Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 33 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1601 Emerald Rain Boys 16-Elite 1575 5-1 83% 16 WA
1602 Oasis 16-Black 1575 17-8 68% 16 CO
1603 HAVC 14-Red 1575 39-21 65% 14 IL
1604 Tool City 15-Orange 1574 8-5 62% 15 PA
1605 FEVA 18-Boys 1574 8-15 35% 18 FL
1606 MVP 16-Red 1574 13-18 41% 16 MD
1607 HEAT 12-Black 1574 4-3 57% 12 CA
1608 VVA 13-Carter 1574 4-8 33% 13 MO
1609 GRV 13 1573 4-2 67% 13 MI
1610 Vibe Boys 17-Matt 1573 6-2 75% 17 CA
1611 Sportime 17 Lynbrook 1573 23-19 55% 17 NY
1612 AFVBC 18 Apex 1573 22-11 67% 18 CA
1613 Husky 18.2 1573 13-25 34% 18 CT
1614 PR Arsenal Raúl 14 1572 11-8 58% 14 PR
1615 CHAOS BOYS 18-1 national 1572 20-28 42% 18 OR
1616 CHAOS BOYS 14U GOLD 1572 10-4 71% 14 OR
1617 GRV 14 1572 16-9 64% 14 MI
1618 SAND BOYS 18 Gold 1572 17-20 46% 18 CA
1619 JJVA Boys 16-Teal 1572 26-34 43% 16 FL
1620 C2 Attack 16-2 premier 1572 31-37 46% 16 TN
1621 Element 18U 1571 4-3 57% 18 TX
1622 Legit 17-G malea 1571 2-0 100% 17 FL
1623 Tx Outlaws 12 Silver 1571 3-1 75% 12
1624 Northern Lights 18-B boys 1571 17-9 65% 18 MN
1625 Golden State 17-Black 1571 25-27 48% 17 CA
1626 OPVC 12-Purple 1571 14-7 67% 12 OH
1627 Ultimate B14-Blue 1571 46-29 61% 14 IL
1628 Va Wave 16 Jaws 1571 24-23 51% 16 VA
1629 Santa Fe Storm 13-1 joylynn 1571 4-2 50% 13
1630 SCB 16-S francisco 1570 8-15 35% 16 LA
1631 BAVC 16-2 boys 1570 18-31 37% 16 CA
1632 Orlando Gold 14-Black 1570 17-24 41% 14 FL
1633 Emerald Rain Boys 14 E 1570 12-13 48% 14 WA
1634 Miami United 17-National carlos 1570 26-20 57% 17 FL
1635 SynergyForce 17-2 natl 1570 22-15 59% 17 CA
1636 MVVC B 13-Black 1570 43-38 53% 13 CA
1637 MVC 14-Black developmental 1569 6-6 50% 14
1638 Seaside 16-Black 1569 25-25 50% 16 CA
1639 MVVC B 15-National 1569 37-38 49% 15 CA
1640 United 14-Sam/quillan 1569 5-1 83% 14 IL
1641 Utah Mojo 18 National 1569 15-14 50% 18 UT
1642 VVA 14-Pirok 1569 21-21 50% 14 MO
1643 Top Flight 16-Nat black 1569 21-14 60% 16 IL
1644 Legacy Boys 17 Premier 1569 11-8 58% 17 MI
1645 Sideout Boys 18 1569 2-3 40% 18
1646 SKY 14-1 1569 19-13 59% 14 IL
1647 South County Juniors Boys 18-Gold 1568 27-16 63% 18 RI
1648 Velocity B18-RED 1568 6-7 46% 18 IL
1649 Powrhaus 17-West 1568 22-27 45% 17 NC
1650 Slainte 15-Platinum 1568 35-31 53% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.