Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 5 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
201 SG ELITE BOYS 15-Elite 1977 5-5 50% 15 CA
202 Outrigger U15 1976 31-9 78% 15 HI
203 MVVC B 17-Black 1974 58-25 70% 17 CA
204 Orlando Gold 18-Black 1973 31-22 58% 18 FL
205 MKE Sting 16-2 1973 56-20 74% 16 WI
206 MVC 18-Black 1971 48-20 71% 18 AZ
207 630 Volleyball 14-1 1970 53-28 64% 14 IL
208 Orlando Gold 17-Black 1970 26-23 53% 17 FL
209 Aspire 14 Groot 1970 39-12 76% 14 AZ
210 630 Volleyball 15-1 1967 38-33 54% 15 IL
211 A'o a Koa Volleyball 15-B 1967 28-14 67% 15 HI
212 949 B16-Black 1965 26-27 49% 16 CA
213 Core 17 National 1965 52-29 64% 17 CA
214 CCVA 17 Benji 1962 38-4 90% 17 CA
215 A4 Volley Boys 18-Tyler 1961 15-25 38% 18 CA
216 GSL 16-Elect - jeremiah 1960 25-23 52% 16 UT
217 Vegas Aces 16-1 1958 25-12 68% 16 NV
218 CSVC 17-Big slide 1956 48-10 83% 17 NY
219 Cinci Attack 15 Jake 1955 35-25 58% 15 OH
220 Legends 17-1victor 1954 15-4 79% 17 PR
221 Miami United 18-National michael 1953 29-29 50% 18 FL
222 MN Select Boys 18-1 1953 43-21 67% 18 MN
223 SBVC Boys 17 Molten 1953 11-4 73% 17 CA
224 Tropics Boys 17-S elite marc 1953 28-13 68% 17 FL
225 PSVC 18 Josh 1951 30-25 55% 18 SC
226 ACAD Boys 18-Red 1951 29-19 60% 18 NY
227 TORRI 17-1 efrain 1951 21-12 64% 17 PR
228 Club 1 B 17-Skronkstrong 1949 30-36 45% 17 IL
229 MAVS 15-Red 1949 39-8 83% 15 KS
230 C2 Attack 16-1 elite 1949 47-29 62% 16 TN
231 314 VBC 18-Boys 1948 33-12 73% 18 MO
232 Vegas United B 16-Black 1947 15-13 54% 16 NV
233 Team Colorado 16-Black 1947 20-16 56% 16 CO
234 Bay to Bay 17-Premier 1944 34-29 54% 17 CA
235 ACAD Boys 17-Red 1942 23-19 55% 17 NY
236 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-2m 1942 20-11 65% 16 PR
237 MKE Sting 17-1 1942 41-48 46% 17 WI
238 Pulse 16 Lila 1941 20-31 39% 16 CA
239 SASVBC 13-Keali'i 1941 23-6 79% 13 HI
240 PILIPA'A 16U 1940 26-4 87% 16 HI
241 Vegas Aces 18-1 1940 27-12 69% 18 NV
242 BAVC 16-1 boys 1940 55-15 79% 16 CA
243 SASVBC B 18-Andy 1939 42-14 75% 18 HI
244 Team Rockstar 16 Jake 1939 30-1 97% 16 CA
245 HPSTL B18-Orange 1938 41-26 61% 18 MO
246 Club 1 B 18-Skronkstrong 1938 34-37 48% 18 IL
247 NorCal Boys 16-1 1937 52-19 73% 16 CA
248 SASVBC B 17-Jayce 1936 24-14 63% 17 HI
249 Academy Boys West 14-1 1936 42-28 60% 14 CA
250 Orlando Gold 16-Black 1934 22-13 63% 16 FL
← Previous12345678Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.