Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 21 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1001 Bay to Bay 13-Premier 1680 37-32 54% 13 CA
1002 Country Kids 14 10 1679 6-3 67% 10 HI
1003 Platinum 13-Bonnie 1678 10-0 100% 13 UT
1004 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 14 Split Mountain Corey 1678 8-2 73% 14 UT
1005 South County Boys 17-1 1677 5-2 71% 17 UT
1006 OMNI 14-2 elite 1677 28-21 57% 14 CA
1007 NYC VBA 18 Riverside 1677 25-29 46% 18 NY
1008 OVC B14 1677 32-8 80% 14 WI
1009 AJAXVB Bend 18-1 gold 1677 22-15 59% 18 OR
1010 SF Elite 14 Ayoso 1677 28-14 67% 14 CA
1011 Aspire 18-Winter soldier 1676 12-11 52% 18 AZ
1012 BAVC 18-1 boys 1676 28-19 60% 18 CA
1013 BAVC 16-1 sal 1676 0-0 0% 16 CA
1014 SOSVBC 18-Cooper 1676 6-6 50% 18 NY
1015 ID ONE 18-Elite boys 1676 27-18 60% 18 ID
1016 COAST 18-2 brody 1675 11-8 58% 18 CA
1017 NEVBC Boys 17.2 1675 25-11 69% 17 CT
1018 Pacific Rim 17-1 1675 34-22 61% 17 CA
1019 RAGE 16-1 scott 1675 35-25 58% 16 CA
1020 Apex 16U Elite 1674 4-4 50% 16 BC
1021 BVC 17-Boom 1674 22-21 51% 17 DE
1022 EVA Boys 18-1 1674 20-15 57% 18 NJ
1023 NF 15 Cobalt 1674 23-24 49% 15 NY
1024 MVP BOS 16-Black 1674 33-23 58% 16 MA
1025 Cap City 18-Blue 1673 21-23 47% 18 PA
1026 HPSTL B14-White 1673 27-10 71% 14 MO
1027 Crown City 18 Kings 1673 16-16 50% 18 CA
1028 Tribe 13-B elite cardinal 1673 36-20 64% 13 FL
1029 DNA 18-Blue 1673 29-20 59% 18 FL
1030 LVC 15-Black 1673 29-19 59% 15 NY
1031 SERV 17 Beast 1673 29-20 59% 17 VA
1032 LVC 14-Blue 1673 17-8 68% 14 NY
1033 C2 Attack 17-2 premier 1672 39-35 53% 17 TN
1034 Delaware Juniors 14-A 1672 23-7 77% 14 PA
1035 SASVBC B 12-Briana 1671 17-22 44% 12 HI
1036 Junior Bisons 16 1671 4-1 80% 16 KY
1037 PA ELITE 18-National 1671 8-7 53% 18 PA
1038 FIVA 18-Boys rene 1671 13-16 45% 18 FL
1039 Eclipse Boys 13-S solar 1671 23-26 47% 13 CA
1040 Southport B17-Blue 1670 37-32 54% 17 WI
1041 SIVC 18-1 sam 1670 14-12 54% 18 CO
1042 Pipeline 18-Black 1670 32-6 84% 18 IL
1043 TVA Top-Tier 17-Mint 1670 22-16 58% 17 CA
1044 FAV 16 Maverick 1670 23-17 57% 16 CA
1045 Red Rock Boys 18-1 1670 30-24 56% 18 CA
1046 Jax Skyline 15-B royal 1670 21-26 45% 15 FL
1047 FPVC 16-Ren boys 1670 15-13 54% 16 CA
1048 808 Athletic Boys 14-S austin 1669 25-6 81% 14 HI
1049 Miami United 17-National kylee 1669 20-22 48% 17 FL
1050 United Volleyball Club 18-1 1669 6-1 86% 18 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.