2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 751 | FRVBC 18-1 boys | 1734 | 18-22 | 45% | 18 | CO |
| 752 | Cyclones Boys 16-B | 1734 | 50-36 | 58% | 16 | IL |
| 753 | NOC 18-Green | 1734 | 15-21 | 42% | 18 | CA |
| 754 | Beach Cities 17-Black | 1734 | 18-8 | 69% | 17 | CA |
| 755 | Mintonette Sports 13-1 | 1733 | 44-26 | 63% | 13 | OH |
| 756 | WAVE 18 Andy | 1733 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 757 | Lusher 18 | 1733 | 9-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 758 | Idaho Strike 18-Black | 1732 | 12-9 | 57% | 18 | ID |
| 759 | AZ LEGACY 16 APEX | 1732 | 28-45 | 38% | 16 | AZ |
| 760 | OVC 14-1 | 1732 | 7-1 | 88% | 14 | VA |
| 761 | TLP/ACT 17 Noah | 1731 | 18-5 | 78% | 17 | CA |
| 762 | SLAM 17-1 boys | 1731 | 26-25 | 51% | 17 | MA |
| 763 | BVA - Lions 14-1 | 1730 | 44-28 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 764 | Legacy Boys 18 Elite | 1729 | 15-19 | 44% | 18 | MI |
| 765 | GSL 16-Elite - maddy | 1729 | 14-8 | 64% | 16 | UT |
| 766 | Apex 15-Select boys | 1728 | 22-9 | 71% | 15 | MO |
| 767 | Sky High Adidas B16-1 | 1728 | 44-33 | 57% | 16 | IL |
| 768 | MDJRS 15-Boys | 1728 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | MD |
| 769 | Stars 16 Lion | 1727 | 32-18 | 64% | 16 | SC |
| 770 | Crown City 14 Kings | 1727 | 25-19 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 771 | Husky 18.1 | 1727 | 27-25 | 52% | 18 | CT |
| 772 | Bay Area Eagles 15-1 | 1727 | 29-14 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 773 | Southport B18-Blue | 1727 | 36-34 | 51% | 18 | WI |
| 774 | BORINQUEN COQUI 14-2m | 1727 | 9-10 | 47% | 14 | PR |
| 775 | Tool City 18-Orange | 1727 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | PA |
| 776 | OVC 18 Neptune | 1726 | 44-21 | 68% | 18 | VA |
| 777 | SOVBC 18 | 1726 | 7-8 | 47% | 18 | |
| 778 | SMASH Boys 17-Shock | 1726 | 30-20 | 60% | 17 | MA |
| 779 | LIV 15-Royal | 1725 | 29-17 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 780 | AZ Fear 14-Black | 1725 | 45-16 | 74% | 14 | AZ |
| 781 | Playeros Ponce 17-Gray | 1725 | 10-8 | 56% | 17 | PR |
| 782 | Next 16-Black | 1724 | 33-28 | 54% | 16 | OH |
| 783 | Future 16-Elite | 1724 | 20-51 | 28% | 16 | IL |
| 784 | OMNI 15-1 national | 1724 | 38-46 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 785 | Elevation 14-Peak boys | 1724 | 16-21 | 43% | 14 | CO |
| 786 | CJVA Boys 17-Black | 1724 | 15-16 | 48% | 17 | NJ |
| 787 | Core 16 National | 1723 | 40-30 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 788 | 314 VBC 18-B | 1723 | 11-4 | 73% | 18 | MO |
| 789 | Boys BSVBC 17-Blue | 1723 | 30-20 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 790 | OVC B15 | 1722 | 48-19 | 72% | 15 | WI |
| 791 | TNT Boys 16-Sublime | 1722 | 23-21 | 52% | 16 | PA |
| 792 | SVC 16-1 boys | 1722 | 44-20 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 793 | TAMPA UNITED VBA BOYS 18-Black | 1721 | 10-13 | 43% | 18 | FL |
| 794 | SMASH Boys 15-1 | 1721 | 29-31 | 48% | 15 | MA |
| 795 | SAS Ho'oikaika VBC 13-1 | 1721 | 7-1 | 88% | 13 | HI |
| 796 | Tropics Boys 16-S elite | 1721 | 26-14 | 65% | 16 | FL |
| 797 | Uno Boys 17 Elite | 1721 | 37-34 | 52% | 17 | IL |
| 798 | Kali 13-M jose | 1721 | 15-4 | 79% | 13 | PR |
| 799 | The St. James Boys 16-W | 1720 | 31-23 | 57% | 16 | VA |
| 800 | Warren Sixpack 18-2 | 1720 | 25-18 | 58% | 18 | NJ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.