2025-2026 Season — Page 34 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1651 | Slainte 15-Platinum | 1568 | 35-31 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 1652 | Phoenix 14 Mihelic | 1567 | 27-29 | 48% | 14 | OH |
| 1653 | TKVBC 18-1 | 1567 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | GA |
| 1654 | UNION 16-White | 1567 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | IN |
| 1655 | H Hawks HHVBC 14-Hawks | 1567 | 2-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 1656 | Rival 17 | 1567 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | NY |
| 1657 | Aspire 15 Quicksilver | 1567 | 7-19 | 27% | 15 | AZ |
| 1658 | Gentlemen of Storm 18 | 1567 | 3-0 | 100% | 18 | FL |
| 1659 | Club 1 B 15-Skronkstrong | 1567 | 37-32 | 54% | 15 | IL |
| 1660 | Forza - Boys 18-Orange | 1567 | 40-18 | 69% | 18 | IL |
| 1661 | Orlando Gold 17-Gold | 1567 | 18-17 | 51% | 17 | FL |
| 1662 | TVC 16-1s | 1567 | 18-12 | 60% | 16 | IN |
| 1663 | Pulse 18 Vo | 1567 | 11-4 | 73% | 18 | CA |
| 1664 | Junior Bisons 18 | 1566 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | |
| 1665 | Husky 17.2 | 1566 | 24-15 | 62% | 17 | CT |
| 1666 | Iowa Impact 17-1 premier | 1566 | 2-0 | 100% | 17 | IA |
| 1667 | APXVB 17-Boys | 1566 | 6-8 | 43% | 17 | UT |
| 1668 | True North B 18-Green | 1565 | 12-5 | 71% | 18 | |
| 1669 | Sting 10 Honeybees | 1565 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | WI |
| 1670 | CCVA 13-Orange | 1565 | 13-11 | 54% | 13 | CA |
| 1671 | FC Elite 10 Navy | 1565 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 1672 | COAST 16-Spring katie | 1565 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 1673 | Squad 16-Premier | 1565 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | NV |
| 1674 | WSA Gators 14-Elite boys | 1565 | 23-26 | 47% | 14 | FL |
| 1675 | Vegas Volley 17-1 | 1565 | 4-2 | 67% | 17 | NV |
| 1676 | Chicago Elite B 16-Nike | 1565 | 35-21 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 1677 | MKE Sting 15-2 | 1565 | 26-42 | 38% | 15 | WI |
| 1678 | Red Rock Heat 12 | 1565 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | |
| 1679 | FRVBC 14-1 boys | 1564 | 6-10 | 38% | 14 | CO |
| 1680 | I AM VBC 10-RED | 1564 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | WI |
| 1681 | Ultimate B17-Black | 1564 | 35-34 | 51% | 17 | IL |
| 1682 | FIVA BOYS 17-1 | 1564 | 12-19 | 39% | 17 | FL |
| 1683 | RCVS 18-1 yavi | 1564 | 11-7 | 61% | 18 | PR |
| 1684 | Mass Pats Boys 18-1 tenacity | 1564 | 26-15 | 58% | 18 | MA |
| 1685 | NJ RONIN 18 SAKURA | 1564 | 14-7 | 64% | 18 | NJ |
| 1686 | Miami United 18-National benitez | 1564 | 4-20 | 17% | 18 | FL |
| 1687 | Club 1 B 17-Royal | 1564 | 31-37 | 46% | 17 | IL |
| 1688 | Elevation 16-Timberline boys | 1564 | 27-28 | 49% | 16 | CO |
| 1689 | Team Colorado 18-Green | 1564 | 16-20 | 44% | 18 | CO |
| 1690 | Inland Elite 18-1 | 1564 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 1691 | Electric City 18-1 | 1563 | 7-4 | 64% | 18 | NY |
| 1692 | ACE 10-Red | 1563 | 3-1 | 75% | 10 | |
| 1693 | Illinois Jr's B17-1's | 1562 | 39-36 | 52% | 17 | IL |
| 1694 | NLVA 15 | 1562 | 11-6 | 65% | 15 | MO |
| 1695 | United Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1562 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | IL |
| 1696 | Diablo Black 14-1 | 1562 | 19-22 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 1697 | Top Flight 18-Maverick | 1562 | 32-31 | 51% | 18 | IL |
| 1698 | Madtown 11-2 select | 1562 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 1699 | Quicksets 14-Black | 1562 | 21-11 | 66% | 14 | HI |
| 1700 | Rancho 16-Blue | 1561 | 7-6 | 54% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.