2025-2026 Season — Page 13 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 601 | Balboa Bay 12-Blue | 1775 | 35-17 | 67% | 12 | CA |
| 602 | SG Elite 14 Elite | 1775 | 16-17 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 603 | LIV 17-Royal | 1774 | 17-3 | 85% | 17 | CA |
| 604 | LBVC 17-Tyler | 1774 | 24-10 | 71% | 17 | CA |
| 605 | HAVC 15-Red | 1773 | 46-23 | 66% | 15 | IL |
| 606 | COAST 13-1 bridgette | 1773 | 29-28 | 51% | 13 | CA |
| 607 | PAC 14 JP | 1772 | 32-19 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 608 | CUVC 18-1 boys | 1771 | 48-29 | 62% | 18 | NC |
| 609 | MVC 16-GJ | 1771 | 37-32 | 54% | 16 | WI |
| 610 | Club 1 B 16-Skronkstrong | 1770 | 48-25 | 66% | 16 | IL |
| 611 | HVA 13-Young guns | 1770 | 42-4 | 91% | 13 | TX |
| 612 | Ocean Bay 15-Quiksilver | 1770 | 33-25 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 613 | MKE Sting 17-2 | 1770 | 41-29 | 59% | 17 | WI |
| 614 | Byron Boys 14u | 1770 | 14-0 | 100% | 14 | MN |
| 615 | HICVB 15-1 | 1770 | 9-7 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 616 | WPVC Boys 17-Armour silver | 1769 | 35-21 | 63% | 17 | FL |
| 617 | Red Rock Boys 14-1 | 1769 | 28-23 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 618 | HPSTL B17-White | 1769 | 47-18 | 72% | 17 | MO |
| 619 | SG Elite 17 Elite | 1769 | 5-10 | 33% | 17 | CA |
| 620 | Reach 16-Ignite | 1768 | 9-0 | 100% | 16 | WA |
| 621 | MVP BOS 18-Black | 1768 | 16-15 | 52% | 18 | MA |
| 622 | AJAXVB 17-1 gold | 1768 | 22-29 | 43% | 17 | OR |
| 623 | Velocity B17-Red | 1768 | 23-13 | 64% | 17 | IL |
| 624 | CCVA Boys 17-Benji | 1767 | 5-0 | 100% | 17 | CA |
| 625 | Velocity 18-1 national | 1766 | 14-21 | 40% | 18 | PA |
| 626 | GOLDENBULLS 17-B black | 1766 | 20-9 | 69% | 17 | FL |
| 627 | A2 16-Red | 1766 | 27-35 | 44% | 16 | OH |
| 628 | Nova 17-1 - boys | 1765 | 14-9 | 61% | 17 | AZ |
| 629 | FRVBC 17-1 | 1764 | 12-13 | 48% | 17 | CO |
| 630 | RUSH 18-Red | 1764 | 29-19 | 60% | 18 | AZ |
| 631 | C2 Attack 18-2 elite | 1764 | 38-33 | 54% | 18 | TN |
| 632 | KeAloha 18-1 rogue | 1764 | 29-27 | 52% | 18 | IN |
| 633 | SMBC Shack 17 Molten | 1764 | 9-15 | 38% | 17 | CA |
| 634 | LI Fury 16-1 | 1764 | 18-17 | 51% | 16 | NY |
| 635 | Maverick 18 Rooster | 1763 | 20-19 | 51% | 18 | AZ |
| 636 | IMUA UVC 18-Ua | 1763 | 21-23 | 48% | 18 | CA |
| 637 | Pipeline 17-1 | 1763 | 27-43 | 39% | 17 | IL |
| 638 | Princeton 16-Black boys | 1763 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | NJ |
| 639 | TORRIMAR 14-Cristian | 1763 | 11-6 | 65% | 14 | PR |
| 640 | COAST 16-2 connor | 1762 | 30-22 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 641 | FVVC 18-1 | 1761 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | |
| 642 | Pakmen 16 Gold | 1760 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | |
| 643 | #951 Elite Boys 17-1 | 1760 | 16-13 | 55% | 17 | CA |
| 644 | Balboa Bay 16-Red | 1760 | 37-16 | 70% | 16 | CA |
| 645 | CORE Boys 18-Platinum | 1760 | 17-19 | 47% | 18 | NJ |
| 646 | NCVC 18 Mizuno | 1759 | 27-18 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 647 | MVVC B 11-Red | 1759 | 54-20 | 73% | 11 | CA |
| 648 | SynergyForce 18-1 natl | 1759 | 50-36 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 649 | Urban Volleyball 14 Gold | 1759 | 23-7 | 77% | 14 | TX |
| 650 | SPVC 16-1 | 1759 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.