Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 12 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
551 Epic United 16-Red 1799 44-26 63% 16 IL
552 Roch PaceBootleggr 15-Blk 1799 37-19 66% 15 NY
553 AVA 14 Hanalei 1798 28-3 90% 14 HI
554 VVA 18-Orro 1798 36-21 63% 18 CA
555 SF Elite 16 Manalo 1798 54-13 81% 16 CA
556 SASVBC B 16-Erika 1798 21-11 66% 16 HI
557 Maverick Volleyball Club 17 Maverick Marshalls 1796 6-0 100% 17 ON
558 Next 18-Black 1796 35-31 53% 18 OH
559 Eclipse Boys 14-S 1796 40-12 77% 14 CA
560 Absolute 17-Blue 1795 32-29 52% 17 CA
561 Bay to Bay 18-Premier 1795 30-19 61% 18 CA
562 787EV 14-M kelvyn 1795 8-0 100% 14 PR
563 Steel City 18-Black 1795 22-3 88% 18 PA
564 Uno Boys 16 Elite 1795 42-27 61% 16 IL
565 NYC Impact 17-National 1794 17-3 85% 17 NY
566 Tribe 16-B premier cardinal 1794 38-17 69% 16 FL
567 MOD B17-Black 1794 49-23 68% 17 IL
568 Pipeline 18-1 1793 31-37 46% 18 IL
569 Boston United Boys 15 National 1793 22-14 61% 15 MA
570 SCVC 16-Sarah 1791 26-15 63% 16 UT
571 TLP/ACT Volleyball Club 17-Jared 1790 19-10 66% 17 CA
572 MVVC B 14-National 1790 54-19 74% 14 CA
573 Absol SubZero 18-Romer 1789 4-7 36% 18 WA
574 FVVC 18-1 1789 6-1 86% 18 BC
575 MOD B18 Gold 1789 39-31 56% 18 IL
576 Seaside VBC 18-Black 1788 12-16 43% 18 CA
577 TVA Top-Tier 15-Mint 1788 26-5 84% 15 CA
578 FRVBC 18-1 1787 14-14 50% 18 CO
579 GSL 17-St. george alaina 1787 25-14 64% 17 UT
580 Accuracy 16-Champ 1786 21-9 70% 16 NJ
581 MTRX 18-1 1786 23-14 62% 18 AZ
582 COAST 13-1 bridgette 1786 29-28 51% 13 CA
583 OK Charge 17-Boys 1786 31-17 63% 17 OK
584 MVC 14-Dixon 1786 35-30 54% 14 WI
585 The Lab 18-1 1786 15-11 58% 18 CO
586 WAVE 17 Jorge 1785 16-24 40% 17 CA
587 Sanger 14 1784 37-12 76% 14 CA
588 Empowered B16-Black 1783 44-23 66% 16 IN
589 Venom Volleyball 17 Venom Black Mambas 1783 8-2 80% 17 FL
590 Annapolis 14U 1782 51-28 65% 14 MD
591 Husky 16.1 1782 30-13 67% 16 CT
592 E3 18-Excel 1781 13-22 37% 18 NM
593 Kaizen Boys 17-Black 1781 42-21 67% 17 OK
594 Velocity 17-1 national 1781 20-16 56% 17 PA
595 LBVC 17-Tyler 1780 24-10 71% 17 CA
596 PAC 14 JP 1780 32-19 63% 14 CA
597 WC Aces - 18-Spades 1780 36-32 53% 18 IL
598 Red Rock Boys 16-1 1779 39-15 72% 16 CA
599 HAVC 15-Red 1779 46-23 66% 15 IL
600 Club 1 B 16-Skronkstrong 1778 48-25 66% 16 IL
← Previous123456789101112131415Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.