2025-2026 Season — Page 6 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 251 | Left Coast 13 | 1934 | 49-27 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 252 | Orlando Gold 16-Black | 1934 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 253 | Inferno 16-1 national | 1932 | 38-26 | 59% | 16 | WI |
| 254 | Roch PaceBootleggr 16-Blk | 1932 | 36-32 | 53% | 16 | NY |
| 255 | Outrigger 16 | 1931 | 22-11 | 67% | 16 | HI |
| 256 | EXCEL 15-N red | 1929 | 37-24 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 257 | MN Select Boys 16-1 | 1929 | 37-27 | 58% | 16 | MN |
| 258 | MB Surf 12-Asics | 1928 | 37-8 | 82% | 12 | CA |
| 259 | Academy 15-O under armour | 1928 | 31-34 | 48% | 15 | IN |
| 260 | Outrigger 17 | 1928 | 26-15 | 63% | 17 | HI |
| 261 | TeamLVC Boys 16U Black | 1927 | 48-16 | 75% | 16 | NY |
| 262 | The St. James Boys 16 N | 1927 | 25-26 | 49% | 16 | VA |
| 263 | A4 Volley Boys 15-Tyler | 1925 | 32-24 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 264 | Warren Sixpack 14-1 | 1925 | 39-17 | 70% | 14 | NJ |
| 265 | VVA 15-Dilley | 1925 | 27-15 | 64% | 15 | MO |
| 266 | UNION B17-Black | 1925 | 32-28 | 53% | 17 | IN |
| 267 | Legends 18-1 de sevilla | 1923 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | PR |
| 268 | Rancho 18-Black | 1922 | 20-13 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 269 | OCVC 18 Slunks | 1922 | 25-18 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 270 | Apex 18-1 | 1920 | 7-5 | 58% | 18 | MO |
| 271 | NEVBC Boys 18.1 | 1919 | 29-18 | 62% | 18 | CT |
| 272 | DallasOne 17-Black | 1918 | 24-31 | 43% | 17 | TX |
| 273 | GSEVC 18-Boys premier | 1918 | 25-12 | 68% | 18 | NJ |
| 274 | HPSTL B17-Orange | 1918 | 43-27 | 61% | 17 | MO |
| 275 | Northern Lights 18-1 boys | 1917 | 32-16 | 67% | 18 | MN |
| 276 | Northern Lights 17-1 boys | 1917 | 30-16 | 65% | 17 | MN |
| 277 | MVP 16-Black | 1917 | 24-27 | 47% | 16 | MD |
| 278 | SC Legends 16-Elite | 1917 | 19-26 | 42% | 16 | CA |
| 279 | PVC Sandlot 18-Blue | 1916 | 17-8 | 68% | 18 | PA |
| 280 | RCVA 16-National black | 1913 | 40-27 | 59% | 16 | VA |
| 281 | Warren Sixpack 15-1 | 1912 | 31-17 | 65% | 15 | NJ |
| 282 | Bay to Bay 15-Premier | 1912 | 38-27 | 58% | 15 | CA |
| 283 | MN Select Boys 14-1 | 1911 | 35-18 | 66% | 14 | MN |
| 284 | Boys BSVBC 14-Black | 1911 | 39-22 | 64% | 14 | IL |
| 285 | Team Rockstar 18 Rees | 1911 | 13-17 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 286 | MVC 18-Erik | 1910 | 54-27 | 67% | 18 | WI |
| 287 | Phoenix 17 Meehan | 1909 | 37-26 | 59% | 17 | OH |
| 288 | PRVA 18-1 | 1909 | 11-3 | 79% | 18 | CA |
| 289 | UVA 15 Allen | 1909 | 47-19 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 290 | Pursuit Boys 17 National | 1908 | 46-10 | 82% | 17 | MO |
| 291 | A2 18-Red | 1907 | 29-32 | 48% | 18 | OH |
| 292 | SC Legends 18-Elite | 1907 | 17-22 | 44% | 18 | CA |
| 293 | Team Rockstar 12 Alec | 1907 | 45-14 | 76% | 12 | CA |
| 294 | Sanger 17 | 1907 | 13-4 | 76% | 17 | CA |
| 295 | LVC 17BLACK | 1906 | 31-15 | 67% | 17 | NY |
| 296 | Future 17-Elite | 1905 | 35-30 | 54% | 17 | IL |
| 297 | RCVA 15-National | 1905 | 39-18 | 68% | 15 | VA |
| 298 | South County Juniors Boys 18-Blue | 1905 | 28-8 | 78% | 18 | RI |
| 299 | PSA Power 17 | 1904 | 14-2 | 88% | 17 | TX |
| 300 | Aspire 15-Black panther | 1904 | 31-33 | 48% | 15 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.