2025-2026 Season — Page 22 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051 | Seaside 17-Black | 1669 | 19-15 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 1052 | Kahua 14 | 1669 | 9-3 | 75% | 14 | HI |
| 1053 | Velocity 18-2 national | 1669 | 13-23 | 36% | 18 | PA |
| 1054 | Premier Boys 15-Black | 1669 | 42-14 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 1055 | ECVBA 15-1 | 1669 | 19-16 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 1056 | Accuracy 15-Champ | 1668 | 21-14 | 60% | 15 | NJ |
| 1057 | CORE Volleyball 18-Platinum | 1668 | 13-16 | 45% | 18 | NJ |
| 1058 | AZ LEGACY 18 APEX | 1668 | 25-42 | 37% | 18 | AZ |
| 1059 | Western Mass 18-Ac mufasa | 1668 | 57-16 | 76% | 18 | MA |
| 1060 | RUSH 15-Black | 1667 | 10-16 | 38% | 15 | AZ |
| 1061 | CJVA Boys 16-Onyx | 1667 | 14-16 | 47% | 16 | NJ |
| 1062 | VAQUE 16-1 | 1667 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | PR |
| 1063 | Kinnect 17-Forest | 1666 | 20-16 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 1064 | Eden Prairie Volleyball 18-Usa | 1666 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | MN |
| 1065 | HPSTL B16-White | 1666 | 41-24 | 63% | 16 | MO |
| 1066 | LVL UP 18-National - boys | 1666 | 29-33 | 47% | 18 | AZ |
| 1067 | Ronin 18-Sword | 1666 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | MA |
| 1068 | South County Juniors Boys 17-1 | 1666 | 14-19 | 42% | 17 | RI |
| 1069 | Cinci Attack 12-Black | 1666 | 12-4 | 75% | 12 | OH |
| 1070 | Cinci Attack 13-Black | 1666 | 22-22 | 50% | 13 | OH |
| 1071 | Leaside Volleyball Club 18 Leaside Knights | 1666 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | ON |
| 1072 | VUVC B15-BLACK | 1666 | 24-32 | 43% | 15 | NV |
| 1073 | Venom Volleyball 15 Venom Riot | 1665 | 7-4 | 64% | 15 | FL |
| 1074 | SPVB 15-Alpha | 1665 | 40-20 | 67% | 15 | IL |
| 1075 | Brainerd Northern Heat 16 NH Berserkers | 1665 | 18-5 | 78% | 16 | MN |
| 1076 | A4 Volley Boys 16-Torrey | 1665 | 25-23 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 1077 | Volley Next 16U | 1665 | 22-8 | 73% | 16 | IL |
| 1078 | MVC 18-Red | 1664 | 36-25 | 59% | 18 | AZ |
| 1079 | MVP FL 17-Black | 1664 | 39-14 | 74% | 17 | FL |
| 1080 | NorCal Boys 18-2 | 1663 | 27-25 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 1081 | Legends 15-2 naldo | 1663 | 19-5 | 79% | 15 | PR |
| 1082 | MAVS 14-Red | 1663 | 21-18 | 54% | 14 | KS |
| 1083 | SAN JUAN VC 17-1 fernando | 1663 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | PR |
| 1084 | WC Aces - 17-Spades | 1663 | 41-38 | 51% | 17 | IL |
| 1085 | WSA Gators 18-Elite boys | 1663 | 30-24 | 56% | 18 | FL |
| 1086 | Club GSL 14-Elect - jackie | 1662 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | UT |
| 1087 | Top Flight 16-Nat black | 1662 | 26-17 | 60% | 16 | IL |
| 1088 | GSL 16-Elect - josh | 1662 | 36-27 | 57% | 16 | UT |
| 1089 | LHV Boys 16-1 valiants | 1662 | 34-22 | 61% | 16 | MA |
| 1090 | Tyrants 14-Black | 1661 | 33-34 | 49% | 14 | CA |
| 1091 | Mentor Volley 17-1 | 1661 | 6-10 | 38% | 17 | CA |
| 1092 | Top Flight 16-Nat red | 1661 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | IL |
| 1093 | Aspire 15 Venom | 1659 | 31-26 | 54% | 15 | AZ |
| 1094 | Bay to Bay 15-Club | 1659 | 37-28 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 1095 | Miami United 14-Matt | 1659 | 28-15 | 65% | 14 | FL |
| 1096 | Vanguard 17-Gold kelso | 1659 | 9-8 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 1097 | Sportime 16-2 | 1659 | 16-24 | 40% | 16 | NY |
| 1098 | NY Strangers 16 | 1658 | 18-17 | 51% | 16 | NJ |
| 1099 | VAQUEROS 13-M ariel | 1658 | 14-6 | 70% | 13 | PR |
| 1100 | MOD B17-White | 1658 | 44-27 | 62% | 17 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.