Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 12 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
551 WPVC Boys 18-Armour orange 1684 19-27 41% 18 FL
552 OVC 17 Neptune 1684 23-10 70% 17 NJ
553 ACAD Boys 17-Blue 1684 24-5 83% 17 NY
554 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-2m 1684 12-8 60% 16 PR
555 Cyclones Boys 16-B 1683 43-23 65% 16 IL
556 MOD B17-Black 1683 37-18 67% 17 IL
557 BAVC 18-1 boys 1683 28-19 60% 18 CA
558 HAVC 18-Red 1683 24-21 53% 18 SD
559 Victory 16-Black 1683 11-9 55% 16 TX
560 Aspire 17 Falcon 1683 21-17 55% 17 AZ
561 Warren Sixpack 16-3 1682 22-9 71% 16 NJ
562 Accuracy 16-Champ 1682 17-9 65% 16 NJ
563 FVP 15-Regional 1682 17-6 74% 15 WI
564 TUVA Boys 15-Elite 1682 24-11 69% 15 NC
565 SASVBC B 15-Maya 1682 14-5 74% 15 HI
566 APEX1 16-A1BLACK 1681 20-8 71% 16 CA
567 A4 Volley Boys 17-Jon 1681 25-10 71% 17 CA
568 Accuracy 14-Champ 1681 29-10 74% 14 NJ
569 Tropics Boys 17-S elite ray 1681 14-12 54% 17 FL
570 630 Volleyball 17-1 1680 22-28 44% 17 IL
571 MVP 17-Black 1680 13-23 36% 17 MD
572 Rancho Valley 18-Black 1680 6-1 86% 18 CA
573 TNT Boys 18-Colossus 1680 22-16 58% 18 PA
574 OZP 16-Platinum 1680 10-5 67% 16
575 Western Mass 18-Ac mufasa 1679 52-10 81% 18 MA
576 Pipeline 17-Black 1679 32-13 71% 17 IL
577 Northern Lights 17-1 boys 1679 19-11 63% 17 MN
578 SVC 15-1 boys 1679 20-3 87% 15 NY
579 347 18 1679 16-14 53% 18 AZ
580 A-10 Boys 18-Black 1679 19-20 49% 18 PA
581 Eclipse Boys 14-S 1678 21-7 75% 14 NJ
582 Meraki VB 18-1 1678 15-19 44% 18 NH
583 Premier Boys 15-Black 1678 26-8 76% 15 TX
584 Rancho 18-Black 1678 15-5 75% 18 CA
585 Aspire 18-Winter soldier 1678 12-11 52% 18 AZ
586 Sportime 15-1 1678 12-13 48% 15 NY
587 SASVBC 14-Keali'i 1678 13-8 62% 14 HI
588 Team Rockstar 14 Joey 1678 26-8 76% 14 CA
589 Phoenix 15 Thoma 1677 26-13 67% 15 OH
590 Pure Aloha 18-1 boys 1677 6-3 67% 18 HI
591 CCVA 18 Elite 1677 20-3 87% 18 CA
592 GSL 17-Elect - colby 1677 18-15 55% 17 UT
593 Strikers 18-Ocean beach 1677 12-8 60% 18 AZ
594 TUVA Boys 16-Elite 1677 21-19 53% 16 NC
595 Northern Lights 16-1 boys 1677 21-11 66% 16 MN
596 630 Volleyball 18-3 1677 39-14 74% 18 IL
597 GSEVC 17-Boys premier 1676 16-12 57% 17 NJ
598 AZ LEGACY 16 APEX 1676 22-25 47% 16 AZ
599 Central Cal 17 Benji 1676 6-2 75% 17 CA
600 SLAM 17-1 boys 1676 26-25 51% 17 TX
← Previous123456789101112131415Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.