Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 9 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
401 A5 Boys 14 Umar 1855 40-8 83% 14 GA
402 PREVA 13-Carlos 1855 13-8 62% 13 PR
403 JJVA Boys 18-Teal 1855 28-12 70% 18 FL
404 L2 16-1 boys 1855 32-21 60% 16 MI
405 Academy 16-E blue 1855 38-32 54% 16 IN
406 Miami United 15-National camilo 1854 36-28 56% 15 FL
407 SCVC 18 Nap 1854 36-19 65% 18 UT
408 JAX SKYLINE 17-B royal 1854 29-19 60% 17 FL
409 VAQUEROS 14-M carlos 1854 6-10 38% 14 PR
410 630 Volleyball 17-1 1853 27-39 41% 17 IL
411 Mamba 16-Black 1853 46-34 57% 16 WI
412 Lakas 18-S b2f 1853 36-27 57% 18 CA
413 Forza Boys 18-Blk 1852 54-21 71% 18 IL
414 MAVS 18-Red 1852 32-16 67% 18 KS
415 TUVA Boys 17 Elite 1851 31-28 53% 17 NC
416 L2 18-1 boys 1851 31-22 58% 18 MI
417 OMNI 14-1 national 1850 55-30 65% 14 CA
418 BEVBC 16-1 - lucas 1850 14-5 74% 16 CA
419 BIGIB 18-1 1849 20-5 80% 18 HI
420 PREVAIL Boys 16-Platinum 1849 10-18 36% 16 PA
421 NorCal Boys 17-1 1849 29-26 53% 17 CA
422 Sky High Adidas B17-1 1849 55-29 65% 17 IL
423 Hurricanes 16-1 1848 6-0 100% 16 ON
424 RAGE 18 TOA 1848 41-12 77% 18 CA
425 Wasatch 18-1 1847 29-16 64% 18 UT
426 GSL 15-Elect - andy 1847 46-9 84% 15 UT
427 Adversity VBC 18 Adidas 1846 39-39 50% 18 IL
428 Mentor 17 1846 6-4 60% 17 CA
429 SVC 17-1 boys 1846 48-15 76% 17 NY
430 Momentum 17-Orange 1846 35-26 57% 17 OH
431 RVC 16-Boys travel 1844 39-18 68% 16 VA
432 Core BOYS 12-Platinum 1844 4-6 40% 12 NJ
433 Husky 17.1 1844 34-17 67% 17 CT
434 808 Athletic Boys 18-Elton 1844 24-8 75% 18 HI
435 MKE Sting 15-1 1843 39-35 53% 15 WI
436 Tribe 14-B elite cardinal 1843 48-21 70% 14 FL
437 MVVC B 14-Black 1843 50-26 66% 14 CA
438 Windy City Premier 17 1843 44-30 59% 17 IL
439 The St. James Boys 17 N 1842 21-24 46% 17 VA
440 Venom Volleyball Club 15 1841 3-4 43% 15 ON
441 Sky High Adidas B14-1 1841 56-29 64% 14 IL
442 MDJRS 16-Boys black 1841 40-32 55% 16 MD
443 FURY Volleyball 16-1 1841 15-10 60% 16 NY
444 TeamLVC Boys 18U Black 1839 31-30 51% 18 NY
445 MKE Sting 18-2 1839 44-27 62% 18 WI
446 Blue Royals 17 National 1838 20-16 56% 17 WA
447 AZ Fear 17-Blue 1838 33-27 55% 17 AZ
448 Elevation 15-Peak boys 1838 34-31 52% 15 CO
449 Victory 16-Black 1838 11-9 55% 16 AZ
450 SPVB B14 Elite 1838 34-26 56% 14 IL
← Previous123456789101112Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.