Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 25 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1201 Preds 17-Boys reign 1640 3-3 50% 17 OH
1202 GVA Boys 13-Dark blue 1640 13-8 62% 13 PR
1203 Utah Flight 16 Flight - Cody 1640 17-21 45% 16 UT
1204 Apex 17-1 1639 5-3 63% 17 SC
1205 Sideout 17 Justin 1639 13-28 32% 17 NY
1206 FRVBC 18-2 boys 1639 13-11 54% 18 CO
1207 CJVA Boys 16-Black 1639 17-22 44% 16 NJ
1208 STVA 18-1 raul 1639 5-3 63% 18 MA
1209 BAVC 16-2 boys matt 1639 5-1 83% 16 CA
1210 Princeton 15-Black boys 1638 0-0 0% 15 NJ
1211 Kansas Volleyball Club 16-1 1638 11-0 100% 16 KS
1212 CCVA 16 Premier 1638 20-11 65% 16 CA
1213 Lakas 16-S lje 1637 6-4 60% 16 CA
1214 CCVBC 17 1637 30-24 56% 17 WI
1215 BIGIB 12-1 1637 7-2 70% 12 HI
1216 Pilipaa 14 1637 18-8 69% 14 HI
1217 OVA 18 Region 1637 11-14 44% 18 AZ
1218 FRVBC 15-1 boys 1636 16-9 64% 15 CO
1219 PV Boys 17-1 1636 22-18 55% 17 MA
1220 Lakas 16-S lj 1636 36-20 64% 16 CA
1221 Chicago Elite B 15-Elite 1636 41-32 55% 15 IL
1222 NE Storm 17 Tsunami 1636 39-19 67% 17 MA
1223 SNIPERS VBC 16-1 b 1636 5-2 71% 16 NV
1224 MOD B14-Black 1635 35-28 56% 14 IL
1225 Keaukaha Jr s 14-Boys 1635 19-12 61% 14 HI
1226 808 Athletic Club 18-Thomas 1635 25-13 66% 18 HI
1227 WAVE 16-Spring max 1635 9-0 100% 16 CA
1228 Beach Cities 16 Onyx 1635 23-22 51% 16 CA
1229 BAVC 18-2 boys 1634 24-26 48% 18 CA
1230 Bama Elite 18-Boys premier 1634 5-1 83% 18 AL
1231 BAVC 14-1 alejandro 1634 7-1 88% 14 CA
1232 FIVA Boys 18-1 1634 12-10 55% 18 FL
1233 Pipeline 16-3 1634 26-43 38% 16 IL
1234 Legit 16-G suzanne 1634 4-0 100% 16 IA
1235 Apex 17-Select boys 1634 36-19 65% 17 SC
1236 NKYVC 14-1 cyclone 1634 13-6 68% 14 KY
1237 SCVC 14-Justin/tim 1634 11-6 65% 14 CA
1238 Pulse 14 Jimmy 1634 20-18 53% 14 CA
1239 Empowered B18 Onyx 1633 46-25 65% 18 IN
1240 The St. James Boys 14 W 1633 19-11 63% 14 VA
1241 Oasis 14-Teal 1633 9-0 100% 14 CA
1242 Philly Boys 16 1633 7-2 58% 16 PA
1243 GSEVC 17-Boys premier 1632 25-23 52% 17 NJ
1244 LVC 12-Black 1632 5-4 56% 12 NY
1245 KC Legends 14-1 1631 11-3 79% 14 MO
1246 ECVBA 15-1 kayli 1631 9-1 90% 15 CA
1247 Hive 15-Gold 1631 15-12 56% 15 UT
1248 Supreme 16-1 1631 16-6 73% 16 MA
1249 SF Elite 12-Nono 1631 3-2 60% 12 CA
1250 Heat 16-Blue 1631 26-11 70% 16 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.