Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 22 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1051 Redline Zia VBC 14-1 1667 8-1 89% 14
1052 MVP FL 17-Black 1667 39-14 74% 17 FL
1053 L2 18-2 boys 1666 36-22 62% 18 MI
1054 Cinci Attack 12-Black 1666 12-4 75% 12 OH
1055 Metro 11 Travel 1665 0-0 0% 11
1056 VAQUE 16-1 1665 7-2 78% 16
1057 Miami United 17-National kylee 1665 20-22 48% 17 FL
1058 RUSH 15-Black 1665 10-16 38% 15 AZ
1059 Seaside 17-Black 1665 19-15 56% 17 CA
1060 Diablo 14-1 black 1665 5-1 83% 14 CA
1061 AZ LEGACY 18 APEX 1664 25-42 37% 18 AZ
1062 C2 Attack 17-2 premier 1664 39-35 53% 17 TN
1063 COAST 18-2 brody 1664 11-8 58% 18 CA
1064 Legends 15-2 naldo 1664 19-5 79% 15 PR
1065 CJVA Boys 16-Onyx 1664 14-16 47% 16 NJ
1066 Boston United Boys 15 N 1663 7-12 37% 15 MA
1067 Hive 18 Gold 1663 15-17 47% 18 UT
1068 Jax Skyline 15-B royal 1663 21-26 45% 15 FL
1069 Bay to Bay 15-Club 1663 37-28 57% 15 CA
1070 Fresno Heat HEAT 14-Travel 1663 4-2 67% 14 CA
1071 Snipers 16-1 1663 10-4 63% 16 NV
1072 OVC 17-1 1663 2-5 29% 17 VA
1073 SERV 17 Beast 1662 29-20 59% 17 VA
1074 Crown City 18 Kings 1662 16-16 50% 18 CA
1075 Cinci Attack 13-Black 1662 22-22 50% 13 OH
1076 TLP/ACT 15 Ethan 1662 38-13 75% 15 CA
1077 MVP 12-Black 1661 18-12 60% 12 MD
1078 ECVBA 15-1 1661 19-16 54% 15 CA
1079 Miami United 14-Matt 1661 28-15 65% 14 FL
1080 Vegas Aces 14-1 1661 14-8 64% 14 NV
1081 Kahua 14 1661 9-3 75% 14 HI
1082 WC Aces - 17-Spades 1660 41-38 51% 17 IL
1083 Roots Volleyball Academy 14-1 1660 7-0 100% 14 TX
1084 OVC 18-1 1660 4-3 57% 18 VA
1085 SVC 14-1 1660 12-0 100% 14 NY
1086 ID ONE 18-Elite boys 1660 27-18 60% 18 ID
1087 Mayhem 18-1 1660 10-18 36% 18 KS
1088 Vanguard 17-Gold kelso 1659 9-8 53% 17 OH
1089 VAQUEROS 13-M ariel 1659 14-6 70% 13 PR
1090 ACAD Boys 16-Blue 1659 17-14 55% 16 NY
1091 Aspire 15 Venom 1659 31-26 54% 15 AZ
1092 MAVS 14-Red 1659 21-18 54% 14 KS
1093 Cinci Attack 14-Red 1659 36-22 62% 14 OH
1094 SPVB 15-Alpha 1659 40-20 67% 15 IL
1095 Platinum 15-Dallas 1659 5-3 63% 15 UT
1096 DCVA 13-1 1659 6-1 75% 13 NM
1097 MVC 18-Red 1658 36-25 59% 18 AZ
1098 SERV 18 Beast 1657 38-22 63% 18 VA
1099 Eclipse Boys 16-S 1657 26-30 46% 16 CA
1100 630 Volleyball 18-3 1657 49-22 69% 18 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.