2025-2026 Season — Page 21 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | Bay to Bay 13-Premier | 1680 | 37-32 | 54% | 13 | CA |
| 1002 | Country Kids 14 10 | 1679 | 6-3 | 67% | 10 | HI |
| 1003 | Platinum 13-Bonnie | 1678 | 10-0 | 100% | 13 | UT |
| 1004 | Split Mountain Volleyball Club 14 Split Mountain Corey | 1678 | 8-2 | 73% | 14 | UT |
| 1005 | South County Boys 17-1 | 1677 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | UT |
| 1006 | OMNI 14-2 elite | 1677 | 28-21 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 1007 | NYC VBA 18 Riverside | 1677 | 25-29 | 46% | 18 | NY |
| 1008 | OVC B14 | 1677 | 32-8 | 80% | 14 | WI |
| 1009 | AJAXVB Bend 18-1 gold | 1677 | 22-15 | 59% | 18 | OR |
| 1010 | SF Elite 14 Ayoso | 1677 | 28-14 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 1011 | Aspire 18-Winter soldier | 1676 | 12-11 | 52% | 18 | AZ |
| 1012 | BAVC 18-1 boys | 1676 | 28-19 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 1013 | BAVC 16-1 sal | 1676 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 1014 | SOSVBC 18-Cooper | 1676 | 6-6 | 50% | 18 | NY |
| 1015 | ID ONE 18-Elite boys | 1676 | 27-18 | 60% | 18 | ID |
| 1016 | COAST 18-2 brody | 1675 | 11-8 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 1017 | NEVBC Boys 17.2 | 1675 | 25-11 | 69% | 17 | CT |
| 1018 | Pacific Rim 17-1 | 1675 | 34-22 | 61% | 17 | CA |
| 1019 | RAGE 16-1 scott | 1675 | 35-25 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 1020 | Apex 16U Elite | 1674 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | BC |
| 1021 | BVC 17-Boom | 1674 | 22-21 | 51% | 17 | DE |
| 1022 | EVA Boys 18-1 | 1674 | 20-15 | 57% | 18 | NJ |
| 1023 | NF 15 Cobalt | 1674 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | NY |
| 1024 | MVP BOS 16-Black | 1674 | 33-23 | 58% | 16 | MA |
| 1025 | Cap City 18-Blue | 1673 | 21-23 | 47% | 18 | PA |
| 1026 | HPSTL B14-White | 1673 | 27-10 | 71% | 14 | MO |
| 1027 | Crown City 18 Kings | 1673 | 16-16 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 1028 | Tribe 13-B elite cardinal | 1673 | 36-20 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 1029 | DNA 18-Blue | 1673 | 29-20 | 59% | 18 | FL |
| 1030 | LVC 15-Black | 1673 | 29-19 | 59% | 15 | NY |
| 1031 | SERV 17 Beast | 1673 | 29-20 | 59% | 17 | VA |
| 1032 | LVC 14-Blue | 1673 | 17-8 | 68% | 14 | NY |
| 1033 | C2 Attack 17-2 premier | 1672 | 39-35 | 53% | 17 | TN |
| 1034 | Delaware Juniors 14-A | 1672 | 23-7 | 77% | 14 | PA |
| 1035 | SASVBC B 12-Briana | 1671 | 17-22 | 44% | 12 | HI |
| 1036 | Junior Bisons 16 | 1671 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | KY |
| 1037 | PA ELITE 18-National | 1671 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | PA |
| 1038 | FIVA 18-Boys rene | 1671 | 13-16 | 45% | 18 | FL |
| 1039 | Eclipse Boys 13-S solar | 1671 | 23-26 | 47% | 13 | CA |
| 1040 | Southport B17-Blue | 1670 | 37-32 | 54% | 17 | WI |
| 1041 | SIVC 18-1 sam | 1670 | 14-12 | 54% | 18 | CO |
| 1042 | Pipeline 18-Black | 1670 | 32-6 | 84% | 18 | IL |
| 1043 | TVA Top-Tier 17-Mint | 1670 | 22-16 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 1044 | FAV 16 Maverick | 1670 | 23-17 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 1045 | Red Rock Boys 18-1 | 1670 | 30-24 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 1046 | Jax Skyline 15-B royal | 1670 | 21-26 | 45% | 15 | FL |
| 1047 | FPVC 16-Ren boys | 1670 | 15-13 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 1048 | 808 Athletic Boys 14-S austin | 1669 | 25-6 | 81% | 14 | HI |
| 1049 | Miami United 17-National kylee | 1669 | 20-22 | 48% | 17 | FL |
| 1050 | United Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1669 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.