2025-2026 Season — Page 25 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1201 | Preds 17-Boys reign | 1640 | 3-3 | 50% | 17 | OH |
| 1202 | GVA Boys 13-Dark blue | 1640 | 13-8 | 62% | 13 | PR |
| 1203 | Utah Flight 16 Flight - Cody | 1640 | 17-21 | 45% | 16 | UT |
| 1204 | Apex 17-1 | 1639 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | SC |
| 1205 | Sideout 17 Justin | 1639 | 13-28 | 32% | 17 | NY |
| 1206 | FRVBC 18-2 boys | 1639 | 13-11 | 54% | 18 | CO |
| 1207 | CJVA Boys 16-Black | 1639 | 17-22 | 44% | 16 | NJ |
| 1208 | STVA 18-1 raul | 1639 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | MA |
| 1209 | BAVC 16-2 boys matt | 1639 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | CA |
| 1210 | Princeton 15-Black boys | 1638 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | NJ |
| 1211 | Kansas Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1638 | 11-0 | 100% | 16 | KS |
| 1212 | CCVA 16 Premier | 1638 | 20-11 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 1213 | Lakas 16-S lje | 1637 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 1214 | CCVBC 17 | 1637 | 30-24 | 56% | 17 | WI |
| 1215 | BIGIB 12-1 | 1637 | 7-2 | 70% | 12 | HI |
| 1216 | Pilipaa 14 | 1637 | 18-8 | 69% | 14 | HI |
| 1217 | OVA 18 Region | 1637 | 11-14 | 44% | 18 | AZ |
| 1218 | FRVBC 15-1 boys | 1636 | 16-9 | 64% | 15 | CO |
| 1219 | PV Boys 17-1 | 1636 | 22-18 | 55% | 17 | MA |
| 1220 | Lakas 16-S lj | 1636 | 36-20 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 1221 | Chicago Elite B 15-Elite | 1636 | 41-32 | 55% | 15 | IL |
| 1222 | NE Storm 17 Tsunami | 1636 | 39-19 | 67% | 17 | MA |
| 1223 | SNIPERS VBC 16-1 b | 1636 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | NV |
| 1224 | MOD B14-Black | 1635 | 35-28 | 56% | 14 | IL |
| 1225 | Keaukaha Jr s 14-Boys | 1635 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | HI |
| 1226 | 808 Athletic Club 18-Thomas | 1635 | 25-13 | 66% | 18 | HI |
| 1227 | WAVE 16-Spring max | 1635 | 9-0 | 100% | 16 | CA |
| 1228 | Beach Cities 16 Onyx | 1635 | 23-22 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 1229 | BAVC 18-2 boys | 1634 | 24-26 | 48% | 18 | CA |
| 1230 | Bama Elite 18-Boys premier | 1634 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | AL |
| 1231 | BAVC 14-1 alejandro | 1634 | 7-1 | 88% | 14 | CA |
| 1232 | FIVA Boys 18-1 | 1634 | 12-10 | 55% | 18 | FL |
| 1233 | Pipeline 16-3 | 1634 | 26-43 | 38% | 16 | IL |
| 1234 | Legit 16-G suzanne | 1634 | 4-0 | 100% | 16 | IA |
| 1235 | Apex 17-Select boys | 1634 | 36-19 | 65% | 17 | SC |
| 1236 | NKYVC 14-1 cyclone | 1634 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | KY |
| 1237 | SCVC 14-Justin/tim | 1634 | 11-6 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 1238 | Pulse 14 Jimmy | 1634 | 20-18 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 1239 | Empowered B18 Onyx | 1633 | 46-25 | 65% | 18 | IN |
| 1240 | The St. James Boys 14 W | 1633 | 19-11 | 63% | 14 | VA |
| 1241 | Oasis 14-Teal | 1633 | 9-0 | 100% | 14 | CA |
| 1242 | Philly Boys 16 | 1633 | 7-2 | 58% | 16 | PA |
| 1243 | GSEVC 17-Boys premier | 1632 | 25-23 | 52% | 17 | NJ |
| 1244 | LVC 12-Black | 1632 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | NY |
| 1245 | KC Legends 14-1 | 1631 | 11-3 | 79% | 14 | MO |
| 1246 | ECVBA 15-1 kayli | 1631 | 9-1 | 90% | 15 | CA |
| 1247 | Hive 15-Gold | 1631 | 15-12 | 56% | 15 | UT |
| 1248 | Supreme 16-1 | 1631 | 16-6 | 73% | 16 | MA |
| 1249 | SF Elite 12-Nono | 1631 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | CA |
| 1250 | Heat 16-Blue | 1631 | 26-11 | 70% | 16 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.