2025-2026 Season — Page 22 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051 | Redline Zia VBC 14-1 | 1667 | 8-1 | 89% | 14 | |
| 1052 | MVP FL 17-Black | 1667 | 39-14 | 74% | 17 | FL |
| 1053 | L2 18-2 boys | 1666 | 36-22 | 62% | 18 | MI |
| 1054 | Cinci Attack 12-Black | 1666 | 12-4 | 75% | 12 | OH |
| 1055 | Metro 11 Travel | 1665 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 1056 | VAQUE 16-1 | 1665 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | |
| 1057 | Miami United 17-National kylee | 1665 | 20-22 | 48% | 17 | FL |
| 1058 | RUSH 15-Black | 1665 | 10-16 | 38% | 15 | AZ |
| 1059 | Seaside 17-Black | 1665 | 19-15 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 1060 | Diablo 14-1 black | 1665 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | CA |
| 1061 | AZ LEGACY 18 APEX | 1664 | 25-42 | 37% | 18 | AZ |
| 1062 | C2 Attack 17-2 premier | 1664 | 39-35 | 53% | 17 | TN |
| 1063 | COAST 18-2 brody | 1664 | 11-8 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 1064 | Legends 15-2 naldo | 1664 | 19-5 | 79% | 15 | PR |
| 1065 | CJVA Boys 16-Onyx | 1664 | 14-16 | 47% | 16 | NJ |
| 1066 | Boston United Boys 15 N | 1663 | 7-12 | 37% | 15 | MA |
| 1067 | Hive 18 Gold | 1663 | 15-17 | 47% | 18 | UT |
| 1068 | Jax Skyline 15-B royal | 1663 | 21-26 | 45% | 15 | FL |
| 1069 | Bay to Bay 15-Club | 1663 | 37-28 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 1070 | Fresno Heat HEAT 14-Travel | 1663 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 1071 | Snipers 16-1 | 1663 | 10-4 | 63% | 16 | NV |
| 1072 | OVC 17-1 | 1663 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | VA |
| 1073 | SERV 17 Beast | 1662 | 29-20 | 59% | 17 | VA |
| 1074 | Crown City 18 Kings | 1662 | 16-16 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 1075 | Cinci Attack 13-Black | 1662 | 22-22 | 50% | 13 | OH |
| 1076 | TLP/ACT 15 Ethan | 1662 | 38-13 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 1077 | MVP 12-Black | 1661 | 18-12 | 60% | 12 | MD |
| 1078 | ECVBA 15-1 | 1661 | 19-16 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 1079 | Miami United 14-Matt | 1661 | 28-15 | 65% | 14 | FL |
| 1080 | Vegas Aces 14-1 | 1661 | 14-8 | 64% | 14 | NV |
| 1081 | Kahua 14 | 1661 | 9-3 | 75% | 14 | HI |
| 1082 | WC Aces - 17-Spades | 1660 | 41-38 | 51% | 17 | IL |
| 1083 | Roots Volleyball Academy 14-1 | 1660 | 7-0 | 100% | 14 | TX |
| 1084 | OVC 18-1 | 1660 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | VA |
| 1085 | SVC 14-1 | 1660 | 12-0 | 100% | 14 | NY |
| 1086 | ID ONE 18-Elite boys | 1660 | 27-18 | 60% | 18 | ID |
| 1087 | Mayhem 18-1 | 1660 | 10-18 | 36% | 18 | KS |
| 1088 | Vanguard 17-Gold kelso | 1659 | 9-8 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 1089 | VAQUEROS 13-M ariel | 1659 | 14-6 | 70% | 13 | PR |
| 1090 | ACAD Boys 16-Blue | 1659 | 17-14 | 55% | 16 | NY |
| 1091 | Aspire 15 Venom | 1659 | 31-26 | 54% | 15 | AZ |
| 1092 | MAVS 14-Red | 1659 | 21-18 | 54% | 14 | KS |
| 1093 | Cinci Attack 14-Red | 1659 | 36-22 | 62% | 14 | OH |
| 1094 | SPVB 15-Alpha | 1659 | 40-20 | 67% | 15 | IL |
| 1095 | Platinum 15-Dallas | 1659 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | UT |
| 1096 | DCVA 13-1 | 1659 | 6-1 | 75% | 13 | NM |
| 1097 | MVC 18-Red | 1658 | 36-25 | 59% | 18 | AZ |
| 1098 | SERV 18 Beast | 1657 | 38-22 | 63% | 18 | VA |
| 1099 | Eclipse Boys 16-S | 1657 | 26-30 | 46% | 16 | CA |
| 1100 | 630 Volleyball 18-3 | 1657 | 49-22 | 69% | 18 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.