Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 26 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1251 BAVC 18-2 boys 1631 24-26 48% 18 CA
1252 SF Elite 12-Nono 1630 3-2 60% 12 CA
1253 BSVBC 12-White 1630 0-0 0% 12 IL
1254 RVBC 16-1 1630 4-4 50% 16
1255 HEAT 18 Travel 1630 19-13 59% 18 CA
1256 ECVBA 15-1 kayli 1630 9-1 90% 15 CA
1257 TLP/ACT 16-Jared/nathan 1630 32-16 67% 16 CA
1258 Cinci Attack 15-Red 1629 35-28 56% 15 OH
1259 Torrimar 14-1 1629 6-1 86% 14 PR
1260 NWJRS 14-Slate 1629 5-1 83% 14 WA
1261 MDJRS 18-Boys 1629 1-6 14% 18 MD
1262 BIGIB 12-1 1628 7-2 70% 12 HI
1263 Niagara Rapids Shockwaves 17U 1628 3-2 60% 17
1264 Apex Boys VBC 14-1 1628 17-6 74% 14 TN
1265 Empowered B18 Onyx 1628 46-25 65% 18 IN
1266 SAND 18-Gold 1628 3-2 60% 18 CA
1267 Hurricanes 18-1 1628 7-4 64% 18 ON
1268 SPVB 16-Bravo 1627 33-24 58% 16 IL
1269 TVC 18-1 1627 11-19 37% 18 AZ
1270 Kinnect 17-Forest 1627 16-13 55% 17 CA
1271 GSEVC 17-Boys premier 1627 25-23 52% 17 NJ
1272 CSVC 18 HAYSTACK 1627 41-18 69% 18 NY
1273 TopFlight 18-Alpha 1627 3-11 21% 18 NV
1274 NorCal Boys 14-1 1627 24-23 51% 14 CA
1275 Phoenix 13 Marquette 1627 18-9 67% 13 OH
1276 GRV 18-Blue 1627 22-11 67% 18 MI
1277 Colorado Elite VBC 17-2 1627 9-3 75% 17 CO
1278 808 Athletic Club 18-Thomas 1626 25-13 66% 18 HI
1279 Vortex 13-Alta 1626 4-0 100% 13 UT
1280 WC Aces - 16-Diamonds 1626 45-29 61% 16 IL
1281 H Skyline Boys 18 Royal 1626 27-30 47% 18 TX
1282 RVC 18-Boys travel 1626 34-21 62% 18 VA
1283 CCVBC 14-1 1626 23-11 68% 14 CA
1284 MDJRS 18-Boys black 1626 29-36 43% 18 MD
1285 Colorado Elite VBC 18 1626 14-4 78% 18 CO
1286 Blockheads Elite 17 1625 5-1 83% 17
1287 GSL 18-Elite - kilie 1625 8-7 53% 18 UT
1288 IMUA UVC 17UA 1625 12-22 35% 17 CA
1289 Battle 18-Black 1625 35-20 56% 18 VA
1290 Spartans 14-Boys apex 1625 0-0 0% 14
1291 Apex NW 15-Ascent 1625 15-7 68% 15 WA
1292 Vegas United B 15-Black 1624 9-15 38% 15 NV
1293 MVP Boys 17-Blue 1624 38-32 54% 17 TX
1294 LHV 18-1 rafiki 1624 12-7 63% 18 MA
1295 Heat 16-Blue 1624 26-11 70% 16 WI
1296 LHV Boys 17-1 ubuntu 1624 13-8 62% 17 MA
1297 Low Country 18 1624 14-4 78% 18 SC
1298 OPVC 18-Black 1624 28-14 67% 18 OH
1299 Downstate 18-Cobras 1624 30-15 67% 18 NY
1300 West VBC 14-1 1624 6-1 67% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.