Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 29 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1401 MKE Sting 12-1 1606 21-8 72% 12 WI
1402 Huskies 16 Premier 1606 5-3 63% 16 CT
1403 HVA 17-Performance natl 1606 32-30 52% 17 TX
1404 Aspire 17 Drax 1606 13-17 43% 17 AZ
1405 COAST 17-2 bryce 1606 5-9 36% 17 CA
1406 Velocity B18-Purple 1605 13-11 54% 18 IL
1407 VUVC B15-BLACK 1605 15-17 47% 15 NV
1408 Salt City Boys 14-S bryan 1605 0-0 0% 14 UT
1409 HPSTL B13-Orange 1605 25-18 53% 13 MO
1410 Velocity B14-Red 1605 13-6 68% 14 IL
1411 Central Cal 14-1 1605 3-4 43% 14 CA
1412 ECC South Boys 16 1604 16-10 57% 16 NJ
1413 Cincy Elite 16 Miracle 1604 31-19 62% 16 OH
1414 Salt City Boys 17-S tanner 1604 14-8 64% 17 UT
1415 MN Select Boys 14-3 1604 28-8 78% 14 MN
1416 MVC 14-Sean 1604 32-34 48% 14 WI
1417 Academy 18-E blue 1604 22-45 33% 18 IN
1418 Aspire 13 Vision 1603 29-22 57% 13 AZ
1419 Aspire 18-Star lord 1603 10-19 34% 18 AZ
1420 PVA BOYS 15-Regional 1603 9-4 69% 15 PA
1421 787EV 14-2 1603 4-0 100% 14 PR
1422 KUIKAHI 17-Red roshambo 1603 18-23 44% 17 HI
1423 The Hbc 14-BLACK 1603 23-16 59% 14 CA
1424 Mililani 14-1 1603 4-2 67% 14
1425 PAC 15 Chelsea 1603 20-36 36% 15 CA
1426 KC United 17 Navy 1603 23-16 59% 17 MO
1427 MOD B12-Blue 1603 37-27 58% 12 IL
1428 AV IMPACT 14-Luis 1603 17-3 85% 14 CA
1429 WC 15-1 1603 6-2 75% 15
1430 SMV 18-Boys 1603 22-8 73% 18 MN
1431 CCVA Boys 16-Power 1602 4-2 67% 16 CA
1432 BAVC 16-3 boys aria 1602 3-2 60% 16 CA
1433 Supreme 16-1 1602 16-6 73% 16 MA
1434 PalShore 17-1 1602 25-23 52% 17 MI
1435 True North Volleyball Academy 16-1 1602 6-1 86% 16 MO
1436 BAVC 18-1 sebastian 1602 0-0 0% 18
1437 Oasis 12-Black 1602 7-0 100% 12 CO
1438 Uno Boys 18 National 1601 42-25 63% 18 IL
1439 Mentor Volley 16-1 1601 6-0 100% 16 CA
1440 Cap City 16-Blue 1601 17-12 55% 16 PA
1441 TeamLVC Boys 15U Black 1601 28-25 53% 15 NY
1442 WI Flight 18-B blue 1601 11-4 73% 18 WI
1443 KIVA 18-B red 1600 18-27 40% 18 KY
1444 Power Volleyball 18 1600 13-10 57% 18 TX
1445 Faucons 17-Boys 1 1600 2-5 29% 17
1446 ETVMR 18-1 - fortuno 1600 5-11 31% 18 PR
1447 118 18-Hallie 1600 16-11 59% 18 CA
1448 SVA Boys 18-S 1600 19-13 59% 18 WA
1449 SVA 18-S jayden 1600 5-12 29% 18 WA
1450 PV Boys 18-2 1600 17-14 55% 18 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.