2025-2026 Season — Page 35 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1701 | GVA Boys 11-Dark blue | 1561 | 9-10 | 47% | 11 | PR |
| 1702 | Boston United Boys 16-National 1 | 1561 | 11-24 | 31% | 16 | MA |
| 1703 | Rancho 16-Blue | 1561 | 7-6 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 1704 | Colorado Elite Boys 17 | 1561 | 5-10 | 33% | 17 | CO |
| 1705 | Sportime 17-3 | 1561 | 32-19 | 63% | 17 | NY |
| 1706 | LMVC 18-Boys | 1561 | 21-6 | 70% | 18 | SC |
| 1707 | PAC 16 Holmgren | 1560 | 32-18 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 1708 | SynergyForce B 14-Gold | 1560 | 9-10 | 47% | 14 | CA |
| 1709 | Legit 16-G mike | 1560 | 3-1 | 75% | 16 | FL |
| 1710 | DCVA 14-Boys | 1560 | 1-6 | 14% | 14 | NM |
| 1711 | Evolution 12 Elite | 1560 | 25-24 | 51% | 12 | CA |
| 1712 | Preds 18-Boys vision | 1560 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | |
| 1713 | BIGIB 16-1 | 1560 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | HI |
| 1714 | Uno Boys 15 Elite | 1559 | 35-38 | 48% | 15 | IL |
| 1715 | NorCal Boys 16-2 | 1559 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 1716 | BAVC 17-2 boys allan | 1559 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 1717 | VVA 15-Gonzalez | 1559 | 12-15 | 44% | 15 | MO |
| 1718 | Gigasa Elite 18-Black | 1559 | 12-9 | 57% | 18 | NJ |
| 1719 | Manhattan Mayhem 18-1 | 1559 | 8-6 | 57% | 18 | KS |
| 1720 | A5 Boys 14-1 | 1559 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | GA |
| 1721 | MTA 18-A | 1558 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 1722 | FRVBC 16-1 boys | 1558 | 23-17 | 57% | 16 | CO |
| 1723 | Kamuela VBC 18-Kane | 1558 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | HI |
| 1724 | TVC 18-2s | 1558 | 26-11 | 70% | 18 | IN |
| 1725 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-2m | 1558 | 7-8 | 47% | 12 | PR |
| 1726 | SOVBC 17 | 1558 | 4-6 | 40% | 17 | |
| 1727 | NYC Impact 18 Travel | 1558 | 14-5 | 74% | 18 | NY |
| 1728 | A5 Gwinnett 16-3 | 1558 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | |
| 1729 | BVP 14 | 1558 | 11-7 | 61% | 14 | PA |
| 1730 | Academy 18-E black | 1558 | 21-16 | 57% | 18 | IN |
| 1731 | PEVC Boys 14 | 1558 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 1732 | FRVBC 18-Legend boys | 1558 | 6-12 | 33% | 18 | CO |
| 1733 | Dive 16-Orange | 1557 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | CO |
| 1734 | MVVC B 16-National | 1557 | 31-45 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 1735 | ECVBA 18-1 | 1557 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 1736 | City 16-S | 1557 | 8-8 | 38% | 16 | NY |
| 1737 | NIVA Boys 15U | 1557 | 16-5 | 76% | 15 | IN |
| 1738 | WENTZVILLE HEAT 12-1 navy | 1557 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 1739 | Saint Louis Volleyball Club 13 | 1557 | 12-9 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 1740 | Aspire 14-Knights | 1556 | 14-5 | 74% | 14 | CA |
| 1741 | NE Storm 16 Monsoon | 1556 | 22-13 | 59% | 16 | MA |
| 1742 | Hive 18-Black | 1556 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | UT |
| 1743 | DIGS 18-1 | 1556 | 17-10 | 63% | 18 | NJ |
| 1744 | Velocity 14 | 1556 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | IL |
| 1745 | Momentum 16-Orange | 1556 | 14-8 | 64% | 16 | OH |
| 1746 | BAE 15-1 mariah | 1556 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 1747 | GVA Boys 10-Orange | 1555 | 6-3 | 67% | 10 | PR |
| 1748 | EVA 18-1 | 1555 | 38-35 | 52% | 18 | IL |
| 1749 | Sportime 16-Lynbrook | 1555 | 21-20 | 51% | 16 | NY |
| 1750 | Impact Boys 18-Red kj | 1555 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | NV |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.