2025-2026 Season — Page 29 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1401 | Mill City 15 | 1606 | 24-14 | 63% | 15 | MA |
| 1402 | Mayhem 18-2 | 1606 | 18-11 | 62% | 18 | MA |
| 1403 | SCB 16-S francisco | 1606 | 24-23 | 51% | 16 | UT |
| 1404 | Velocity B18-Purple | 1606 | 13-11 | 54% | 18 | IL |
| 1405 | SCVC 17-Erika | 1606 | 13-19 | 41% | 17 | UT |
| 1406 | True North Volleyball Academy 16-1 | 1605 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | MO |
| 1407 | IDVB 18-Premier | jason | 1605 | 30-15 | 67% | 18 | MI |
| 1408 | Cincy Elite 16 Miracle | 1605 | 31-19 | 62% | 16 | OH |
| 1409 | Philly Boys 17 | 1605 | 8-4 | 53% | 17 | PA |
| 1410 | Aspire 13 Vision | 1604 | 29-22 | 57% | 13 | AZ |
| 1411 | Team Momentum B18 Navy | 1604 | 30-33 | 48% | 18 | MO |
| 1412 | MN Select Boys 14-3 | 1604 | 28-8 | 78% | 14 | MN |
| 1413 | KIVA 18-B red | 1604 | 18-27 | 40% | 18 | KY |
| 1414 | ECC South Boys 16 | 1604 | 16-10 | 57% | 16 | NJ |
| 1415 | AV IMPACT 14-Luis | 1604 | 17-3 | 85% | 14 | CA |
| 1416 | Bravo Athletics Volleyball Club 17-Havoc | 1604 | 22-12 | 65% | 17 | CA |
| 1417 | Phoenix 13 Marquette | 1604 | 18-9 | 67% | 13 | OH |
| 1418 | South County Boys 18-1 | 1604 | 6-5 | 55% | 18 | RI |
| 1419 | Molten 14-1 | 1604 | 24-21 | 53% | 14 | AZ |
| 1420 | Leaside Volleyball Club 15 15U Leaside Lancers | 1604 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | ON |
| 1421 | Stars 15 Lion | 1604 | 36-19 | 65% | 15 | SC |
| 1422 | TeamLVC Boys 15U Black | 1603 | 28-25 | 53% | 15 | NY |
| 1423 | Uno Boys 18 National | 1603 | 42-25 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 1424 | SVA Boys 18-S | 1603 | 19-13 | 59% | 18 | CO |
| 1425 | AZ Fear 16-Blue | 1603 | 25-38 | 40% | 16 | AZ |
| 1426 | 787EV 14-2 | 1603 | 4-0 | 100% | 14 | PR |
| 1427 | Exodus Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1603 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 1428 | Titans Volleyball Association 17 Titans Behemoth | 1603 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | ON |
| 1429 | KC United 17 Navy | 1602 | 23-16 | 59% | 17 | MO |
| 1430 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-2 | 1602 | 29-17 | 63% | 16 | CT |
| 1431 | Maverick 14-Jester | 1602 | 8-4 | 67% | 14 | AZ |
| 1432 | Oasis 12-Black | 1602 | 7-0 | 100% | 12 | CA |
| 1433 | EHVB 18-1 | 1602 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | CA |
| 1434 | CCVA Boys 16-Power | 1602 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 1435 | Cap City 16-Blue | 1601 | 17-12 | 55% | 16 | PA |
| 1436 | Rockland VBC 18-1 | 1601 | 21-16 | 57% | 18 | NY |
| 1437 | SMV 18-Boys | 1601 | 22-8 | 73% | 18 | MN |
| 1438 | OMNI 13-1 national | 1601 | 27-24 | 53% | 13 | CA |
| 1439 | CVVC Sky View 18-Boys | 1601 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | |
| 1440 | GSL 15-Elite - earle | 1601 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | UT |
| 1441 | Hawaiian Style Boys 16-Red | 1600 | 9-5 | 64% | 16 | HI |
| 1442 | PV Boys 18-2 | 1600 | 17-14 | 55% | 18 | MA |
| 1443 | PACE BOOTLEGGER 12-Black | 1600 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | VA |
| 1444 | Stars 18 Hunt | 1600 | 33-18 | 65% | 18 | SC |
| 1445 | The Hbc 14-BLACK | 1600 | 23-16 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 1446 | Utah Mojo 18 National | 1600 | 21-23 | 47% | 18 | UT |
| 1447 | BAVC 16-3 boys aria | 1599 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 1448 | Sidewinder 18-2 | 1599 | 9-13 | 41% | 18 | AZ |
| 1449 | Princeton 16-National | 1599 | 24-21 | 53% | 16 | NJ |
| 1450 | Salt City Boys Lindon Team Academy 14-Tim | 1599 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.