Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
101 Durham Attack 18 Blast 2083 21-6 78% 18 PA
102 HVA 18-Performance red 2083 50-19 72% 18 TX
103 Elevation 17-Elite boys 2083 40-14 74% 17 CO
104 MVVC B 15-Red 2082 47-28 63% 15 CA
105 MB Surf 13-1 asics 2082 56-11 84% 13 CA
106 HVA 17-Performance red 2082 51-21 71% 17 TX
107 Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Blk 2078 55-13 80% 14 NY
108 SCB 18-Salty reed 2078 57-21 73% 18 UT
109 SNVF 16-Mount adams 2077 25-14 64% 16 WA
110 SPVB B16 Elite 2077 41-34 55% 16 IL
111 TORRI 14-1 2075 20-5 80% 14 PR
112 Ultimate B17 Gold 2072 46-24 66% 17 IL
113 Academy 17-O under armour 2070 41-32 56% 17 IN
114 Legends Volleyball Club 15-1 erik 2068 19-11 63% 15 PR
115 GVA Boys 14-Dark blue 2068 16-5 76% 14 PR
116 AJAXVB 18-1 gold 2064 43-13 77% 18 OR
117 Tribe 16-B elite cardinal 2063 35-22 61% 16 FL
118 Bay to Bay 13-1 2062 59-15 80% 13 CA
119 Pacific Rim 18-1 2061 46-22 68% 18 CA
120 Tribe 15-B elite cardinal 2060 50-21 70% 15 FL
121 OCVC 16 Slunks 2060 28-23 55% 16 CA
122 Cinci Attack 14-Black 2059 48-12 80% 14 OH
123 GVA Boys 12-Dark blue 2059 21-1 95% 12 PR
124 Bay to Bay 14-Premier 2059 47-15 76% 14 CA
125 MOD B17 Gold 2058 51-22 70% 17 IL
126 BORINQUEN COQUI 13-1m 2058 22-1 96% 13 PR
127 MOD B16 Gold 2058 43-27 61% 16 IL
128 VAQUEROS 15-M carlos 2057 25-9 74% 15 PR
129 AJV Boys 16 adidas 2057 48-14 77% 16 TX
130 WPVC Boys 14-Armour black 2056 54-21 72% 14 FL
131 Vanguard 16-Gold cagnoli 2055 41-15 73% 16 OH
132 Molten 16-Black 2055 30-14 68% 16 AZ
133 WAVE 14 Cole 2054 32-30 52% 14 CA
134 SCB 17-Salty kris 2051 45-21 68% 17 UT
135 Bay to Bay 18-1 2049 42-22 66% 18 CA
136 SMASH Boys 17-1 2048 38-19 67% 17 MA
137 Aspire 18 Thor 2047 35-21 63% 18 AZ
138 Team Rockstar 17 Angel 2046 23-19 55% 17 CA
139 787EV 12-M kelvyn 2046 10-2 83% 12 PR
140 SPVB 18-Lenny 2045 43-20 68% 18 IL
141 Coastal 18 Matt 2041 50-17 75% 18 VA
142 HVA 16-Performance red 2038 43-27 61% 16 TX
143 EXCEL 13-N red 2038 42-5 89% 13 TX
144 MVP 18-Black 2035 28-18 61% 18 MD
145 HPSTL 14-Royal 2035 43-18 70% 14 MO
146 SMASH Boys 18-1 2033 36-21 63% 18 MA
147 Ocean Bay 17-Quiksilver 2029 38-19 67% 17 FL
148 Cinci Attack 15 Allie 2029 46-18 72% 15 OH
149 Team Rockstar 15 Sabryn 2028 47-17 73% 15 CA
150 UNION B14-Black 2028 42-15 74% 14 IN
← Previous123456Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.