2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Durham Attack 18 Blast | 2083 | 21-6 | 78% | 18 | PA |
| 102 | HVA 18-Performance red | 2083 | 50-19 | 72% | 18 | TX |
| 103 | Elevation 17-Elite boys | 2083 | 40-14 | 74% | 17 | CO |
| 104 | MVVC B 15-Red | 2082 | 47-28 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 105 | MB Surf 13-1 asics | 2082 | 56-11 | 84% | 13 | CA |
| 106 | HVA 17-Performance red | 2082 | 51-21 | 71% | 17 | TX |
| 107 | Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Blk | 2078 | 55-13 | 80% | 14 | NY |
| 108 | SCB 18-Salty reed | 2078 | 57-21 | 73% | 18 | UT |
| 109 | SNVF 16-Mount adams | 2077 | 25-14 | 64% | 16 | WA |
| 110 | SPVB B16 Elite | 2077 | 41-34 | 55% | 16 | IL |
| 111 | TORRI 14-1 | 2075 | 20-5 | 80% | 14 | PR |
| 112 | Ultimate B17 Gold | 2072 | 46-24 | 66% | 17 | IL |
| 113 | Academy 17-O under armour | 2070 | 41-32 | 56% | 17 | IN |
| 114 | Legends Volleyball Club 15-1 erik | 2068 | 19-11 | 63% | 15 | PR |
| 115 | GVA Boys 14-Dark blue | 2068 | 16-5 | 76% | 14 | PR |
| 116 | AJAXVB 18-1 gold | 2064 | 43-13 | 77% | 18 | OR |
| 117 | Tribe 16-B elite cardinal | 2063 | 35-22 | 61% | 16 | FL |
| 118 | Bay to Bay 13-1 | 2062 | 59-15 | 80% | 13 | CA |
| 119 | Pacific Rim 18-1 | 2061 | 46-22 | 68% | 18 | CA |
| 120 | Tribe 15-B elite cardinal | 2060 | 50-21 | 70% | 15 | FL |
| 121 | OCVC 16 Slunks | 2060 | 28-23 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 122 | Cinci Attack 14-Black | 2059 | 48-12 | 80% | 14 | OH |
| 123 | GVA Boys 12-Dark blue | 2059 | 21-1 | 95% | 12 | PR |
| 124 | Bay to Bay 14-Premier | 2059 | 47-15 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 125 | MOD B17 Gold | 2058 | 51-22 | 70% | 17 | IL |
| 126 | BORINQUEN COQUI 13-1m | 2058 | 22-1 | 96% | 13 | PR |
| 127 | MOD B16 Gold | 2058 | 43-27 | 61% | 16 | IL |
| 128 | VAQUEROS 15-M carlos | 2057 | 25-9 | 74% | 15 | PR |
| 129 | AJV Boys 16 adidas | 2057 | 48-14 | 77% | 16 | TX |
| 130 | WPVC Boys 14-Armour black | 2056 | 54-21 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 131 | Vanguard 16-Gold cagnoli | 2055 | 41-15 | 73% | 16 | OH |
| 132 | Molten 16-Black | 2055 | 30-14 | 68% | 16 | AZ |
| 133 | WAVE 14 Cole | 2054 | 32-30 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 134 | SCB 17-Salty kris | 2051 | 45-21 | 68% | 17 | UT |
| 135 | Bay to Bay 18-1 | 2049 | 42-22 | 66% | 18 | CA |
| 136 | SMASH Boys 17-1 | 2048 | 38-19 | 67% | 17 | MA |
| 137 | Aspire 18 Thor | 2047 | 35-21 | 63% | 18 | AZ |
| 138 | Team Rockstar 17 Angel | 2046 | 23-19 | 55% | 17 | CA |
| 139 | 787EV 12-M kelvyn | 2046 | 10-2 | 83% | 12 | PR |
| 140 | SPVB 18-Lenny | 2045 | 43-20 | 68% | 18 | IL |
| 141 | Coastal 18 Matt | 2041 | 50-17 | 75% | 18 | VA |
| 142 | HVA 16-Performance red | 2038 | 43-27 | 61% | 16 | TX |
| 143 | EXCEL 13-N red | 2038 | 42-5 | 89% | 13 | TX |
| 144 | MVP 18-Black | 2035 | 28-18 | 61% | 18 | MD |
| 145 | HPSTL 14-Royal | 2035 | 43-18 | 70% | 14 | MO |
| 146 | SMASH Boys 18-1 | 2033 | 36-21 | 63% | 18 | MA |
| 147 | Ocean Bay 17-Quiksilver | 2029 | 38-19 | 67% | 17 | FL |
| 148 | Cinci Attack 15 Allie | 2029 | 46-18 | 72% | 15 | OH |
| 149 | Team Rockstar 15 Sabryn | 2028 | 47-17 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 150 | UNION B14-Black | 2028 | 42-15 | 74% | 14 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.