2025-2026 Season — Page 12 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 551 | GSL 17-St. george alaina | 1791 | 14-9 | 61% | 17 | UT |
| 552 | WAVE 13 Jed | 1790 | 29-31 | 48% | 13 | CA |
| 553 | APEX1 16-A1BLACK | 1790 | 41-14 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 554 | NYC VBA 16 Hudson | 1790 | 29-25 | 53% | 16 | NY |
| 555 | Team Colorado 17-Black | 1790 | 15-19 | 44% | 17 | CO |
| 556 | MVC 14-Dixon | 1789 | 35-30 | 54% | 14 | WI |
| 557 | MKE Sting 15-1 | 1789 | 50-58 | 46% | 15 | WI |
| 558 | Absolute 17-Blue | 1789 | 32-29 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 559 | MVVC B 15-Black | 1789 | 40-33 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 560 | SCB 14-Salty aaron | 1788 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | LA |
| 561 | Paramount VBC 12 Jasmine | 1788 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 562 | Bay to Bay 18-Premier | 1788 | 30-19 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 563 | Epic United 16-Red | 1787 | 44-26 | 63% | 16 | IN |
| 564 | Accuracy 16-Champ | 1787 | 21-9 | 70% | 16 | NJ |
| 565 | MTRX 18-1 | 1787 | 23-14 | 62% | 18 | AZ |
| 566 | 787EV 14-M kelvyn | 1787 | 8-0 | 100% | 14 | PR |
| 567 | MVVC B 14-National | 1786 | 54-19 | 74% | 14 | CA |
| 568 | VVA 17-Clarke | 1785 | 25-38 | 40% | 17 | MO |
| 569 | Pipeline 18-1 | 1785 | 31-37 | 46% | 18 | IL |
| 570 | Vegas Aces 17-1 | 1785 | 22-16 | 58% | 17 | NV |
| 571 | TVS 12 Dayron | 1784 | 4-0 | 100% | 12 | |
| 572 | Faucons 16-Boys 1 | 1784 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | |
| 573 | Venom Havoc 15u | 1783 | 5-6 | 45% | 15 | |
| 574 | E3 18-Excel - boys | 1783 | 7-9 | 44% | 18 | NM |
| 575 | Seaside VBC 18-Black | 1783 | 12-16 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 576 | OK Charge 17-Boys | 1782 | 31-17 | 63% | 17 | OK |
| 577 | Roch PaceBootleggr 15-Blk | 1782 | 37-19 | 66% | 15 | NY |
| 578 | TLP/ACT 17 Jared | 1782 | 19-10 | 66% | 17 | CA |
| 579 | Ocean Bay 16-Quiksilver | 1782 | 32-27 | 54% | 16 | FL |
| 580 | SG Elite 15 Elite | 1781 | 15-22 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 581 | Husky 16.1 | 1781 | 30-13 | 67% | 16 | CT |
| 582 | The Lab 18-1 | 1780 | 15-11 | 58% | 18 | CO |
| 583 | MOD B18 Gold | 1780 | 39-31 | 56% | 18 | IL |
| 584 | MTRX 15-1 | 1780 | 24-12 | 67% | 15 | AZ |
| 585 | Wasatch 18-1 | 1779 | 11-10 | 52% | 18 | UT |
| 586 | WC Aces - 18-Spades | 1779 | 36-32 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 587 | Red Rock Boys 16-1 | 1779 | 39-15 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 588 | Velocity 17-1 national | 1778 | 20-16 | 56% | 17 | PA |
| 589 | Az Fear 18-Blue | 1778 | 23-16 | 59% | 18 | AZ |
| 590 | Central Cal 16 TJ | 1778 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 591 | UVA 14 Allen | 1778 | 30-6 | 83% | 14 | CA |
| 592 | FRVBC 18-1 | 1777 | 14-14 | 50% | 18 | CO |
| 593 | Kaizen Boys 17-Black | 1777 | 42-21 | 67% | 17 | OK |
| 594 | VVA 18-Orro | 1777 | 36-21 | 63% | 18 | MO |
| 595 | MB Surf 17-S Gold | 1777 | 5-4 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 596 | E3 18-Excel | 1777 | 13-22 | 37% | 18 | NM |
| 597 | MKE Sting 16-3 | 1777 | 33-16 | 67% | 16 | WI |
| 598 | SPVB 18-Alpha | 1777 | 41-20 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 599 | WAVE 17 Jorge | 1776 | 16-24 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 600 | High Flyers 14-Red | 1775 | 26-16 | 62% | 14 | NE |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.