2025-2026 Season — Page 30 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1451 | SAVBC 18-1 | 1599 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | CA |
| 1452 | The Stacks 18-1 | 1599 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | |
| 1453 | OMNI 13-1 national | 1599 | 27-24 | 53% | 13 | CA |
| 1454 | Pulse 17 Griggs | 1599 | 14-21 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 1455 | Bravo 17-Havoc | 1599 | 22-12 | 65% | 17 | KY |
| 1456 | Hawaiian Style Boys 16-Red | 1599 | 9-5 | 64% | 16 | HI |
| 1457 | Colorado Elite VBC 17-1 | 1599 | 5-8 | 38% | 17 | CO |
| 1458 | Bay to Bay 14-National | 1598 | 35-26 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 1459 | Inferno 14-1 select | 1598 | 29-18 | 62% | 14 | WI |
| 1460 | Stars 18 Hunt | 1598 | 33-18 | 65% | 18 | SC |
| 1461 | TVA Top-Tier 18-MInt | 1598 | 16-11 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 1462 | Molten 14-Black | 1597 | 21-20 | 51% | 14 | AZ |
| 1463 | AZ Fear 16-Blue | 1597 | 25-38 | 40% | 16 | AZ |
| 1464 | SPVB 18-Charlie | 1597 | 38-20 | 66% | 18 | IL |
| 1465 | Power Volleyball 17 | 1597 | 22-14 | 61% | 17 | TX |
| 1466 | Alpha Omega Volleyball 18-1 | 1597 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | MO |
| 1467 | Team Momentum B18 Navy | 1597 | 30-33 | 48% | 18 | MO |
| 1468 | PAC 13 Huber | 1597 | 24-24 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 1469 | Milwaukee Jr's 11-1 | 1597 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 1470 | SAVBC 14-1 | 1596 | 16-10 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 1471 | NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 15-1 | 1596 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | |
| 1472 | MVC 15-Red | 1596 | 6-12 | 33% | 15 | AZ |
| 1473 | Empower 16-Fuse | 1596 | 50-22 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 1474 | RCVS 16-1 yavi | 1596 | 11-5 | 69% | 16 | PR |
| 1475 | KeAloha 18-2 mavericks | 1596 | 20-24 | 43% | 18 | IN |
| 1476 | FVVC 15-Peter | 1595 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | |
| 1477 | 316VBC G16-1 | 1595 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 1478 | LVC 16-White | 1595 | 18-12 | 58% | 16 | NY |
| 1479 | VRTXVB 15-Mercedes | 1595 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | |
| 1480 | Alliance 18-Blue boys | 1595 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | TN |
| 1481 | MKE Sting 11-Black | 1594 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | WI |
| 1482 | Stars 15 Lion | 1594 | 36-19 | 65% | 15 | SC |
| 1483 | Academy Boys West 12-1 | 1594 | 27-16 | 63% | 12 | CA |
| 1484 | Walton 18-1 | 1594 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 1485 | Ka Ulukoa 13-Lee | 1594 | 10-11 | 48% | 13 | |
| 1486 | Sportime 16-3 | 1593 | 20-17 | 54% | 16 | NY |
| 1487 | Gentlemen of Kiwi 16 | 1593 | 39-29 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 1488 | ECVBA 17-1 anthony | 1593 | 10-11 | 48% | 17 | CA |
| 1489 | PREVAIL Boys 16-Purple | 1593 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | PA |
| 1490 | HVA 17-Performance national | 1593 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | TX |
| 1491 | No Panic 14-Boys | 1592 | 37-26 | 58% | 14 | VA |
| 1492 | South County Boys 18-1 | 1592 | 6-5 | 55% | 18 | RI |
| 1493 | Pipeline 18-2 | 1592 | 33-38 | 46% | 18 | IL |
| 1494 | CSVC 16 WOLFJAW | 1592 | 22-12 | 59% | 16 | NY |
| 1495 | Salt City Boys Lindon Team Academy 14-Tim | 1592 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | UT |
| 1496 | NEVBC Boys 16.2 | 1592 | 29-17 | 63% | 16 | CT |
| 1497 | Premier 17U | 1592 | 13-8 | 62% | 17 | DE |
| 1498 | COAST 12-1 brett | 1592 | 25-31 | 45% | 12 | CA |
| 1499 | 118 15-Joey | 1592 | 21-12 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 1500 | Club Serve G16-1 | 1592 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.