Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 28 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1351 E3 17-Excel 1615 13-10 57% 17 NM
1352 Emerald Rain Boys 14-Elite 1615 4-1 80% 14 WA
1353 The Lab Boys 18-S 1615 6-11 35% 18 CO
1354 Phoenix 17 Howells 1614 31-27 53% 17 OH
1355 Legends 17-2 javi 1614 12-4 75% 17 PR
1356 SBVC Boys 17 Premier 1614 7-1 88% 17 CA
1357 Locked In 16-1 1614 7-3 70% 16
1358 CVC 14-1 1613 29-17 63% 14 OH
1359 KIVA 14-B red 1613 24-36 40% 14 KY
1360 Rockland VBC 16-1 1613 12-4 75% 16 NY
1361 Coastal 18 Tony 1613 20-23 47% 18 MA
1362 Mayhem 16-1 1613 10-4 71% 16 KS
1363 Illinois Jr's B18-1's 1612 39-35 53% 18 IL
1364 Top Flight 16-Nat red 1612 7-2 78% 16 IL
1365 NorthU 15-1 1612 9-13 41% 15 PA
1366 MVP 14-Black 1612 13-27 33% 14 MD
1367 Annapolis 17U 1611 27-35 42% 17 MD
1368 FPVC 15-Ren boys 1611 15-12 56% 15 CA
1369 Courthouse Boys 18-Red 1611 7-2 78% 18 OR
1370 GAFUS 12-1 1611 5-1 83% 12
1371 Omni 14-N1 1611 0-0 0% 14 CA
1372 HEMOLELE 12 1611 5-1 71% 12
1373 Stars 17 Lion 1610 22-26 46% 17 SC
1374 Warren Sixpack 18-3 1610 17-7 68% 18 NJ
1375 Mass Pats Boys 16-1 trust 1610 32-12 70% 16 MA
1376 Low Country 18-Boys 1610 5-3 63% 18 SC
1377 TK 18-Bandits elite 1610 28-21 57% 18 GA
1378 Fresno Heat HEAT Travel 18 1610 4-2 67% 18 CA
1379 BVA - Lions 13-1 1610 7-0 100% 13 IL
1380 Sanger 18-Red 1609 16-13 55% 18 CA
1381 CVC 12-1 1609 23-16 59% 12 OH
1382 Philly Boys 17 1609 8-4 53% 17 PA
1383 RootsVBA 16-Ironbark 1609 18-26 41% 16 KS
1384 Summit 13-Boys 1609 0-0 0% 13 MO
1385 AZ LEGACY 14-Apex 1608 17-11 61% 14 AZ
1386 ECVBA 18-1 brennan 1608 13-5 72% 18 CA
1387 Onyx VBC 18-Onyx national 1608 0-0 0% 18 CA
1388 Rockland VBC 18-1 1608 21-16 57% 18 NY
1389 High Flyers 18-Red 1608 11-11 50% 18 NE
1390 Elevation 18-Timberline boys 1608 27-22 55% 18 CO
1391 SAVC 18-1 1607 9-3 75% 18 CA
1392 EXCEL 12-Red boys 1607 0-0 0% 12 TX
1393 PACE BOOTLEGGER 12-Black 1607 0-0 0% 12
1394 Princeton 16-National 1607 24-21 53% 16 NJ
1395 HEAT 14 Travel 1607 27-19 59% 14 CA
1396 EHVB 18-1 1606 5-3 63% 18 CA
1397 ECVC 12-BLACK 1606 0-0 0% 12
1398 IDVB 18-Premier | jason 1606 30-15 67% 18 ID
1399 HVA 17-Performance natl 1606 32-30 52% 17 TX
1400 Weber Elite 18 Carri 1606 17-7 71% 18 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.