Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 34 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1651 CCVA 13-Orange 1567 13-11 54% 13 CA
1652 H Hawks HHVBC 14-Hawks 1567 2-0 100% 14 IA
1653 Husky Volleyball 17-2 1566 21-12 64% 17 CT
1654 Club 1 B 17-Royal 1566 31-37 46% 17 IL
1655 Sky View 18 1566 3-1 75% 18
1656 Scorpions Youth Volleyball Club 18 Scorpions Surge 1566 2-3 40% 18
1657 ECVBA 18-1 1566 3-4 43% 18 CA
1658 SG Elite 13 Elite 1566 26-21 55% 13 CA
1659 Colorado Elite Boys 17 1565 5-10 33% 17 CO
1660 Red Rock Heat 12 1565 3-2 60% 12 UT
1661 Mass Pats Boys 18-1 tenacity 1565 26-15 58% 18 MA
1662 Illinois Jr's B17-1's 1565 39-36 52% 17 IL
1663 Miami United 18-National benitez 1564 4-20 17% 18 FL
1664 NorCal Boys 16-2 1564 26-20 57% 16 CA
1665 C2 Attack 16-2 premier 1564 31-37 46% 16 TN
1666 PAC 16 Holmgren 1564 32-18 64% 16 CA
1667 Chicago Elite B 16-Nike 1564 35-21 63% 16 IL
1668 Venom Volleyball 15 Venom Mayhem 1564 3-2 60% 15 FL
1669 BAE 15-1 mariah 1564 5-2 71% 15 CA
1670 PVA Boys 18 National 1564 19-16 54% 18 NY
1671 MVVC B 15-National 1564 37-38 49% 15 CA
1672 NCVC 14-Mizuno 1563 23-29 44% 14 CA
1673 FRVBC 14-1 boys 1563 6-10 38% 14 CO
1674 Squad 16-Premier 1563 4-1 80% 16 NV
1675 Rancho 16-Blue 1563 7-6 54% 16 CA
1676 Nova Volleyball Club 17 1563 4-4 50% 17 PA
1677 INLND 18-1 1563 7-4 64% 18 CA
1678 Ultimate B17-Black 1563 35-34 51% 17 IL
1679 Quicksets 14-Black 1563 21-11 66% 14 HI
1680 WAVE 16 Jasper 1562 10-15 40% 16 CA
1681 COAST 16-Spring katie 1562 4-2 67% 16 CA
1682 Alpha Omega Boys 18-1 1562 19-11 63% 18 MO
1683 Unity 18-Boys national vikings 1562 20-22 44% 18 MA
1684 True North B 18-Green 1562 12-5 71% 18 MO
1685 FIVA BOYS 17-1 1562 12-19 39% 17 FL
1686 ID Impact 16-Courtney 1561 3-1 75% 16 WA
1687 GVA Boys 11-Dark blue 1561 9-10 47% 11 PR
1688 Forza - Boys 18-Orange 1561 55-30 65% 18 IL
1689 Weber Elite 18 Carri 1561 34-17 67% 18 UT
1690 TopFlight VBA 18-1 1561 11-7 61% 18 FL
1691 BIGIB 16-1 1561 4-6 40% 16 HI
1692 MVVC B 16-National 1561 31-45 41% 16 CA
1693 FRVBC 18-Legend boys 1561 6-12 33% 18 CO
1694 BAVC 17-2 boys allan 1561 2-3 40% 17 CA
1695 City 16-S 1560 8-8 38% 16 NY
1696 KIVA 15-B red 1560 27-36 43% 15 KY
1697 GSEVC 16-Boys regional 1560 6-5 55% 16 NJ
1698 Vortex 18-Select - des 1560 9-7 56% 18 UT
1699 Crow Creek Volleyball 16 Jays 1560 6-2 75% 16 ID
1700 LMVC 18-Boys 1560 21-6 70% 18 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.