2025-2026 Season — Page 28 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1351 | MVA BOYS 17-S | 1615 | 15-6 | 68% | 17 | MD |
| 1352 | MVP 14-Black | 1615 | 13-27 | 33% | 14 | MD |
| 1353 | Triangle Boys 14-Black | 1615 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | NC |
| 1354 | Princeton 17-Black boys | 1615 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | NJ |
| 1355 | Synergy Boys 17-Frost | 1615 | 19-23 | 45% | 17 | PA |
| 1356 | Front Range Volleyball Club Inc 17-3 | 1614 | 7-2 | 78% | 17 | CO |
| 1357 | Blast 17 Ignite | 1614 | 13-19 | 41% | 17 | RI |
| 1358 | E3 17-Excel | 1614 | 13-10 | 57% | 17 | NM |
| 1359 | HVA 17-Performance natl | 1613 | 32-30 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 1360 | Aspire 17 Drax | 1613 | 13-17 | 43% | 17 | AZ |
| 1361 | Central Cal 14-1 | 1612 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | CA |
| 1362 | Mass Pats Boys 16-1 trust | 1612 | 32-12 | 70% | 16 | MA |
| 1363 | Merrimack Valley Volleyball Club United 14 ValleyVBC Elite Boys | 1612 | 17-5 | 77% | 14 | MA |
| 1364 | Coastal 18 Tony | 1612 | 20-23 | 47% | 18 | VA |
| 1365 | Academy 18-E blue | 1612 | 22-45 | 33% | 18 | IN |
| 1366 | Pulse 17 Griggs | 1611 | 14-21 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 1367 | Club GSL 16-Elite - maddy | 1611 | 4-0 | 100% | 16 | UT |
| 1368 | RootsVBA 16-Ironbark | 1611 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | MO |
| 1369 | PalShore 17-1 | 1611 | 25-23 | 52% | 17 | SC |
| 1370 | FPVC 15-Ren boys | 1611 | 15-12 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 1371 | Omni 14-N1 | 1611 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 1372 | Junior Bisons 17 | 1611 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | KY |
| 1373 | Onyx VBC 18-Onyx national | 1610 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 1374 | BVA - Lions 13-1 | 1610 | 7-0 | 100% | 13 | IL |
| 1375 | WAVE 17 Gino | 1610 | 14-13 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 1376 | Illinois Jr's B18-1's | 1610 | 39-35 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 1377 | Warren Sixpack 18-3 | 1610 | 17-7 | 68% | 18 | NJ |
| 1378 | NYC Impact Volleyball Club 17-National | 1609 | 3-8 | 27% | 17 | NJ |
| 1379 | Summit 13-Boys | 1609 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | MO |
| 1380 | Emerald Rain Boys 14-Elite | 1609 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | WA |
| 1381 | High Flyers 18-Red | 1609 | 11-11 | 50% | 18 | NE |
| 1382 | NorthU 15-1 | 1609 | 9-13 | 41% | 15 | PA |
| 1383 | KUIKAHI 17-Red roshambo | 1609 | 18-23 | 44% | 17 | HI |
| 1384 | MKE Sting 12-1 | 1608 | 21-8 | 72% | 12 | WI |
| 1385 | COAST 17-2 bryce | 1608 | 5-9 | 36% | 17 | CA |
| 1386 | Hive 16-Gold | 1608 | 9-18 | 33% | 16 | UT |
| 1387 | Velocity B14-Red | 1608 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | IL |
| 1388 | Sanger 18-Red | 1608 | 16-13 | 55% | 18 | CA |
| 1389 | MVC 14-Sean | 1608 | 32-34 | 48% | 14 | WI |
| 1390 | Santa Barbara Volleyball Club 17-Premier | 1608 | 7-1 | 88% | 17 | CA |
| 1391 | Elevation 18-Timberline boys | 1608 | 27-22 | 55% | 18 | CO |
| 1392 | 118 18-Hallie | 1608 | 16-11 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 1393 | Aspire 18-Star lord | 1607 | 10-19 | 34% | 18 | AZ |
| 1394 | MVVC YB 14 Carlos | 1607 | 12-5 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 1395 | Vegas Volley 18-1 | 1607 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | NV |
| 1396 | WPVC Boys 15-Armour orange | 1607 | 39-27 | 59% | 15 | FL |
| 1397 | HPSTL B13-Orange | 1607 | 25-18 | 53% | 13 | MO |
| 1398 | Bay to Bay 14-National | 1607 | 35-26 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 1399 | Lobos Elite Volleyball 18 Lobos Elite Volleyball (71) | 1607 | 12-5 | 71% | 18 | |
| 1400 | Boston United Boys 17-National 1 | 1607 | 17-27 | 39% | 17 | MA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.