2025-2026 Season — Page 32 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1551 | BSG 11-Navy | 1581 | 3-0 | 75% | 11 | |
| 1552 | Sharks 18-Boys navy | 1581 | 15-7 | 68% | 18 | AL |
| 1553 | DigThis! Ohana 14-Pink | 1581 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | NV |
| 1554 | CHAOS BOYS 18-1 national | 1581 | 20-28 | 42% | 18 | OR |
| 1555 | ECVBA 17-1 | 1581 | 5-9 | 36% | 17 | CA |
| 1556 | MALULANI - MOMI 12 | 1581 | 4-1 | 67% | 12 | HI |
| 1557 | Warriors Elite 14 | 1580 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | NV |
| 1558 | Pulse 14-Jana | 1580 | 10-3 | 77% | 14 | CA |
| 1559 | RAGE 14-Nilo | 1580 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 1560 | Roch PaceBootlegger 13 | 1579 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | NY |
| 1561 | RUSH 16-Black | 1579 | 7-15 | 32% | 16 | AZ |
| 1562 | Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Blue | 1579 | 27-19 | 59% | 14 | NY |
| 1563 | PC Elite 18-1 | 1579 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | TX |
| 1564 | TopFlight VBA 17-1 | 1579 | 8-8 | 50% | 17 | FL |
| 1565 | PWVolleyball 18-1 | 1579 | 30-17 | 64% | 18 | NY |
| 1566 | Apex 16-1 | 1579 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | VA |
| 1567 | Cincy East Boys 14-Black | 1579 | 17-6 | 74% | 14 | OH |
| 1568 | CVT Phoenix 16-Black | 1579 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | NY |
| 1569 | Elevation 16-Timberline boys | 1578 | 27-28 | 49% | 16 | CO |
| 1570 | Prescott Peregrines Volleyball Club 18 Prescott Peregrines VB | 1578 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | AZ |
| 1571 | Trojan VBC 18-Orange | 1578 | 4-1 | 80% | 18 | PA |
| 1572 | SPORTIME VBC 16-3 | 1578 | 15-14 | 52% | 16 | NY |
| 1573 | NPJ Seattle 14-B national | 1578 | 17-10 | 63% | 14 | WA |
| 1574 | MVC 14-Black developmental | 1578 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 1575 | Royals Infinity 18-N | 1578 | 32-24 | 57% | 18 | MN |
| 1576 | Sideout Boys 18 | 1577 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | WA |
| 1577 | Princeton 15-National | 1577 | 18-21 | 46% | 15 | NJ |
| 1578 | COV Team FB 16-1 | 1577 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 1579 | BAVC 16-2 boys | 1577 | 18-31 | 37% | 16 | CA |
| 1580 | Ignite VBCF Boys 15 National | 1577 | 33-28 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 1581 | VVA 13-Carter | 1577 | 4-8 | 33% | 13 | CA |
| 1582 | Ultimate B16-Blue | 1577 | 35-26 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 1583 | Emerald Rain Boys 14 E | 1577 | 12-13 | 48% | 14 | WA |
| 1584 | Absolute SubZero BVC 18-Romer | 1577 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | WA |
| 1585 | Core 18 Kai | 1577 | 31-35 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 1586 | NIVA Boys 18U | 1577 | 23-11 | 68% | 18 | IN |
| 1587 | The Stacks 18 The Stacks | 1577 | 8-10 | 44% | 18 | |
| 1588 | GP 14-Black | 1577 | 28-20 | 58% | 14 | FL |
| 1589 | LBVC 16-Tyler | 1577 | 36-21 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 1590 | Beach Cities 15-Black | 1576 | 30-23 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 1591 | VIBE 16 | 1576 | 24-17 | 59% | 16 | VA |
| 1592 | TAMPA UNITED VBA BOYS 18-Red | 1576 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | FL |
| 1593 | Chicago Legends 18-Black | 1576 | 39-25 | 61% | 18 | IL |
| 1594 | BIVC 18-4 | 1575 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | HI |
| 1595 | Junior Bisons 18 | 1575 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | KY |
| 1596 | SynergyForce 17-2 natl | 1575 | 22-15 | 59% | 17 | CA |
| 1597 | Golden State 17-Black | 1575 | 25-27 | 48% | 17 | CA |
| 1598 | Element 18U | 1574 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | BC |
| 1599 | GRV 14 | 1574 | 16-9 | 64% | 14 | MI |
| 1600 | JJVA Boys 16-Teal | 1574 | 26-34 | 43% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.