Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 6 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
251 Academy 15-O under armour 1940 31-34 48% 15 IN
252 NorCal Boys 16-1 1940 52-19 73% 16 CA
253 HPSTL B18-Orange 1939 41-26 61% 18 MO
254 A4 Volley Boys 15-Tyler 1939 32-24 57% 15 CA
255 SCB 15-Salty rob 1939 39-31 56% 15 UT
256 OCVC 18 Slunks 1939 25-18 58% 18 CA
257 SG Elite 15 Elite 1938 20-27 43% 15 CA
258 VVA 15-Dilley 1936 27-15 64% 15 CA
259 Team Rockstar 16 Jake 1936 30-1 97% 16 CA
260 MN Select Boys 16-1 1936 37-27 58% 16 MN
261 SAVBC 16-1 1936 23-22 51% 16 CA
262 BAVC 16-1 boys 1935 55-15 79% 16 CA
263 Outrigger 16 1935 22-11 67% 16 HI
264 Roch PaceBootleggr 16-Blk 1934 36-32 53% 16 NY
265 The St. James Boys 16 N 1934 25-26 49% 16 VA
266 Warren Sixpack 15-1 1933 31-17 65% 15 NJ
267 GSL 18-Elect - ben 1932 36-14 72% 18 UT
268 Legends 18-1 de sevilla 1932 14-6 70% 18 PR
269 AJV Boys 17 adidas 1931 45-29 61% 17 TX
270 TeamLVC Boys 16U Black 1931 48-16 75% 16 NY
271 Bay to Bay 15-Premier 1930 38-27 58% 15 CA
272 PILIPA'A 16U 1930 26-4 87% 16 HI
273 HPSTL B17-Orange 1928 43-27 61% 17 MO
274 UNION B17-Black 1928 32-28 53% 17 IN
275 PVC Sandlot 18-Blue 1927 17-8 68% 18 PA
276 SC Legends 18-Elite 1927 17-22 44% 18 CA
277 MB Surf 12-Asics 1927 37-8 82% 12 CA
278 CCVA Boys 17-Jay 1927 4-1 80% 17 CA
279 DallasOne 17-Black 1926 24-31 43% 17 TX
280 Phoenix 17 Meehan 1926 37-26 59% 17 OH
281 SC Legends 16-Elite 1924 19-26 42% 16 CA
282 A2 18-Red 1924 29-32 48% 18 OH
283 Team Rockstar 18 Rees 1923 13-17 43% 18 CA
284 SC Legends 15-Elite 1923 27-28 49% 15 CA
285 Northern Lights 18-1 boys 1923 32-16 67% 18 MN
286 Northern Lights 17-1 boys 1920 30-16 65% 17 MN
287 MVP 15-Black 1920 29-26 53% 15 MD
288 MVP 16-Black 1920 24-27 47% 16 MD
289 Hawaiian Style Boys 16-Black 1919 24-10 71% 16 HI
290 SG ELITE 15-Elite boys 1919 7-2 78% 15 CA
291 Academy Boys West 14-1 1915 54-51 51% 14 CA
292 Rancho 18-Black 1915 20-13 61% 18 CA
293 LVC 17BLACK 1915 31-15 67% 17 NY
294 118 17-Aaron 1914 21-18 54% 17 CA
295 JJVA Boys 14-Teal 1914 60-17 78% 14 FL
296 MVC 18-Erik 1914 54-27 67% 18 WI
297 RCVA Boys 16-National 1913 44-30 59% 16 VA
298 MOD B15 Gold 1913 38-29 57% 15 IL
299 MVC 16-Black 1912 38-26 59% 16 AZ
300 Sanger 17 1911 13-4 76% 17 CA
← Previous123456789Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.