2025-2026 Season — Page 35 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1701 | KIVA 15-B red | 1560 | 27-36 | 43% | 15 | KY |
| 1702 | SOVBC 17 | 1559 | 4-6 | 40% | 17 | NJ |
| 1703 | NE Storm 16 Monsoon | 1559 | 22-13 | 59% | 16 | MA |
| 1704 | VVA 15-Gonzalez | 1559 | 12-15 | 44% | 15 | CA |
| 1705 | SPORTIME VBC 17-3 | 1559 | 25-17 | 60% | 17 | NY |
| 1706 | NJ RONIN 18 SAKURA | 1559 | 14-7 | 64% | 18 | NJ |
| 1707 | Uno Boys 15 Elite | 1559 | 35-38 | 48% | 15 | IL |
| 1708 | Kahua 18 | 1559 | 11-8 | 58% | 18 | HI |
| 1709 | Manhattan Mayhem 18-1 | 1559 | 8-6 | 57% | 18 | KS |
| 1710 | CHAOS BOYS 14U GOLD | 1559 | 10-4 | 71% | 14 | OR |
| 1711 | Legit 16-G mike | 1559 | 3-1 | 75% | 16 | IA |
| 1712 | Red Rock Boys 14 Alameda | 1559 | 23-24 | 49% | 14 | CA |
| 1713 | Rival 17 | 1559 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | AR |
| 1714 | A5 Boys 14-1 | 1559 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | GA |
| 1715 | Aspire 14-Knights | 1559 | 14-5 | 74% | 14 | CA |
| 1716 | Red Rock Boys 13-1 | 1558 | 28-24 | 54% | 13 | CA |
| 1717 | RVA Boys 16 Navy | 1558 | 34-36 | 48% | 16 | WI |
| 1718 | Gigasa Elite 18-Black | 1558 | 12-9 | 57% | 18 | NJ |
| 1719 | NIVA Boys 15U | 1558 | 16-5 | 76% | 15 | IN |
| 1720 | MTA 18-A | 1558 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 1721 | PEVC Boys 14 | 1558 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | AL |
| 1722 | Saint Louis Volleyball Club 13 | 1557 | 12-9 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 1723 | Absolute 14-Blue | 1557 | 25-33 | 43% | 14 | CA |
| 1724 | SBVC Boys 14 Molten | 1557 | 15-19 | 44% | 14 | CA |
| 1725 | NYC Impact 18 Travel | 1557 | 14-5 | 74% | 18 | NY |
| 1726 | SynergyForce B 14-Gold | 1557 | 9-10 | 47% | 14 | CA |
| 1727 | Dive 16-Orange | 1557 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | CO |
| 1728 | Mentor 15 | 1557 | 4-12 | 25% | 15 | CA |
| 1729 | NOC 17-Green | 1557 | 7-6 | 54% | 17 | CA |
| 1730 | Utah Synergy Boys Volleyball 15 White | 1556 | 2-1 | 40% | 15 | UT |
| 1731 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-2m | 1556 | 7-8 | 47% | 12 | PR |
| 1732 | SNVF 18-Mount baker | 1556 | 7-23 | 23% | 18 | WA |
| 1733 | The St. James Boys 18-W | 1556 | 27-25 | 52% | 18 | VA |
| 1734 | WPVC Boys 13-Armour black | 1556 | 26-37 | 41% | 13 | FL |
| 1735 | Velocity 14 | 1556 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | AR |
| 1736 | Team Colorado 18-Green | 1556 | 16-20 | 44% | 18 | CO |
| 1737 | Sporting Albany Boys 14 | 1556 | 22-12 | 65% | 14 | NY |
| 1738 | SNVF 14-Glacier peak | 1556 | 16-21 | 43% | 14 | WA |
| 1739 | MTRX 14-1 | 1556 | 37-28 | 57% | 14 | AZ |
| 1740 | FRVBC 16-1 boys | 1555 | 23-17 | 57% | 16 | CO |
| 1741 | GVA Boys 10-Orange | 1555 | 6-3 | 67% | 10 | PR |
| 1742 | DIGS 18-1 | 1555 | 17-10 | 63% | 18 | MN |
| 1743 | Vengeance 18-Lusher | 1555 | 29-21 | 58% | 18 | OH |
| 1744 | Empire 16-Blue | 1555 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 1745 | MVC 14-Black | 1555 | 27-22 | 55% | 14 | AZ |
| 1746 | Onyx 14-Emerald | 1554 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | CA |
| 1747 | Electric City 18-1 | 1554 | 7-4 | 64% | 18 | MT |
| 1748 | Momentum 16-Orange | 1554 | 14-8 | 64% | 16 | OH |
| 1749 | Academy Boys West 18-1 | 1554 | 21-24 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 1750 | Princeton 17-National | 1554 | 20-22 | 48% | 17 | NJ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.