2025-2026 Season — Page 12 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 551 | Epic United 16-Red | 1799 | 44-26 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 552 | Roch PaceBootleggr 15-Blk | 1799 | 37-19 | 66% | 15 | NY |
| 553 | AVA 14 Hanalei | 1798 | 28-3 | 90% | 14 | HI |
| 554 | VVA 18-Orro | 1798 | 36-21 | 63% | 18 | CA |
| 555 | SF Elite 16 Manalo | 1798 | 54-13 | 81% | 16 | CA |
| 556 | SASVBC B 16-Erika | 1798 | 21-11 | 66% | 16 | HI |
| 557 | Maverick Volleyball Club 17 Maverick Marshalls | 1796 | 6-0 | 100% | 17 | ON |
| 558 | Next 18-Black | 1796 | 35-31 | 53% | 18 | OH |
| 559 | Eclipse Boys 14-S | 1796 | 40-12 | 77% | 14 | CA |
| 560 | Absolute 17-Blue | 1795 | 32-29 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 561 | Bay to Bay 18-Premier | 1795 | 30-19 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 562 | 787EV 14-M kelvyn | 1795 | 8-0 | 100% | 14 | PR |
| 563 | Steel City 18-Black | 1795 | 22-3 | 88% | 18 | PA |
| 564 | Uno Boys 16 Elite | 1795 | 42-27 | 61% | 16 | IL |
| 565 | NYC Impact 17-National | 1794 | 17-3 | 85% | 17 | NY |
| 566 | Tribe 16-B premier cardinal | 1794 | 38-17 | 69% | 16 | FL |
| 567 | MOD B17-Black | 1794 | 49-23 | 68% | 17 | IL |
| 568 | Pipeline 18-1 | 1793 | 31-37 | 46% | 18 | IL |
| 569 | Boston United Boys 15 National | 1793 | 22-14 | 61% | 15 | MA |
| 570 | SCVC 16-Sarah | 1791 | 26-15 | 63% | 16 | UT |
| 571 | TLP/ACT Volleyball Club 17-Jared | 1790 | 19-10 | 66% | 17 | CA |
| 572 | MVVC B 14-National | 1790 | 54-19 | 74% | 14 | CA |
| 573 | Absol SubZero 18-Romer | 1789 | 4-7 | 36% | 18 | WA |
| 574 | FVVC 18-1 | 1789 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | BC |
| 575 | MOD B18 Gold | 1789 | 39-31 | 56% | 18 | IL |
| 576 | Seaside VBC 18-Black | 1788 | 12-16 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 577 | TVA Top-Tier 15-Mint | 1788 | 26-5 | 84% | 15 | CA |
| 578 | FRVBC 18-1 | 1787 | 14-14 | 50% | 18 | CO |
| 579 | GSL 17-St. george alaina | 1787 | 25-14 | 64% | 17 | UT |
| 580 | Accuracy 16-Champ | 1786 | 21-9 | 70% | 16 | NJ |
| 581 | MTRX 18-1 | 1786 | 23-14 | 62% | 18 | AZ |
| 582 | COAST 13-1 bridgette | 1786 | 29-28 | 51% | 13 | CA |
| 583 | OK Charge 17-Boys | 1786 | 31-17 | 63% | 17 | OK |
| 584 | MVC 14-Dixon | 1786 | 35-30 | 54% | 14 | WI |
| 585 | The Lab 18-1 | 1786 | 15-11 | 58% | 18 | CO |
| 586 | WAVE 17 Jorge | 1785 | 16-24 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 587 | Sanger 14 | 1784 | 37-12 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 588 | Empowered B16-Black | 1783 | 44-23 | 66% | 16 | IN |
| 589 | Venom Volleyball 17 Venom Black Mambas | 1783 | 8-2 | 80% | 17 | FL |
| 590 | Annapolis 14U | 1782 | 51-28 | 65% | 14 | MD |
| 591 | Husky 16.1 | 1782 | 30-13 | 67% | 16 | CT |
| 592 | E3 18-Excel | 1781 | 13-22 | 37% | 18 | NM |
| 593 | Kaizen Boys 17-Black | 1781 | 42-21 | 67% | 17 | OK |
| 594 | Velocity 17-1 national | 1781 | 20-16 | 56% | 17 | PA |
| 595 | LBVC 17-Tyler | 1780 | 24-10 | 71% | 17 | CA |
| 596 | PAC 14 JP | 1780 | 32-19 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 597 | WC Aces - 18-Spades | 1780 | 36-32 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 598 | Red Rock Boys 16-1 | 1779 | 39-15 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 599 | HAVC 15-Red | 1779 | 46-23 | 66% | 15 | IL |
| 600 | Club 1 B 16-Skronkstrong | 1778 | 48-25 | 66% | 16 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.