2025-2026 Season — Page 29 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1401 | MKE Sting 12-1 | 1606 | 21-8 | 72% | 12 | WI |
| 1402 | Huskies 16 Premier | 1606 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | CT |
| 1403 | HVA 17-Performance natl | 1606 | 32-30 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 1404 | Aspire 17 Drax | 1606 | 13-17 | 43% | 17 | AZ |
| 1405 | COAST 17-2 bryce | 1606 | 5-9 | 36% | 17 | CA |
| 1406 | Velocity B18-Purple | 1605 | 13-11 | 54% | 18 | IL |
| 1407 | VUVC B15-BLACK | 1605 | 15-17 | 47% | 15 | NV |
| 1408 | Salt City Boys 14-S bryan | 1605 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | UT |
| 1409 | HPSTL B13-Orange | 1605 | 25-18 | 53% | 13 | MO |
| 1410 | Velocity B14-Red | 1605 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | IL |
| 1411 | Central Cal 14-1 | 1605 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | CA |
| 1412 | ECC South Boys 16 | 1604 | 16-10 | 57% | 16 | NJ |
| 1413 | Cincy Elite 16 Miracle | 1604 | 31-19 | 62% | 16 | OH |
| 1414 | Salt City Boys 17-S tanner | 1604 | 14-8 | 64% | 17 | UT |
| 1415 | MN Select Boys 14-3 | 1604 | 28-8 | 78% | 14 | MN |
| 1416 | MVC 14-Sean | 1604 | 32-34 | 48% | 14 | WI |
| 1417 | Academy 18-E blue | 1604 | 22-45 | 33% | 18 | IN |
| 1418 | Aspire 13 Vision | 1603 | 29-22 | 57% | 13 | AZ |
| 1419 | Aspire 18-Star lord | 1603 | 10-19 | 34% | 18 | AZ |
| 1420 | PVA BOYS 15-Regional | 1603 | 9-4 | 69% | 15 | PA |
| 1421 | 787EV 14-2 | 1603 | 4-0 | 100% | 14 | PR |
| 1422 | KUIKAHI 17-Red roshambo | 1603 | 18-23 | 44% | 17 | HI |
| 1423 | The Hbc 14-BLACK | 1603 | 23-16 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 1424 | Mililani 14-1 | 1603 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | |
| 1425 | PAC 15 Chelsea | 1603 | 20-36 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 1426 | KC United 17 Navy | 1603 | 23-16 | 59% | 17 | MO |
| 1427 | MOD B12-Blue | 1603 | 37-27 | 58% | 12 | IL |
| 1428 | AV IMPACT 14-Luis | 1603 | 17-3 | 85% | 14 | CA |
| 1429 | WC 15-1 | 1603 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | |
| 1430 | SMV 18-Boys | 1603 | 22-8 | 73% | 18 | MN |
| 1431 | CCVA Boys 16-Power | 1602 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 1432 | BAVC 16-3 boys aria | 1602 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 1433 | Supreme 16-1 | 1602 | 16-6 | 73% | 16 | MA |
| 1434 | PalShore 17-1 | 1602 | 25-23 | 52% | 17 | MI |
| 1435 | True North Volleyball Academy 16-1 | 1602 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | MO |
| 1436 | BAVC 18-1 sebastian | 1602 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 1437 | Oasis 12-Black | 1602 | 7-0 | 100% | 12 | CO |
| 1438 | Uno Boys 18 National | 1601 | 42-25 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 1439 | Mentor Volley 16-1 | 1601 | 6-0 | 100% | 16 | CA |
| 1440 | Cap City 16-Blue | 1601 | 17-12 | 55% | 16 | PA |
| 1441 | TeamLVC Boys 15U Black | 1601 | 28-25 | 53% | 15 | NY |
| 1442 | WI Flight 18-B blue | 1601 | 11-4 | 73% | 18 | WI |
| 1443 | KIVA 18-B red | 1600 | 18-27 | 40% | 18 | KY |
| 1444 | Power Volleyball 18 | 1600 | 13-10 | 57% | 18 | TX |
| 1445 | Faucons 17-Boys 1 | 1600 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | |
| 1446 | ETVMR 18-1 - fortuno | 1600 | 5-11 | 31% | 18 | PR |
| 1447 | 118 18-Hallie | 1600 | 16-11 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 1448 | SVA Boys 18-S | 1600 | 19-13 | 59% | 18 | WA |
| 1449 | SVA 18-S jayden | 1600 | 5-12 | 29% | 18 | WA |
| 1450 | PV Boys 18-2 | 1600 | 17-14 | 55% | 18 | MA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.