2025-2026 Season — Page 36 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1751 | Onyx 14-Emerald | 1554 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | CA |
| 1752 | Sting VC 13-1 | 1554 | 13-8 | 62% | 13 | CA |
| 1753 | BAVC 17-2 boys | 1553 | 22-29 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 1754 | Idaho ONE 18-Elite boys | 1553 | 3-11 | 21% | 18 | ID |
| 1755 | Vortex 13-Alta | 1553 | 6-7 | 43% | 13 | UT |
| 1756 | PREVAIL Boys 14-Platinum | 1553 | 3-10 | 23% | 14 | PA |
| 1757 | Empowered B17-Black | 1553 | 30-34 | 47% | 17 | IN |
| 1758 | DCVA 14-Boys | 1552 | 1-6 | 14% | 14 | NM |
| 1759 | RUVBC 17 Phoenix | 1552 | 30-32 | 48% | 17 | IL |
| 1760 | Club GSL 14-Comp - jac/mike | 1552 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | UT |
| 1761 | Club W 16-Black | 1552 | 25-29 | 46% | 16 | WI |
| 1762 | Absolute 14-Gold | 1552 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 1763 | CPVC Boys 18-Black | 1552 | 15-11 | 58% | 18 | NC |
| 1764 | Sportime 16-Lynbrook | 1552 | 21-20 | 51% | 16 | NY |
| 1765 | TC 18-Gold | 1552 | 8-14 | 36% | 18 | UT |
| 1766 | DIGS Volleyball Club 15-Red | 1551 | 9-9 | 50% | 15 | NJ |
| 1767 | Titanes Osvaldo 17 | 1551 | 10-9 | 53% | 17 | PR |
| 1768 | TVC 18-2s | 1551 | 26-11 | 70% | 18 | IN |
| 1769 | Xtreme 17-Nat-braulio | 1551 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | NJ |
| 1770 | PA ELITE 14-National | 1551 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | PA |
| 1771 | Platinum 15-Dallas | 1551 | 14-12 | 54% | 15 | UT |
| 1772 | Academy 18-E black | 1551 | 21-16 | 57% | 18 | IN |
| 1773 | Beach Cities 14-Black | 1551 | 23-22 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 1774 | MPV 17 Julie | 1550 | 31-25 | 55% | 17 | UT |
| 1775 | WSA Gators 16-Premier boys | 1550 | 24-29 | 45% | 16 | FL |
| 1776 | Victory 14-Black | 1550 | 18-16 | 53% | 14 | AZ |
| 1777 | 495 18 | 1550 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | VA |
| 1778 | Sportime 15-Quogue | 1550 | 10-6 | 63% | 15 | NY |
| 1779 | Hurricanes 17-1 | 1549 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | ON |
| 1780 | VOLTAGE 15-Alexis | 1549 | 2-1 | 67% | 15 | CO |
| 1781 | TORRI 17-2 wicho | 1549 | 20-8 | 71% | 17 | PR |
| 1782 | CUE 17-1 | 1549 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | |
| 1783 | CJVA Boys 17-Onyx | 1549 | 8-21 | 28% | 17 | NJ |
| 1784 | Legacy Boys 16 Elite | 1549 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | MI |
| 1785 | Evolution 12 Elite | 1549 | 25-24 | 51% | 12 | CA |
| 1786 | OCVC 15 Slunks | 1549 | 16-44 | 27% | 15 | CA |
| 1787 | Kamuela VBC 18-Kane | 1549 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | HI |
| 1788 | BVP 14 | 1549 | 11-7 | 61% | 14 | PA |
| 1789 | Aloha 17-1 gold | 1549 | 17-24 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 1790 | Mintonette Sports 18-1 | 1549 | 36-30 | 55% | 18 | OH |
| 1791 | 352 Elite VB 16-Royal | 1549 | 13-8 | 62% | 16 | FL |
| 1792 | GJ 14-Elite boys | 1548 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | FL |
| 1793 | ARVC 16-Black adidas | 1548 | 7-13 | 35% | 16 | NM |
| 1794 | NEW SPORTS 16U | 1548 | 3-0 | 100% | 16 | FL |
| 1795 | CUVC 18-2 boys | 1548 | 21-26 | 45% | 18 | NC |
| 1796 | The HBC 18-S sail on sailor/americanpie | 1548 | 2-0 | 100% | 18 | CA |
| 1797 | EVRC 16 W | 1548 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | IN |
| 1798 | Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Shawn | 1548 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 1799 | Meraki VB 17-1 | 1548 | 13-22 | 37% | 17 | NH |
| 1800 | Club 1 B 18-Royal | 1547 | 25-27 | 48% | 18 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.