Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 31 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1501 Infinity Royals 14-L 1550 13-7 65% 14 MN
1502 COV Team FB 16-1 1550 3-2 60% 16 CA
1503 ForceVC 13-1 1549 5-1 83% 13 OH
1504 Beach Cities 14-Black 1549 16-13 55% 14 CA
1505 Central Cal 14-1 1549 3-4 43% 14 CA
1506 Vibe Boys 17-Matt 1549 6-2 75% 17 CA
1507 SPVB 15-Alpha 1549 29-14 67% 15 IL
1508 SMBC Islands 18-S 1549 8-4 67% 18 CA
1509 TUVA Boys 18-Select 1549 23-17 57% 18 NC
1510 Stars 17 Lion 1549 13-16 45% 17 SC
1511 Saint Louis Volleyball Club 13 1549 12-9 50% 13 MO
1512 Ajax Bend 18-1 1549 7-3 70% 18 OR
1513 Snipers 16-1 1549 10-4 63% 16 NV
1514 United Volleyball Club 16-1 1548 5-2 71% 16 IL
1515 EXCELL 18-1 shane navy 1548 13-10 57% 18 SC
1516 Ignite Boys 14 National 1548 15-8 65% 14 AZ
1517 Chicago Elite B 17 Nike 1548 22-10 69% 17 IL
1518 Emerald Rain Boys 14-Elite 1548 4-1 80% 14 WA
1519 The Stacks 18-1 1548 6-2 75% 18
1520 WAVE 14 Justin 1548 19-16 54% 14 CA
1521 Eclipse Boys 13-S solar 1547 15-14 52% 13 NJ
1522 Eclipse Boys 16-S 1547 16-20 44% 16 NJ
1523 Rancho 16-Black 1547 12-7 63% 16 CA
1524 Vortex 13-Alta 1547 3-0 100% 13 UT
1525 Quicksets 14-Black 1547 4-1 80% 14 HI
1526 LI Fury 17-1 1547 14-11 56% 17 NY
1527 Trojan VBC 18-Orange 1547 4-1 80% 18
1528 Warren Sixpack 17-4 1546 18-14 56% 17 NJ
1529 LAVA 13-1 1546 5-1 83% 13 OH
1530 FRVBC 14-1 1546 10-11 48% 14 CO
1531 Golden State 18-Black 1546 23-19 55% 18 CA
1532 NYC Impact 18 Travel 1546 17-9 65% 18 NY
1533 MoCo Boys 13 Adidas 1546 10-7 59% 13 MD
1534 MVC 15-Red 1546 6-12 33% 15 AZ
1535 Eclipse 13-S solar 1546 3-4 43% 13 NJ
1536 CJVA Boys 18-Black 1546 5-14 26% 18 NJ
1537 FAV 17 Maverick 1546 11-17 39% 17 CA
1538 Sky High 15-Clark 1546 17-9 65% 15 IL
1539 Titan Premier 14 Taylor 1546 17-12 59% 14 CA
1540 VOLTAGE 16-Sonja 1546 5-1 83% 16 FL
1541 SAND 16-Gold 1546 3-2 60% 16 CA
1542 NPJ Seattle 14-1 boys 1546 4-1 80% 14 WA
1543 Sportime 16-3 1546 10-10 50% 16 NY
1544 Crown City 16 Kings 1545 13-14 48% 16 CA
1545 KC United 16 Navy 1545 12-11 52% 16 MO
1546 EHVB 18-1 1545 5-3 63% 18 NY
1547 Seaside VBC 18-Black 1545 9-10 47% 18 CA
1548 Iowa Juniors 14-Red 1545 3-0 100% 14 IA
1549 NW Jrs 14-Ua slate 1545 6-3 67% 14 WA
1550 IDVB 18-Reg | keyden 1545 9-4 69% 18 ID
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.