Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 36 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1751 Onyx 14-Emerald 1554 8-2 80% 14 CA
1752 Sting VC 13-1 1554 13-8 62% 13 CA
1753 BAVC 17-2 boys 1553 22-29 43% 17 CA
1754 Idaho ONE 18-Elite boys 1553 3-11 21% 18 ID
1755 Vortex 13-Alta 1553 6-7 43% 13 UT
1756 PREVAIL Boys 14-Platinum 1553 3-10 23% 14 PA
1757 Empowered B17-Black 1553 30-34 47% 17 IN
1758 DCVA 14-Boys 1552 1-6 14% 14 NM
1759 RUVBC 17 Phoenix 1552 30-32 48% 17 IL
1760 Club GSL 14-Comp - jac/mike 1552 3-1 75% 14 UT
1761 Club W 16-Black 1552 25-29 46% 16 WI
1762 Absolute 14-Gold 1552 6-4 60% 14 CA
1763 CPVC Boys 18-Black 1552 15-11 58% 18 NC
1764 Sportime 16-Lynbrook 1552 21-20 51% 16 NY
1765 TC 18-Gold 1552 8-14 36% 18 UT
1766 DIGS Volleyball Club 15-Red 1551 9-9 50% 15 NJ
1767 Titanes Osvaldo 17 1551 10-9 53% 17 PR
1768 TVC 18-2s 1551 26-11 70% 18 IN
1769 Xtreme 17-Nat-braulio 1551 3-2 60% 17 NJ
1770 PA ELITE 14-National 1551 2-3 40% 14 PA
1771 Platinum 15-Dallas 1551 14-12 54% 15 UT
1772 Academy 18-E black 1551 21-16 57% 18 IN
1773 Beach Cities 14-Black 1551 23-22 51% 14 CA
1774 MPV 17 Julie 1550 31-25 55% 17 UT
1775 WSA Gators 16-Premier boys 1550 24-29 45% 16 FL
1776 Victory 14-Black 1550 18-16 53% 14 AZ
1777 495 18 1550 3-4 43% 18 VA
1778 Sportime 15-Quogue 1550 10-6 63% 15 NY
1779 Hurricanes 17-1 1549 2-3 40% 17 ON
1780 VOLTAGE 15-Alexis 1549 2-1 67% 15 CO
1781 TORRI 17-2 wicho 1549 20-8 71% 17 PR
1782 CUE 17-1 1549 4-1 80% 17
1783 CJVA Boys 17-Onyx 1549 8-21 28% 17 NJ
1784 Legacy Boys 16 Elite 1549 36-26 58% 16 MI
1785 Evolution 12 Elite 1549 25-24 51% 12 CA
1786 OCVC 15 Slunks 1549 16-44 27% 15 CA
1787 Kamuela VBC 18-Kane 1549 4-3 57% 18 HI
1788 BVP 14 1549 11-7 61% 14 PA
1789 Aloha 17-1 gold 1549 17-24 41% 17 CA
1790 Mintonette Sports 18-1 1549 36-30 55% 18 OH
1791 352 Elite VB 16-Royal 1549 13-8 62% 16 FL
1792 GJ 14-Elite boys 1548 2-3 40% 14 FL
1793 ARVC 16-Black adidas 1548 7-13 35% 16 NM
1794 NEW SPORTS 16U 1548 3-0 100% 16 FL
1795 CUVC 18-2 boys 1548 21-26 45% 18 NC
1796 The HBC 18-S sail on sailor/americanpie 1548 2-0 100% 18 CA
1797 EVRC 16 W 1548 30-16 65% 16 IN
1798 Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Shawn 1548 6-6 50% 14 AZ
1799 Meraki VB 17-1 1548 13-22 37% 17 NH
1800 Club 1 B 18-Royal 1547 25-27 48% 18 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.