2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | Vanguard 18-Gold webb | 2162 | 35-17 | 67% | 18 | OH |
| 52 | Team Rockstar 15 Hawk | 2161 | 49-13 | 79% | 15 | CA |
| 53 | AZ Fear 17-Black | 2160 | 48-14 | 77% | 17 | AZ |
| 54 | MVC 17-Brad | 2153 | 57-24 | 70% | 17 | WI |
| 55 | HPSTL 15-Royal | 2153 | 50-19 | 72% | 15 | MO |
| 56 | SMASH Boys 16-1 | 2153 | 49-19 | 72% | 16 | MA |
| 57 | OMNI 18-1 national | 2149 | 60-29 | 67% | 18 | CA |
| 58 | Academy 16-O under armour | 2149 | 52-21 | 71% | 16 | IN |
| 59 | MVC 15-Jim | 2147 | 49-23 | 68% | 15 | WI |
| 60 | COAST 14-1 bela | 2145 | 46-15 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 61 | MB Surf 17-Asics | 2144 | 32-10 | 76% | 17 | CA |
| 62 | Tribe 18-B elite cardinal | 2141 | 39-22 | 64% | 18 | FL |
| 63 | 630 Volleyball 16-1 | 2135 | 51-30 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 64 | Warren Sixpack 18-1 | 2134 | 40-12 | 77% | 18 | NJ |
| 65 | MVVC B 17-Red | 2132 | 59-18 | 77% | 17 | CA |
| 66 | LVC 16-Black | 2132 | 51-11 | 82% | 16 | NY |
| 67 | HPSTL 18-Royal | 2132 | 47-22 | 68% | 18 | MO |
| 68 | PAC 18 Amado | 2129 | 32-10 | 76% | 18 | CA |
| 69 | Bay to Bay 15-1 | 2123 | 46-20 | 70% | 15 | CA |
| 70 | GVA Boys 15-Pink | 2122 | 19-7 | 73% | 15 | PR |
| 71 | GVA Boys 17-Dark blue | 2122 | 25-8 | 76% | 17 | PR |
| 72 | MOD B17-Blue | 2120 | 54-17 | 76% | 17 | IL |
| 73 | Balboa Bay 17-Blue | 2118 | 31-10 | 76% | 17 | CA |
| 74 | Stars 18 Lion | 2118 | 56-5 | 92% | 18 | SC |
| 75 | Elevation 16-Peak boys | 2117 | 28-25 | 53% | 16 | CO |
| 76 | Balboa Bay 15-Blue | 2116 | 41-18 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 77 | AZ Fear 16-Black | 2114 | 42-26 | 62% | 16 | AZ |
| 78 | WAVE 16 Noly | 2107 | 33-18 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 79 | GVA Boys 16-Dark blue | 2106 | 17-1 | 94% | 16 | PR |
| 80 | MOD B18-Blue | 2101 | 46-23 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 81 | The St. James Boys 18 N | 2101 | 33-24 | 58% | 18 | VA |
| 82 | Adversity VBC 17 Adidas | 2096 | 51-31 | 62% | 17 | IL |
| 83 | PREVA 14-Carlos | 2094 | 17-5 | 77% | 14 | PR |
| 84 | Miami United 17-National sebi | 2090 | 34-23 | 60% | 17 | FL |
| 85 | WPVC Boys 15-Armour black | 2088 | 56-24 | 70% | 15 | FL |
| 86 | AZ Fear 18-Black | 2088 | 45-19 | 70% | 18 | AZ |
| 87 | OCVC 14 Slunks | 2088 | 32-22 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 88 | DallasOne 16-Black | 2086 | 36-18 | 65% | 16 | TX |
| 89 | Legends 15-1 erik | 2086 | 19-11 | 63% | 15 | PR |
| 90 | MOD B16-Blue | 2086 | 35-28 | 54% | 16 | IL |
| 91 | Yorktowne 18-Blue | 2085 | 32-22 | 59% | 18 | PA |
| 92 | TORRI 16-Efrain | 2085 | 24-9 | 73% | 16 | PR |
| 93 | SPVB B15 Elite | 2081 | 47-25 | 65% | 15 | IL |
| 94 | MB Surf 15-1 asics | 2080 | 36-22 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 95 | OMNI 16-1 national | 2076 | 57-24 | 70% | 16 | CA |
| 96 | HVA 17-Performance red | 2076 | 51-21 | 71% | 17 | TX |
| 97 | Outrigger 18-1 | 2076 | 25-10 | 71% | 18 | HI |
| 98 | Team Rockstar 16-Thomas | 2074 | 24-3 | 89% | 16 | CA |
| 99 | VAQUEROS 15-M carlos | 2074 | 25-9 | 74% | 15 | PR |
| 100 | Academy 18-O under armour | 2074 | 33-26 | 56% | 18 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.