Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 13 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
601 Balboa Bay 12-Blue 1775 35-17 67% 12 CA
602 SG Elite 14 Elite 1775 16-17 48% 14 CA
603 LIV 17-Royal 1774 17-3 85% 17 CA
604 LBVC 17-Tyler 1774 24-10 71% 17 CA
605 HAVC 15-Red 1773 46-23 66% 15 IL
606 COAST 13-1 bridgette 1773 29-28 51% 13 CA
607 PAC 14 JP 1772 32-19 63% 14 CA
608 CUVC 18-1 boys 1771 48-29 62% 18 NC
609 MVC 16-GJ 1771 37-32 54% 16 WI
610 Club 1 B 16-Skronkstrong 1770 48-25 66% 16 IL
611 HVA 13-Young guns 1770 42-4 91% 13 TX
612 Ocean Bay 15-Quiksilver 1770 33-25 57% 15 FL
613 MKE Sting 17-2 1770 41-29 59% 17 WI
614 Byron Boys 14u 1770 14-0 100% 14 MN
615 HICVB 15-1 1770 9-7 56% 15 CA
616 WPVC Boys 17-Armour silver 1769 35-21 63% 17 FL
617 Red Rock Boys 14-1 1769 28-23 55% 14 CA
618 HPSTL B17-White 1769 47-18 72% 17 MO
619 SG Elite 17 Elite 1769 5-10 33% 17 CA
620 Reach 16-Ignite 1768 9-0 100% 16 WA
621 MVP BOS 18-Black 1768 16-15 52% 18 MA
622 AJAXVB 17-1 gold 1768 22-29 43% 17 OR
623 Velocity B17-Red 1768 23-13 64% 17 IL
624 CCVA Boys 17-Benji 1767 5-0 100% 17 CA
625 Velocity 18-1 national 1766 14-21 40% 18 PA
626 GOLDENBULLS 17-B black 1766 20-9 69% 17 FL
627 A2 16-Red 1766 27-35 44% 16 OH
628 Nova 17-1 - boys 1765 14-9 61% 17 AZ
629 FRVBC 17-1 1764 12-13 48% 17 CO
630 RUSH 18-Red 1764 29-19 60% 18 AZ
631 C2 Attack 18-2 elite 1764 38-33 54% 18 TN
632 KeAloha 18-1 rogue 1764 29-27 52% 18 IN
633 SMBC Shack 17 Molten 1764 9-15 38% 17 CA
634 LI Fury 16-1 1764 18-17 51% 16 NY
635 Maverick 18 Rooster 1763 20-19 51% 18 AZ
636 IMUA UVC 18-Ua 1763 21-23 48% 18 CA
637 Pipeline 17-1 1763 27-43 39% 17 IL
638 Princeton 16-Black boys 1763 6-2 75% 16 NJ
639 TORRIMAR 14-Cristian 1763 11-6 65% 14 PR
640 COAST 16-2 connor 1762 30-22 58% 16 CA
641 FVVC 18-1 1761 6-1 86% 18
642 Pakmen 16 Gold 1760 5-2 71% 16
643 #951 Elite Boys 17-1 1760 16-13 55% 17 CA
644 Balboa Bay 16-Red 1760 37-16 70% 16 CA
645 CORE Boys 18-Platinum 1760 17-19 47% 18 NJ
646 NCVC 18 Mizuno 1759 27-18 60% 18 CA
647 MVVC B 11-Red 1759 54-20 73% 11 CA
648 SynergyForce 18-1 natl 1759 50-36 58% 18 CA
649 Urban Volleyball 14 Gold 1759 23-7 77% 14 TX
650 SPVC 16-1 1759 7-2 78% 16 CA
← Previous12345678910111213141516Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.