Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 13 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
601 WPVC Boys 17-Armour silver 1778 35-21 63% 17 FL
602 MTRX 15-1 1778 24-12 67% 15 AZ
603 Central Cal 16 TJ 1777 4-3 57% 16 CA
604 SPVB 18-Alpha 1777 41-20 67% 18 IL
605 MKE Sting 16-3 1777 33-16 67% 16 WI
606 High Flyers 14-Red 1777 26-16 62% 14 NE
607 MB Surf 17-S Gold 1777 5-4 56% 17 CA
608 Sting VC 14-1 1777 36-7 84% 14 CA
609 Sportime 14-1 1776 26-13 67% 14 NY
610 IMUA UVC 18-Ua 1776 21-23 48% 18 CA
611 EXCEL 12-Red 1776 20-11 63% 12 TX
612 SynergyForce 18-1 natl 1776 50-36 58% 18 CA
613 Ocean Bay 16-Quiksilver 1776 32-27 54% 16 FL
614 Az Fear 18-Blue 1776 23-16 59% 18 AZ
615 CUVC 18-1 boys 1775 48-29 62% 18 NC
616 LIV 17-Royal 1775 17-3 85% 17 CA
617 Ocean Bay 15-Quiksilver 1775 33-25 57% 15 FL
618 AJAXVB 17-1 gold 1775 22-29 43% 17 OR
619 Cypress Huskies Volleyball Club 18-Rooster 1775 6-2 75% 18 TX
620 FRVBC 17-1 1774 12-13 48% 17 CO
621 A2 16-Red 1772 27-35 44% 16 OH
622 MKE Sting 17-2 1772 41-29 59% 17 WI
623 Tyrants 17-Black 1772 25-36 41% 17 CA
624 Balboa Bay 12-Blue 1771 35-17 67% 12 CA
625 Balboa Bay 16-Red 1771 37-16 70% 16 CA
626 HVA 13-Young guns 1770 42-4 91% 13 TX
627 Byron Boys 14u 1770 14-0 100% 14 MN
628 All In Volleyball Academy 17-Boys 1770 27-18 60% 17 FL
629 C2 Attack 18-2 elite 1770 38-33 54% 18 TN
630 Reach 16-Ignite 1769 9-0 100% 16 PA
631 Velocity B17-Red 1769 23-13 64% 17 IL
632 GOLDENBULLS 17-B black 1769 20-9 69% 17 FL
633 Pipeline 17-1 1769 27-43 39% 17 IL
634 Bravo 18-X 1768 23-5 82% 18 CA
635 Ocean Point 13-Maverick 1768 34-26 57% 13 CA
636 Red Rock Boys 14-1 1768 28-23 55% 14 CA
637 HPSTL B17-White 1768 47-18 72% 17 MO
638 NYC Volleyball Academy 16-Hudson 1768 23-23 49% 16 NY
639 West Texas Power VC 18 1767 27-5 84% 18 TX
640 MVC 16-GJ 1767 37-32 54% 16 WI
641 HPSTL B15-Orange 1766 38-26 59% 15 MO
642 TORRIMAR 14-Cristian 1766 11-6 65% 14 PR
643 RUSH 18-Red 1765 29-19 60% 18 AZ
644 Nova 17-1 - boys 1765 14-9 61% 17 AZ
645 NCVC 18 Mizuno 1765 27-18 60% 18 CA
646 KeAloha 18-1 rogue 1765 29-27 52% 18 IN
647 #951 Elite Boys 17-1 1765 16-13 55% 17 CA
648 Princeton 16-Black boys 1764 6-2 75% 16 NJ
649 Pilipaa 15 1764 16-10 62% 15 HI
650 Maverick Volleyball Academy 18-Rooster 1764 14-17 45% 18 AZ
← Previous12345678910111213141516Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.