2025-2026 Season — Page 23 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1101 | NF 15 Cobalt | 1657 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | NY |
| 1102 | Tropics Boys 17-S elite ray | 1657 | 25-17 | 60% | 17 | FL |
| 1103 | VTV 18-1 | 1656 | 23-24 | 49% | 18 | VT |
| 1104 | WSA Gators 18-Elite boys | 1656 | 30-24 | 56% | 18 | FL |
| 1105 | Future 18-White | 1656 | 23-14 | 62% | 18 | IL |
| 1106 | Evolution 14-Elite noah | 1656 | 36-23 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 1107 | SAN JUAN VC 17-1 fernando | 1656 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | PR |
| 1108 | Mentor Volley 17-1 | 1655 | 6-10 | 38% | 17 | CA |
| 1109 | TVS 12 Jayla | 1655 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | |
| 1110 | MOD B17-White | 1655 | 44-27 | 62% | 17 | IL |
| 1111 | OVC 14 Neptune | 1655 | 21-9 | 70% | 14 | VA |
| 1112 | ACAD Boys 18-Blue | 1655 | 27-15 | 64% | 18 | NY |
| 1113 | SG Elite 16 Elite | 1655 | 17-15 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 1114 | WAVE 16-Spring max | 1655 | 9-0 | 100% | 16 | CA |
| 1115 | TUVA Boys 16-Elite | 1654 | 33-24 | 57% | 16 | NC |
| 1116 | A4 Volley Boys 16-Torrey | 1654 | 25-23 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 1117 | Salt City Boys 14-Purple | 1654 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | UT |
| 1118 | SERV 14 Beast | 1653 | 43-20 | 68% | 14 | VA |
| 1119 | Utah Flight 18-S black | 1653 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 1120 | NorCal Boys 18-2 | 1653 | 27-25 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 1121 | Bristol Crush 14-1 | 1653 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 1122 | Hurricanes 15-1 | 1653 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | ON |
| 1123 | Husky 17 | 1653 | 6-0 | 100% | 17 | CT |
| 1124 | STL Crossfire 16-T1 | 1652 | 30-22 | 58% | 16 | MO |
| 1125 | Yorktowne 18-Red | 1651 | 23-17 | 57% | 18 | PA |
| 1126 | SASVBC B 17-Haryson | 1651 | 16-16 | 50% | 17 | HI |
| 1127 | SVA Boys 16-S | 1651 | 10-6 | 63% | 16 | WA |
| 1128 | RoVo Boys 18U | 1650 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | |
| 1129 | COA 17-1 | 1650 | 43-19 | 69% | 17 | IN |
| 1130 | FRVBC 15-1 | 1650 | 15-9 | 63% | 15 | CO |
| 1131 | Rancho 16-Black | 1650 | 27-20 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 1132 | GSL 16-Elect - josh | 1650 | 34-22 | 61% | 16 | UT |
| 1133 | SASVBC 15-Alaka'i | 1650 | 10-20 | 33% | 15 | HI |
| 1134 | I AM VBC 11-BLACK | 1650 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | WI |
| 1135 | Torrimar 17-2 | 1649 | 8-1 | 89% | 17 | PR |
| 1136 | Blast 18 Fire | 1649 | 19-22 | 46% | 18 | PA |
| 1137 | Diggin 12-Black | 1649 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | |
| 1138 | RUSH SV 18-Black | 1649 | 12-11 | 52% | 18 | AZ |
| 1139 | Western Mass 17-Ac simba | 1649 | 29-9 | 71% | 17 | MA |
| 1140 | Yorktowne 16-Red | 1649 | 23-17 | 55% | 16 | PA |
| 1141 | Eclipse Boys 17-S | 1649 | 19-22 | 46% | 17 | CA |
| 1142 | Epic United 18-Red | 1649 | 29-32 | 48% | 18 | IN |
| 1143 | Boiler Jrs 18 Gold | 1649 | 12-4 | 75% | 18 | IN |
| 1144 | SC Legends 12-Elite | 1649 | 29-30 | 49% | 12 | CA |
| 1145 | HVA 18-Performance national | 1649 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | TX |
| 1146 | Hot Shots 18 National | 1648 | 20-11 | 59% | 18 | NY |
| 1147 | Orlando Gold 15-Black | 1648 | 27-28 | 49% | 15 | FL |
| 1148 | SF Elite 12 Saga | 1648 | 30-16 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 1149 | BORINQUEN COQUI 18-1m | 1648 | 6-3 | 67% | 18 | PR |
| 1150 | New Haven Juniors 18-Open | 1647 | 24-14 | 60% | 18 | CT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.