Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 27 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1301 SMBC West 16-Molten t 1624 18-26 41% 16 CA
1302 CCVA 16-Navy 1623 22-14 59% 16 MD
1303 Vaqueros 10-M edwin 1623 5-1 83% 10 PR
1304 Academy 15-E blue 1623 27-32 46% 15 IN
1305 VV 16-1b 1623 5-2 71% 16 CA
1306 FVP 15-Regional 1622 19-9 68% 15 WI
1307 TNT Boys 15-Juggernaut 1622 13-9 59% 15 PA
1308 Maverick 15 Viper 1622 7-11 39% 15 AZ
1309 MVA BOYS 17-S 1622 15-6 68% 17 MD
1310 SoCal VBC 17-Beacons 1622 15-6 71% 17 CA
1311 Legends 16-1 francisco 1622 1-5 17% 16 PR
1312 Sideout 16-Adalberto 1621 14-6 70% 16
1313 VVA 16-White 1621 33-16 67% 16 MO
1314 Quandomania Boys 18 1621 19-7 66% 18 NJ
1315 Lakas 17-S dn 1621 34-32 52% 17 CA
1316 NEVA 18-1 1620 3-2 60% 18 UT
1317 Tool City 17-Orange 1620 5-6 45% 17 PA
1318 AVA 18-Boys 1620 14-6 70% 18 FL
1319 A'o a Koa Volleyball 14-B 1619 22-6 79% 14 HI
1320 Premier 18 Tiger 1619 34-28 55% 18 OH
1321 SynergyForce 15-1 natl 1619 25-46 35% 15 CA
1322 Flight 18-S 1619 3-4 43% 18 IL
1323 DallasOne 17-Blue 1619 32-28 52% 17 TX
1324 Sideout 17-Adalberto 1619 3-1 75% 17
1325 MN Select 13-Black 1618 2-1 67% 13 MN
1326 FRVBC 17-2 boys 1618 18-8 69% 17 CO
1327 Synergy Boys 17-Frost 1618 19-23 45% 17 CA
1328 Empire 16-Blue 1618 5-4 56% 16 KS
1329 Ignite 16-Boys national 1618 11-16 41% 16 AZ
1330 Elevation 15-Timberline boys 1618 15-7 63% 15 CO
1331 Pulse 14 Jimmy 1618 20-18 53% 14 CA
1332 AVA 16-Ikaika 1617 6-5 55% 16 HI
1333 WAVE 17 Gino 1617 14-13 52% 17 CA
1334 Triangle Boys 14-Black 1617 19-12 61% 14 NC
1335 TopFlight 16-Alpha 1617 4-1 80% 16 NV
1336 Sharks Boys 18 1617 0-0 0% 18
1337 BVA - Lions 14-2 1617 15-0 100% 14 IL
1338 SJVBC Boys 17-Elite 1617 11-13 46% 17 NJ
1339 Mayhem 18-2 1617 18-11 62% 18 KS
1340 DCVA 12-1 1617 6-1 86% 12 NM
1341 Forza 18-Orange 1616 15-12 56% 18 IL
1342 SKY 15-1 1616 14-7 67% 15 IL
1343 PREVAIL Boys 17-Platinum 1616 15-22 39% 17 PA
1344 Ignite Boys 15-National 1616 6-5 55% 15 AZ
1345 LHV 16-1 valiants 1616 11-8 58% 16 MA
1346 Princeton 17-Black boys 1616 6-2 75% 17 NJ
1347 MVVC B 14-Club 1616 41-32 56% 14 CA
1348 E3 17-Excel 1615 13-10 57% 17 NM
1349 ECVBA 14-1 1615 17-9 65% 14 CA
1350 Ajax Bend 18-1 1615 4-1 80% 18 OR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.