Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 9 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2010 Elo rating and 40-4 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
401 WAVE 14 Cole 1636 26-25 51% 14 CA
402 HPSTL B14-Orange 1636 32-15 68% 14 MO
403 OCC 18-1 1636 17-6 74% 18 HI
404 MVC 17-Black 1636 30-16 65% 17 AZ
405 MVC 17-Sydney 1636 39-21 64% 17 WI
406 Miami United 16-National thews 1635 28-11 72% 16 FL
407 Elevation 17-Peak boys 1635 18-7 72% 17 CO
408 DNA 18-Blue 1635 33-17 66% 18 FL
409 Triangle Boys 16-Blue 1635 27-10 73% 16 NC
410 Legends 18-1 de sevilla 1634 14-6 70% 18 CA
411 630 Volleyball 18-3 1634 39-14 74% 18 IL
412 MVC 18-Erik 1634 40-21 66% 18 WI
413 Team Rockstar 16 Devon 1634 23-11 68% 16 CA
414 Gentlemen of Kiwi 17 1633 40-17 70% 17 FL
415 PAC 17 JMay 1633 18-9 67% 17 CA
416 Hurricanes 16-1 1633 6-0 100% 16 NC
417 RCVA 16-National black 1633 22-19 54% 16 VA
418 MN Select Boys 14-3 1633 30-11 73% 14 MN
419 Beach Cities 13-Black 1632 28-20 58% 13 CA
420 Pulse 16 Mike 1632 26-10 72% 16 CA
421 NE Storm 18 Thunder 1632 33-14 70% 18 MA
422 OVC 14 Neptune 1632 21-9 70% 14 NJ
423 OCVC 14 Slunks 1632 25-18 58% 14 CA
424 Uno Boys 16 Elite 1631 32-20 62% 16 IL
425 High Flyers 14-Red 1631 15-6 71% 14 NE
426 Core 17 National 1631 36-23 61% 17 NJ
427 FRVBC 16-1 boys 1631 16-8 67% 16 CO
428 KeAloha 18-1 rogue 1631 23-23 50% 18 IN
429 Digs Boys 18-Red 1631 21-8 72% 18 NJ
430 Kaizen Boys 16-Black 1630 20-18 53% 16 OK
431 Aztlan VC 18 Dante 1630 24-7 77% 18 CA
432 GSL 16-Elite - maddy 1630 12-3 80% 16 UT
433 WSA Gators 18-Elite boys 1629 23-19 55% 18 MA
434 SMASH Boys 17-Shock 1629 26-14 65% 17 MA
435 A'o a Koa 15-B 1628 10-3 77% 15 HI
436 Maverick 16 Goose 1628 23-15 61% 16 OH
437 AJAXVB 16-1 gold 1628 20-10 67% 16 OR
438 A4 Volley Boys 17-Jon 1628 25-10 71% 17 CA
439 MDJRS 15-Boys black 1628 35-27 56% 15 MD
440 Ohana 18-National boys 1628 11-2 85% 18 IA
441 FAV 18 Maverick 1628 18-12 60% 18 CA
442 AVA 17-Boys 1628 25-17 60% 17 TX
443 Adversity VBC 17 Adidas 1628 33-24 58% 17 IL
444 Aspire 18 Thor 1628 27-19 59% 18 AZ
445 Warren Sixpack 16-3 1627 22-9 71% 16 NJ
446 The St. James Boys 17 N 1627 20-15 56% 17 VA
447 CSVC 18 HAYSTACK 1627 34-13 72% 18 NY
448 LVC 15-Black 1627 25-13 64% 15 NY
449 MDJRS 16-Boys black 1627 38-27 58% 16 MD
450 SG Elite 15 Select 1627 16-12 57% 15 CA
← Previous123456789101112Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.