Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 31 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1501 SAVBC 14-1 1590 16-10 62% 14 CA
1502 Iowa Juniors 14-Red 1590 3-0 100% 14 IA
1503 A-10 Boys 16-Black 1589 21-30 41% 16 PA
1504 Ka Ulukoa 13-Lee 1589 10-11 48% 13 HI
1505 RockCity 18-1 1589 17-21 45% 18 OH
1506 Emerald Rain Boys 16-Elite 1589 5-1 83% 16 WA
1507 PVC Sandlot 16-White 1589 8-9 47% 16 PA
1508 Phoenix 16 Ramirez 1589 20-34 37% 16 OH
1509 FRVBC 14-1 1588 12-19 39% 14 CO
1510 WIndy CIty Premier B16-1 1588 43-28 61% 16 IL
1511 Ashland 14-1 1588 14-17 45% 14 OR
1512 GSL 18-St. george josh 1588 13-27 33% 18 UT
1513 OMNI 15-2 elite 1588 32-42 43% 15 CA
1514 Roots Volleyball Academy 16-2 1588 5-2 71% 16 TX
1515 Golden State 18-Black 1587 36-26 58% 18 CA
1516 LKN 16-S boys 1587 19-16 54% 16 NC
1517 204 18-Gold 1587 3-2 60% 18
1518 Space Needle Volleyball Foundation 18 SNVF Red (PS) 1587 3-1 75% 18 WA
1519 GSL 18-Elite mark/matt 1587 6-2 75% 18 UT
1520 PEAK 18-1 boys 1587 19-8 70% 18 OK
1521 MB Surf 16-Gold 1586 3-5 38% 16 CA
1522 Aspire 18-1 gladiators 1586 22-35 39% 18 CA
1523 Valley Velocity 16-Red 1586 6-1 86% 16 WI
1524 Pipeline 18-2 1586 33-38 46% 18 IL
1525 CORE Volleyball 16-Titanium 1586 25-14 64% 16 NJ
1526 COAST 16-Spring ismail 1586 5-1 83% 16 CA
1527 No Limits 16-Boys 1586 26-19 58% 16 FL
1528 Titan Premier 14 Taylor 1585 24-16 60% 14 CA
1529 FPVC 16 Jason 1585 16-6 73% 16 CA
1530 SMBC North 16 Molten 1585 64-39 62% 16 CA
1531 Sanger 18 1585 4-1 80% 18 CA
1532 Xtreme 18-Nat-kelly 1585 3-2 60% 18 NJ
1533 Urban Volleyball 16 Gold 1584 19-13 59% 16 CA
1534 Absolute 18-Blue 1584 20-44 31% 18 CA
1535 MN Select Boys 14-2 1584 38-22 63% 14 MN
1536 Trojan VBC 15 1584 3-1 75% 15 IA
1537 Aspire 16-1 warriors 1584 31-32 49% 16 CA
1538 Apex Boys VBC 16-1 1584 20-8 71% 16 TN
1539 Tampa United BOYS 18-R 1584 9-9 50% 18 FL
1540 Bay Area Eagles 15-Boys 1583 3-2 60% 15 CA
1541 WAVE 15-Spring colin 1583 5-3 63% 15 CA
1542 GSL 16-Elite ashlyn 1583 16-13 55% 16 UT
1543 Windy City Premier B18-2 1583 48-27 64% 18 IL
1544 Premier 17U 1583 13-8 62% 17 FL
1545 Team Rockstar 17-Austin 1582 11-7 61% 17 CA
1546 Seaside 16-Black 1582 25-25 50% 16 CA
1547 The Academy of Central Florida 15 GOLDENBULLS WHITE 1582 4-1 80% 15 FL
1548 Annapolis 17U 1582 27-42 38% 17 MD
1549 Sideout 15 Rob 1582 5-14 26% 15 NY
1550 Sharks 18-Boys navy 1581 15-7 68% 18 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.