Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
751 FRVBC 18-1 boys 1734 18-22 45% 18 CO
752 Cyclones Boys 16-B 1734 50-36 58% 16 IL
753 NOC 18-Green 1734 15-21 42% 18 CA
754 Beach Cities 17-Black 1734 18-8 69% 17 CA
755 Mintonette Sports 13-1 1733 44-26 63% 13 OH
756 WAVE 18 Andy 1733 10-8 56% 18 CA
757 Lusher 18 1733 9-0 100% 18
758 Idaho Strike 18-Black 1732 12-9 57% 18 ID
759 AZ LEGACY 16 APEX 1732 28-45 38% 16 AZ
760 OVC 14-1 1732 7-1 88% 14 VA
761 TLP/ACT 17 Noah 1731 18-5 78% 17 CA
762 SLAM 17-1 boys 1731 26-25 51% 17 MA
763 BVA - Lions 14-1 1730 44-28 59% 14 IL
764 Legacy Boys 18 Elite 1729 15-19 44% 18 MI
765 GSL 16-Elite - maddy 1729 14-8 64% 16 UT
766 Apex 15-Select boys 1728 22-9 71% 15 MO
767 Sky High Adidas B16-1 1728 44-33 57% 16 IL
768 MDJRS 15-Boys 1728 4-5 44% 15 MD
769 Stars 16 Lion 1727 32-18 64% 16 SC
770 Crown City 14 Kings 1727 25-19 57% 14 CA
771 Husky 18.1 1727 27-25 52% 18 CT
772 Bay Area Eagles 15-1 1727 29-14 67% 15 CA
773 Southport B18-Blue 1727 36-34 51% 18 WI
774 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-2m 1727 9-10 47% 14 PR
775 Tool City 18-Orange 1727 4-6 40% 18 PA
776 OVC 18 Neptune 1726 44-21 68% 18 VA
777 SOVBC 18 1726 7-8 47% 18
778 SMASH Boys 17-Shock 1726 30-20 60% 17 MA
779 LIV 15-Royal 1725 29-17 63% 15 CA
780 AZ Fear 14-Black 1725 45-16 74% 14 AZ
781 Playeros Ponce 17-Gray 1725 10-8 56% 17 PR
782 Next 16-Black 1724 33-28 54% 16 OH
783 Future 16-Elite 1724 20-51 28% 16 IL
784 OMNI 15-1 national 1724 38-46 45% 15 CA
785 Elevation 14-Peak boys 1724 16-21 43% 14 CO
786 CJVA Boys 17-Black 1724 15-16 48% 17 NJ
787 Core 16 National 1723 40-30 57% 16 CA
788 314 VBC 18-B 1723 11-4 73% 18 MO
789 Boys BSVBC 17-Blue 1723 30-20 60% 17 IL
790 OVC B15 1722 48-19 72% 15 WI
791 TNT Boys 16-Sublime 1722 23-21 52% 16 PA
792 SVC 16-1 boys 1722 44-20 68% 16 NY
793 TAMPA UNITED VBA BOYS 18-Black 1721 10-13 43% 18 FL
794 SMASH Boys 15-1 1721 29-31 48% 15 MA
795 SAS Ho'oikaika VBC 13-1 1721 7-1 88% 13 HI
796 Tropics Boys 16-S elite 1721 26-14 65% 16 FL
797 Uno Boys 17 Elite 1721 37-34 52% 17 IL
798 Kali 13-M jose 1721 15-4 79% 13 PR
799 The St. James Boys 16-W 1720 31-23 57% 16 VA
800 Warren Sixpack 18-2 1720 25-18 58% 18 NJ
← Previous12345678910111213141516171819Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.