Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 23 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1101 STL Crossfire 16-T1 1657 30-22 58% 16 MO
1102 North Central Indiana Sand VBC 17 1657 6-0 100% 17 IN
1103 Tropics Boys 17-S elite ray 1657 25-17 60% 17 FL
1104 SASVBC 15-Alaka'i 1657 10-20 33% 15 HI
1105 SERV 18 Beast 1657 38-22 63% 18 VA
1106 TUVA Boys 16-Elite 1656 33-24 57% 16 NC
1107 TLP/ACT 15 Ethan 1656 38-13 75% 15 CA
1108 Eclipse Boys 16-S 1656 26-30 46% 16 CA
1109 Roots Volleyball Academy 14-1 1656 7-0 100% 14 TX
1110 Salt City Boys 14-Purple 1656 8-6 57% 14 UT
1111 Nova 18-1 - boys 1656 8-14 36% 18 AZ
1112 Eclipse Boys 17-S 1656 19-22 46% 17 CA
1113 Kamuela Volleyball Club 18 Kamuela VBC18s-Kane 1655 6-2 75% 18 HI
1114 630 Volleyball 18-3 1655 49-22 69% 18 IL
1115 Bay to Bay 16-National 1655 39-24 62% 16 CA
1116 ACAD Boys 18-Blue 1655 27-15 64% 18 NY
1117 FRVBC 15-1 1654 15-9 63% 15 CO
1118 GSL 18-Elite - matt 1654 9-7 56% 18 UT
1119 Red Rock 13-Leandro - redwood city 1654 9-12 43% 13 CA
1120 Cinci Attack 14-Red 1654 36-22 62% 14 OH
1121 FURY Volleyball 15-1 1654 8-2 80% 15 NY
1122 Rancho 16-Black 1653 27-20 57% 16 CA
1123 BORINQUEN COQUI 18-1m 1653 6-3 67% 18 PR
1124 SASVBC B 17-Haryson 1653 16-16 50% 17 HI
1125 Yorktowne 18-Red 1653 23-17 57% 18 PA
1126 Scorpions Youth Volleyball Club 17 Scorpions Apex 1653 3-2 60% 17
1127 Sanger Volleyball Club 18 Sanger18's 1653 6-1 86% 18 CA
1128 Future 18-White 1652 23-14 62% 18 IL
1129 Diablo 14-1 black 1652 5-1 83% 14 CA
1130 Mayhem 18-1 1652 10-18 36% 18 MA
1131 SERV 14 Beast 1652 43-20 68% 14 VA
1132 GSL 16-Elite maddy 1652 16-11 59% 16 UT
1133 Salt City Boys 14-S bryan 1652 14-7 64% 14 UT
1134 Evolution 14-Elite noah 1651 36-23 61% 14 CA
1135 MVP 12-Black 1651 18-12 60% 12 MD
1136 RoVo Boys 18U 1651 20-10 67% 18 VA
1137 COA 17-1 1651 43-19 69% 17 CA
1138 ACAD Boys 16-Blue 1651 17-14 55% 16 NY
1139 Salt City Boys 17-S tanner 1651 29-11 73% 17 UT
1140 Hot Shots 18 National 1650 20-11 59% 18 NY
1141 Aspire 16 Hawkeye 1650 27-29 48% 16 AZ
1142 SC Legends 12-Elite 1649 29-30 49% 12 CA
1143 Yorktowne 16-Red 1649 23-17 55% 16 PA
1144 MOD B18-Black 1649 27-24 53% 18 IL
1145 VV 15-1b 1649 2-5 29% 15 VA
1146 SF Elite 12 Saga 1648 30-16 65% 12 CA
1147 VC United 16-1 elite 1648 18-26 41% 16 IL
1148 Battle 16-Black 1648 40-20 65% 16 VA
1149 ACAD Boys 15-Red 1648 20-28 42% 15 NY
1150 KOKUA BOYS 14-BLACK 1648 20-16 56% 14 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.