2025-2026 Season — Page 36 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1751 | Impact Boys 18-Red kj | 1555 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | NV |
| 1752 | RVA Boys 16 Navy | 1555 | 34-36 | 48% | 16 | WI |
| 1753 | Sportime 16-Lynbrook | 1555 | 21-20 | 51% | 16 | NY |
| 1754 | Salt City Boys 17-Chapman | 1554 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | UT |
| 1755 | Onyx 14-Emerald | 1554 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | CA |
| 1756 | Kahua 18 | 1554 | 11-8 | 58% | 18 | HI |
| 1757 | KIVA 15-B red | 1554 | 27-36 | 43% | 15 | KY |
| 1758 | WPVC Boys 13-Armour black | 1554 | 26-37 | 41% | 13 | FL |
| 1759 | GSEVC 16-Boys regional | 1554 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | NJ |
| 1760 | NOC 17-Green | 1554 | 7-6 | 54% | 17 | CA |
| 1761 | SAND 16-Gold | 1554 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 1762 | MEVC 12 National | 1554 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 1763 | Renegades 10-National | 1553 | 2-1 | 67% | 10 | |
| 1764 | CPVC Boys 18-Black | 1553 | 15-11 | 58% | 18 | NC |
| 1765 | WC Aces - 18-Diamonds | 1553 | 38-34 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 1766 | Vengeance 18-Lusher | 1553 | 29-21 | 58% | 18 | OH |
| 1767 | NCVC 14-Mizuno | 1553 | 23-29 | 44% | 14 | CA |
| 1768 | PREVAIL Boys 14-Platinum | 1553 | 3-10 | 23% | 14 | PA |
| 1769 | MVP BOS 18-Blue | 1553 | 20-15 | 57% | 18 | CA |
| 1770 | Princeton 17-National | 1553 | 20-22 | 48% | 17 | NJ |
| 1771 | CJVA Boys 17-Onyx | 1553 | 8-21 | 28% | 17 | NJ |
| 1772 | Sanger 16 | 1553 | 22-20 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 1773 | Molten 14-1 | 1552 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | AZ |
| 1774 | Absolute 14-Gold | 1552 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 1775 | HEAT 16-Black | 1552 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | CA |
| 1776 | Red Rock Boys 14 Alameda | 1552 | 23-24 | 49% | 14 | CA |
| 1777 | Mintonette Sports 18-1 | 1552 | 36-30 | 55% | 18 | OH |
| 1778 | MEVBC/CT STARS 17-1 | 1552 | 11-15 | 42% | 17 | CT |
| 1779 | Academy 14-R blue | 1552 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | IN |
| 1780 | Red Rock Boys 13-1 | 1551 | 28-24 | 54% | 13 | CA |
| 1781 | NC Power & Sand 18-Black | 1551 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | NC |
| 1782 | Sol Taino 16 10 | 1551 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | PR |
| 1783 | Westside VBC 14-Green | 1551 | 21-17 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 1784 | Xtreme 17-Nat-braulio | 1551 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | NJ |
| 1785 | Titanes Osvaldo 17 | 1551 | 10-9 | 53% | 17 | PR |
| 1786 | Salt City Boys 17-S teria | 1551 | 11-10 | 52% | 17 | UT |
| 1787 | PA ELITE 14-National | 1551 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | PA |
| 1788 | Club W 16-Black | 1551 | 25-29 | 46% | 16 | WI |
| 1789 | Flight 15-S | 1551 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | IL |
| 1790 | PVA Boys 18 National | 1551 | 19-16 | 54% | 18 | PA |
| 1791 | Salt City Boys 17 Chap | 1551 | 9-12 | 43% | 17 | UT |
| 1792 | CVA 14-1 pfadenhauer | 1551 | 2-1 | 67% | 14 | CO |
| 1793 | SPVB 15-Bravo | 1550 | 38-20 | 66% | 15 | IL |
| 1794 | Ronin 18-Sakura | 1550 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | |
| 1795 | Hurricanes 17-1 | 1550 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | ON |
| 1796 | MVP Academy BOS 18-Black | 1550 | 6-10 | 38% | 18 | MA |
| 1797 | CUVC 18-2 boys | 1550 | 21-26 | 45% | 18 | NC |
| 1798 | SBVC Boys 14 Molten | 1550 | 15-19 | 44% | 14 | CA |
| 1799 | 495 18 | 1550 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | MD |
| 1800 | Meraki VB 17-1 | 1550 | 13-22 | 37% | 17 | NH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.