2025-2026 Season · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Balboa Bay 16-Blue | 2364 | 49-7 | 88% | 16 | CA |
| 2 | C2 Attack 17-1 | 2357 | 76-8 | 90% | 17 | TN |
| 3 | Triangle Boys 18-Black | 2328 | 72-9 | 89% | 18 | NC |
| 4 | MB Surf 18-Asics | 2313 | 38-6 | 86% | 18 | CA |
| 5 | 949 B18-Black | 2305 | 36-8 | 82% | 18 | CA |
| 6 | Balboa Bay 14-Blue | 2299 | 53-6 | 90% | 14 | CA |
| 7 | Balboa Bay 18-Blue | 2296 | 36-6 | 86% | 18 | CA |
| 8 | Indoor 15 | 2294 | 59-8 | 88% | 15 | CA |
| 9 | Cinci Attack 16-Black | 2287 | 55-12 | 82% | 16 | OH |
| 10 | MB Surf 16-Asics | 2271 | 42-11 | 79% | 16 | CA |
| 11 | Bay to Bay 17-1 | 2270 | 51-15 | 77% | 17 | CA |
| 12 | Team Rockstar 16 Angel | 2265 | 46-6 | 88% | 16 | CA |
| 13 | Team Rockstar 18 Matt | 2264 | 37-8 | 82% | 18 | CA |
| 14 | MB Surf 14-1 asics | 2263 | 48-10 | 83% | 14 | CA |
| 15 | HPSTL 17-Royal | 2257 | 65-12 | 84% | 17 | MO |
| 16 | Pipeline 16-1 | 2255 | 60-18 | 77% | 16 | IL |
| 17 | Warren Sixpack 16-1 | 2246 | 39-11 | 78% | 16 | NJ |
| 18 | COAST 16-1 dave/nick | 2246 | 47-9 | 84% | 16 | CA |
| 19 | MVVC B 16-Red | 2243 | 60-18 | 77% | 16 | CA |
| 20 | BORINQUEN COQUI 14-1m | 2242 | 28-4 | 88% | 14 | PR |
| 21 | WPVC Boys 18-Armour black | 2241 | 58-11 | 84% | 18 | FL |
| 22 | SouthCoastVolleyball 18 | 2234 | 44-6 | 88% | 18 | CA |
| 23 | Bay to Bay 16-1 | 2231 | 40-16 | 71% | 16 | CA |
| 24 | 630 Volleyball 18-1 | 2228 | 56-19 | 75% | 18 | IL |
| 25 | Team Rockstar 17 Jason | 2225 | 39-6 | 87% | 17 | CA |
| 26 | SPVB B18 Elite | 2222 | 54-16 | 77% | 18 | IL |
| 27 | Aspire 17-Iron man | 2219 | 55-10 | 85% | 17 | AZ |
| 28 | MVC 18-North shore | 2217 | 68-16 | 81% | 18 | WI |
| 29 | MOD B14-Blue | 2215 | 75-9 | 89% | 14 | IL |
| 30 | COAST 18-1 pat | 2215 | 36-8 | 82% | 18 | CA |
| 31 | COAST 15-1 chris/ian | 2213 | 52-13 | 80% | 15 | CA |
| 32 | COAST 17-1 victor/berkeley | 2210 | 39-6 | 87% | 17 | CA |
| 33 | Adversity VBC 16 Adidas | 2209 | 62-25 | 71% | 16 | IL |
| 34 | Bay to Bay 14-1 | 2208 | 44-16 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 35 | MVVC B 18-Red | 2204 | 67-10 | 87% | 18 | CA |
| 36 | MKE Sting 16-1 | 2203 | 68-24 | 74% | 16 | WI |
| 37 | C2 Attack 18-1 elite | 2202 | 60-14 | 81% | 18 | TN |
| 38 | Adversity South 18 Adidas | 2200 | 55-27 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 39 | Team Rockstar 14 Anjinho | 2196 | 41-20 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 40 | HPSTL 16-Royal | 2194 | 47-23 | 67% | 16 | MO |
| 41 | SASVBC B 15-Maya | 2193 | 31-8 | 79% | 15 | HI |
| 42 | PAC 17 McKay | 2188 | 34-9 | 79% | 17 | CA |
| 43 | MKE Sting 18-1 | 2183 | 52-34 | 60% | 18 | WI |
| 44 | SBVC Boys 17-1 | 2182 | 12-0 | 100% | 17 | CA |
| 45 | TORRI 14-1 | 2179 | 14-4 | 78% | 14 | PR |
| 46 | Aspire 16 Spiderman | 2176 | 39-18 | 68% | 16 | AZ |
| 47 | Pulse 15 Isaac | 2175 | 44-12 | 79% | 15 | CA |
| 48 | Miami United 16-National matt | 2173 | 28-13 | 68% | 16 | FL |
| 49 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-1m | 2171 | 27-7 | 79% | 16 | PR |
| 50 | SASVBC B 18-Jordan | 2165 | 27-4 | 87% | 18 | HI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.