Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 20 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
951 BCFLIGHT 17-1 1689 3-10 23% 17
952 Durham Attack VBC 16 Durham Attack Chaos 1689 4-1 80% 16 PA
953 LIV 15-Royal preston 1688 5-6 45% 15 CA
954 Sidewinder 15-1 1688 26-25 51% 15 AZ
955 Ultimate B18 Gold 1688 27-27 49% 18 IL
956 HVA 16-Performance blue 1688 25-14 64% 16 TX
957 Red Rock Volleyball Club 17-National 1 1688 6-2 75% 17 CA
958 Molten 18-Black 1688 8-15 35% 18 AZ
959 Juggernaut 16-National 1 1688 23-29 44% 16 CO
960 O-Zone 16u Platinum 1687 28-19 60% 16 FL
961 Horns 18-1 k 1687 19-7 73% 18 FL
962 CCVBC 18 1687 27-17 61% 18 WI
963 NorthU 16-1 1687 21-17 51% 16 PA
964 Unity Volleyball Club 15 Unity Force 1687 3-4 43% 15 MA
965 TORRI 15-1 1687 6-10 38% 15 PR
966 WPVC Boys 14-Armour orange 1687 46-22 68% 14 FL
967 NE Storm 16 Lightning 1686 26-20 57% 16 MA
968 Meraki VB 18-1 1686 15-19 44% 18 NH
969 Aztlan VC 18 Dante 1686 29-9 76% 18 CA
970 LBVC 18-Red 1686 9-1 82% 18 PA
971 MN Select Boys 15-1 1686 40-24 63% 15 MN
972 SAND BOYS 17 Gold 1686 27-16 63% 17 CA
973 630 Volleyball 17-2 1686 31-37 46% 17 IL
974 Crown City 15 Kings 1685 33-20 62% 15 CA
975 Sportime 18-Quogue 1684 19-17 53% 18 NY
976 TVA Top-Tier 16-Mint 1684 11-1 92% 16 CA
977 NF 17 Cobalt 1684 22-21 49% 17 NY
978 SBVC Boys 16 Molten 1684 22-10 69% 16 CA
979 MVC 18-White 1684 10-12 45% 18 AZ
980 Triangle Boys 16-Blue 1683 36-15 71% 16 NC
981 Cinci Attack 18-Red 1683 37-28 57% 18 OH
982 LKN 18-Boys 1683 24-8 75% 18 NC
983 Sportime 18-2 1683 24-16 60% 18 NY
984 TX LEGACY 18-Boys elite 1683 39-21 64% 18 TX
985 MN Select Boys 17-1 1682 30-33 48% 17 MN
986 Eclipse Mountain 18-1 1682 11-1 92% 18 UT
987 Red Rock 15-Chip - redwood city 1682 11-5 69% 15 CA
988 MB Surf 12-Asics kantor 1682 6-0 100% 12 CA
989 CORE Boys 18 1682 4-2 67% 18 NJ
990 808 Athletic Club 16-Kolten 1682 22-13 63% 16 HI
991 Volley Next 18-2 1681 42-27 61% 18 IL
992 Balboa Bay 17-Red 1681 20-15 57% 17 CA
993 Hi Bred VBC 18 Premier 1681 20-3 87% 18 HI
994 GSL 18-Elite mariah 1681 19-10 66% 18 UT
995 UNION B18-Black 1681 25-32 44% 18 IN
996 Pure Aloha 16-Boys 1681 22-34 39% 16 HI
997 630 Volleyball 15-2 1680 35-35 49% 15 IL
998 OPVC 16-Purple daren 1680 25-24 51% 16 OH
999 MVC 17-Black 1680 42-21 67% 17 AZ
1000 Legacy Volleyball Club 18-National 1680 19-35 35% 18 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.