Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 21 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1001 LBVC 18-Red 1677 9-1 82% 18 CA
1002 MVC 17-Black 1677 42-21 67% 17 AZ
1003 Tribe 13-B elite cardinal 1677 36-20 64% 13 FL
1004 South County Boys 17-1 1677 5-2 71% 17 RI
1005 Annapolis 14-1 1677 3-5 38% 14 MD
1006 Rockwood Thunder 16-Elite 1676 4-3 57% 16
1007 Western Mass 18-Ac mufasa 1676 57-16 76% 18 MA
1008 630 Volleyball 15-2 1676 35-35 49% 15 IL
1009 O-Zone 16u Platinum 1676 14-12 54% 16 FL
1010 NJ RONIN 18 SWORD 1676 22-19 54% 18 NJ
1011 NEVBC Boys 17.2 1676 25-11 69% 17 CT
1012 SF Elite 14 Ayoso 1676 28-14 67% 14 CA
1013 Cap City 18-Blue 1675 21-23 47% 18 PA
1014 Apex 16U Elite 1675 4-4 50% 16 MO
1015 OMNI 14-2 elite 1675 28-21 57% 14 CA
1016 Red Rock Boys 18-1 1675 30-24 56% 18 CA
1017 BAVC 18-1 boys 1675 28-19 60% 18 CA
1018 SASVBC B 12-Briana 1675 17-22 44% 12 HI
1019 LIV 15-Royal preston 1675 5-6 45% 15 CA
1020 Junior Bisons 16 1674 4-1 80% 16
1021 EVA Boys 18-1 1674 20-15 57% 18 NJ
1022 Westside 14-Green 1674 9-4 69% 14 CA
1023 Ronin 18-Sword 1673 3-4 43% 18
1024 HPSTL B14-White 1673 27-10 71% 14 MO
1025 Cinci Attack 18-Red 1673 37-28 57% 18 OH
1026 Sportime 18-Quogue 1673 19-17 53% 18 NY
1027 HSJ 15-1 1672 0-0 0% 15
1028 LVC 14-Blue 1672 17-8 68% 14 NY
1029 RAGE 16-1 scott 1672 35-25 58% 16 CA
1030 Delaware Juniors 14-A 1672 23-7 77% 14 DE
1031 DNA 18-Blue 1672 29-20 59% 18 FL
1032 PA ELITE 18-National 1672 8-7 53% 18 PA
1033 LVL UP 18-National - boys 1671 29-33 47% 18 AZ
1034 Pipeline 18-Black 1671 32-6 84% 18 IL
1035 Southport B17-Blue 1671 37-32 54% 17 WI
1036 FPVC 16-Ren boys 1670 15-13 54% 16 CA
1037 BVC 17-Boom 1670 22-21 51% 17 MD
1038 TVA Top-Tier 17-Mint 1669 22-16 58% 17 CA
1039 United Volleyball Club 18-1 1669 6-1 86% 18 IL
1040 Accuracy 15-Champ 1669 21-14 60% 15 NJ
1041 Premier Boys 15-Black 1669 42-14 75% 15 TX
1042 808 Athletic Boys 14-S austin 1669 25-6 81% 14 HI
1043 Volley Next 16U 1668 22-8 73% 16 MI
1044 Velocity 18-2 national 1668 13-23 36% 18 PA
1045 Eclipse Boys 13-S solar 1668 23-26 47% 13 CA
1046 LVC 15-Black 1668 29-19 59% 15 NY
1047 HPSTL B16-White 1668 41-24 63% 16 MO
1048 FAV 16 Maverick 1668 23-17 57% 16 CA
1049 SIVC 18-1 sam 1668 14-12 54% 18 WA
1050 EAVC 18-1 1667 6-9 40% 18 SD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.