Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 12 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
551 GSL 17-St. george alaina 1791 14-9 61% 17 UT
552 WAVE 13 Jed 1790 29-31 48% 13 CA
553 APEX1 16-A1BLACK 1790 41-14 75% 16 CA
554 NYC VBA 16 Hudson 1790 29-25 53% 16 NY
555 Team Colorado 17-Black 1790 15-19 44% 17 CO
556 MVC 14-Dixon 1789 35-30 54% 14 WI
557 MKE Sting 15-1 1789 50-58 46% 15 WI
558 Absolute 17-Blue 1789 32-29 52% 17 CA
559 MVVC B 15-Black 1789 40-33 55% 15 CA
560 SCB 14-Salty aaron 1788 3-5 38% 14 LA
561 Paramount VBC 12 Jasmine 1788 0-0 0% 12
562 Bay to Bay 18-Premier 1788 30-19 61% 18 CA
563 Epic United 16-Red 1787 44-26 63% 16 IN
564 Accuracy 16-Champ 1787 21-9 70% 16 NJ
565 MTRX 18-1 1787 23-14 62% 18 AZ
566 787EV 14-M kelvyn 1787 8-0 100% 14 PR
567 MVVC B 14-National 1786 54-19 74% 14 CA
568 VVA 17-Clarke 1785 25-38 40% 17 MO
569 Pipeline 18-1 1785 31-37 46% 18 IL
570 Vegas Aces 17-1 1785 22-16 58% 17 NV
571 TVS 12 Dayron 1784 4-0 100% 12
572 Faucons 16-Boys 1 1784 7-1 88% 16
573 Venom Havoc 15u 1783 5-6 45% 15
574 E3 18-Excel - boys 1783 7-9 44% 18 NM
575 Seaside VBC 18-Black 1783 12-16 43% 18 CA
576 OK Charge 17-Boys 1782 31-17 63% 17 OK
577 Roch PaceBootleggr 15-Blk 1782 37-19 66% 15 NY
578 TLP/ACT 17 Jared 1782 19-10 66% 17 CA
579 Ocean Bay 16-Quiksilver 1782 32-27 54% 16 FL
580 SG Elite 15 Elite 1781 15-22 41% 15 CA
581 Husky 16.1 1781 30-13 67% 16 CT
582 The Lab 18-1 1780 15-11 58% 18 CO
583 MOD B18 Gold 1780 39-31 56% 18 IL
584 MTRX 15-1 1780 24-12 67% 15 AZ
585 Wasatch 18-1 1779 11-10 52% 18 UT
586 WC Aces - 18-Spades 1779 36-32 53% 18 IL
587 Red Rock Boys 16-1 1779 39-15 72% 16 CA
588 Velocity 17-1 national 1778 20-16 56% 17 PA
589 Az Fear 18-Blue 1778 23-16 59% 18 AZ
590 Central Cal 16 TJ 1778 4-3 57% 16 CA
591 UVA 14 Allen 1778 30-6 83% 14 CA
592 FRVBC 18-1 1777 14-14 50% 18 CO
593 Kaizen Boys 17-Black 1777 42-21 67% 17 OK
594 VVA 18-Orro 1777 36-21 63% 18 MO
595 MB Surf 17-S Gold 1777 5-4 56% 17 CA
596 E3 18-Excel 1777 13-22 37% 18 NM
597 MKE Sting 16-3 1777 33-16 67% 16 WI
598 SPVB 18-Alpha 1777 41-20 67% 18 IL
599 WAVE 17 Jorge 1776 16-24 40% 17 CA
600 High Flyers 14-Red 1775 26-16 62% 14 NE
← Previous123456789101112131415Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.