2025-2026 Season — Page 26 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1251 | BAVC 18-2 boys | 1631 | 24-26 | 48% | 18 | CA |
| 1252 | SF Elite 12-Nono | 1630 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | CA |
| 1253 | BSVBC 12-White | 1630 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | IL |
| 1254 | RVBC 16-1 | 1630 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | |
| 1255 | HEAT 18 Travel | 1630 | 19-13 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 1256 | ECVBA 15-1 kayli | 1630 | 9-1 | 90% | 15 | CA |
| 1257 | TLP/ACT 16-Jared/nathan | 1630 | 32-16 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 1258 | Cinci Attack 15-Red | 1629 | 35-28 | 56% | 15 | OH |
| 1259 | Torrimar 14-1 | 1629 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | PR |
| 1260 | NWJRS 14-Slate | 1629 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | WA |
| 1261 | MDJRS 18-Boys | 1629 | 1-6 | 14% | 18 | MD |
| 1262 | BIGIB 12-1 | 1628 | 7-2 | 70% | 12 | HI |
| 1263 | Niagara Rapids Shockwaves 17U | 1628 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | |
| 1264 | Apex Boys VBC 14-1 | 1628 | 17-6 | 74% | 14 | TN |
| 1265 | Empowered B18 Onyx | 1628 | 46-25 | 65% | 18 | IN |
| 1266 | SAND 18-Gold | 1628 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 1267 | Hurricanes 18-1 | 1628 | 7-4 | 64% | 18 | ON |
| 1268 | SPVB 16-Bravo | 1627 | 33-24 | 58% | 16 | IL |
| 1269 | TVC 18-1 | 1627 | 11-19 | 37% | 18 | AZ |
| 1270 | Kinnect 17-Forest | 1627 | 16-13 | 55% | 17 | CA |
| 1271 | GSEVC 17-Boys premier | 1627 | 25-23 | 52% | 17 | NJ |
| 1272 | CSVC 18 HAYSTACK | 1627 | 41-18 | 69% | 18 | NY |
| 1273 | TopFlight 18-Alpha | 1627 | 3-11 | 21% | 18 | NV |
| 1274 | NorCal Boys 14-1 | 1627 | 24-23 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 1275 | Phoenix 13 Marquette | 1627 | 18-9 | 67% | 13 | OH |
| 1276 | GRV 18-Blue | 1627 | 22-11 | 67% | 18 | MI |
| 1277 | Colorado Elite VBC 17-2 | 1627 | 9-3 | 75% | 17 | CO |
| 1278 | 808 Athletic Club 18-Thomas | 1626 | 25-13 | 66% | 18 | HI |
| 1279 | Vortex 13-Alta | 1626 | 4-0 | 100% | 13 | UT |
| 1280 | WC Aces - 16-Diamonds | 1626 | 45-29 | 61% | 16 | IL |
| 1281 | H Skyline Boys 18 Royal | 1626 | 27-30 | 47% | 18 | TX |
| 1282 | RVC 18-Boys travel | 1626 | 34-21 | 62% | 18 | VA |
| 1283 | CCVBC 14-1 | 1626 | 23-11 | 68% | 14 | CA |
| 1284 | MDJRS 18-Boys black | 1626 | 29-36 | 43% | 18 | MD |
| 1285 | Colorado Elite VBC 18 | 1626 | 14-4 | 78% | 18 | CO |
| 1286 | Blockheads Elite 17 | 1625 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | |
| 1287 | GSL 18-Elite - kilie | 1625 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | UT |
| 1288 | IMUA UVC 17UA | 1625 | 12-22 | 35% | 17 | CA |
| 1289 | Battle 18-Black | 1625 | 35-20 | 56% | 18 | VA |
| 1290 | Spartans 14-Boys apex | 1625 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 1291 | Apex NW 15-Ascent | 1625 | 15-7 | 68% | 15 | WA |
| 1292 | Vegas United B 15-Black | 1624 | 9-15 | 38% | 15 | NV |
| 1293 | MVP Boys 17-Blue | 1624 | 38-32 | 54% | 17 | TX |
| 1294 | LHV 18-1 rafiki | 1624 | 12-7 | 63% | 18 | MA |
| 1295 | Heat 16-Blue | 1624 | 26-11 | 70% | 16 | WI |
| 1296 | LHV Boys 17-1 ubuntu | 1624 | 13-8 | 62% | 17 | MA |
| 1297 | Low Country 18 | 1624 | 14-4 | 78% | 18 | SC |
| 1298 | OPVC 18-Black | 1624 | 28-14 | 67% | 18 | OH |
| 1299 | Downstate 18-Cobras | 1624 | 30-15 | 67% | 18 | NY |
| 1300 | West VBC 14-1 | 1624 | 6-1 | 67% | 14 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.