Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 36 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1751 Impact Boys 18-Red kj 1555 8-7 53% 18 NV
1752 RVA Boys 16 Navy 1555 34-36 48% 16 WI
1753 Sportime 16-Lynbrook 1555 21-20 51% 16 NY
1754 Salt City Boys 17-Chapman 1554 4-3 57% 17 UT
1755 Onyx 14-Emerald 1554 8-2 80% 14 CA
1756 Kahua 18 1554 11-8 58% 18 HI
1757 KIVA 15-B red 1554 27-36 43% 15 KY
1758 WPVC Boys 13-Armour black 1554 26-37 41% 13 FL
1759 GSEVC 16-Boys regional 1554 6-5 55% 16 NJ
1760 NOC 17-Green 1554 7-6 54% 17 CA
1761 SAND 16-Gold 1554 3-2 60% 16 CA
1762 MEVC 12 National 1554 0-0 0% 12
1763 Renegades 10-National 1553 2-1 67% 10
1764 CPVC Boys 18-Black 1553 15-11 58% 18 NC
1765 WC Aces - 18-Diamonds 1553 38-34 53% 18 IL
1766 Vengeance 18-Lusher 1553 29-21 58% 18 OH
1767 NCVC 14-Mizuno 1553 23-29 44% 14 CA
1768 PREVAIL Boys 14-Platinum 1553 3-10 23% 14 PA
1769 MVP BOS 18-Blue 1553 20-15 57% 18 CA
1770 Princeton 17-National 1553 20-22 48% 17 NJ
1771 CJVA Boys 17-Onyx 1553 8-21 28% 17 NJ
1772 Sanger 16 1553 22-20 52% 16 CA
1773 Molten 14-1 1552 3-1 75% 14 AZ
1774 Absolute 14-Gold 1552 6-4 60% 14 CA
1775 HEAT 16-Black 1552 3-4 43% 16 CA
1776 Red Rock Boys 14 Alameda 1552 23-24 49% 14 CA
1777 Mintonette Sports 18-1 1552 36-30 55% 18 OH
1778 MEVBC/CT STARS 17-1 1552 11-15 42% 17 CT
1779 Academy 14-R blue 1552 19-12 61% 14 IN
1780 Red Rock Boys 13-1 1551 28-24 54% 13 CA
1781 NC Power & Sand 18-Black 1551 6-4 60% 18 NC
1782 Sol Taino 16 10 1551 2-2 50% 10 PR
1783 Westside VBC 14-Green 1551 21-17 55% 14 CA
1784 Xtreme 17-Nat-braulio 1551 3-2 60% 17 NJ
1785 Titanes Osvaldo 17 1551 10-9 53% 17 PR
1786 Salt City Boys 17-S teria 1551 11-10 52% 17 UT
1787 PA ELITE 14-National 1551 2-3 40% 14 PA
1788 Club W 16-Black 1551 25-29 46% 16 WI
1789 Flight 15-S 1551 3-4 43% 15 IL
1790 PVA Boys 18 National 1551 19-16 54% 18 PA
1791 Salt City Boys 17 Chap 1551 9-12 43% 17 UT
1792 CVA 14-1 pfadenhauer 1551 2-1 67% 14 CO
1793 SPVB 15-Bravo 1550 38-20 66% 15 IL
1794 Ronin 18-Sakura 1550 4-3 57% 18
1795 Hurricanes 17-1 1550 2-3 40% 17 ON
1796 MVP Academy BOS 18-Black 1550 6-10 38% 18 MA
1797 CUVC 18-2 boys 1550 21-26 45% 18 NC
1798 SBVC Boys 14 Molten 1550 15-19 44% 14 CA
1799 495 18 1550 3-4 43% 18 MD
1800 Meraki VB 17-1 1550 13-22 37% 17 NH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.