Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 24 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1151 Venom Volleyball 14 Venom Carnage 1647 5-2 71% 14 FL
1152 Orlando Gold 15-Black 1647 27-28 49% 15 FL
1153 Boys 18-Nate 1647 0-0 0% 18 IN
1154 Flight Academy 18 1647 16-18 47% 18 OH
1155 BVC Slammy Boys 16-1 1647 21-8 72% 16 AL
1156 Salt City Boys North Team Academy 14-S 1647 6-0 100% 14 UT
1157 BAVC 17-1 boys 1647 20-24 45% 17 CA
1158 AZ LEGACY 14-Apex 1647 17-11 61% 14 AZ
1159 Snipers 16-1 1646 10-4 63% 16 NV
1160 BAVC Boys 16-1 1646 21-14 60% 16 OK
1161 HICVB 15-1 1646 16-7 70% 15 UT
1162 HVA 18-Performance national 1646 0-0 0% 18 CA
1163 NPJ Seattle 14-1 boys 1646 4-1 80% 14 WA
1164 Boiler Jrs 18 Gold 1646 12-4 75% 18 IN
1165 CCVBC 16-Tanner 1646 24-21 53% 16 WI
1166 PVC Sandlot 14-Blue 1645 17-8 68% 14 PA
1167 Team Momentum B17 Navy 1645 33-37 47% 17 MO
1168 MN Juniors 18-1 1645 5-0 100% 18 MN
1169 Western Mass 17-Ac simba 1645 29-9 71% 17 MA
1170 WAVE 16-Skyler 1645 14-11 56% 16 CA
1171 SynergyForce 14-1 natl 1645 27-29 48% 14 CA
1172 FVP B18 National 1644 31-14 69% all WI
1173 REACH Volleyball Club 15 Reach Apex 1644 10-4 71% 15 PA
1174 Playeros Ponce 17-Blue 1644 6-11 35% 17 PR
1175 Slainte 18-Platinum 1644 38-29 57% 18 CA
1176 JJVA Boys 12-A 1644 24-13 65% 12 FL
1177 Synergy Boys 18-Fire 1644 23-25 48% 18 PA
1178 Blast 18 Fire 1643 19-22 46% 18 RI
1179 Velocity 16-1 regional 1643 4-1 80% 16 AR
1180 UVC 14-Sam/quillan 1643 20-12 63% 14 CA
1181 Aloha 16-2 blue 1643 32-23 58% 16 CA
1182 MKE Sting 14-3 1642 38-16 70% 14 WI
1183 SC Legends 18-Nike 1642 16-7 70% 18 CA
1184 HP 14-1b 1642 15-3 83% 14 MI
1185 New Haven Juniors 18-Open 1642 24-14 60% 18 CT
1186 Red Rock Heat 13 1642 5-1 83% 13 UT
1187 BAVC 15-1 wendy 1642 8-1 89% 15 CA
1188 Tribe 17-B elite cardinal 1641 15-42 26% 17 FL
1189 MN Select Boys 18-2 1641 29-17 63% 18 MN
1190 L2 Volleyball Club 15-Nomad 1641 0-0 0% 15 MI
1191 MB Surf 12-Asics greg 1641 31-28 53% 12 CA
1192 Epic United 18-Red 1641 29-32 48% 18 IL
1193 VTV 18-1 1641 23-24 49% 18 VT
1194 Windy City Premier B18-1 1641 20-48 27% 18 IL
1195 COAST 17-2 joe 1641 6-12 33% 17 CA
1196 MADFROG 13-Boys 1641 23-17 57% 13 TX
1197 Team Rockstar 15 Mike 1641 32-27 54% 15 CA
1198 GSL 18-Elite - kilie 1641 8-7 53% 18 UT
1199 Mill City 18 1640 24-28 46% 18 MA
1200 513VB Boys 15-1 1640 26-27 49% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.