Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 26 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1251 MN Select Boys 16-2 1575 26-11 70% 16 MN
1252 Elevation 16-Timber boys 1575 11-10 52% 16 CO
1253 A'o a Koa 14-B 1575 5-0 100% 14 HI
1254 Pure Aloha 18-1 og 1575 5-0 100% 18 HI
1255 True North Volleyball Academy 16-1 1574 6-1 86% 16 MO
1256 EXCEL 12-Red 1574 15-6 68% 12 TX
1257 Ocean Bay 13-Surf 1574 6-0 100% 13 FL
1258 NOC 18-Green 1574 12-20 38% 18 CA
1259 Mayhem 16-1 1574 10-4 71% 16 KS
1260 Niagara Frontier 18 Cobalt 1574 4-3 57% 18 NY
1261 BAVC 17-1 boys 1574 20-24 45% 17 CA
1262 Cap City 16-Blue 1574 16-13 53% 16 NC
1263 Evolution 14-Elite noah 1574 25-17 60% 14 FL
1264 Cincy Elite 16 Miracle 1574 27-13 68% 16 OH
1265 SKY 15-1 1574 14-7 67% 15 IL
1266 SKY 14-1 1574 19-13 59% 14 IL
1267 Salt City Boys 14-S bryan 1574 4-3 57% 14 UT
1268 EVA 18-1 1573 32-22 59% 18 IL
1269 SoCal VBC 17-Beacons 1573 13-15 46% 17 CA
1270 VIBE 16 1573 14-8 64% 16 CA
1271 Spanish Fork 18 1573 4-4 50% 18 UT
1272 Princeton 17-Black boys 1573 6-2 75% 17 PA
1273 OPVC 11-Young 1572 5-0 100% 11 OH
1274 118 18-Hallie 1572 17-10 63% 18 CA
1275 Eclipse Boys 15-S 1572 17-10 63% 15 NJ
1276 Princeton 15-National 1572 9-12 43% 15 PA
1277 Eclipse 14-S 1572 4-3 57% 14 NJ
1278 E3 18-Excel - boys 1572 4-5 44% 18 NM
1279 Pipeline 18-2 1572 23-29 44% 18 IL
1280 Horns 18-1 k 1572 6-4 60% 18
1281 630 Volleyball 17-2 1571 24-26 48% 17 IL
1282 PC Elite 18-1 1571 14-6 70% 18 TX
1283 MVC 14-Sean 1571 21-21 50% 14 WI
1284 Balboa Bay 13-Blue 1571 19-21 48% 13 CA
1285 NYC impact 16-S national 1571 3-2 60% 16 NY
1286 The St. James Boys 18-W 1571 16-13 55% 18 VA
1287 Legends 15-2 naldo 1571 7-1 88% 15 CA
1288 TVC 15-Royal 1570 6-1 86% 15 OH
1289 KIVA 18-B red 1570 18-27 40% 18 KY
1290 LBVC 17-Tyler 1570 23-14 62% 17 CA
1291 LVC 16-White 1570 12-7 60% 16 NY
1292 Aspire 13 Vision 1570 19-16 54% 13 AZ
1293 BAVC 14-1 boys 1570 17-17 50% 14 CA
1294 RVA Boys 16 Navy 1570 24-22 52% 16 AZ
1295 Warren Sixpack 17-3 1569 17-13 57% 17 NJ
1296 ID Strike 18-Black 1569 6-1 86% 18 ID
1297 MKE Sting 13-2 1569 24-18 57% 13 WI
1298 Kinnect 17-Forest 1569 16-13 55% 17 CA
1299 Team'Sota 18 Premier 1569 16-10 62% 18 MN
1300 SF Elite 18 Roschelle 1569 17-14 55% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.