2025-2026 Season — Page 33 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601 | GRV 14 | 1574 | 16-9 | 64% | 14 | MI |
| 1602 | SAND BOYS 18 Gold | 1574 | 17-20 | 46% | 18 | CA |
| 1603 | Northern Lights 18-B boys | 1573 | 17-9 | 65% | 18 | MN |
| 1604 | Pulse 18 Vo | 1573 | 11-4 | 73% | 18 | CA |
| 1605 | GRV 13 | 1573 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | MI |
| 1606 | OCR 16-S gold | 1573 | 6-0 | 100% | 16 | CA |
| 1607 | HAVC 14-Red | 1573 | 39-21 | 65% | 14 | IL |
| 1608 | AFVBC 18 Apex | 1573 | 22-11 | 67% | 18 | CA |
| 1609 | Diablo Black 14-1 | 1573 | 19-22 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 1610 | Prime 16 adidas | 1573 | 23-13 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 1611 | MVVC B 13-Black | 1573 | 43-38 | 53% | 13 | CA |
| 1612 | FEVA 18-Boys | 1573 | 8-15 | 35% | 18 | FL |
| 1613 | Downstate 16-Black | 1572 | 28-22 | 56% | 16 | NY |
| 1614 | Ultimate B14-Blue | 1572 | 46-29 | 61% | 14 | IL |
| 1615 | Miami United 17-National carlos | 1572 | 26-20 | 57% | 17 | FL |
| 1616 | MKE Sting 15-2 | 1572 | 26-42 | 38% | 15 | WI |
| 1617 | OPVC 12-Purple | 1572 | 14-7 | 67% | 12 | OH |
| 1618 | Legit 17-G malea | 1571 | 2-0 | 100% | 17 | IA |
| 1619 | Tx Outlaws 12 Silver | 1571 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | TX |
| 1620 | Phoenix 12-Boys mack | 1571 | 12-11 | 52% | 12 | OH |
| 1621 | Oasis Volleyball Academy 15-Boys | 1570 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | AZ |
| 1622 | GSL 13-Comp kimber | 1570 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | UT |
| 1623 | Long Island Fury Volleyball II Inc 16-1 | 1569 | 3-7 | 30% | 16 | NJ |
| 1624 | Powrhaus 17-West | 1569 | 22-27 | 45% | 17 | NC |
| 1625 | VVA 14-Pirok | 1569 | 21-21 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 1626 | SKY 14-1 | 1569 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | OH |
| 1627 | Vibe Boys 17-Matt | 1569 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | VT |
| 1628 | Slainte 15-Platinum | 1569 | 35-31 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 1629 | Husky 18.2 | 1569 | 13-25 | 34% | 18 | CT |
| 1630 | PR Arsenal Raúl 14 | 1569 | 11-8 | 58% | 14 | PR |
| 1631 | South County Juniors Boys 18-Gold | 1569 | 27-16 | 63% | 18 | RI |
| 1632 | United 14-Sam/quillan | 1568 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | IL |
| 1633 | United Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1568 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | IL |
| 1634 | UNION 16-White | 1568 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | IN |
| 1635 | Orlando Gold 17-Gold | 1568 | 18-17 | 51% | 17 | FL |
| 1636 | Orlando Gold 14-Black | 1568 | 17-24 | 41% | 14 | FL |
| 1637 | TKVBC 18-1 | 1568 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | GA |
| 1638 | Gentlemen of Storm 18 | 1568 | 3-0 | 100% | 18 | FL |
| 1639 | TVC 16-1s | 1568 | 18-12 | 60% | 16 | IN |
| 1640 | WSA Gators 14-Elite boys | 1568 | 23-26 | 47% | 14 | FL |
| 1641 | Phoenix 14 Mihelic | 1567 | 27-29 | 48% | 14 | OH |
| 1642 | Sporks 18 sporks | 1567 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | UT |
| 1643 | Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Troy | 1567 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 1644 | Va Wave 16 Jaws | 1567 | 24-23 | 51% | 16 | VA |
| 1645 | CCVA 13-Orange | 1567 | 13-11 | 54% | 13 | CA |
| 1646 | Velocity B18-RED | 1567 | 6-7 | 46% | 18 | IL |
| 1647 | Top Flight 18-Maverick | 1567 | 32-31 | 51% | 18 | IL |
| 1648 | Aspire 15 Quicksilver | 1567 | 7-19 | 27% | 15 | AZ |
| 1649 | Club 1 B 15-Skronkstrong | 1567 | 37-32 | 54% | 15 | IL |
| 1650 | Endless Momentum Volleyball Club 18-Gold | 1567 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.