Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
51 Cinci Attack 18-Black 1918 38-17 69% 18 OH
52 GVA Boys 17-Dark blue 1918 19-4 83% 17 NJ
53 Yorktowne 18-Blue 1917 26-11 70% 18 PA
54 SCB 16-Salty jj 1916 34-7 83% 16 LA
55 Cinci Attack 15 Allie 1915 42-13 76% 15 OH
56 949 B18-Black 1914 30-7 81% 18 CA
57 Stars 18 Lion 1914 29-2 94% 18 SC
58 MVC 17-Brad 1913 40-17 70% 17 WI
59 AZ Fear 15-Black 1911 38-8 83% 15 AZ
60 SouthCoastVolleyball 18 1911 25-2 93% 18 CA
61 MB Surf 13-1 asics 1907 37-4 90% 13 CA
62 Tribe 15-B elite cardinal 1907 33-12 73% 15 FL
63 630 Volleyball 16-1 1904 42-22 66% 16 IL
64 Triangle Boys 16-Black 1904 33-13 72% 16 NC
65 Tropics Boys 17-S elite marc 1904 22-7 76% 17 FL
66 Bay to Bay 16-1 1901 32-14 70% 16 CA
67 MVVC B 14-Red 1900 34-23 60% 14 CA
68 Cinci Attack 14-Black 1900 41-7 85% 14 OH
69 Ultimate B17 Gold 1900 37-17 69% 17 IL
70 Boys BSVBC 14-Black 1898 35-11 76% 14 IL
71 TeamLVC Boys 16U Black 1898 33-7 83% 16 NY
72 AZ Fear 17-Black 1898 35-10 78% 17 AZ
73 South County Juniors Boys 18-Blue 1895 28-8 78% 18 RI
74 CSVC 17-Big slide 1894 34-1 97% 17 NY
75 AJV Boys 16 adidas 1894 34-7 83% 16 TX
76 MDJRS 17-Boys black 1894 40-14 74% 17 MD
77 SCB 18-Salty reed 1894 33-8 80% 18 LA
78 SMASH Boys 17 Chaos 1894 30-11 73% 17 MA
79 SPVB B15 Elite 1892 35-18 66% 15 IL
80 HPSTL 14-Royal 1892 32-12 73% 14 MO
81 Bay to Bay 18-1 1891 34-13 72% 18 CA
82 Coastal 18 Matt 1891 29-14 67% 18 MA
83 Orlando Gold 18-Black 1890 26-10 72% 18 FL
84 HPSTL 18-Royal 1890 36-16 69% 18 MO
85 Husky 17.1 1890 29-12 71% 17 CT
86 Team Rockstar 16 Angel 1887 31-4 89% 16 CA
87 Warren Sixpack 16-1 1885 31-7 82% 16 NJ
88 WC Aces - 16-Spades 1884 45-18 71% 16 IL
89 NEVBC Boys 18.1 1880 29-18 62% 18 CT
90 C2 Attack 15-1 elite 1879 39-14 74% 15 TN
91 The St. James Boys 18 N 1877 23-17 57% 18 VA
92 Team Rockstar 14 Anjinho 1876 29-12 71% 14 CA
93 WAVE 16 Noly 1876 25-12 68% 16 CA
94 WPVC Boys 14-Armour black 1874 37-13 74% 14 FL
95 Adversity South 17 Adidas 1874 35-26 57% 17 IL
96 ACAD Boys 16-Red 1874 24-7 77% 16 NY
97 Gentlemen of Kiwi 15 1874 29-3 91% 15 FL
98 CUVC 17-1 boys 1872 42-9 82% 17 NC
99 HVA 18-Performance red 1871 32-8 80% 18 TX
100 WPVC Boys 15-Armour black 1870 34-17 67% 15 FL
← Previous12345Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.