Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 20 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
951 Mamba 18-Black 1687 27-46 37% 18 WI
952 Warren Sixpack 17-2 1687 25-23 52% 17 NJ
953 WPVC Boys 14-Armour orange 1687 46-22 68% 14 FL
954 CCVBC 18 1687 27-17 61% 18 CA
955 GSL 18-Elect - les 1687 22-18 55% 18 UT
956 Sidewinder 15-1 1687 26-25 51% 15 AZ
957 Aztlan VC 18 Dante 1686 29-9 76% 18 CA
958 TVA Top-Tier 16-Mint 1686 11-1 92% 16 CA
959 TX LEGACY 18-Boys elite 1685 39-21 64% 18 TX
960 BCFLIGHT 17-1 1685 3-10 23% 17
961 GSEVC 16-Boys premier 1685 21-14 60% 16 NJ
962 SG ELITE BOYS 16-Elite 1685 4-6 40% 16 CA
963 NorthU 16-1 1684 21-17 51% 16 PA
964 Triangle Boys 16-Blue 1684 36-15 71% 16 NC
965 SBVC Boys 16 Molten 1684 22-10 69% 16 CA
966 Legacy Boys 17 National 1683 31-31 50% 17 NY
967 Hi Bred VBC 18 Premier 1683 20-3 87% 18 HI
968 Molten 18-Black 1683 8-15 35% 18 AZ
969 TORRI 15-1 1683 6-10 38% 15 PR
970 CORE Boys 18 1682 4-2 67% 18 NJ
971 Crown City 15 Kings 1682 33-20 62% 15 CA
972 MB Surf 12-Asics kantor 1682 6-0 100% 12 CA
973 SAND BOYS 17 Gold 1682 27-16 63% 17 CA
974 FAV 18 Maverick 1681 14-11 56% 18 CA
975 630 Volleyball 17-2 1681 31-37 46% 17 IL
976 APEX1 15-A1BLACK 1681 26-19 58% 15 CA
977 HVA 16-Performance blue 1681 25-14 64% 16 TX
978 Red Rock 15-Chip - redwood city 1681 11-5 69% 15 CA
979 NF 17 Cobalt 1681 22-21 49% 17 NY
980 NE Storm 16 Lightning 1681 26-20 57% 16 MA
981 Horns 18-1 k 1681 19-7 73% 18 FL
982 OVC B14 1680 32-8 80% 14 WI
983 OPVC 16-Purple daren 1680 25-24 51% 16 OH
984 MN Select Boys 17-1 1680 30-33 48% 17 MN
985 GSL 18-Elite - mariah 1680 7-7 50% 18 UT
986 South County Juniors Boys 17-1 1680 14-19 42% 17 RI
987 UNION B18-Black 1680 25-32 44% 18 IN
988 Country Kids 14 10 1679 6-3 67% 10
989 Mill City 18 1679 13-20 39% 18 MA
990 Pure Aloha 16-Boys 1679 22-34 39% 16 HI
991 MVP Academy BOS 16-Black 1679 17-9 65% 16 MA
992 LKN 18-Boys 1679 24-8 75% 18 NC
993 Aspire 18-Winter soldier 1679 12-11 52% 18 AZ
994 AJAXVB Bend 18-1 gold 1679 22-15 59% 18 OR
995 Beach Elite 16-Lucas 1679 11-12 48% 16 CA
996 CORE Boys 15-Titanium 1679 11-9 55% 15 NJ
997 MVP BOS 17-Black 1678 12-19 39% 17 MA
998 Mill City 15 1678 13-7 65% 15 MA
999 Bay to Bay 13-Premier 1678 37-32 54% 13 CA
1000 Exodus 18-1 1677 5-2 71% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.