Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 20 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is C2 Attack 17-1 with a 2233 Elo rating and 60-5 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
951 South County Boys 18-1 1666 6-3 67% 18 RI
952 Team Momentum B16 Navy 1666 24-24 50% 16 MO
953 South County 18 Napoleon 1666 13-4 76% 18 RI
954 Yorktowne 16-Red 1666 20-13 57% 16 PA
955 CCVBC 18 1665 24-13 65% 18 CA
956 RUSH 15-Black 1665 10-16 38% 15 AZ
957 Bay to Bay 16-National 1665 29-17 63% 16 CA
958 PACE BOOTLEGGER 14-Blue 1665 7-1 88% 14
959 Absolute 17-Blue 1665 27-25 52% 17 CA
960 OPVC 11-Young 1664 5-0 100% 11 OH
961 Idaho ONE 18-Elite boys 1664 9-11 45% 18 ID
962 Princeton 15-Black boys 1664 7-8 47% 15 PA
963 Boys CJVA 16-Black 1664 5-2 71% 16 NJ
964 LBK 14-1 1664 6-0 100% 14 CA
965 NF 17 Cobalt 1663 16-13 52% 17 NY
966 Team Colorado 17-Black 1663 13-12 52% 17 CO
967 Gigantes 16-Angel 1663 7-0 100% 16
968 Pacific Rim 17-1 1662 19-10 66% 17 CA
969 Evolution 15 Elite 1662 22-13 63% 15 FL
970 Core 16 National 1661 33-22 60% 16 NJ
971 Miami United 17-National kylee 1661 24-17 59% 17 FL
972 Battle 16-Black 1661 31-16 63% 16 VA
973 No Limits 16-Boys 1661 19-12 61% 16 IL
974 Tropics 17-Elite ray 1661 7-1 88% 17 FL
975 SVC 14-1 1661 12-0 100% 14
976 OVC 18-1 1661 4-3 57% 18
977 Mayhem 18-1 1661 10-18 36% 18 KS
978 SG Elite 17 Elite 1660 13-12 52% 17 CA
979 OMNI 14-2 elite 1660 26-18 59% 14 CA
980 Inferno 18-1 national 1660 20-23 47% 18 WI
981 Phoenix 14 Mihelic 1660 19-19 50% 14 OH
982 MAVS 14-Red 1660 16-12 57% 14 KS
983 Roots Volleyball Academy 14-1 1660 7-0 100% 14 TX
984 TopFlight VBA 17-1 1660 4-1 80% 17 IL
985 WAVE 18 Andy 1660 15-11 58% 18 CA
986 LI Fury 15-1 1660 18-7 72% 15 NY
987 SERV 17 Beast 1659 29-20 59% 17 VA
988 Upontop Boys 16-Elite 1659 26-17 60% 16 FL
989 Orlando Gold 12-Black 1659 16-7 70% 12 FL
990 CCVA 16 Elite 1659 10-5 67% 16 CA
991 Platinum 15-Dallas 1659 5-3 63% 15 UT
992 NW Jrs 14-Ua slate 1659 15-5 75% 14 WA
993 WSA Gators 17-Elite boys 1659 26-18 59% 17 MA
994 Sidewinder 16-2 1658 10-11 48% 16 AZ
995 Snipers 16-1 1658 10-4 63% 16 NV
996 Absolute 16-Blue 1658 28-23 55% 16 CA
997 Vanguard 17-Gold kelso 1658 9-8 53% 17 OH
998 K2 18-Elite boys 1658 19-11 63% 18 TN
999 Synergy Boys 18-Fire 1657 17-19 47% 18 CA
1000 GSL 18-Elect - les 1657 16-17 48% 18 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.