Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 28 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1351 MVA BOYS 17-S 1615 15-6 68% 17 MD
1352 MVP 14-Black 1615 13-27 33% 14 MD
1353 Triangle Boys 14-Black 1615 19-12 61% 14 NC
1354 Princeton 17-Black boys 1615 6-2 75% 17 NJ
1355 Synergy Boys 17-Frost 1615 19-23 45% 17 PA
1356 Front Range Volleyball Club Inc 17-3 1614 7-2 78% 17 CO
1357 Blast 17 Ignite 1614 13-19 41% 17 RI
1358 E3 17-Excel 1614 13-10 57% 17 NM
1359 HVA 17-Performance natl 1613 32-30 52% 17 TX
1360 Aspire 17 Drax 1613 13-17 43% 17 AZ
1361 Central Cal 14-1 1612 3-4 43% 14 CA
1362 Mass Pats Boys 16-1 trust 1612 32-12 70% 16 MA
1363 Merrimack Valley Volleyball Club United 14 ValleyVBC Elite Boys 1612 17-5 77% 14 MA
1364 Coastal 18 Tony 1612 20-23 47% 18 VA
1365 Academy 18-E blue 1612 22-45 33% 18 IN
1366 Pulse 17 Griggs 1611 14-21 40% 17 CA
1367 Club GSL 16-Elite - maddy 1611 4-0 100% 16 UT
1368 RootsVBA 16-Ironbark 1611 18-26 41% 16 MO
1369 PalShore 17-1 1611 25-23 52% 17 SC
1370 FPVC 15-Ren boys 1611 15-12 56% 15 CA
1371 Omni 14-N1 1611 0-0 0% 14 CA
1372 Junior Bisons 17 1611 3-2 60% 17 KY
1373 Onyx VBC 18-Onyx national 1610 0-0 0% 18 CA
1374 BVA - Lions 13-1 1610 7-0 100% 13 IL
1375 WAVE 17 Gino 1610 14-13 52% 17 CA
1376 Illinois Jr's B18-1's 1610 39-35 53% 18 IL
1377 Warren Sixpack 18-3 1610 17-7 68% 18 NJ
1378 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 17-National 1609 3-8 27% 17 NJ
1379 Summit 13-Boys 1609 0-0 0% 13 MO
1380 Emerald Rain Boys 14-Elite 1609 4-1 80% 14 WA
1381 High Flyers 18-Red 1609 11-11 50% 18 NE
1382 NorthU 15-1 1609 9-13 41% 15 PA
1383 KUIKAHI 17-Red roshambo 1609 18-23 44% 17 HI
1384 MKE Sting 12-1 1608 21-8 72% 12 WI
1385 COAST 17-2 bryce 1608 5-9 36% 17 CA
1386 Hive 16-Gold 1608 9-18 33% 16 UT
1387 Velocity B14-Red 1608 13-6 68% 14 IL
1388 Sanger 18-Red 1608 16-13 55% 18 CA
1389 MVC 14-Sean 1608 32-34 48% 14 WI
1390 Santa Barbara Volleyball Club 17-Premier 1608 7-1 88% 17 CA
1391 Elevation 18-Timberline boys 1608 27-22 55% 18 CO
1392 118 18-Hallie 1608 16-11 59% 18 CA
1393 Aspire 18-Star lord 1607 10-19 34% 18 AZ
1394 MVVC YB 14 Carlos 1607 12-5 71% 14 CA
1395 Vegas Volley 18-1 1607 3-4 43% 18 NV
1396 WPVC Boys 15-Armour orange 1607 39-27 59% 15 FL
1397 HPSTL B13-Orange 1607 25-18 53% 13 MO
1398 Bay to Bay 14-National 1607 35-26 57% 14 CA
1399 Lobos Elite Volleyball 18 Lobos Elite Volleyball (71) 1607 12-5 71% 18
1400 Boston United Boys 17-National 1 1607 17-27 39% 17 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.