Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 35 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1701 KIVA 15-B red 1560 27-36 43% 15 KY
1702 SOVBC 17 1559 4-6 40% 17 NJ
1703 NE Storm 16 Monsoon 1559 22-13 59% 16 MA
1704 VVA 15-Gonzalez 1559 12-15 44% 15 CA
1705 SPORTIME VBC 17-3 1559 25-17 60% 17 NY
1706 NJ RONIN 18 SAKURA 1559 14-7 64% 18 NJ
1707 Uno Boys 15 Elite 1559 35-38 48% 15 IL
1708 Kahua 18 1559 11-8 58% 18 HI
1709 Manhattan Mayhem 18-1 1559 8-6 57% 18 KS
1710 CHAOS BOYS 14U GOLD 1559 10-4 71% 14 OR
1711 Legit 16-G mike 1559 3-1 75% 16 IA
1712 Red Rock Boys 14 Alameda 1559 23-24 49% 14 CA
1713 Rival 17 1559 5-5 50% 17 AR
1714 A5 Boys 14-1 1559 3-2 60% 14 GA
1715 Aspire 14-Knights 1559 14-5 74% 14 CA
1716 Red Rock Boys 13-1 1558 28-24 54% 13 CA
1717 RVA Boys 16 Navy 1558 34-36 48% 16 WI
1718 Gigasa Elite 18-Black 1558 12-9 57% 18 NJ
1719 NIVA Boys 15U 1558 16-5 76% 15 IN
1720 MTA 18-A 1558 10-6 63% 18 IL
1721 PEVC Boys 14 1558 0-0 0% 14 AL
1722 Saint Louis Volleyball Club 13 1557 12-9 50% 13 MO
1723 Absolute 14-Blue 1557 25-33 43% 14 CA
1724 SBVC Boys 14 Molten 1557 15-19 44% 14 CA
1725 NYC Impact 18 Travel 1557 14-5 74% 18 NY
1726 SynergyForce B 14-Gold 1557 9-10 47% 14 CA
1727 Dive 16-Orange 1557 6-5 55% 16 CO
1728 Mentor 15 1557 4-12 25% 15 CA
1729 NOC 17-Green 1557 7-6 54% 17 CA
1730 Utah Synergy Boys Volleyball 15 White 1556 2-1 40% 15 UT
1731 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-2m 1556 7-8 47% 12 PR
1732 SNVF 18-Mount baker 1556 7-23 23% 18 WA
1733 The St. James Boys 18-W 1556 27-25 52% 18 VA
1734 WPVC Boys 13-Armour black 1556 26-37 41% 13 FL
1735 Velocity 14 1556 2-3 40% 14 AR
1736 Team Colorado 18-Green 1556 16-20 44% 18 CO
1737 Sporting Albany Boys 14 1556 22-12 65% 14 NY
1738 SNVF 14-Glacier peak 1556 16-21 43% 14 WA
1739 MTRX 14-1 1556 37-28 57% 14 AZ
1740 FRVBC 16-1 boys 1555 23-17 57% 16 CO
1741 GVA Boys 10-Orange 1555 6-3 67% 10 PR
1742 DIGS 18-1 1555 17-10 63% 18 MN
1743 Vengeance 18-Lusher 1555 29-21 58% 18 OH
1744 Empire 16-Blue 1555 5-4 56% 16 CA
1745 MVC 14-Black 1555 27-22 55% 14 AZ
1746 Onyx 14-Emerald 1554 8-2 80% 14 CA
1747 Electric City 18-1 1554 7-4 64% 18 MT
1748 Momentum 16-Orange 1554 14-8 64% 16 OH
1749 Academy Boys West 18-1 1554 21-24 47% 18 CA
1750 Princeton 17-National 1554 20-22 48% 17 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.