2025-2026 Season — Page 23 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1101 | STL Crossfire 16-T1 | 1657 | 30-22 | 58% | 16 | MO |
| 1102 | North Central Indiana Sand VBC 17 | 1657 | 6-0 | 100% | 17 | IN |
| 1103 | Tropics Boys 17-S elite ray | 1657 | 25-17 | 60% | 17 | FL |
| 1104 | SASVBC 15-Alaka'i | 1657 | 10-20 | 33% | 15 | HI |
| 1105 | SERV 18 Beast | 1657 | 38-22 | 63% | 18 | VA |
| 1106 | TUVA Boys 16-Elite | 1656 | 33-24 | 57% | 16 | NC |
| 1107 | TLP/ACT 15 Ethan | 1656 | 38-13 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 1108 | Eclipse Boys 16-S | 1656 | 26-30 | 46% | 16 | CA |
| 1109 | Roots Volleyball Academy 14-1 | 1656 | 7-0 | 100% | 14 | TX |
| 1110 | Salt City Boys 14-Purple | 1656 | 8-6 | 57% | 14 | UT |
| 1111 | Nova 18-1 - boys | 1656 | 8-14 | 36% | 18 | AZ |
| 1112 | Eclipse Boys 17-S | 1656 | 19-22 | 46% | 17 | CA |
| 1113 | Kamuela Volleyball Club 18 Kamuela VBC18s-Kane | 1655 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | HI |
| 1114 | 630 Volleyball 18-3 | 1655 | 49-22 | 69% | 18 | IL |
| 1115 | Bay to Bay 16-National | 1655 | 39-24 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 1116 | ACAD Boys 18-Blue | 1655 | 27-15 | 64% | 18 | NY |
| 1117 | FRVBC 15-1 | 1654 | 15-9 | 63% | 15 | CO |
| 1118 | GSL 18-Elite - matt | 1654 | 9-7 | 56% | 18 | UT |
| 1119 | Red Rock 13-Leandro - redwood city | 1654 | 9-12 | 43% | 13 | CA |
| 1120 | Cinci Attack 14-Red | 1654 | 36-22 | 62% | 14 | OH |
| 1121 | FURY Volleyball 15-1 | 1654 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | NY |
| 1122 | Rancho 16-Black | 1653 | 27-20 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 1123 | BORINQUEN COQUI 18-1m | 1653 | 6-3 | 67% | 18 | PR |
| 1124 | SASVBC B 17-Haryson | 1653 | 16-16 | 50% | 17 | HI |
| 1125 | Yorktowne 18-Red | 1653 | 23-17 | 57% | 18 | PA |
| 1126 | Scorpions Youth Volleyball Club 17 Scorpions Apex | 1653 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | |
| 1127 | Sanger Volleyball Club 18 Sanger18's | 1653 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | CA |
| 1128 | Future 18-White | 1652 | 23-14 | 62% | 18 | IL |
| 1129 | Diablo 14-1 black | 1652 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | CA |
| 1130 | Mayhem 18-1 | 1652 | 10-18 | 36% | 18 | MA |
| 1131 | SERV 14 Beast | 1652 | 43-20 | 68% | 14 | VA |
| 1132 | GSL 16-Elite maddy | 1652 | 16-11 | 59% | 16 | UT |
| 1133 | Salt City Boys 14-S bryan | 1652 | 14-7 | 64% | 14 | UT |
| 1134 | Evolution 14-Elite noah | 1651 | 36-23 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 1135 | MVP 12-Black | 1651 | 18-12 | 60% | 12 | MD |
| 1136 | RoVo Boys 18U | 1651 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | VA |
| 1137 | COA 17-1 | 1651 | 43-19 | 69% | 17 | CA |
| 1138 | ACAD Boys 16-Blue | 1651 | 17-14 | 55% | 16 | NY |
| 1139 | Salt City Boys 17-S tanner | 1651 | 29-11 | 73% | 17 | UT |
| 1140 | Hot Shots 18 National | 1650 | 20-11 | 59% | 18 | NY |
| 1141 | Aspire 16 Hawkeye | 1650 | 27-29 | 48% | 16 | AZ |
| 1142 | SC Legends 12-Elite | 1649 | 29-30 | 49% | 12 | CA |
| 1143 | Yorktowne 16-Red | 1649 | 23-17 | 55% | 16 | PA |
| 1144 | MOD B18-Black | 1649 | 27-24 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 1145 | VV 15-1b | 1649 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | VA |
| 1146 | SF Elite 12 Saga | 1648 | 30-16 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 1147 | VC United 16-1 elite | 1648 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | IL |
| 1148 | Battle 16-Black | 1648 | 40-20 | 65% | 16 | VA |
| 1149 | ACAD Boys 15-Red | 1648 | 20-28 | 42% | 15 | NY |
| 1150 | KOKUA BOYS 14-BLACK | 1648 | 20-16 | 56% | 14 | WA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.