Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 31 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1501 The HBC 17-Sail on sailor 1591 1-6 14% 17 CA
1502 ETVMR 18-1 1591 0-0 0% 18 PR
1503 SG Elite 13 Elite 1591 20-16 56% 13 CA
1504 Trojan VBC 15 1591 3-1 75% 15 PA
1505 PILPA'A 14 1591 4-1 80% 14
1506 Cincy East Boys 14-Black 1591 17-6 74% 14 OH
1507 Sidewinder 18-2 1590 9-13 41% 18 AZ
1508 PVC Sandlot 16-White 1590 8-9 47% 16 PA
1509 Faucons 14-Boys 1 1590 3-4 43% 14
1510 JVBC Boys 18-National 1590 3-2 60% 18 MN
1511 JAG VBC 11-1 1590 0-0 0% 11
1512 RCVA Boys 16-National blue 1590 5-4 56% 16 VA
1513 Iowa Juniors 14-Red 1590 3-0 100% 14 IA
1514 MOD B15-Black 1589 38-34 53% 15 IL
1515 Eclipse Mountain 18-1 1589 4-1 80% 18
1516 RockCity 18-1 1589 17-21 45% 18 OH
1517 LKN 16-S boys 1589 19-16 54% 16 NC
1518 Sharks 18-Boys navy 1589 15-7 68% 18 FL
1519 Warren Sixpack 15-2 1589 22-20 52% 15 NJ
1520 WIndy CIty Premier B16-1 1589 43-28 61% 16 IL
1521 BIVC 18-4 1589 6-2 75% 18 MN
1522 FORZA1 Boys 15 ONE 1589 11-6 65% 15 CA
1523 PEAK 18-1 boys 1589 19-8 70% 18
1524 Phoenix 16 Ramirez 1589 20-34 37% 16 OH
1525 GSL 18-St. george josh 1588 9-15 38% 18 UT
1526 Metro 12-Central 1588 0-0 0% 12
1527 FRVBC 14-1 1588 12-19 39% 14 CO
1528 MVVC YB 14 Carlos 1588 12-5 71% 14 CA
1529 A-10 Boys 16-Black 1588 21-30 41% 16 PA
1530 OMNI 15-2 elite 1588 32-42 43% 15 CA
1531 VVA 13-Roden 1588 17-20 46% 13 MO
1532 Urban Volleyball 16 Gold 1587 19-13 59% 16 TX
1533 Ashland 14-1 1587 14-17 45% 14 OR
1534 GP 14-Black 1587 28-20 58% 14 NE
1535 MJVA 15-3 1587 5-2 71% 15
1536 Sanger 18 1586 4-1 80% 18 CA
1537 COAST 16-Spring ismail 1586 5-1 83% 16 CA
1538 Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Blue 1586 27-19 59% 14 NY
1539 Golden State 18-Black 1586 36-26 58% 18 CA
1540 Tampa United BOYS 18-R 1585 9-9 50% 18 FL
1541 Xtreme 18-Nat-kelly 1585 3-2 60% 18 NJ
1542 Core 18 Kai 1585 31-35 47% 18 CA
1543 PWVolleyball 18-1 1585 30-17 64% 18 NY
1544 Aspire 16-1 warriors 1585 31-32 49% 16 CA
1545 FPVC 16 Jason 1585 16-6 73% 16 CA
1546 No Limits 16-Boys 1585 26-19 58% 16 IL
1547 Tstreet SN 18-Dana 1584 4-2 67% 18 NV
1548 MB Surf 16-Gold 1584 3-5 38% 16 CA
1549 MN Select Boys 14-2 1584 38-22 63% 14 MN
1550 Titan Premier 16 Tori 1584 23-16 59% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.