Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 32 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1551 Niagara Frontier 17 Cobalt 1583 0-0 0% 17 NY
1552 WAVE 15-Spring colin 1583 5-3 63% 15 CA
1553 Maverick 14-Jester 1583 8-4 67% 14 AZ
1554 Apex Boys VBC 16-1 1583 20-8 71% 16 TN
1555 Bay Area Eagles 15-Boys 1583 3-2 60% 15 CA
1556 Team Rockstar 17-Austin 1583 11-7 61% 17 CA
1557 NWJRS 16-Slate 1583 5-1 83% 16 WA
1558 NYC Impact 15 National 1582 15-9 63% 15 NY
1559 Windy City Premier B18-2 1582 48-27 64% 18 IL
1560 Ignite Boys 14 National 1582 20-9 69% 14 AZ
1561 Sideout 15 Rob 1582 5-14 26% 15 NJ
1562 Titan Premier 14 Taylor 1582 24-16 60% 14 CA
1563 Pulse 14-Jana 1582 10-3 77% 14 MI
1564 Beach Cities 15-Black 1582 30-23 57% 15 CA
1565 PC Elite 18-1 1581 14-6 70% 18 TX
1566 DigThis! Ohana 14-Pink 1581 4-1 80% 14
1567 MALULANI - MOMI 12 1581 4-1 67% 12
1568 Roch PaceBootlegger 13 1580 3-1 75% 13 NY
1569 VIBE 16 1580 24-17 59% 16 CA
1570 Roots Volleyball Academy 16-2 1580 5-2 71% 16 TX
1571 NIVA Boys 18U 1580 23-11 68% 18 IN
1572 FC Elite 11 Navy 1580 0-0 0% 11
1573 Weber 18-Carri 1580 11-8 58% 18
1574 Warriors Elite 14 1580 4-1 80% 14
1575 CORE Boys 16-Titanium 1579 29-17 63% 16 NJ
1576 OCR 16-S gold 1579 6-0 100% 16 CA
1577 Prime 16 adidas 1578 23-13 64% 16 CA
1578 LI Fury 15-1 1578 11-9 55% 15 NY
1579 CVT Phoenix 16-Black 1578 4-2 67% 16
1580 LBVC 16-Tyler 1578 36-21 63% 16 CA
1581 Trojan VBC 18-Orange 1578 4-1 80% 18 PA
1582 Princeton 15-National 1578 18-21 46% 15 NJ
1583 COV Team FB 16-1 1577 3-2 60% 16 CA
1584 RAGE 14-Nilo 1577 5-5 50% 14 CA
1585 TAMPA UNITED VBA BOYS 18-Red 1577 5-3 63% 18
1586 Absolute SubZero BVC 18-Romer 1577 4-2 67% 18 WA
1587 Absolute 18-Blue 1577 20-44 31% 18 CA
1588 HEAT 13-Red 1577 4-2 67% 13 CA
1589 Infinity Royals 18-N 1577 36-28 56% 18 MN
1590 BSG 11-Navy 1577 3-0 75% 11
1591 Ultimate B16-Blue 1577 35-26 56% 16 IL
1592 Chicago Legends 18-Black 1576 39-25 61% 18 IL
1593 ECVBA 17-1 1576 5-9 36% 17 CA
1594 Aspire 18-1 gladiators 1576 22-35 39% 18 CA
1595 Apex 16-1 1576 3-2 60% 16 MO
1596 Phoenix 12-Boys mack 1576 12-11 52% 12 OH
1597 RUSH 16-Black 1576 7-15 32% 16 AZ
1598 Oasis 16-Black 1575 17-8 68% 16 CO
1599 TopFlight VBA 17-1 1575 8-8 50% 17 IL
1600 Unity 18-Boys national vikings 1575 20-22 44% 18 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.