Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 27 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1301 Ignite 16-Boys national 1623 11-16 41% 16 AZ
1302 NWJRS 14-Slate 1623 5-1 83% 14 WA
1303 MTRX 18-2 1623 18-18 50% 18 AZ
1304 L2 18-2 boys 1623 41-40 51% 18 MI
1305 CCVBC 14-1 1623 23-11 68% 14 WI
1306 Rockland VBC 16-1 1622 12-4 75% 16 NY
1307 Premier 18 Tiger 1622 34-28 55% 18 OH
1308 VVA 16-White 1622 33-16 67% 16 CA
1309 OPVC 18-Black 1622 28-14 67% 18 OH
1310 Lakas 17-S dn 1622 34-32 52% 17 CA
1311 The Stacks 18-1 1622 14-10 58% 18
1312 Capital Sliders Volleyball Club 16-Wolfjaw 1621 18-9 60% 16 NY
1313 NEVA 18-1 1621 3-2 60% 18 PA
1314 HEAT 14 Travel 1621 31-21 60% 14 CA
1315 Sideout 16-Adalberto 1621 14-6 70% 16 PR
1316 RUSH 18-Black 1621 18-28 39% 18 AZ
1317 SynergyForce 15-1 natl 1621 25-46 35% 15 CA
1318 Sideout 17-Adalberto 1621 3-1 75% 17 PR
1319 Tool City 17-Orange 1621 5-6 45% 17 PA
1320 Legends 17-2 javi 1621 12-4 75% 17 PR
1321 Maverick 15 Viper 1621 7-11 39% 15 AZ
1322 GRV 18-Blue 1621 22-11 67% 18 MI
1323 DallasOne 17-Blue 1621 32-28 52% 17 TX
1324 MVVC B 14-Club 1620 41-32 56% 14 CA
1325 The Lab Boys 18-S 1620 6-11 35% 18 CO
1326 Huskies 16 Premier 1620 5-3 63% 16 SK
1327 PREVAIL Boys 17-Platinum 1620 15-22 39% 17 PA
1328 Cinci Attack 15-Red 1620 35-28 56% 15 OH
1329 Quandomania Boys 18 1620 19-7 66% 18 NJ
1330 Elevation 15-Timberline boys 1620 15-7 63% 15 CO
1331 KIVA 14-B red 1620 24-36 40% 14 KY
1332 PAC 15 Chelsea 1619 20-36 36% 15 CA
1333 Bristol Crush Volleyball 14-1 1619 5-0 100% 14 CT
1334 Phoenix 17 Howells 1619 31-27 53% 17 OH
1335 AVA 18-Boys 1619 14-6 70% 18 FL
1336 VV 16-1b 1619 5-2 71% 16 VA
1337 Sharks Boys 18 1618 0-0 0% 18 FL
1338 A'o a Koa Volleyball 14-B 1618 22-6 79% 14 HI
1339 ECVBA 18-1 brennan 1618 13-5 72% 18 CA
1340 TK 18-Bandits elite 1618 28-21 57% 18 GA
1341 BAVC 18-2 boys kevin 1617 5-1 83% 18 CA
1342 AVA 16-Ikaika 1617 6-5 55% 16 HI
1343 NYC Impact 15-National 1617 9-5 64% 15 NY
1344 Courthouse Boys 18-Red 1617 7-2 78% 18 OR
1345 SJVBC Boys 17-Elite 1617 11-13 46% 17 NJ
1346 SKY 15-1 1616 14-7 67% 15 OH
1347 TopFlight 16-Alpha 1616 4-1 80% 16 FL
1348 Stars 17 Lion 1616 22-26 46% 17 SC
1349 PVA BOYS 15-Regional 1615 9-4 69% 15 PA
1350 Low Country 18-Boys 1615 5-3 63% 18 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.