Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
751 Adversity VBC 17-Purple 1739 43-39 52% 17 IL
752 VCN 16-Elite 1739 8-1 89% 16 NE
753 MVVC B 18-Black 1738 38-31 55% 18 CA
754 HEAT 14-Travel boo 1738 6-5 55% 14 CA
755 NOC 18-Green 1738 15-21 42% 18 CA
756 Flight 18-S 1738 29-17 63% 18 UT
757 KUIKAHI 16-Red roshambo 1737 26-16 62% 16 HI
758 GSL 17-Elect - davis 1737 32-24 57% 17 UT
759 Lusher 18 1737 9-0 100% 18 NY
760 NF 16 Cobalt 1736 25-26 49% 16 NY
761 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-2m 1736 9-10 47% 14 PR
762 Legacy Boys 18 Elite 1736 15-19 44% 18 MI
763 AZ Fear 14-Black 1736 45-16 74% 14 AZ
764 CJVA Boys 18-Black 1735 17-18 49% 18 NJ
765 OVC 18 Neptune 1734 48-24 67% 18 VA
766 CCVA Boys 18-Elite 1734 6-0 100% 18 CA
767 GSL 16-Elect josh 1734 9-6 60% 16 UT
768 Sky High Adidas B16-1 1734 44-33 57% 16 IL
769 Apex 15-Select boys 1733 22-9 71% 15 SC
770 SVC 16-1 boys 1733 44-20 68% 16 NY
771 Salt City Boys 18-S bryan 1733 37-14 73% 18 UT
772 Crown City 14 Kings 1731 25-19 57% 14 CA
773 Mintonette Sports 13-1 1730 44-26 63% 13 OH
774 Boys BSVBC 17-Blue 1728 30-20 60% 17 IL
775 BVA - Lions 14-1 1728 44-28 59% 14 IL
776 417 Boys 18 National 1727 35-13 73% 18 MO
777 Sportime 15-1 1727 11-15 42% 15 NY
778 Brandywine Volleyball Club 18 BVC Ballers 1727 11-10 52% 18 DE
779 SLAM 17-1 boys 1727 26-25 51% 17 MA
780 SMASH Boys 15-1 1727 29-31 48% 15 MA
781 Team Rockstar 17 Morte 1727 11-21 34% 17 CA
782 Vegas Aces 15-1 1727 37-19 66% 15 NV
783 Vortex 18-National - chad 1727 9-0 100% 18 UT
784 Core 16 National 1726 40-30 57% 16 CA
785 SOVBC 18 1726 7-8 47% 18 NJ
786 AOT Elite 18-2 1726 14-9 61% 18 AZ
787 Bay Area Eagles 15-1 1726 29-14 67% 15 CA
788 Elevation 14-Peak boys 1726 16-21 43% 14 CO
789 A-10 Boys 18-Black 1725 19-20 49% 18 PA
790 Vaqueros 16-M frank 1725 12-8 60% 16 PR
791 Uno Boys 17 Elite 1723 37-34 52% 17 IL
792 EXILE 18-Red 1723 25-6 81% 18 PA
793 Next 16-Black 1723 33-28 54% 16 OH
794 Southport B18-Blue 1722 36-34 51% 18 WI
795 TNT Boys 16-Sublime 1722 23-21 52% 16 PA
796 AOT Elite 18-1 1722 23-20 53% 18 AZ
797 Preds 15-Boys altius 1722 5-1 83% 15 OH
798 Future 15-Elite 1722 22-41 35% 15 IL
799 Steel City 16-Black 1722 16-10 62% 16 PA
800 OVC B15 1722 48-19 72% 15 WI
← Previous12345678910111213141516171819Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.