Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 6 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
251 Left Coast 13 1934 49-27 64% 13 CA
252 Orlando Gold 16-Black 1934 22-13 63% 16 FL
253 Inferno 16-1 national 1932 38-26 59% 16 WI
254 Roch PaceBootleggr 16-Blk 1932 36-32 53% 16 NY
255 Outrigger 16 1931 22-11 67% 16 HI
256 EXCEL 15-N red 1929 37-24 60% 15 TX
257 MN Select Boys 16-1 1929 37-27 58% 16 MN
258 MB Surf 12-Asics 1928 37-8 82% 12 CA
259 Academy 15-O under armour 1928 31-34 48% 15 IN
260 Outrigger 17 1928 26-15 63% 17 HI
261 TeamLVC Boys 16U Black 1927 48-16 75% 16 NY
262 The St. James Boys 16 N 1927 25-26 49% 16 VA
263 A4 Volley Boys 15-Tyler 1925 32-24 57% 15 CA
264 Warren Sixpack 14-1 1925 39-17 70% 14 NJ
265 VVA 15-Dilley 1925 27-15 64% 15 MO
266 UNION B17-Black 1925 32-28 53% 17 IN
267 Legends 18-1 de sevilla 1923 14-6 70% 18 PR
268 Rancho 18-Black 1922 20-13 61% 18 CA
269 OCVC 18 Slunks 1922 25-18 58% 18 CA
270 Apex 18-1 1920 7-5 58% 18 MO
271 NEVBC Boys 18.1 1919 29-18 62% 18 CT
272 DallasOne 17-Black 1918 24-31 43% 17 TX
273 GSEVC 18-Boys premier 1918 25-12 68% 18 NJ
274 HPSTL B17-Orange 1918 43-27 61% 17 MO
275 Northern Lights 18-1 boys 1917 32-16 67% 18 MN
276 Northern Lights 17-1 boys 1917 30-16 65% 17 MN
277 MVP 16-Black 1917 24-27 47% 16 MD
278 SC Legends 16-Elite 1917 19-26 42% 16 CA
279 PVC Sandlot 18-Blue 1916 17-8 68% 18 PA
280 RCVA 16-National black 1913 40-27 59% 16 VA
281 Warren Sixpack 15-1 1912 31-17 65% 15 NJ
282 Bay to Bay 15-Premier 1912 38-27 58% 15 CA
283 MN Select Boys 14-1 1911 35-18 66% 14 MN
284 Boys BSVBC 14-Black 1911 39-22 64% 14 IL
285 Team Rockstar 18 Rees 1911 13-17 43% 18 CA
286 MVC 18-Erik 1910 54-27 67% 18 WI
287 Phoenix 17 Meehan 1909 37-26 59% 17 OH
288 PRVA 18-1 1909 11-3 79% 18 CA
289 UVA 15 Allen 1909 47-19 71% 15 CA
290 Pursuit Boys 17 National 1908 46-10 82% 17 MO
291 A2 18-Red 1907 29-32 48% 18 OH
292 SC Legends 18-Elite 1907 17-22 44% 18 CA
293 Team Rockstar 12 Alec 1907 45-14 76% 12 CA
294 Sanger 17 1907 13-4 76% 17 CA
295 LVC 17BLACK 1906 31-15 67% 17 NY
296 Future 17-Elite 1905 35-30 54% 17 IL
297 RCVA 15-National 1905 39-18 68% 15 VA
298 South County Juniors Boys 18-Blue 1905 28-8 78% 18 RI
299 PSA Power 17 1904 14-2 88% 17 TX
300 Aspire 15-Black panther 1904 31-33 48% 15 AZ
← Previous123456789Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.