2025-2026 Season — Page 9 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401 | Core BOYS 12-Platinum | 1849 | 4-6 | 40% | 12 | NJ |
| 402 | VAQUEROS 14-M carlos | 1848 | 6-10 | 38% | 14 | PR |
| 403 | JJVA Boys 18-Teal | 1848 | 28-12 | 70% | 18 | FL |
| 404 | BIGIB 18-1 | 1848 | 20-5 | 80% | 18 | HI |
| 405 | MAVS 18-Red | 1847 | 32-16 | 67% | 18 | KS |
| 406 | Hurricanes 16-1 | 1846 | 6-0 | 100% | 16 | ON |
| 407 | 118 17-Aaron | 1846 | 18-12 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 408 | MDJRS 16-Boys black | 1846 | 40-32 | 55% | 16 | MD |
| 409 | Ultimate B15 Gold | 1846 | 30-38 | 44% | 15 | IL |
| 410 | 630 Volleyball 17-1 | 1845 | 27-39 | 41% | 17 | IL |
| 411 | Lakas 18-S b2f | 1845 | 36-27 | 57% | 18 | CA |
| 412 | L2 18-1 boys | 1845 | 31-22 | 58% | 18 | MI |
| 413 | Forza Boys 18-Blk | 1845 | 54-21 | 71% | 18 | IL |
| 414 | Victory 16-Black | 1845 | 11-9 | 55% | 16 | AZ |
| 415 | TUVA Boys 17 Elite | 1844 | 31-28 | 53% | 17 | NC |
| 416 | CA Volley 18-1 | 1844 | 16-24 | 40% | 18 | CA |
| 417 | SC Legends 13-Elite | 1844 | 26-34 | 43% | 13 | CA |
| 418 | PSA Power 18 | 1844 | 33-7 | 83% | 18 | TX |
| 419 | RVC 16-Boys travel | 1844 | 39-18 | 68% | 16 | VA |
| 420 | RAGE 18 TOA | 1843 | 41-12 | 77% | 18 | CA |
| 421 | Mamba 16-Black | 1843 | 46-34 | 57% | 16 | WI |
| 422 | GSL 14-Elect jackie | 1843 | 21-3 | 88% | 14 | UT |
| 423 | Sky High Adidas B17-1 | 1843 | 55-29 | 65% | 17 | IL |
| 424 | Mentor 17 | 1843 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 425 | PREVAIL Boys 16-Platinum | 1843 | 10-18 | 36% | 16 | PA |
| 426 | Adversity VBC 18 Adidas | 1842 | 39-39 | 50% | 18 | IL |
| 427 | CCVA 16 Elite | 1841 | 25-9 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 428 | 808 Athletic Boys 18-Elton | 1841 | 24-8 | 75% | 18 | HI |
| 429 | Warren Sixpack 16-2 | 1839 | 33-15 | 69% | 16 | NJ |
| 430 | Windy City Premier 17 | 1838 | 44-30 | 59% | 17 | IL |
| 431 | Tribe 14-B elite cardinal | 1838 | 48-21 | 70% | 14 | FL |
| 432 | SVC 17-1 boys | 1838 | 48-15 | 76% | 17 | NY |
| 433 | The St. James Boys 17 N | 1837 | 21-24 | 46% | 17 | VA |
| 434 | Mill City 16 | 1837 | 24-8 | 75% | 16 | MA |
| 435 | TeamLVC Boys 18U Black | 1837 | 31-30 | 51% | 18 | NY |
| 436 | Sky High Adidas B14-1 | 1837 | 56-29 | 64% | 14 | IL |
| 437 | MVC 17-Sydney | 1836 | 45-31 | 58% | 17 | WI |
| 438 | Westside VBC 16-Green | 1835 | 45-12 | 79% | 16 | CA |
| 439 | SPVB B14 Elite | 1835 | 34-26 | 56% | 14 | IL |
| 440 | Momentum 17-Orange | 1834 | 35-26 | 57% | 17 | OH |
| 441 | Balboa Bay 14-White | 1834 | 39-23 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 442 | MVVC B 14-Black | 1834 | 50-26 | 66% | 14 | CA |
| 443 | Blue Royals 17 National | 1834 | 20-16 | 56% | 17 | WA |
| 444 | Miami United 15-National camilo | 1833 | 36-28 | 56% | 15 | FL |
| 445 | Bay to Bay 12-1 | 1833 | 42-27 | 61% | 12 | CA |
| 446 | MKE Sting 18-2 | 1832 | 44-27 | 62% | 18 | WI |
| 447 | MB Surf 16-Ascis chris | 1832 | 24-20 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 448 | AZ Fear 17-Blue | 1832 | 33-27 | 55% | 17 | AZ |
| 449 | NorCal Boys 17-1 | 1830 | 29-26 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 450 | Vanguard 17-Gold attia | 1829 | 18-17 | 51% | 17 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.