2025-2026 Season — Page 21 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | LBVC 18-Red | 1677 | 9-1 | 82% | 18 | CA |
| 1002 | MVC 17-Black | 1677 | 42-21 | 67% | 17 | AZ |
| 1003 | Tribe 13-B elite cardinal | 1677 | 36-20 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 1004 | South County Boys 17-1 | 1677 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | RI |
| 1005 | Annapolis 14-1 | 1677 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | MD |
| 1006 | Rockwood Thunder 16-Elite | 1676 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | |
| 1007 | Western Mass 18-Ac mufasa | 1676 | 57-16 | 76% | 18 | MA |
| 1008 | 630 Volleyball 15-2 | 1676 | 35-35 | 49% | 15 | IL |
| 1009 | O-Zone 16u Platinum | 1676 | 14-12 | 54% | 16 | FL |
| 1010 | NJ RONIN 18 SWORD | 1676 | 22-19 | 54% | 18 | NJ |
| 1011 | NEVBC Boys 17.2 | 1676 | 25-11 | 69% | 17 | CT |
| 1012 | SF Elite 14 Ayoso | 1676 | 28-14 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 1013 | Cap City 18-Blue | 1675 | 21-23 | 47% | 18 | PA |
| 1014 | Apex 16U Elite | 1675 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | MO |
| 1015 | OMNI 14-2 elite | 1675 | 28-21 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 1016 | Red Rock Boys 18-1 | 1675 | 30-24 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 1017 | BAVC 18-1 boys | 1675 | 28-19 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 1018 | SASVBC B 12-Briana | 1675 | 17-22 | 44% | 12 | HI |
| 1019 | LIV 15-Royal preston | 1675 | 5-6 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 1020 | Junior Bisons 16 | 1674 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | |
| 1021 | EVA Boys 18-1 | 1674 | 20-15 | 57% | 18 | NJ |
| 1022 | Westside 14-Green | 1674 | 9-4 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 1023 | Ronin 18-Sword | 1673 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | |
| 1024 | HPSTL B14-White | 1673 | 27-10 | 71% | 14 | MO |
| 1025 | Cinci Attack 18-Red | 1673 | 37-28 | 57% | 18 | OH |
| 1026 | Sportime 18-Quogue | 1673 | 19-17 | 53% | 18 | NY |
| 1027 | HSJ 15-1 | 1672 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | |
| 1028 | LVC 14-Blue | 1672 | 17-8 | 68% | 14 | NY |
| 1029 | RAGE 16-1 scott | 1672 | 35-25 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 1030 | Delaware Juniors 14-A | 1672 | 23-7 | 77% | 14 | DE |
| 1031 | DNA 18-Blue | 1672 | 29-20 | 59% | 18 | FL |
| 1032 | PA ELITE 18-National | 1672 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | PA |
| 1033 | LVL UP 18-National - boys | 1671 | 29-33 | 47% | 18 | AZ |
| 1034 | Pipeline 18-Black | 1671 | 32-6 | 84% | 18 | IL |
| 1035 | Southport B17-Blue | 1671 | 37-32 | 54% | 17 | WI |
| 1036 | FPVC 16-Ren boys | 1670 | 15-13 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 1037 | BVC 17-Boom | 1670 | 22-21 | 51% | 17 | MD |
| 1038 | TVA Top-Tier 17-Mint | 1669 | 22-16 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 1039 | United Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1669 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | IL |
| 1040 | Accuracy 15-Champ | 1669 | 21-14 | 60% | 15 | NJ |
| 1041 | Premier Boys 15-Black | 1669 | 42-14 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 1042 | 808 Athletic Boys 14-S austin | 1669 | 25-6 | 81% | 14 | HI |
| 1043 | Volley Next 16U | 1668 | 22-8 | 73% | 16 | MI |
| 1044 | Velocity 18-2 national | 1668 | 13-23 | 36% | 18 | PA |
| 1045 | Eclipse Boys 13-S solar | 1668 | 23-26 | 47% | 13 | CA |
| 1046 | LVC 15-Black | 1668 | 29-19 | 59% | 15 | NY |
| 1047 | HPSTL B16-White | 1668 | 41-24 | 63% | 16 | MO |
| 1048 | FAV 16 Maverick | 1668 | 23-17 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 1049 | SIVC 18-1 sam | 1668 | 14-12 | 54% | 18 | WA |
| 1050 | EAVC 18-1 | 1667 | 6-9 | 40% | 18 | SD |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.