Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 23 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1101 NF 15 Cobalt 1657 23-24 49% 15 NY
1102 Tropics Boys 17-S elite ray 1657 25-17 60% 17 FL
1103 VTV 18-1 1656 23-24 49% 18 VT
1104 WSA Gators 18-Elite boys 1656 30-24 56% 18 FL
1105 Future 18-White 1656 23-14 62% 18 IL
1106 Evolution 14-Elite noah 1656 36-23 61% 14 CA
1107 SAN JUAN VC 17-1 fernando 1656 6-4 60% 17 PR
1108 Mentor Volley 17-1 1655 6-10 38% 17 CA
1109 TVS 12 Jayla 1655 4-1 80% 12
1110 MOD B17-White 1655 44-27 62% 17 IL
1111 OVC 14 Neptune 1655 21-9 70% 14 VA
1112 ACAD Boys 18-Blue 1655 27-15 64% 18 NY
1113 SG Elite 16 Elite 1655 17-15 53% 16 CA
1114 WAVE 16-Spring max 1655 9-0 100% 16 CA
1115 TUVA Boys 16-Elite 1654 33-24 57% 16 NC
1116 A4 Volley Boys 16-Torrey 1654 25-23 52% 16 CA
1117 Salt City Boys 14-Purple 1654 0-0 0% 14 UT
1118 SERV 14 Beast 1653 43-20 68% 14 VA
1119 Utah Flight 18-S black 1653 6-0 100% 18
1120 NorCal Boys 18-2 1653 27-25 52% 18 CA
1121 Bristol Crush 14-1 1653 5-0 100% 14
1122 Hurricanes 15-1 1653 5-1 83% 15 ON
1123 Husky 17 1653 6-0 100% 17 CT
1124 STL Crossfire 16-T1 1652 30-22 58% 16 MO
1125 Yorktowne 18-Red 1651 23-17 57% 18 PA
1126 SASVBC B 17-Haryson 1651 16-16 50% 17 HI
1127 SVA Boys 16-S 1651 10-6 63% 16 WA
1128 RoVo Boys 18U 1650 20-10 67% 18
1129 COA 17-1 1650 43-19 69% 17 IN
1130 FRVBC 15-1 1650 15-9 63% 15 CO
1131 Rancho 16-Black 1650 27-20 57% 16 CA
1132 GSL 16-Elect - josh 1650 34-22 61% 16 UT
1133 SASVBC 15-Alaka'i 1650 10-20 33% 15 HI
1134 I AM VBC 11-BLACK 1650 0-0 0% 11 WI
1135 Torrimar 17-2 1649 8-1 89% 17 PR
1136 Blast 18 Fire 1649 19-22 46% 18 PA
1137 Diggin 12-Black 1649 5-0 100% 12
1138 RUSH SV 18-Black 1649 12-11 52% 18 AZ
1139 Western Mass 17-Ac simba 1649 29-9 71% 17 MA
1140 Yorktowne 16-Red 1649 23-17 55% 16 PA
1141 Eclipse Boys 17-S 1649 19-22 46% 17 CA
1142 Epic United 18-Red 1649 29-32 48% 18 IN
1143 Boiler Jrs 18 Gold 1649 12-4 75% 18 IN
1144 SC Legends 12-Elite 1649 29-30 49% 12 CA
1145 HVA 18-Performance national 1649 0-0 0% 18 TX
1146 Hot Shots 18 National 1648 20-11 59% 18 NY
1147 Orlando Gold 15-Black 1648 27-28 49% 15 FL
1148 SF Elite 12 Saga 1648 30-16 65% 12 CA
1149 BORINQUEN COQUI 18-1m 1648 6-3 67% 18 PR
1150 New Haven Juniors 18-Open 1647 24-14 60% 18 CT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.