Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 34 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1651 Slainte 15-Platinum 1568 35-31 53% 15 CA
1652 Phoenix 14 Mihelic 1567 27-29 48% 14 OH
1653 TKVBC 18-1 1567 4-6 40% 18 GA
1654 UNION 16-White 1567 4-2 67% 16 IN
1655 H Hawks HHVBC 14-Hawks 1567 2-0 100% 14
1656 Rival 17 1567 5-5 50% 17 NY
1657 Aspire 15 Quicksilver 1567 7-19 27% 15 AZ
1658 Gentlemen of Storm 18 1567 3-0 100% 18 FL
1659 Club 1 B 15-Skronkstrong 1567 37-32 54% 15 IL
1660 Forza - Boys 18-Orange 1567 40-18 69% 18 IL
1661 Orlando Gold 17-Gold 1567 18-17 51% 17 FL
1662 TVC 16-1s 1567 18-12 60% 16 IN
1663 Pulse 18 Vo 1567 11-4 73% 18 CA
1664 Junior Bisons 18 1566 3-2 60% 18
1665 Husky 17.2 1566 24-15 62% 17 CT
1666 Iowa Impact 17-1 premier 1566 2-0 100% 17 IA
1667 APXVB 17-Boys 1566 6-8 43% 17 UT
1668 True North B 18-Green 1565 12-5 71% 18
1669 Sting 10 Honeybees 1565 0-0 0% 10 WI
1670 CCVA 13-Orange 1565 13-11 54% 13 CA
1671 FC Elite 10 Navy 1565 0-0 0% 10
1672 COAST 16-Spring katie 1565 4-2 67% 16 CA
1673 Squad 16-Premier 1565 4-1 80% 16 NV
1674 WSA Gators 14-Elite boys 1565 23-26 47% 14 FL
1675 Vegas Volley 17-1 1565 4-2 67% 17 NV
1676 Chicago Elite B 16-Nike 1565 35-21 63% 16 IL
1677 MKE Sting 15-2 1565 26-42 38% 15 WI
1678 Red Rock Heat 12 1565 3-2 60% 12
1679 FRVBC 14-1 boys 1564 6-10 38% 14 CO
1680 I AM VBC 10-RED 1564 0-0 0% 10 WI
1681 Ultimate B17-Black 1564 35-34 51% 17 IL
1682 FIVA BOYS 17-1 1564 12-19 39% 17 FL
1683 RCVS 18-1 yavi 1564 11-7 61% 18 PR
1684 Mass Pats Boys 18-1 tenacity 1564 26-15 58% 18 MA
1685 NJ RONIN 18 SAKURA 1564 14-7 64% 18 NJ
1686 Miami United 18-National benitez 1564 4-20 17% 18 FL
1687 Club 1 B 17-Royal 1564 31-37 46% 17 IL
1688 Elevation 16-Timberline boys 1564 27-28 49% 16 CO
1689 Team Colorado 18-Green 1564 16-20 44% 18 CO
1690 Inland Elite 18-1 1564 4-4 50% 18 CA
1691 Electric City 18-1 1563 7-4 64% 18 NY
1692 ACE 10-Red 1563 3-1 75% 10
1693 Illinois Jr's B17-1's 1562 39-36 52% 17 IL
1694 NLVA 15 1562 11-6 65% 15 MO
1695 United Volleyball Club 16-1 1562 5-2 71% 16 IL
1696 Diablo Black 14-1 1562 19-22 46% 14 CA
1697 Top Flight 18-Maverick 1562 32-31 51% 18 IL
1698 Madtown 11-2 select 1562 0-0 0% 11
1699 Quicksets 14-Black 1562 21-11 66% 14 HI
1700 Rancho 16-Blue 1561 7-6 54% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.