2025-2026 Season — Page 30 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1451 | BAVC 16-3 boys aria | 1599 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 1452 | Colorado Elite VBC 17-1 | 1598 | 5-8 | 38% | 17 | CO |
| 1453 | MOD B12-Blue | 1598 | 37-27 | 58% | 12 | IL |
| 1454 | Venom Volleyball 15 | 1598 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | FL |
| 1455 | BAVC 18-1 sebastian | 1598 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 1456 | Power Volleyball 18 | 1598 | 13-10 | 57% | 18 | MO |
| 1457 | Warren Sixpack 15-2 | 1598 | 22-20 | 52% | 15 | NJ |
| 1458 | Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Micah | 1598 | 8-4 | 67% | 14 | AZ |
| 1459 | Mayhem 16-1 | 1598 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | MA |
| 1460 | SPVB 18-Charlie | 1598 | 38-20 | 66% | 18 | IL |
| 1461 | TVA Top-Tier 18-MInt | 1598 | 16-11 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 1462 | Empower 16-Fuse | 1598 | 50-22 | 69% | 16 | IL |
| 1463 | PAC 13 Huber | 1598 | 24-24 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 1464 | FURY Volleyball 17-1 | 1597 | 14-11 | 56% | 17 | NY |
| 1465 | Inferno 14-1 select | 1597 | 29-18 | 62% | 14 | WI |
| 1466 | EAVC 18-1 | 1597 | 8-13 | 38% | 18 | UT |
| 1467 | ETVMR 18-1 - fortuno | 1597 | 5-11 | 31% | 18 | PR |
| 1468 | Faucons 17-Boys 1 | 1597 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | MA |
| 1469 | Power Volleyball 17 | 1596 | 22-14 | 61% | 17 | MO |
| 1470 | HVA 17-Performance national | 1596 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | CA |
| 1471 | FVVC 15-Peter | 1596 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | BC |
| 1472 | RCVS 16-1 yavi | 1596 | 11-5 | 69% | 16 | PR |
| 1473 | 118 15-Joey | 1596 | 21-12 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 1474 | Club GSL 15-Elect - andy | 1595 | 3-1 | 60% | 15 | UT |
| 1475 | Legends 16-1 francisco | 1595 | 2-8 | 20% | 16 | PR |
| 1476 | Crow Creek Volleyball 15 Rianne | 1595 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | ID |
| 1477 | MVC 15-Red | 1595 | 6-12 | 33% | 15 | AZ |
| 1478 | VVA 13-Roden | 1595 | 17-20 | 46% | 13 | CA |
| 1479 | ECVBA 17-1 anthony | 1594 | 10-11 | 48% | 17 | CA |
| 1480 | The HBC 17-Sail on sailor | 1594 | 1-6 | 14% | 17 | CA |
| 1481 | Gentlemen of Kiwi 16 | 1594 | 39-29 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 1482 | Alliance 18-Blue boys | 1594 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 1483 | Walton 18-1 | 1594 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | GA |
| 1484 | WI Flight 18-B blue | 1593 | 11-4 | 73% | 18 | WI |
| 1485 | Faucons 14-Boys 1 | 1593 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | MA |
| 1486 | PREVAIL Boys 16-Purple | 1593 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | PA |
| 1487 | CVC 14-1 | 1593 | 29-17 | 63% | 14 | OH |
| 1488 | COAST 12-1 brett | 1593 | 25-31 | 45% | 12 | CA |
| 1489 | SPORTIME VBC 17-Lynbrook | 1593 | 21-14 | 60% | 17 | NY |
| 1490 | Preds 18-Boys vision | 1592 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | OH |
| 1491 | KeAloha 18-2 mavericks | 1592 | 20-24 | 43% | 18 | IN |
| 1492 | LVC 16-White | 1592 | 18-12 | 58% | 16 | NY |
| 1493 | NWJRS 16-Slate | 1592 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | WA |
| 1494 | Ignite Boys 14 National | 1592 | 20-9 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 1495 | Utah Synergy Boys 14 Blue | 1592 | 7-3 | 54% | 14 | UT |
| 1496 | Academy Boys West 12-1 | 1592 | 27-16 | 63% | 12 | CA |
| 1497 | PILPA'A 14 | 1591 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | HI |
| 1498 | ETVMR 18-1 | 1591 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | PR |
| 1499 | JVBC Boys 18-National | 1591 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | MN |
| 1500 | MOD B15-Black | 1591 | 38-34 | 53% | 15 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.