Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 6 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
251 Bay to Bay 16-Premier 1771 23-22 51% 16 CA
252 Academy Boys West 14-1 1770 35-22 61% 14 CA
253 A5 Boys 16 Gary 1770 26-10 72% 16 GA
254 CUVC 18-1 boys 1770 30-20 60% 18 NC
255 Cinci Attack 17-Black 1770 32-21 60% 17 OH
256 SCB 17-Salty kris 1769 28-11 72% 17 LA
257 SVC 16-1 boys 1769 24-5 83% 16 NY
258 Team Rockstar 12 Alec 1769 24-7 77% 12 CA
259 MVP 16-Black 1768 16-18 47% 16 MD
260 Pacific Rim 18-1 1768 23-8 74% 18 CA
261 Team Rockstar 15 Sabryn 1768 23-12 66% 15 CA
262 GOLDENBULLS 18-B black 1766 22-11 67% 18 NY
263 Kaizen Boys 17-Black 1765 26-13 67% 17 OK
264 PVC Sandlot 15-Blue 1765 22-4 85% 15 PA
265 GSEVC 18-Boys premier 1765 22-7 76% 18 NJ
266 630 Volleyball 14-1 1765 27-16 60% 14 IL
267 EXCEL 14-N red 1764 24-9 73% 14 TX
268 Annapolis 14U 1764 41-15 73% 14 MD
269 MVC 18-Erik 1764 36-19 65% 18 WI
270 Warren Sixpack 14-1 1763 29-8 78% 14 NJ
271 NorCal Boys 15-1 1763 30-15 67% 15 CA
272 Apex 18-Select boys 1762 21-18 54% 18 MO
273 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-1m 1762 13-4 76% 16 PR
274 Elevation 16-Peak boys 1761 13-13 50% 16 CO
275 Ocean Bay 16-Quiksilver 1760 21-18 54% 16 FL
276 Kaizen Boys 16-Black 1760 17-16 52% 16 OK
277 MKE Sting 14-1 1760 36-10 78% 14 WI
278 NorCal Boys 16-1 1760 31-13 70% 16 CA
279 Sky High Adidas B14-1 1760 38-16 68% 14 IL
280 Tribe 16-B premier cardinal 1759 24-12 67% 16 FL
281 EXCEL 18-N red 1759 20-12 61% 18 TX
282 Aspire 14 Groot 1758 29-9 76% 14 AZ
283 LHV Boys 18-1 rafiki 1758 23-17 57% 18 MA
284 HVA 16-Performance red 1757 22-15 59% 16 TX
285 Core 17 National 1756 36-23 61% 17 NJ
286 MVVC B 14-Black 1756 40-20 67% 14 CA
287 MB Surf 12-Asics 1755 24-5 83% 12 CA
288 MVC 17-Sydney 1755 35-19 64% 17 WI
289 NYC Impact 17U National 1755 21-6 78% 17 NY
290 KeAloha 18-1 rogue 1754 23-23 50% 18 IN
291 Volley Next 18-1 1754 25-10 71% 18 MI
292 VC United 18-1 elite 1754 30-13 70% 18 IL
293 RCVA 15-National 1754 26-11 70% 15 VA
294 Carolina ICE 18-1 1753 31-13 70% 18 SC
295 Molten 16-Black 1753 19-13 59% 16 AZ
296 Digs Boys 18-Red 1753 21-8 72% 18 NJ
297 NEVBC Boys 14.1 1753 33-4 89% 14 CT
298 VVA 18-Orro 1752 29-15 66% 18 MO
299 Juggernaut 18-National 1 1752 16-6 73% 18 CO
300 MKE Sting 16-3 1752 30-14 68% 16 WI
← Previous123456789Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.