Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
51 Vanguard 18-Gold webb 2162 35-17 67% 18 OH
52 Team Rockstar 15 Hawk 2161 49-13 79% 15 CA
53 AZ Fear 17-Black 2160 48-14 77% 17 AZ
54 MVC 17-Brad 2153 57-24 70% 17 WI
55 HPSTL 15-Royal 2153 50-19 72% 15 MO
56 SMASH Boys 16-1 2153 49-19 72% 16 MA
57 OMNI 18-1 national 2149 60-29 67% 18 CA
58 Academy 16-O under armour 2149 52-21 71% 16 IN
59 MVC 15-Jim 2147 49-23 68% 15 WI
60 COAST 14-1 bela 2145 46-15 75% 14 CA
61 MB Surf 17-Asics 2144 32-10 76% 17 CA
62 Tribe 18-B elite cardinal 2141 39-22 64% 18 FL
63 630 Volleyball 16-1 2135 51-30 63% 16 IL
64 Warren Sixpack 18-1 2134 40-12 77% 18 NJ
65 LVC 16-Black 2132 51-11 82% 16 NY
66 MVVC B 17-Red 2132 59-18 77% 17 CA
67 HPSTL 18-Royal 2132 47-22 68% 18 MO
68 PAC 18 Amado 2129 32-10 76% 18 CA
69 Bay to Bay 15-1 2123 46-20 70% 15 CA
70 GVA Boys 15-Pink 2122 19-7 73% 15 PR
71 GVA Boys 17-Dark blue 2122 25-8 76% 17 PR
72 MOD B17-Blue 2120 54-17 76% 17 IL
73 Stars 18 Lion 2118 56-5 92% 18 SC
74 Balboa Bay 17-Blue 2118 31-10 76% 17 CA
75 Elevation 16-Peak boys 2117 28-25 53% 16 CO
76 Balboa Bay 15-Blue 2116 41-18 69% 15 CA
77 AZ Fear 16-Black 2114 42-26 62% 16 AZ
78 WAVE 16 Noly 2107 33-18 65% 16 CA
79 GVA Boys 16-Dark blue 2106 17-1 94% 16 PR
80 The St. James Boys 18 N 2101 33-24 58% 18 VA
81 MOD B18-Blue 2101 46-23 67% 18 IL
82 Adversity VBC 17 Adidas 2096 51-31 62% 17 IL
83 PREVA 14-Carlos 2094 17-5 77% 14 PR
84 Miami United 17-National sebi 2090 34-23 60% 17 FL
85 WPVC Boys 15-Armour black 2088 56-24 70% 15 FL
86 AZ Fear 18-Black 2088 45-19 70% 18 AZ
87 OCVC 14 Slunks 2088 32-22 59% 14 CA
88 Legends 15-1 erik 2086 19-11 63% 15 PR
89 MOD B16-Blue 2086 35-28 54% 16 IL
90 DallasOne 16-Black 2086 36-18 65% 16 TX
91 Yorktowne 18-Blue 2085 32-22 59% 18 PA
92 TORRI 16-Efrain 2085 24-9 73% 16 PR
93 SPVB B15 Elite 2081 47-25 65% 15 IL
94 MB Surf 15-1 asics 2080 36-22 62% 15 CA
95 OMNI 16-1 national 2076 57-24 70% 16 CA
96 HVA 17-Performance red 2076 51-21 71% 17 TX
97 Outrigger 18-1 2076 25-10 71% 18 HI
98 Academy 18-O under armour 2074 33-26 56% 18 IN
99 SPVB B16 Elite 2074 41-34 55% 16 IL
100 VAQUEROS 15-M carlos 2074 25-9 74% 15 PR
← Previous12345Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.