2025-2026 Season — Page 28 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1351 | E3 17-Excel | 1615 | 13-10 | 57% | 17 | NM |
| 1352 | Emerald Rain Boys 14-Elite | 1615 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | WA |
| 1353 | The Lab Boys 18-S | 1615 | 6-11 | 35% | 18 | CO |
| 1354 | Phoenix 17 Howells | 1614 | 31-27 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 1355 | Legends 17-2 javi | 1614 | 12-4 | 75% | 17 | PR |
| 1356 | SBVC Boys 17 Premier | 1614 | 7-1 | 88% | 17 | CA |
| 1357 | Locked In 16-1 | 1614 | 7-3 | 70% | 16 | |
| 1358 | CVC 14-1 | 1613 | 29-17 | 63% | 14 | OH |
| 1359 | KIVA 14-B red | 1613 | 24-36 | 40% | 14 | KY |
| 1360 | Rockland VBC 16-1 | 1613 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | NY |
| 1361 | Coastal 18 Tony | 1613 | 20-23 | 47% | 18 | MA |
| 1362 | Mayhem 16-1 | 1613 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | KS |
| 1363 | Illinois Jr's B18-1's | 1612 | 39-35 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 1364 | Top Flight 16-Nat red | 1612 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | IL |
| 1365 | NorthU 15-1 | 1612 | 9-13 | 41% | 15 | PA |
| 1366 | MVP 14-Black | 1612 | 13-27 | 33% | 14 | MD |
| 1367 | Annapolis 17U | 1611 | 27-35 | 42% | 17 | MD |
| 1368 | FPVC 15-Ren boys | 1611 | 15-12 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 1369 | Courthouse Boys 18-Red | 1611 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | OR |
| 1370 | GAFUS 12-1 | 1611 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | |
| 1371 | Omni 14-N1 | 1611 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 1372 | HEMOLELE 12 | 1611 | 5-1 | 71% | 12 | |
| 1373 | Stars 17 Lion | 1610 | 22-26 | 46% | 17 | SC |
| 1374 | Warren Sixpack 18-3 | 1610 | 17-7 | 68% | 18 | NJ |
| 1375 | Mass Pats Boys 16-1 trust | 1610 | 32-12 | 70% | 16 | MA |
| 1376 | Low Country 18-Boys | 1610 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | SC |
| 1377 | TK 18-Bandits elite | 1610 | 28-21 | 57% | 18 | GA |
| 1378 | Fresno Heat HEAT Travel 18 | 1610 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | CA |
| 1379 | BVA - Lions 13-1 | 1610 | 7-0 | 100% | 13 | IL |
| 1380 | Sanger 18-Red | 1609 | 16-13 | 55% | 18 | CA |
| 1381 | CVC 12-1 | 1609 | 23-16 | 59% | 12 | OH |
| 1382 | Philly Boys 17 | 1609 | 8-4 | 53% | 17 | PA |
| 1383 | RootsVBA 16-Ironbark | 1609 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | KS |
| 1384 | Summit 13-Boys | 1609 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | MO |
| 1385 | AZ LEGACY 14-Apex | 1608 | 17-11 | 61% | 14 | AZ |
| 1386 | ECVBA 18-1 brennan | 1608 | 13-5 | 72% | 18 | CA |
| 1387 | Onyx VBC 18-Onyx national | 1608 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 1388 | Rockland VBC 18-1 | 1608 | 21-16 | 57% | 18 | NY |
| 1389 | High Flyers 18-Red | 1608 | 11-11 | 50% | 18 | NE |
| 1390 | Elevation 18-Timberline boys | 1608 | 27-22 | 55% | 18 | CO |
| 1391 | SAVC 18-1 | 1607 | 9-3 | 75% | 18 | CA |
| 1392 | EXCEL 12-Red boys | 1607 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 1393 | PACE BOOTLEGGER 12-Black | 1607 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 1394 | Princeton 16-National | 1607 | 24-21 | 53% | 16 | NJ |
| 1395 | HEAT 14 Travel | 1607 | 27-19 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 1396 | EHVB 18-1 | 1606 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | CA |
| 1397 | ECVC 12-BLACK | 1606 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 1398 | IDVB 18-Premier | jason | 1606 | 30-15 | 67% | 18 | ID |
| 1399 | HVA 17-Performance natl | 1606 | 32-30 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 1400 | Weber Elite 18 Carri | 1606 | 17-7 | 71% | 18 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.