Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 9 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
401 OPVC 14-Purple 1718 29-14 67% 14 OH
402 WPVC Boys 17-Armour orange 1718 21-28 43% 17 FL
403 OCC 18-1 1717 17-6 74% 18 HI
404 Mamba 17-Black 1717 25-21 54% 17 WI
405 SASVBC B 17-Jayce 1717 21-7 75% 17 HI
406 Beach Cities 13-Black 1717 25-14 64% 13 CA
407 Ocean Bay 18-Quiksilver 1716 18-19 49% 18 FL
408 Az Fear 18-Blue 1716 29-18 62% 18 AZ
409 Bravo 18-X 1716 27-12 69% 18 KY
410 Vegas Aces 15-1 1716 28-12 70% 15 NV
411 UVA 15 Allen 1716 31-15 67% 15 CA
412 Pipeline 18-1 1716 23-27 46% 18 IL
413 GOLDENBULLS 17-B black 1715 20-9 69% 17 NY
414 SCB 15-Salty rob 1715 21-17 55% 15 LA
415 Digs Boys 16-Red 1715 21-6 78% 16 NJ
416 Balboa Bay 12-Blue 1715 21-5 81% 12 CA
417 Cyclones Boys 18-B 1714 28-27 48% 18 IL
418 PEVA Boys 16 Elite 1714 28-7 80% 16 PA
419 MVVC B 16-Black 1714 35-19 65% 16 CA
420 PAC 17 McKay 1714 15-4 79% 17 CA
421 VRTXVB 18-National - chad 1714 17-13 57% 18
422 I AM VBC Boys 12-1 1713 35-4 90% 12 WI
423 Lakas 16-S jmj 1713 34-20 63% 16 CA
424 L2 16-1 boys 1713 23-11 68% 16 MI
425 GSL 16-Elect - jeremiah 1713 15-15 50% 16 UT
426 SNVF 16-Mount adams 1713 12-4 75% 16 WA
427 Uno Boys 17 Elite 1713 27-24 53% 17 IL
428 JAX SKYLINE 18-B royal 1712 23-19 55% 18 FL
429 Warren Sixpack 18-2 1712 18-14 56% 18 NJ
430 Kaizen Boys 18-Black 1712 17-10 63% 18 OK
431 Orlando Gold 18-Gold 1712 25-11 69% 18 FL
432 Aspire 15-Black panther 1712 24-22 52% 15 AZ
433 HPSTL B14-Orange 1712 32-15 68% 14 MO
434 Bay to Bay 18-Premier 1712 28-18 61% 18 CA
435 PREVAIL Boys 16-Platinum 1712 13-11 54% 16 PA
436 Academy Boys West 15-1 1711 27-18 60% 15 CA
437 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-1m 1711 8-3 73% 15 PR
438 MVC 17-Black 1711 30-16 65% 17 AZ
439 Boston United Boys 17-National 1 1711 18-16 53% 17 MA
440 MVVC B 14 National 1711 39-17 70% 14 CA
441 Seaside 14-Black 1710 18-13 58% 14 CA
442 NorCal Boys 18-1 1709 24-20 55% 18 CA
443 SC Legends 15-Elite 1709 16-15 52% 15 CA
444 Velocity 16 National 1709 10-7 59% 16 PA
445 LIV 15-Royal 1708 23-12 66% 15 CA
446 SMASH Boys 14-1 1708 29-14 67% 14 MA
447 UNION B16-Black 1708 24-22 52% 16 IN
448 PAC 14 JP 1708 20-12 63% 14 CA
449 H Skyline Boys 16 Royal 1708 23-16 59% 16 TX
450 TORRI 16-Efrain 1707 8-4 67% 16 PR
← Previous123456789101112Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.