2025-2026 Season — Page 24 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1151 | Aloha 16-2 blue | 1647 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 1152 | Bay to Bay 16-National | 1647 | 39-24 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 1153 | BVC Slammy Boys 16-1 | 1647 | 21-8 | 72% | 16 | AL |
| 1154 | BAVC Boys 16-1 | 1647 | 21-14 | 60% | 16 | OK |
| 1155 | Boys 18-Nate | 1647 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | ID |
| 1156 | Tyrants 14-Black | 1646 | 33-34 | 49% | 14 | CA |
| 1157 | FIVA 18-Boys rene | 1646 | 13-16 | 45% | 18 | FL |
| 1158 | Battle 16-Black | 1646 | 40-20 | 65% | 16 | VA |
| 1159 | MN Juniors 18-1 | 1646 | 5-0 | 100% | 18 | MN |
| 1160 | PVC Sandlot 14-Blue | 1646 | 17-8 | 68% | 14 | PA |
| 1161 | Left Coast 13-1 | 1646 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | CA |
| 1162 | NPJ Seattle 14-1 boys | 1645 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | WA |
| 1163 | VC United 16-1 elite | 1645 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | IL |
| 1164 | KVC 17 Forest | 1645 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | TN |
| 1165 | JJVA Boys 12-A | 1645 | 24-13 | 65% | 12 | FL |
| 1166 | Playeros Ponce 17-Blue | 1645 | 6-11 | 35% | 17 | PR |
| 1167 | Slainte 18-Platinum | 1644 | 38-29 | 57% | 18 | CA |
| 1168 | MKE Sting 14-3 | 1644 | 38-16 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 1169 | SynergyForce 14-1 natl | 1644 | 27-29 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 1170 | The St. James Boys 14 W | 1643 | 19-11 | 63% | 14 | VA |
| 1171 | Velocity 16-1 regional | 1643 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | IL |
| 1172 | Madtown 10-1 select | 1643 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 1173 | Flight Academy 18 | 1643 | 16-18 | 47% | 18 | OH |
| 1174 | GSL 18-Elite - matt | 1643 | 9-7 | 56% | 18 | UT |
| 1175 | MN Select Boys 18-2 | 1643 | 29-17 | 63% | 18 | MN |
| 1176 | COAST 17-2 joe | 1643 | 6-12 | 33% | 17 | CA |
| 1177 | SBS 11-E | 1642 | 4-0 | 100% | 11 | |
| 1178 | Red Rock Heat 13 | 1642 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | |
| 1179 | KOKUA BOYS 14-BLACK | 1642 | 20-16 | 56% | 14 | WA |
| 1180 | WAVE 16-Skyler | 1642 | 14-11 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 1181 | BAVC 15-1 wendy | 1642 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | CA |
| 1182 | Aspire 16 Hawkeye | 1642 | 27-29 | 48% | 16 | AZ |
| 1183 | Sportime 16-2 | 1642 | 16-24 | 40% | 16 | NY |
| 1184 | Team Momentum B17 Navy | 1642 | 33-37 | 47% | 17 | MO |
| 1185 | Chicago Elite B 15-Elite | 1641 | 41-32 | 55% | 15 | IL |
| 1186 | GVA Boys 13-Dark blue | 1641 | 13-8 | 62% | 13 | PR |
| 1187 | 513VB Boys 15-1 | 1641 | 26-27 | 49% | 15 | OH |
| 1188 | OVA 18 Region | 1641 | 11-14 | 44% | 18 | AZ |
| 1189 | MB Surf 12-Asics greg | 1641 | 31-28 | 53% | 12 | CA |
| 1190 | Red Rock 13-Leandro - redwood city | 1641 | 9-12 | 43% | 13 | CA |
| 1191 | CCVA 16 Premier | 1641 | 20-11 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 1192 | Synergy Boys 18-Fire | 1641 | 23-25 | 48% | 18 | CA |
| 1193 | STVA 18-1 raul | 1641 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | TX |
| 1194 | Niagara Frontier 15-Cobalt | 1641 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | NY |
| 1195 | SC Legends 18-Nike | 1640 | 16-7 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 1196 | FRVBC 18-2 boys | 1640 | 13-11 | 54% | 18 | CO |
| 1197 | Preds 17-Boys reign | 1640 | 3-3 | 50% | 17 | |
| 1198 | MADFROG 13-Boys | 1640 | 23-17 | 57% | 13 | TX |
| 1199 | MOD B18-Black | 1640 | 27-24 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 1200 | Team Rockstar 15 Mike | 1640 | 32-27 | 54% | 15 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.