Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 35 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1701 GVA Boys 11-Dark blue 1561 9-10 47% 11 PR
1702 Boston United Boys 16-National 1 1561 11-24 31% 16 MA
1703 Rancho 16-Blue 1561 7-6 54% 16 CA
1704 Colorado Elite Boys 17 1561 5-10 33% 17 CO
1705 Sportime 17-3 1561 32-19 63% 17 NY
1706 LMVC 18-Boys 1561 21-6 70% 18 SC
1707 PAC 16 Holmgren 1560 32-18 64% 16 CA
1708 SynergyForce B 14-Gold 1560 9-10 47% 14 CA
1709 Legit 16-G mike 1560 3-1 75% 16 FL
1710 DCVA 14-Boys 1560 1-6 14% 14 NM
1711 Evolution 12 Elite 1560 25-24 51% 12 CA
1712 Preds 18-Boys vision 1560 2-3 40% 18
1713 BIGIB 16-1 1560 4-6 40% 16 HI
1714 Uno Boys 15 Elite 1559 35-38 48% 15 IL
1715 NorCal Boys 16-2 1559 26-20 57% 16 CA
1716 BAVC 17-2 boys allan 1559 2-3 40% 17 CA
1717 VVA 15-Gonzalez 1559 12-15 44% 15 MO
1718 Gigasa Elite 18-Black 1559 12-9 57% 18 NJ
1719 Manhattan Mayhem 18-1 1559 8-6 57% 18 KS
1720 A5 Boys 14-1 1559 3-2 60% 14 GA
1721 MTA 18-A 1558 10-6 63% 18 IL
1722 FRVBC 16-1 boys 1558 23-17 57% 16 CO
1723 Kamuela VBC 18-Kane 1558 4-3 57% 18 HI
1724 TVC 18-2s 1558 26-11 70% 18 IN
1725 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-2m 1558 7-8 47% 12 PR
1726 SOVBC 17 1558 4-6 40% 17
1727 NYC Impact 18 Travel 1558 14-5 74% 18 NY
1728 A5 Gwinnett 16-3 1558 4-1 80% 16
1729 BVP 14 1558 11-7 61% 14 PA
1730 Academy 18-E black 1558 21-16 57% 18 IN
1731 PEVC Boys 14 1558 0-0 0% 14
1732 FRVBC 18-Legend boys 1558 6-12 33% 18 CO
1733 Dive 16-Orange 1557 6-5 55% 16 CO
1734 MVVC B 16-National 1557 31-45 41% 16 CA
1735 ECVBA 18-1 1557 3-4 43% 18 CA
1736 City 16-S 1557 8-8 38% 16 NY
1737 NIVA Boys 15U 1557 16-5 76% 15 IN
1738 WENTZVILLE HEAT 12-1 navy 1557 0-0 0% 12
1739 Saint Louis Volleyball Club 13 1557 12-9 50% 13 MO
1740 Aspire 14-Knights 1556 14-5 74% 14 CA
1741 NE Storm 16 Monsoon 1556 22-13 59% 16 MA
1742 Hive 18-Black 1556 5-3 63% 18 UT
1743 DIGS 18-1 1556 17-10 63% 18 NJ
1744 Velocity 14 1556 2-3 40% 14 IL
1745 Momentum 16-Orange 1556 14-8 64% 16 OH
1746 BAE 15-1 mariah 1556 5-2 71% 15 CA
1747 GVA Boys 10-Orange 1555 6-3 67% 10 PR
1748 EVA 18-1 1555 38-35 52% 18 IL
1749 Sportime 16-Lynbrook 1555 21-20 51% 16 NY
1750 Impact Boys 18-Red kj 1555 8-7 53% 18 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.