2025-2026 Season — Page 20 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 951 | BCFLIGHT 17-1 | 1689 | 3-10 | 23% | 17 | |
| 952 | Durham Attack VBC 16 Durham Attack Chaos | 1689 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | PA |
| 953 | LIV 15-Royal preston | 1688 | 5-6 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 954 | Sidewinder 15-1 | 1688 | 26-25 | 51% | 15 | AZ |
| 955 | Ultimate B18 Gold | 1688 | 27-27 | 49% | 18 | IL |
| 956 | HVA 16-Performance blue | 1688 | 25-14 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 957 | Red Rock Volleyball Club 17-National 1 | 1688 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | CA |
| 958 | Molten 18-Black | 1688 | 8-15 | 35% | 18 | AZ |
| 959 | Juggernaut 16-National 1 | 1688 | 23-29 | 44% | 16 | CO |
| 960 | O-Zone 16u Platinum | 1687 | 28-19 | 60% | 16 | FL |
| 961 | Horns 18-1 k | 1687 | 19-7 | 73% | 18 | FL |
| 962 | CCVBC 18 | 1687 | 27-17 | 61% | 18 | WI |
| 963 | NorthU 16-1 | 1687 | 21-17 | 51% | 16 | PA |
| 964 | Unity Volleyball Club 15 Unity Force | 1687 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | MA |
| 965 | TORRI 15-1 | 1687 | 6-10 | 38% | 15 | PR |
| 966 | WPVC Boys 14-Armour orange | 1687 | 46-22 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 967 | NE Storm 16 Lightning | 1686 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | MA |
| 968 | Meraki VB 18-1 | 1686 | 15-19 | 44% | 18 | NH |
| 969 | Aztlan VC 18 Dante | 1686 | 29-9 | 76% | 18 | CA |
| 970 | LBVC 18-Red | 1686 | 9-1 | 82% | 18 | PA |
| 971 | MN Select Boys 15-1 | 1686 | 40-24 | 63% | 15 | MN |
| 972 | SAND BOYS 17 Gold | 1686 | 27-16 | 63% | 17 | CA |
| 973 | 630 Volleyball 17-2 | 1686 | 31-37 | 46% | 17 | IL |
| 974 | Crown City 15 Kings | 1685 | 33-20 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 975 | Sportime 18-Quogue | 1684 | 19-17 | 53% | 18 | NY |
| 976 | TVA Top-Tier 16-Mint | 1684 | 11-1 | 92% | 16 | CA |
| 977 | NF 17 Cobalt | 1684 | 22-21 | 49% | 17 | NY |
| 978 | SBVC Boys 16 Molten | 1684 | 22-10 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 979 | MVC 18-White | 1684 | 10-12 | 45% | 18 | AZ |
| 980 | Triangle Boys 16-Blue | 1683 | 36-15 | 71% | 16 | NC |
| 981 | Cinci Attack 18-Red | 1683 | 37-28 | 57% | 18 | OH |
| 982 | LKN 18-Boys | 1683 | 24-8 | 75% | 18 | NC |
| 983 | Sportime 18-2 | 1683 | 24-16 | 60% | 18 | NY |
| 984 | TX LEGACY 18-Boys elite | 1683 | 39-21 | 64% | 18 | TX |
| 985 | MN Select Boys 17-1 | 1682 | 30-33 | 48% | 17 | MN |
| 986 | Eclipse Mountain 18-1 | 1682 | 11-1 | 92% | 18 | UT |
| 987 | Red Rock 15-Chip - redwood city | 1682 | 11-5 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 988 | MB Surf 12-Asics kantor | 1682 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | CA |
| 989 | CORE Boys 18 | 1682 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | NJ |
| 990 | 808 Athletic Club 16-Kolten | 1682 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | HI |
| 991 | Volley Next 18-2 | 1681 | 42-27 | 61% | 18 | IL |
| 992 | Balboa Bay 17-Red | 1681 | 20-15 | 57% | 17 | CA |
| 993 | Hi Bred VBC 18 Premier | 1681 | 20-3 | 87% | 18 | HI |
| 994 | GSL 18-Elite mariah | 1681 | 19-10 | 66% | 18 | UT |
| 995 | UNION B18-Black | 1681 | 25-32 | 44% | 18 | IN |
| 996 | Pure Aloha 16-Boys | 1681 | 22-34 | 39% | 16 | HI |
| 997 | 630 Volleyball 15-2 | 1680 | 35-35 | 49% | 15 | IL |
| 998 | OPVC 16-Purple daren | 1680 | 25-24 | 51% | 16 | OH |
| 999 | MVC 17-Black | 1680 | 42-21 | 67% | 17 | AZ |
| 1000 | Legacy Volleyball Club 18-National | 1680 | 19-35 | 35% | 18 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.