Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 25 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1201 HP 14-1b 1640 15-3 83% 14 MI
1202 BAVC 16-2 boys matt 1639 5-1 83% 16 CA
1203 BAVC 17-1 boys 1639 20-24 45% 17 CA
1204 Apex 17-1 1639 5-3 63% 17 MO
1205 CJVA Boys 16-Black 1639 17-22 44% 16 NJ
1206 BAVC 18-2 boys kevin 1638 5-1 83% 18 CA
1207 Salt City Boys North Team Academy 14-S 1638 6-0 100% 14 UT
1208 Tribe 17-B elite cardinal 1638 15-42 26% 17 FL
1209 KC Legends 14-1 1638 11-3 79% 14 MO
1210 NE Storm 17 Tsunami 1638 39-19 67% 17 MA
1211 CCVBC 16-Tanner 1638 24-21 53% 16 CA
1212 PV Boys 17-1 1638 22-18 55% 17 MA
1213 VV 15-1b 1638 2-5 29% 15 CA
1214 UVC 14-Sam/quillan 1637 20-12 63% 14 CA
1215 Legit 16-G suzanne 1637 4-0 100% 16 FL
1216 Princeton 15-Black boys 1637 0-0 0% 15 NJ
1217 SERV 12 Select 1637 0-0 0% 12 VA
1218 FIVA Boys 18-1 1636 12-10 55% 18 FL
1219 SG Elite 18 Elite 1636 7-15 32% 18 CA
1220 SNIPERS VBC 16-1 b 1636 5-2 71% 16 NV
1221 Keaukaha Jr s 14-Boys 1636 19-12 61% 14 HI
1222 Pilipaa 14 1636 18-8 69% 14 HI
1223 Lakas 16-S lje 1636 6-4 60% 16 CA
1224 Kansas Volleyball Club 16-1 1635 11-0 100% 16
1225 Nova 18-1 - boys 1635 8-14 36% 18 AZ
1226 BAVC 14-1 alejandro 1635 7-1 88% 14 CA
1227 Lakas 16-S lj 1635 36-20 64% 16 CA
1228 Windy City Premier B18-1 1634 20-48 27% 18 IL
1229 Philly Boys 16 1634 7-2 58% 16 PA
1230 Pipeline 16-3 1634 26-43 38% 16 IL
1231 NKYVC 14-1 cyclone 1634 13-6 68% 14 KY
1232 Boltz 18U Black 1634 15-16 48% 18 AZ
1233 VV 16-1 1634 33-14 70% 16 CA
1234 Sideout 17 Justin 1634 13-28 32% 17 NJ
1235 Apex 17-Select boys 1634 36-19 65% 17 MO
1236 LVC 12-Black 1633 5-4 56% 12 NY
1237 Oasis 14-Teal 1633 9-0 100% 14 CO
1238 NE Storm 18 Thunder 1632 33-14 70% 18 MA
1239 MTRX 18-2 1632 18-18 50% 18 AZ
1240 ACAD Boys 15-Red 1632 20-28 42% 15 NY
1241 Blast 17 Ignite 1632 13-19 41% 17 PA
1242 CBVC 15-Black 1632 30-19 61% 15 CA
1243 CVA 16-Nany 1632 6-6 50% 16 CO
1244 CCVBC 17 1631 30-24 56% 17 CA
1245 MOD B14-Black 1631 35-28 56% 14 IL
1246 BAVC 18-2 boys 1631 24-26 48% 18 CA
1247 Beach Cities 16 Onyx 1631 23-22 51% 16 CA
1248 NW Jrs 16-Ua slate 1631 15-5 75% 16 WA
1249 RCVA Boys 14-National 1631 6-2 75% 14 VA
1250 Sidewinder 16-Cienega 1631 12-5 71% 16 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.