2025-2026 Season — Page 26 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1251 | NW Jrs 16-Ua slate | 1631 | 15-5 | 75% | 16 | WA |
| 1252 | SoCal VBC 17-Beacons | 1630 | 15-6 | 71% | 17 | CA |
| 1253 | Westside VBC 14-Green | 1630 | 30-21 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 1254 | NorCal Boys 14-1 | 1630 | 24-23 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 1255 | MDJRS 18-Boys black | 1630 | 30-42 | 41% | 18 | MD |
| 1256 | NE Storm 18 Thunder | 1630 | 33-14 | 70% | 18 | MA |
| 1257 | SVA 18-S jayden | 1630 | 5-12 | 29% | 18 | CO |
| 1258 | GSL 15-Elite earle | 1629 | 17-14 | 55% | 15 | UT |
| 1259 | SPVB 16-Bravo | 1629 | 33-24 | 58% | 16 | IL |
| 1260 | Apex Boys VBC 14-1 | 1629 | 17-6 | 74% | 14 | TN |
| 1261 | TVC 18-1 | 1629 | 11-19 | 37% | 18 | AZ |
| 1262 | IMUA UVC 17UA | 1629 | 12-22 | 35% | 17 | CA |
| 1263 | RVBC 16-1 | 1629 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | PA |
| 1264 | Salt City Boys 17 Chap | 1628 | 25-15 | 63% | 17 | UT |
| 1265 | MVP Boys 17-Blue | 1628 | 38-32 | 54% | 17 | WI |
| 1266 | Niagara Rapids Shockwaves 17U | 1628 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | OH |
| 1267 | Salt City Boys 18-N city t | 1628 | 9-3 | 75% | 18 | UT |
| 1268 | Boltz 18U Black | 1627 | 15-16 | 48% | 18 | AZ |
| 1269 | Sidewinder 16-Cienega | 1627 | 12-5 | 71% | 16 | AZ |
| 1270 | Colorado Elite VBC 17-2 | 1627 | 9-3 | 75% | 17 | CO |
| 1271 | H Skyline Boys 18 Royal | 1627 | 27-30 | 47% | 18 | TX |
| 1272 | TLP/ACT 16-Jared/nathan | 1627 | 32-16 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 1273 | CBVC 15-Black | 1627 | 30-19 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 1274 | SMBC West 16-Molten t | 1627 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 1275 | REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 14 REACH ELITE | 1627 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | PA |
| 1276 | CVA 16-Nany | 1626 | 6-6 | 50% | 16 | PR |
| 1277 | Ajax Bend 18-1 | 1626 | 4-1 | 80% | 18 | OR |
| 1278 | HEAT 18 Travel | 1626 | 19-13 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 1279 | REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 18 REACH CURRENT | 1626 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | PA |
| 1280 | WC Aces - 16-Diamonds | 1626 | 45-29 | 61% | 16 | IL |
| 1281 | TopFlight 18-Alpha | 1626 | 3-11 | 21% | 18 | FL |
| 1282 | SAVBC 18-1 | 1626 | 14-5 | 74% | 18 | CA |
| 1283 | VV 16-1 | 1626 | 33-14 | 70% | 16 | VA |
| 1284 | MILTON EDGE 17 Milton Edge Acers | 1626 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | |
| 1285 | CSVC 18 HAYSTACK | 1625 | 41-18 | 69% | 18 | NY |
| 1286 | FVP 15-Regional | 1625 | 19-9 | 68% | 15 | WI |
| 1287 | Blockheads Elite 17 | 1625 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | PA |
| 1288 | RVC 18-Boys travel | 1625 | 34-21 | 62% | 18 | VA |
| 1289 | Spartans 14-Boys apex | 1625 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | FL |
| 1290 | Apex NW 15-Ascent | 1625 | 15-7 | 68% | 15 | WA |
| 1291 | Low Country 18 | 1625 | 14-4 | 78% | 18 | SC |
| 1292 | FRVBC 17-2 boys | 1625 | 18-8 | 69% | 17 | CO |
| 1293 | TNT Boys 15-Juggernaut | 1624 | 13-9 | 59% | 15 | PA |
| 1294 | Academy 15-E blue | 1624 | 27-32 | 46% | 15 | IN |
| 1295 | Battle 18-Black | 1624 | 35-20 | 56% | 18 | VA |
| 1296 | ECVBA 14-1 | 1624 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 1297 | SVA Boys 16-S | 1623 | 21-13 | 62% | 16 | CO |
| 1298 | Vaqueros 10-M edwin | 1623 | 5-1 | 83% | 10 | PR |
| 1299 | CCVA 16-Navy | 1623 | 22-14 | 59% | 16 | MD |
| 1300 | GSL 18-Elite matt | 1623 | 9-12 | 43% | 18 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.