Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 33 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1601 GRV 14 1574 16-9 64% 14 MI
1602 SAND BOYS 18 Gold 1574 17-20 46% 18 CA
1603 Northern Lights 18-B boys 1573 17-9 65% 18 MN
1604 Pulse 18 Vo 1573 11-4 73% 18 CA
1605 GRV 13 1573 4-2 67% 13 MI
1606 OCR 16-S gold 1573 6-0 100% 16 CA
1607 HAVC 14-Red 1573 39-21 65% 14 IL
1608 AFVBC 18 Apex 1573 22-11 67% 18 CA
1609 Diablo Black 14-1 1573 19-22 46% 14 CA
1610 Prime 16 adidas 1573 23-13 64% 16 CA
1611 MVVC B 13-Black 1573 43-38 53% 13 CA
1612 FEVA 18-Boys 1573 8-15 35% 18 FL
1613 Downstate 16-Black 1572 28-22 56% 16 NY
1614 Ultimate B14-Blue 1572 46-29 61% 14 IL
1615 Miami United 17-National carlos 1572 26-20 57% 17 FL
1616 MKE Sting 15-2 1572 26-42 38% 15 WI
1617 OPVC 12-Purple 1572 14-7 67% 12 OH
1618 Legit 17-G malea 1571 2-0 100% 17 IA
1619 Tx Outlaws 12 Silver 1571 3-1 75% 12 TX
1620 Phoenix 12-Boys mack 1571 12-11 52% 12 OH
1621 Oasis Volleyball Academy 15-Boys 1570 0-0 0% 15 AZ
1622 GSL 13-Comp kimber 1570 6-6 50% 13 UT
1623 Long Island Fury Volleyball II Inc 16-1 1569 3-7 30% 16 NJ
1624 Powrhaus 17-West 1569 22-27 45% 17 NC
1625 VVA 14-Pirok 1569 21-21 50% 14 CA
1626 SKY 14-1 1569 19-13 59% 14 OH
1627 Vibe Boys 17-Matt 1569 6-2 75% 17 VT
1628 Slainte 15-Platinum 1569 35-31 53% 15 CA
1629 Husky 18.2 1569 13-25 34% 18 CT
1630 PR Arsenal Raúl 14 1569 11-8 58% 14 PR
1631 South County Juniors Boys 18-Gold 1569 27-16 63% 18 RI
1632 United 14-Sam/quillan 1568 5-1 83% 14 IL
1633 United Volleyball Club 16-1 1568 5-2 71% 16 IL
1634 UNION 16-White 1568 4-2 67% 16 IN
1635 Orlando Gold 17-Gold 1568 18-17 51% 17 FL
1636 Orlando Gold 14-Black 1568 17-24 41% 14 FL
1637 TKVBC 18-1 1568 4-6 40% 18 GA
1638 Gentlemen of Storm 18 1568 3-0 100% 18 FL
1639 TVC 16-1s 1568 18-12 60% 16 IN
1640 WSA Gators 14-Elite boys 1568 23-26 47% 14 FL
1641 Phoenix 14 Mihelic 1567 27-29 48% 14 OH
1642 Sporks 18 sporks 1567 4-3 57% 18 UT
1643 Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Troy 1567 6-6 50% 14 AZ
1644 Va Wave 16 Jaws 1567 24-23 51% 16 VA
1645 CCVA 13-Orange 1567 13-11 54% 13 CA
1646 Velocity B18-RED 1567 6-7 46% 18 IL
1647 Top Flight 18-Maverick 1567 32-31 51% 18 IL
1648 Aspire 15 Quicksilver 1567 7-19 27% 15 AZ
1649 Club 1 B 15-Skronkstrong 1567 37-32 54% 15 IL
1650 Endless Momentum Volleyball Club 18-Gold 1567 5-2 71% 18 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.