Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
101 SPVB B16 Elite 2074 41-34 55% 16 IL
102 AJAXVB 18-1 gold 2073 43-13 77% 18 OR
103 Durham Attack 18 Blast 2071 21-6 78% 18 ON
104 GVA Boys 14-Dark blue 2070 16-5 76% 14 PR
105 Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Blk 2069 55-13 80% 14 NY
106 MB Surf 13-1 asics 2067 56-11 84% 13 CA
107 SNVF 16-Mount adams 2067 25-14 64% 16 WA
108 HVA 18-Performance red 2066 50-19 72% 18 TX
109 Elevation 17-Elite boys 2065 40-14 74% 17 CO
110 Ultimate B17 Gold 2064 46-24 66% 17 IL
111 GVA Boys 12-Dark blue 2064 21-1 95% 12 PR
112 MVVC B 15-Red 2063 47-28 63% 15 CA
113 Academy 17-O under armour 2061 41-32 56% 17 IN
114 MOD B16 Gold 2061 43-27 61% 16 IL
115 WPVC Boys 14-Armour black 2060 54-21 72% 14 FL
116 Cinci Attack 14-Black 2057 48-12 80% 14 OH
117 Tribe 16-B elite cardinal 2055 35-22 61% 16 FL
118 WAVE 14 Cole 2054 32-30 52% 14 CA
119 Vanguard 16-Gold cagnoli 2054 41-15 73% 16 OH
120 BORINQUEN COQUI 13-1m 2053 22-1 96% 13 PR
121 MOD B17 Gold 2053 51-22 70% 17 IL
122 OCVC 16 Slunks 2053 28-23 55% 16 CA
123 Tribe 15-B elite cardinal 2048 50-21 70% 15 FL
124 Bay to Bay 14-Premier 2048 47-15 76% 14 CA
125 787EV 12-M kelvyn 2047 10-2 83% 12 PR
126 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-1m 2046 20-9 69% 15 PR
127 AJV Boys 16 adidas 2045 48-14 77% 16 TX
128 Bay to Bay 13-1 2043 59-15 80% 13 CA
129 Molten 16-Black 2042 30-14 68% 16 AZ
130 GSL 18-Elect - shane 2042 31-18 63% 18 UT
131 SPVB 18-Lenny 2042 43-20 68% 18 IL
132 SMASH Boys 17-1 2041 38-19 67% 17 MA
133 HPSTL 14-Royal 2040 43-18 70% 14 MO
134 Bay to Bay 18-1 2038 42-22 66% 18 CA
135 Aspire 18 Thor 2038 35-21 63% 18 AZ
136 Coastal 18 Matt 2037 50-17 75% 18 MA
137 EXCEL 13-N red 2036 42-5 89% 13 TX
138 SCB 18-Salty reed 2036 42-18 70% 18 LA
139 Team Rockstar 17 Angel 2036 23-19 55% 17 CA
140 Apex 18U Elite 2033 7-2 78% 18 MO
141 GSL 17-Elect - colby 2032 25-19 57% 17 UT
142 HVA 16-Performance red 2030 43-27 61% 16 TX
143 UNION B14-Black 2030 42-15 74% 14 IN
144 SCB 17-Salty kris 2029 35-17 67% 17 LA
145 Pacific Rim 18-1 2029 35-19 65% 18 CA
146 SMASH Boys 18-1 2028 36-21 63% 18 MA
147 Cinci Attack 15 Allie 2028 46-18 72% 15 OH
148 MVP 18-Black 2026 28-18 61% 18 MD
149 EXCEL 14-N red 2025 41-10 80% 14 TX
150 Bay to Bay 16-Premier 2024 34-24 59% 16 CA
← Previous123456Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.