2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 751 | Adversity VBC 17-Purple | 1739 | 43-39 | 52% | 17 | IL |
| 752 | VCN 16-Elite | 1739 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | NE |
| 753 | MVVC B 18-Black | 1738 | 38-31 | 55% | 18 | CA |
| 754 | HEAT 14-Travel boo | 1738 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 755 | NOC 18-Green | 1738 | 15-21 | 42% | 18 | CA |
| 756 | Flight 18-S | 1738 | 29-17 | 63% | 18 | UT |
| 757 | KUIKAHI 16-Red roshambo | 1737 | 26-16 | 62% | 16 | HI |
| 758 | GSL 17-Elect - davis | 1737 | 32-24 | 57% | 17 | UT |
| 759 | Lusher 18 | 1737 | 9-0 | 100% | 18 | NY |
| 760 | NF 16 Cobalt | 1736 | 25-26 | 49% | 16 | NY |
| 761 | BORINQUEN COQUI 14-2m | 1736 | 9-10 | 47% | 14 | PR |
| 762 | Legacy Boys 18 Elite | 1736 | 15-19 | 44% | 18 | MI |
| 763 | AZ Fear 14-Black | 1736 | 45-16 | 74% | 14 | AZ |
| 764 | CJVA Boys 18-Black | 1735 | 17-18 | 49% | 18 | NJ |
| 765 | OVC 18 Neptune | 1734 | 48-24 | 67% | 18 | VA |
| 766 | CCVA Boys 18-Elite | 1734 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | CA |
| 767 | GSL 16-Elect josh | 1734 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | UT |
| 768 | Sky High Adidas B16-1 | 1734 | 44-33 | 57% | 16 | IL |
| 769 | Apex 15-Select boys | 1733 | 22-9 | 71% | 15 | SC |
| 770 | SVC 16-1 boys | 1733 | 44-20 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 771 | Salt City Boys 18-S bryan | 1733 | 37-14 | 73% | 18 | UT |
| 772 | Crown City 14 Kings | 1731 | 25-19 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 773 | Mintonette Sports 13-1 | 1730 | 44-26 | 63% | 13 | OH |
| 774 | Boys BSVBC 17-Blue | 1728 | 30-20 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 775 | BVA - Lions 14-1 | 1728 | 44-28 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 776 | 417 Boys 18 National | 1727 | 35-13 | 73% | 18 | MO |
| 777 | Sportime 15-1 | 1727 | 11-15 | 42% | 15 | NY |
| 778 | Brandywine Volleyball Club 18 BVC Ballers | 1727 | 11-10 | 52% | 18 | DE |
| 779 | SLAM 17-1 boys | 1727 | 26-25 | 51% | 17 | MA |
| 780 | SMASH Boys 15-1 | 1727 | 29-31 | 48% | 15 | MA |
| 781 | Team Rockstar 17 Morte | 1727 | 11-21 | 34% | 17 | CA |
| 782 | Vegas Aces 15-1 | 1727 | 37-19 | 66% | 15 | NV |
| 783 | Vortex 18-National - chad | 1727 | 9-0 | 100% | 18 | UT |
| 784 | Core 16 National | 1726 | 40-30 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 785 | SOVBC 18 | 1726 | 7-8 | 47% | 18 | NJ |
| 786 | AOT Elite 18-2 | 1726 | 14-9 | 61% | 18 | AZ |
| 787 | Bay Area Eagles 15-1 | 1726 | 29-14 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 788 | Elevation 14-Peak boys | 1726 | 16-21 | 43% | 14 | CO |
| 789 | A-10 Boys 18-Black | 1725 | 19-20 | 49% | 18 | PA |
| 790 | Vaqueros 16-M frank | 1725 | 12-8 | 60% | 16 | PR |
| 791 | Uno Boys 17 Elite | 1723 | 37-34 | 52% | 17 | IL |
| 792 | EXILE 18-Red | 1723 | 25-6 | 81% | 18 | PA |
| 793 | Next 16-Black | 1723 | 33-28 | 54% | 16 | OH |
| 794 | Southport B18-Blue | 1722 | 36-34 | 51% | 18 | WI |
| 795 | TNT Boys 16-Sublime | 1722 | 23-21 | 52% | 16 | PA |
| 796 | AOT Elite 18-1 | 1722 | 23-20 | 53% | 18 | AZ |
| 797 | Preds 15-Boys altius | 1722 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | OH |
| 798 | Future 15-Elite | 1722 | 22-41 | 35% | 15 | IL |
| 799 | Steel City 16-Black | 1722 | 16-10 | 62% | 16 | PA |
| 800 | OVC B15 | 1722 | 48-19 | 72% | 15 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.