Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 26 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1251 NW Jrs 16-Ua slate 1631 15-5 75% 16 WA
1252 SoCal VBC 17-Beacons 1630 15-6 71% 17 CA
1253 Westside VBC 14-Green 1630 30-21 59% 14 CA
1254 NorCal Boys 14-1 1630 24-23 51% 14 CA
1255 MDJRS 18-Boys black 1630 30-42 41% 18 MD
1256 NE Storm 18 Thunder 1630 33-14 70% 18 MA
1257 SVA 18-S jayden 1630 5-12 29% 18 CO
1258 GSL 15-Elite earle 1629 17-14 55% 15 UT
1259 SPVB 16-Bravo 1629 33-24 58% 16 IL
1260 Apex Boys VBC 14-1 1629 17-6 74% 14 TN
1261 TVC 18-1 1629 11-19 37% 18 AZ
1262 IMUA UVC 17UA 1629 12-22 35% 17 CA
1263 RVBC 16-1 1629 4-4 50% 16 PA
1264 Salt City Boys 17 Chap 1628 25-15 63% 17 UT
1265 MVP Boys 17-Blue 1628 38-32 54% 17 WI
1266 Niagara Rapids Shockwaves 17U 1628 3-2 60% 17 OH
1267 Salt City Boys 18-N city t 1628 9-3 75% 18 UT
1268 Boltz 18U Black 1627 15-16 48% 18 AZ
1269 Sidewinder 16-Cienega 1627 12-5 71% 16 AZ
1270 Colorado Elite VBC 17-2 1627 9-3 75% 17 CO
1271 H Skyline Boys 18 Royal 1627 27-30 47% 18 TX
1272 TLP/ACT 16-Jared/nathan 1627 32-16 67% 16 CA
1273 CBVC 15-Black 1627 30-19 61% 15 CA
1274 SMBC West 16-Molten t 1627 18-26 41% 16 CA
1275 REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 14 REACH ELITE 1627 3-2 60% 14 PA
1276 CVA 16-Nany 1626 6-6 50% 16 PR
1277 Ajax Bend 18-1 1626 4-1 80% 18 OR
1278 HEAT 18 Travel 1626 19-13 59% 18 CA
1279 REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 18 REACH CURRENT 1626 3-2 60% 18 PA
1280 WC Aces - 16-Diamonds 1626 45-29 61% 16 IL
1281 TopFlight 18-Alpha 1626 3-11 21% 18 FL
1282 SAVBC 18-1 1626 14-5 74% 18 CA
1283 VV 16-1 1626 33-14 70% 16 VA
1284 MILTON EDGE 17 Milton Edge Acers 1626 2-3 40% 17
1285 CSVC 18 HAYSTACK 1625 41-18 69% 18 NY
1286 FVP 15-Regional 1625 19-9 68% 15 WI
1287 Blockheads Elite 17 1625 5-1 83% 17 PA
1288 RVC 18-Boys travel 1625 34-21 62% 18 VA
1289 Spartans 14-Boys apex 1625 0-0 0% 14 FL
1290 Apex NW 15-Ascent 1625 15-7 68% 15 WA
1291 Low Country 18 1625 14-4 78% 18 SC
1292 FRVBC 17-2 boys 1625 18-8 69% 17 CO
1293 TNT Boys 15-Juggernaut 1624 13-9 59% 15 PA
1294 Academy 15-E blue 1624 27-32 46% 15 IN
1295 Battle 18-Black 1624 35-20 56% 18 VA
1296 ECVBA 14-1 1624 17-9 65% 14 CA
1297 SVA Boys 16-S 1623 21-13 62% 16 CO
1298 Vaqueros 10-M edwin 1623 5-1 83% 10 PR
1299 CCVA 16-Navy 1623 22-14 59% 16 MD
1300 GSL 18-Elite matt 1623 9-12 43% 18 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.