2025-2026 Season — Page 27 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1301 | Ignite 16-Boys national | 1623 | 11-16 | 41% | 16 | AZ |
| 1302 | NWJRS 14-Slate | 1623 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | WA |
| 1303 | MTRX 18-2 | 1623 | 18-18 | 50% | 18 | AZ |
| 1304 | L2 18-2 boys | 1623 | 41-40 | 51% | 18 | MI |
| 1305 | CCVBC 14-1 | 1623 | 23-11 | 68% | 14 | WI |
| 1306 | Rockland VBC 16-1 | 1622 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | NY |
| 1307 | Premier 18 Tiger | 1622 | 34-28 | 55% | 18 | OH |
| 1308 | VVA 16-White | 1622 | 33-16 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 1309 | OPVC 18-Black | 1622 | 28-14 | 67% | 18 | OH |
| 1310 | Lakas 17-S dn | 1622 | 34-32 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 1311 | The Stacks 18-1 | 1622 | 14-10 | 58% | 18 | |
| 1312 | Capital Sliders Volleyball Club 16-Wolfjaw | 1621 | 18-9 | 60% | 16 | NY |
| 1313 | NEVA 18-1 | 1621 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | PA |
| 1314 | HEAT 14 Travel | 1621 | 31-21 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 1315 | Sideout 16-Adalberto | 1621 | 14-6 | 70% | 16 | PR |
| 1316 | RUSH 18-Black | 1621 | 18-28 | 39% | 18 | AZ |
| 1317 | SynergyForce 15-1 natl | 1621 | 25-46 | 35% | 15 | CA |
| 1318 | Sideout 17-Adalberto | 1621 | 3-1 | 75% | 17 | PR |
| 1319 | Tool City 17-Orange | 1621 | 5-6 | 45% | 17 | PA |
| 1320 | Legends 17-2 javi | 1621 | 12-4 | 75% | 17 | PR |
| 1321 | Maverick 15 Viper | 1621 | 7-11 | 39% | 15 | AZ |
| 1322 | GRV 18-Blue | 1621 | 22-11 | 67% | 18 | MI |
| 1323 | DallasOne 17-Blue | 1621 | 32-28 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 1324 | MVVC B 14-Club | 1620 | 41-32 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 1325 | The Lab Boys 18-S | 1620 | 6-11 | 35% | 18 | CO |
| 1326 | Huskies 16 Premier | 1620 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | SK |
| 1327 | PREVAIL Boys 17-Platinum | 1620 | 15-22 | 39% | 17 | PA |
| 1328 | Cinci Attack 15-Red | 1620 | 35-28 | 56% | 15 | OH |
| 1329 | Quandomania Boys 18 | 1620 | 19-7 | 66% | 18 | NJ |
| 1330 | Elevation 15-Timberline boys | 1620 | 15-7 | 63% | 15 | CO |
| 1331 | KIVA 14-B red | 1620 | 24-36 | 40% | 14 | KY |
| 1332 | PAC 15 Chelsea | 1619 | 20-36 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 1333 | Bristol Crush Volleyball 14-1 | 1619 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | CT |
| 1334 | Phoenix 17 Howells | 1619 | 31-27 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 1335 | AVA 18-Boys | 1619 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | FL |
| 1336 | VV 16-1b | 1619 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | VA |
| 1337 | Sharks Boys 18 | 1618 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | FL |
| 1338 | A'o a Koa Volleyball 14-B | 1618 | 22-6 | 79% | 14 | HI |
| 1339 | ECVBA 18-1 brennan | 1618 | 13-5 | 72% | 18 | CA |
| 1340 | TK 18-Bandits elite | 1618 | 28-21 | 57% | 18 | GA |
| 1341 | BAVC 18-2 boys kevin | 1617 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | CA |
| 1342 | AVA 16-Ikaika | 1617 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | HI |
| 1343 | NYC Impact 15-National | 1617 | 9-5 | 64% | 15 | NY |
| 1344 | Courthouse Boys 18-Red | 1617 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | OR |
| 1345 | SJVBC Boys 17-Elite | 1617 | 11-13 | 46% | 17 | NJ |
| 1346 | SKY 15-1 | 1616 | 14-7 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 1347 | TopFlight 16-Alpha | 1616 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | FL |
| 1348 | Stars 17 Lion | 1616 | 22-26 | 46% | 17 | SC |
| 1349 | PVA BOYS 15-Regional | 1615 | 9-4 | 69% | 15 | PA |
| 1350 | Low Country 18-Boys | 1615 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | SC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.