2025-2026 Season — Page 25 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1201 | HP 14-1b | 1640 | 15-3 | 83% | 14 | MI |
| 1202 | BAVC 16-2 boys matt | 1639 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | CA |
| 1203 | BAVC 17-1 boys | 1639 | 20-24 | 45% | 17 | CA |
| 1204 | Apex 17-1 | 1639 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | MO |
| 1205 | CJVA Boys 16-Black | 1639 | 17-22 | 44% | 16 | NJ |
| 1206 | BAVC 18-2 boys kevin | 1638 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | CA |
| 1207 | Salt City Boys North Team Academy 14-S | 1638 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | UT |
| 1208 | Tribe 17-B elite cardinal | 1638 | 15-42 | 26% | 17 | FL |
| 1209 | KC Legends 14-1 | 1638 | 11-3 | 79% | 14 | MO |
| 1210 | NE Storm 17 Tsunami | 1638 | 39-19 | 67% | 17 | MA |
| 1211 | CCVBC 16-Tanner | 1638 | 24-21 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 1212 | PV Boys 17-1 | 1638 | 22-18 | 55% | 17 | MA |
| 1213 | VV 15-1b | 1638 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | CA |
| 1214 | UVC 14-Sam/quillan | 1637 | 20-12 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 1215 | Legit 16-G suzanne | 1637 | 4-0 | 100% | 16 | FL |
| 1216 | Princeton 15-Black boys | 1637 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | NJ |
| 1217 | SERV 12 Select | 1637 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | VA |
| 1218 | FIVA Boys 18-1 | 1636 | 12-10 | 55% | 18 | FL |
| 1219 | SG Elite 18 Elite | 1636 | 7-15 | 32% | 18 | CA |
| 1220 | SNIPERS VBC 16-1 b | 1636 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | NV |
| 1221 | Keaukaha Jr s 14-Boys | 1636 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | HI |
| 1222 | Pilipaa 14 | 1636 | 18-8 | 69% | 14 | HI |
| 1223 | Lakas 16-S lje | 1636 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 1224 | Kansas Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1635 | 11-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 1225 | Nova 18-1 - boys | 1635 | 8-14 | 36% | 18 | AZ |
| 1226 | BAVC 14-1 alejandro | 1635 | 7-1 | 88% | 14 | CA |
| 1227 | Lakas 16-S lj | 1635 | 36-20 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 1228 | Windy City Premier B18-1 | 1634 | 20-48 | 27% | 18 | IL |
| 1229 | Philly Boys 16 | 1634 | 7-2 | 58% | 16 | PA |
| 1230 | Pipeline 16-3 | 1634 | 26-43 | 38% | 16 | IL |
| 1231 | NKYVC 14-1 cyclone | 1634 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | KY |
| 1232 | Boltz 18U Black | 1634 | 15-16 | 48% | 18 | AZ |
| 1233 | VV 16-1 | 1634 | 33-14 | 70% | 16 | CA |
| 1234 | Sideout 17 Justin | 1634 | 13-28 | 32% | 17 | NJ |
| 1235 | Apex 17-Select boys | 1634 | 36-19 | 65% | 17 | MO |
| 1236 | LVC 12-Black | 1633 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | NY |
| 1237 | Oasis 14-Teal | 1633 | 9-0 | 100% | 14 | CO |
| 1238 | NE Storm 18 Thunder | 1632 | 33-14 | 70% | 18 | MA |
| 1239 | MTRX 18-2 | 1632 | 18-18 | 50% | 18 | AZ |
| 1240 | ACAD Boys 15-Red | 1632 | 20-28 | 42% | 15 | NY |
| 1241 | Blast 17 Ignite | 1632 | 13-19 | 41% | 17 | PA |
| 1242 | CBVC 15-Black | 1632 | 30-19 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 1243 | CVA 16-Nany | 1632 | 6-6 | 50% | 16 | CO |
| 1244 | CCVBC 17 | 1631 | 30-24 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 1245 | MOD B14-Black | 1631 | 35-28 | 56% | 14 | IL |
| 1246 | BAVC 18-2 boys | 1631 | 24-26 | 48% | 18 | CA |
| 1247 | Beach Cities 16 Onyx | 1631 | 23-22 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 1248 | NW Jrs 16-Ua slate | 1631 | 15-5 | 75% | 16 | WA |
| 1249 | RCVA Boys 14-National | 1631 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | VA |
| 1250 | Sidewinder 16-Cienega | 1631 | 12-5 | 71% | 16 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.