Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 29 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1401 Mill City 15 1606 24-14 63% 15 MA
1402 Mayhem 18-2 1606 18-11 62% 18 MA
1403 SCB 16-S francisco 1606 24-23 51% 16 UT
1404 Velocity B18-Purple 1606 13-11 54% 18 IL
1405 SCVC 17-Erika 1606 13-19 41% 17 UT
1406 True North Volleyball Academy 16-1 1605 6-1 86% 16 MO
1407 IDVB 18-Premier | jason 1605 30-15 67% 18 MI
1408 Cincy Elite 16 Miracle 1605 31-19 62% 16 OH
1409 Philly Boys 17 1605 8-4 53% 17 PA
1410 Aspire 13 Vision 1604 29-22 57% 13 AZ
1411 Team Momentum B18 Navy 1604 30-33 48% 18 MO
1412 MN Select Boys 14-3 1604 28-8 78% 14 MN
1413 KIVA 18-B red 1604 18-27 40% 18 KY
1414 ECC South Boys 16 1604 16-10 57% 16 NJ
1415 AV IMPACT 14-Luis 1604 17-3 85% 14 CA
1416 Bravo Athletics Volleyball Club 17-Havoc 1604 22-12 65% 17 CA
1417 Phoenix 13 Marquette 1604 18-9 67% 13 OH
1418 South County Boys 18-1 1604 6-5 55% 18 RI
1419 Molten 14-1 1604 24-21 53% 14 AZ
1420 Leaside Volleyball Club 15 15U Leaside Lancers 1604 2-3 40% 15 ON
1421 Stars 15 Lion 1604 36-19 65% 15 SC
1422 TeamLVC Boys 15U Black 1603 28-25 53% 15 NY
1423 Uno Boys 18 National 1603 42-25 63% 18 IL
1424 SVA Boys 18-S 1603 19-13 59% 18 CO
1425 AZ Fear 16-Blue 1603 25-38 40% 16 AZ
1426 787EV 14-2 1603 4-0 100% 14 PR
1427 Exodus Volleyball Club 18-1 1603 6-4 60% 18 CA
1428 Titans Volleyball Association 17 Titans Behemoth 1603 5-5 50% 17 ON
1429 KC United 17 Navy 1602 23-16 59% 17 MO
1430 NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-2 1602 29-17 63% 16 CT
1431 Maverick 14-Jester 1602 8-4 67% 14 AZ
1432 Oasis 12-Black 1602 7-0 100% 12 CA
1433 EHVB 18-1 1602 5-3 63% 18 CA
1434 CCVA Boys 16-Power 1602 4-2 67% 16 CA
1435 Cap City 16-Blue 1601 17-12 55% 16 PA
1436 Rockland VBC 18-1 1601 21-16 57% 18 NY
1437 SMV 18-Boys 1601 22-8 73% 18 MN
1438 OMNI 13-1 national 1601 27-24 53% 13 CA
1439 CVVC Sky View 18-Boys 1601 6-2 75% 18
1440 GSL 15-Elite - earle 1601 6-9 40% 15 UT
1441 Hawaiian Style Boys 16-Red 1600 9-5 64% 16 HI
1442 PV Boys 18-2 1600 17-14 55% 18 MA
1443 PACE BOOTLEGGER 12-Black 1600 0-0 0% 12 VA
1444 Stars 18 Hunt 1600 33-18 65% 18 SC
1445 The Hbc 14-BLACK 1600 23-16 59% 14 CA
1446 Utah Mojo 18 National 1600 21-23 47% 18 UT
1447 BAVC 16-3 boys aria 1599 3-2 60% 16 CA
1448 Sidewinder 18-2 1599 9-13 41% 18 AZ
1449 Princeton 16-National 1599 24-21 53% 16 NJ
1450 Salt City Boys Lindon Team Academy 14-Tim 1599 5-1 83% 14 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.