Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
51 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-1m 2174 27-7 79% 16 PR
52 AZ Fear 17-Black 2174 48-14 77% 17 AZ
53 MVC 17-Brad 2172 57-24 70% 17 WI
54 OMNI 18-1 national 2166 60-29 67% 18 CA
55 HPSTL 15-Royal 2163 50-19 72% 15 MO
56 MB Surf 17-Asics 2160 32-10 76% 17 CA
57 Warren Sixpack 18-1 2158 40-12 77% 18 NJ
58 Tribe 18-B elite cardinal 2157 39-22 64% 18 FL
59 Academy 16-O under armour 2156 52-21 71% 16 IN
60 MVC 15-Jim 2155 49-23 68% 15 WI
61 SMASH Boys 16-1 2152 49-19 72% 16 MA
62 COAST 14-1 bela 2151 46-15 75% 14 CA
63 MVVC B 17-Red 2150 59-18 77% 17 CA
64 HPSTL 18-Royal 2148 47-22 68% 18 MO
65 PAC 18 Amado 2147 32-10 76% 18 CA
66 630 Volleyball 16-1 2142 51-30 63% 16 IL
67 Balboa Bay 15-Blue 2142 41-18 69% 15 CA
68 GVA Boys 17-Dark blue 2137 25-8 76% 17 PR
69 Bay to Bay 15-1 2136 46-20 70% 15 CA
70 LVC 16-Black 2135 51-11 82% 16 NY
71 Stars 18 Lion 2129 56-5 92% 18 SC
72 MOD B17-Blue 2128 54-17 76% 17 IL
73 AZ Fear 16-Black 2127 42-26 62% 16 AZ
74 Balboa Bay 17-Blue 2126 31-10 76% 17 CA
75 Elevation 16-Peak boys 2125 28-25 53% 16 CO
76 GVA Boys 15-Pink 2120 19-7 73% 15 PR
77 WAVE 16 Noly 2119 33-18 65% 16 CA
78 The St. James Boys 18 N 2118 33-24 58% 18 VA
79 MOD B18-Blue 2114 46-23 67% 18 IL
80 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-1m 2113 14-7 67% 15 PR
81 GVA Boys 16-Dark blue 2107 17-1 94% 16 PR
82 Yorktowne 18-Blue 2106 32-22 59% 18 PA
83 WPVC Boys 15-Armour black 2104 56-24 70% 15 FL
84 GSL 17-Elect - colby 2102 30-23 57% 17 UT
85 Adversity VBC 17 Adidas 2102 51-31 62% 17 IL
86 AZ Fear 18-Black 2099 45-19 70% 18 AZ
87 Miami United 17-National sebi 2098 34-23 60% 17 FL
88 PREVA 14-Carlos 2097 17-5 77% 14 PR
89 TORRI 16-Efrain 2096 24-9 73% 16 PR
90 Outrigger 18-1 2096 25-10 71% 18 HI
91 SPVB B15 Elite 2094 47-25 65% 15 IL
92 MB Surf 15-1 asics 2093 36-22 62% 15 CA
93 OCVC 14 Slunks 2093 32-22 59% 14 CA
94 MOD B16-Blue 2092 35-28 54% 16 IL
95 DallasOne 16-Black 2091 36-18 65% 16 TX
96 Apex 18U Elite 2089 7-2 78% 18 BC
97 Academy 18-O under armour 2089 33-26 56% 18 IN
98 Team Rockstar 16-Thomas 2089 24-3 89% 16 CA
99 GSL 18-Elect - shane 2086 31-18 63% 18 UT
100 OMNI 16-1 national 2084 57-24 70% 16 CA
← Previous12345Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.