2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | SPVB B16 Elite | 2074 | 41-34 | 55% | 16 | IL |
| 102 | AJAXVB 18-1 gold | 2073 | 43-13 | 77% | 18 | OR |
| 103 | Durham Attack 18 Blast | 2071 | 21-6 | 78% | 18 | ON |
| 104 | GVA Boys 14-Dark blue | 2070 | 16-5 | 76% | 14 | PR |
| 105 | Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Blk | 2069 | 55-13 | 80% | 14 | NY |
| 106 | MB Surf 13-1 asics | 2067 | 56-11 | 84% | 13 | CA |
| 107 | SNVF 16-Mount adams | 2067 | 25-14 | 64% | 16 | WA |
| 108 | HVA 18-Performance red | 2066 | 50-19 | 72% | 18 | TX |
| 109 | Elevation 17-Elite boys | 2065 | 40-14 | 74% | 17 | CO |
| 110 | Ultimate B17 Gold | 2064 | 46-24 | 66% | 17 | IL |
| 111 | GVA Boys 12-Dark blue | 2064 | 21-1 | 95% | 12 | PR |
| 112 | MVVC B 15-Red | 2063 | 47-28 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 113 | Academy 17-O under armour | 2061 | 41-32 | 56% | 17 | IN |
| 114 | MOD B16 Gold | 2061 | 43-27 | 61% | 16 | IL |
| 115 | WPVC Boys 14-Armour black | 2060 | 54-21 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 116 | Cinci Attack 14-Black | 2057 | 48-12 | 80% | 14 | OH |
| 117 | Tribe 16-B elite cardinal | 2055 | 35-22 | 61% | 16 | FL |
| 118 | WAVE 14 Cole | 2054 | 32-30 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 119 | Vanguard 16-Gold cagnoli | 2054 | 41-15 | 73% | 16 | OH |
| 120 | BORINQUEN COQUI 13-1m | 2053 | 22-1 | 96% | 13 | PR |
| 121 | MOD B17 Gold | 2053 | 51-22 | 70% | 17 | IL |
| 122 | OCVC 16 Slunks | 2053 | 28-23 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 123 | Tribe 15-B elite cardinal | 2048 | 50-21 | 70% | 15 | FL |
| 124 | Bay to Bay 14-Premier | 2048 | 47-15 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 125 | 787EV 12-M kelvyn | 2047 | 10-2 | 83% | 12 | PR |
| 126 | BORINQUEN COQUI 15-1m | 2046 | 20-9 | 69% | 15 | PR |
| 127 | AJV Boys 16 adidas | 2045 | 48-14 | 77% | 16 | TX |
| 128 | Bay to Bay 13-1 | 2043 | 59-15 | 80% | 13 | CA |
| 129 | Molten 16-Black | 2042 | 30-14 | 68% | 16 | AZ |
| 130 | GSL 18-Elect - shane | 2042 | 31-18 | 63% | 18 | UT |
| 131 | SPVB 18-Lenny | 2042 | 43-20 | 68% | 18 | IL |
| 132 | SMASH Boys 17-1 | 2041 | 38-19 | 67% | 17 | MA |
| 133 | HPSTL 14-Royal | 2040 | 43-18 | 70% | 14 | MO |
| 134 | Bay to Bay 18-1 | 2038 | 42-22 | 66% | 18 | CA |
| 135 | Aspire 18 Thor | 2038 | 35-21 | 63% | 18 | AZ |
| 136 | Coastal 18 Matt | 2037 | 50-17 | 75% | 18 | MA |
| 137 | EXCEL 13-N red | 2036 | 42-5 | 89% | 13 | TX |
| 138 | SCB 18-Salty reed | 2036 | 42-18 | 70% | 18 | LA |
| 139 | Team Rockstar 17 Angel | 2036 | 23-19 | 55% | 17 | CA |
| 140 | Apex 18U Elite | 2033 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | MO |
| 141 | GSL 17-Elect - colby | 2032 | 25-19 | 57% | 17 | UT |
| 142 | HVA 16-Performance red | 2030 | 43-27 | 61% | 16 | TX |
| 143 | UNION B14-Black | 2030 | 42-15 | 74% | 14 | IN |
| 144 | SCB 17-Salty kris | 2029 | 35-17 | 67% | 17 | LA |
| 145 | Pacific Rim 18-1 | 2029 | 35-19 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 146 | SMASH Boys 18-1 | 2028 | 36-21 | 63% | 18 | MA |
| 147 | Cinci Attack 15 Allie | 2028 | 46-18 | 72% | 15 | OH |
| 148 | MVP 18-Black | 2026 | 28-18 | 61% | 18 | MD |
| 149 | EXCEL 14-N red | 2025 | 41-10 | 80% | 14 | TX |
| 150 | Bay to Bay 16-Premier | 2024 | 34-24 | 59% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.