2025-2026 Season — Page 24 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1151 | Venom Volleyball 14 Venom Carnage | 1647 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | FL |
| 1152 | Orlando Gold 15-Black | 1647 | 27-28 | 49% | 15 | FL |
| 1153 | Boys 18-Nate | 1647 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | IN |
| 1154 | Flight Academy 18 | 1647 | 16-18 | 47% | 18 | OH |
| 1155 | BVC Slammy Boys 16-1 | 1647 | 21-8 | 72% | 16 | AL |
| 1156 | Salt City Boys North Team Academy 14-S | 1647 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | UT |
| 1157 | BAVC 17-1 boys | 1647 | 20-24 | 45% | 17 | CA |
| 1158 | AZ LEGACY 14-Apex | 1647 | 17-11 | 61% | 14 | AZ |
| 1159 | Snipers 16-1 | 1646 | 10-4 | 63% | 16 | NV |
| 1160 | BAVC Boys 16-1 | 1646 | 21-14 | 60% | 16 | OK |
| 1161 | HICVB 15-1 | 1646 | 16-7 | 70% | 15 | UT |
| 1162 | HVA 18-Performance national | 1646 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 1163 | NPJ Seattle 14-1 boys | 1646 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | WA |
| 1164 | Boiler Jrs 18 Gold | 1646 | 12-4 | 75% | 18 | IN |
| 1165 | CCVBC 16-Tanner | 1646 | 24-21 | 53% | 16 | WI |
| 1166 | PVC Sandlot 14-Blue | 1645 | 17-8 | 68% | 14 | PA |
| 1167 | Team Momentum B17 Navy | 1645 | 33-37 | 47% | 17 | MO |
| 1168 | MN Juniors 18-1 | 1645 | 5-0 | 100% | 18 | MN |
| 1169 | Western Mass 17-Ac simba | 1645 | 29-9 | 71% | 17 | MA |
| 1170 | WAVE 16-Skyler | 1645 | 14-11 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 1171 | SynergyForce 14-1 natl | 1645 | 27-29 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 1172 | FVP B18 National | 1644 | 31-14 | 69% | all | WI |
| 1173 | REACH Volleyball Club 15 Reach Apex | 1644 | 10-4 | 71% | 15 | PA |
| 1174 | Playeros Ponce 17-Blue | 1644 | 6-11 | 35% | 17 | PR |
| 1175 | Slainte 18-Platinum | 1644 | 38-29 | 57% | 18 | CA |
| 1176 | JJVA Boys 12-A | 1644 | 24-13 | 65% | 12 | FL |
| 1177 | Synergy Boys 18-Fire | 1644 | 23-25 | 48% | 18 | PA |
| 1178 | Blast 18 Fire | 1643 | 19-22 | 46% | 18 | RI |
| 1179 | Velocity 16-1 regional | 1643 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | AR |
| 1180 | UVC 14-Sam/quillan | 1643 | 20-12 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 1181 | Aloha 16-2 blue | 1643 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 1182 | MKE Sting 14-3 | 1642 | 38-16 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 1183 | SC Legends 18-Nike | 1642 | 16-7 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 1184 | HP 14-1b | 1642 | 15-3 | 83% | 14 | MI |
| 1185 | New Haven Juniors 18-Open | 1642 | 24-14 | 60% | 18 | CT |
| 1186 | Red Rock Heat 13 | 1642 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | UT |
| 1187 | BAVC 15-1 wendy | 1642 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | CA |
| 1188 | Tribe 17-B elite cardinal | 1641 | 15-42 | 26% | 17 | FL |
| 1189 | MN Select Boys 18-2 | 1641 | 29-17 | 63% | 18 | MN |
| 1190 | L2 Volleyball Club 15-Nomad | 1641 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | MI |
| 1191 | MB Surf 12-Asics greg | 1641 | 31-28 | 53% | 12 | CA |
| 1192 | Epic United 18-Red | 1641 | 29-32 | 48% | 18 | IL |
| 1193 | VTV 18-1 | 1641 | 23-24 | 49% | 18 | VT |
| 1194 | Windy City Premier B18-1 | 1641 | 20-48 | 27% | 18 | IL |
| 1195 | COAST 17-2 joe | 1641 | 6-12 | 33% | 17 | CA |
| 1196 | MADFROG 13-Boys | 1641 | 23-17 | 57% | 13 | TX |
| 1197 | Team Rockstar 15 Mike | 1641 | 32-27 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 1198 | GSL 18-Elite - kilie | 1641 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | UT |
| 1199 | Mill City 18 | 1640 | 24-28 | 46% | 18 | MA |
| 1200 | 513VB Boys 15-1 | 1640 | 26-27 | 49% | 15 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.