Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 30 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1451 SAVBC 18-1 1599 5-2 71% 18 CA
1452 The Stacks 18-1 1599 6-2 75% 18
1453 OMNI 13-1 national 1599 27-24 53% 13 CA
1454 Pulse 17 Griggs 1599 14-21 40% 17 CA
1455 Bravo 17-Havoc 1599 22-12 65% 17 KY
1456 Hawaiian Style Boys 16-Red 1599 9-5 64% 16 HI
1457 Colorado Elite VBC 17-1 1599 5-8 38% 17 CO
1458 Bay to Bay 14-National 1598 35-26 57% 14 CA
1459 Inferno 14-1 select 1598 29-18 62% 14 WI
1460 Stars 18 Hunt 1598 33-18 65% 18 SC
1461 TVA Top-Tier 18-MInt 1598 16-11 59% 18 CA
1462 Molten 14-Black 1597 21-20 51% 14 AZ
1463 AZ Fear 16-Blue 1597 25-38 40% 16 AZ
1464 SPVB 18-Charlie 1597 38-20 66% 18 IL
1465 Power Volleyball 17 1597 22-14 61% 17 TX
1466 Alpha Omega Volleyball 18-1 1597 5-2 71% 18 MO
1467 Team Momentum B18 Navy 1597 30-33 48% 18 MO
1468 PAC 13 Huber 1597 24-24 50% 13 CA
1469 Milwaukee Jr's 11-1 1597 0-0 0% 11
1470 SAVBC 14-1 1596 16-10 62% 14 CA
1471 NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 15-1 1596 5-2 71% 15
1472 MVC 15-Red 1596 6-12 33% 15 AZ
1473 Empower 16-Fuse 1596 50-22 69% 16 CA
1474 RCVS 16-1 yavi 1596 11-5 69% 16 PR
1475 KeAloha 18-2 mavericks 1596 20-24 43% 18 IN
1476 FVVC 15-Peter 1595 5-2 71% 15
1477 316VBC G16-1 1595 0-0 0% 16
1478 LVC 16-White 1595 18-12 58% 16 NY
1479 VRTXVB 15-Mercedes 1595 3-5 38% 15
1480 Alliance 18-Blue boys 1595 0-0 0% 18 TN
1481 MKE Sting 11-Black 1594 0-0 0% 11 WI
1482 Stars 15 Lion 1594 36-19 65% 15 SC
1483 Academy Boys West 12-1 1594 27-16 63% 12 CA
1484 Walton 18-1 1594 0-0 0% 18
1485 Ka Ulukoa 13-Lee 1594 10-11 48% 13
1486 Sportime 16-3 1593 20-17 54% 16 NY
1487 Gentlemen of Kiwi 16 1593 39-29 57% 16 FL
1488 ECVBA 17-1 anthony 1593 10-11 48% 17 CA
1489 PREVAIL Boys 16-Purple 1593 2-3 40% 16 PA
1490 HVA 17-Performance national 1593 4-3 57% 17 TX
1491 No Panic 14-Boys 1592 37-26 58% 14 VA
1492 South County Boys 18-1 1592 6-5 55% 18 RI
1493 Pipeline 18-2 1592 33-38 46% 18 IL
1494 CSVC 16 WOLFJAW 1592 22-12 59% 16 NY
1495 Salt City Boys Lindon Team Academy 14-Tim 1592 5-1 83% 14 UT
1496 NEVBC Boys 16.2 1592 29-17 63% 16 CT
1497 Premier 17U 1592 13-8 62% 17 DE
1498 COAST 12-1 brett 1592 25-31 45% 12 CA
1499 118 15-Joey 1592 21-12 64% 15 CA
1500 Club Serve G16-1 1592 0-0 0% 16
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.