 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 389 | Northern Lights 16-1 boys | 1855 | 33-16 | 67% | 16 | MN |
| 390 | SMBC West 18-Molten h | 1855 | 25-18 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 391 | OVC 16 Neptune | 1854 | 37-14 | 73% | 16 | VA |
| 392 | TLP/ACT 18 Henry | 1854 | 24-11 | 69% | 18 | CA |
| 393 | A5 Boys 16 Gary | 1853 | 43-16 | 73% | 16 | GA |
| 394 | MVP 17-Black | 1853 | 21-33 | 39% | 17 | MD |
| 395 | Husky 17.1 | 1853 | 34-17 | 67% | 17 | CT |
| 396 | JAX SKYLINE 17-B royal | 1852 | 29-19 | 60% | 17 | FL |
| 397 | OMNI 14-1 national | 1852 | 55-30 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 398 | L2 16-1 boys | 1852 | 32-21 | 60% | 16 | MI |
| 399 | Academy 16-E blue | 1850 | 38-32 | 54% | 16 | IN |
| 400 | Sidewinder 16-1 | 1850 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.