Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 22 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1051 Seaside 17-Black 1669 19-15 56% 17 CA
1052 Kahua 14 1669 9-3 75% 14 HI
1053 Velocity 18-2 national 1669 13-23 36% 18 PA
1054 Premier Boys 15-Black 1669 42-14 75% 15 TX
1055 ECVBA 15-1 1669 19-16 54% 15 CA
1056 Accuracy 15-Champ 1668 21-14 60% 15 NJ
1057 CORE Volleyball 18-Platinum 1668 13-16 45% 18 NJ
1058 AZ LEGACY 18 APEX 1668 25-42 37% 18 AZ
1059 Western Mass 18-Ac mufasa 1668 57-16 76% 18 MA
1060 RUSH 15-Black 1667 10-16 38% 15 AZ
1061 CJVA Boys 16-Onyx 1667 14-16 47% 16 NJ
1062 VAQUE 16-1 1667 7-2 78% 16 PR
1063 Kinnect 17-Forest 1666 20-16 56% 17 CA
1064 Eden Prairie Volleyball 18-Usa 1666 6-0 100% 18 MN
1065 HPSTL B16-White 1666 41-24 63% 16 MO
1066 LVL UP 18-National - boys 1666 29-33 47% 18 AZ
1067 Ronin 18-Sword 1666 3-4 43% 18 MA
1068 South County Juniors Boys 17-1 1666 14-19 42% 17 RI
1069 Cinci Attack 12-Black 1666 12-4 75% 12 OH
1070 Cinci Attack 13-Black 1666 22-22 50% 13 OH
1071 Leaside Volleyball Club 18 Leaside Knights 1666 4-3 57% 18 ON
1072 VUVC B15-BLACK 1666 24-32 43% 15 NV
1073 Venom Volleyball 15 Venom Riot 1665 7-4 64% 15 FL
1074 SPVB 15-Alpha 1665 40-20 67% 15 IL
1075 Brainerd Northern Heat 16 NH Berserkers 1665 18-5 78% 16 MN
1076 A4 Volley Boys 16-Torrey 1665 25-23 52% 16 CA
1077 Volley Next 16U 1665 22-8 73% 16 IL
1078 MVC 18-Red 1664 36-25 59% 18 AZ
1079 MVP FL 17-Black 1664 39-14 74% 17 FL
1080 NorCal Boys 18-2 1663 27-25 52% 18 CA
1081 Legends 15-2 naldo 1663 19-5 79% 15 PR
1082 MAVS 14-Red 1663 21-18 54% 14 KS
1083 SAN JUAN VC 17-1 fernando 1663 6-4 60% 17 PR
1084 WC Aces - 17-Spades 1663 41-38 51% 17 IL
1085 WSA Gators 18-Elite boys 1663 30-24 56% 18 FL
1086 Club GSL 14-Elect - jackie 1662 5-0 100% 14 UT
1087 Top Flight 16-Nat black 1662 26-17 60% 16 IL
1088 GSL 16-Elect - josh 1662 36-27 57% 16 UT
1089 LHV Boys 16-1 valiants 1662 34-22 61% 16 MA
1090 Tyrants 14-Black 1661 33-34 49% 14 CA
1091 Mentor Volley 17-1 1661 6-10 38% 17 CA
1092 Top Flight 16-Nat red 1661 7-2 78% 16 IL
1093 Aspire 15 Venom 1659 31-26 54% 15 AZ
1094 Bay to Bay 15-Club 1659 37-28 57% 15 CA
1095 Miami United 14-Matt 1659 28-15 65% 14 FL
1096 Vanguard 17-Gold kelso 1659 9-8 53% 17 OH
1097 Sportime 16-2 1659 16-24 40% 16 NY
1098 NY Strangers 16 1658 18-17 51% 16 NJ
1099 VAQUEROS 13-M ariel 1658 14-6 70% 13 PR
1100 MOD B17-White 1658 44-27 62% 17 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.