Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 24 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1151 Aloha 16-2 blue 1647 32-23 58% 16 CA
1152 Bay to Bay 16-National 1647 39-24 62% 16 CA
1153 BVC Slammy Boys 16-1 1647 21-8 72% 16 AL
1154 BAVC Boys 16-1 1647 21-14 60% 16 OK
1155 Boys 18-Nate 1647 0-0 0% 18 ID
1156 Tyrants 14-Black 1646 33-34 49% 14 CA
1157 FIVA 18-Boys rene 1646 13-16 45% 18 FL
1158 Battle 16-Black 1646 40-20 65% 16 VA
1159 MN Juniors 18-1 1646 5-0 100% 18 MN
1160 PVC Sandlot 14-Blue 1646 17-8 68% 14 PA
1161 Left Coast 13-1 1646 0-0 0% 13 CA
1162 NPJ Seattle 14-1 boys 1645 4-1 80% 14 WA
1163 VC United 16-1 elite 1645 18-26 41% 16 IL
1164 KVC 17 Forest 1645 4-3 57% 17 TN
1165 JJVA Boys 12-A 1645 24-13 65% 12 FL
1166 Playeros Ponce 17-Blue 1645 6-11 35% 17 PR
1167 Slainte 18-Platinum 1644 38-29 57% 18 CA
1168 MKE Sting 14-3 1644 38-16 70% 14 WI
1169 SynergyForce 14-1 natl 1644 27-29 48% 14 CA
1170 The St. James Boys 14 W 1643 19-11 63% 14 VA
1171 Velocity 16-1 regional 1643 4-1 80% 16 IL
1172 Madtown 10-1 select 1643 0-0 0% 10
1173 Flight Academy 18 1643 16-18 47% 18 OH
1174 GSL 18-Elite - matt 1643 9-7 56% 18 UT
1175 MN Select Boys 18-2 1643 29-17 63% 18 MN
1176 COAST 17-2 joe 1643 6-12 33% 17 CA
1177 SBS 11-E 1642 4-0 100% 11
1178 Red Rock Heat 13 1642 5-1 83% 13
1179 KOKUA BOYS 14-BLACK 1642 20-16 56% 14 WA
1180 WAVE 16-Skyler 1642 14-11 56% 16 CA
1181 BAVC 15-1 wendy 1642 8-1 89% 15 CA
1182 Aspire 16 Hawkeye 1642 27-29 48% 16 AZ
1183 Sportime 16-2 1642 16-24 40% 16 NY
1184 Team Momentum B17 Navy 1642 33-37 47% 17 MO
1185 Chicago Elite B 15-Elite 1641 41-32 55% 15 IL
1186 GVA Boys 13-Dark blue 1641 13-8 62% 13 PR
1187 513VB Boys 15-1 1641 26-27 49% 15 OH
1188 OVA 18 Region 1641 11-14 44% 18 AZ
1189 MB Surf 12-Asics greg 1641 31-28 53% 12 CA
1190 Red Rock 13-Leandro - redwood city 1641 9-12 43% 13 CA
1191 CCVA 16 Premier 1641 20-11 65% 16 CA
1192 Synergy Boys 18-Fire 1641 23-25 48% 18 CA
1193 STVA 18-1 raul 1641 5-3 63% 18 TX
1194 Niagara Frontier 15-Cobalt 1641 0-0 0% 15 NY
1195 SC Legends 18-Nike 1640 16-7 70% 18 CA
1196 FRVBC 18-2 boys 1640 13-11 54% 18 CO
1197 Preds 17-Boys reign 1640 3-3 50% 17
1198 MADFROG 13-Boys 1640 23-17 57% 13 TX
1199 MOD B18-Black 1640 27-24 53% 18 IL
1200 Team Rockstar 15 Mike 1640 32-27 54% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.