Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 36 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1751 NJ RONIN 18 SAKURA 1528 10-6 63% 18 NJ
1752 GRV 13 1528 4-2 67% 13 MI
1753 Hi Bred VBC 18 Select 1528 5-3 63% 18 HI
1754 Ku’e VBC 18-Pane’e 1528 4-2 67% 18 WA
1755 Cicero Elite B 18-Purple 1528 10-7 59% 18 IL
1756 SNVF 13-Mount rainier 1528 3-5 38% 13 WA
1757 Tribe 17-B elite cardinal 1528 8-30 21% 17 FL
1758 SMBC West 14 Premier 1528 16-11 59% 14 CA
1759 IA Juniors 14-Black 1528 3-1 75% 14 IA
1760 COA 18-BlueJays 1528 18-9 67% 18 IN
1761 Vaqueros 17-M marcos 1528 5-2 71% 17 PR
1762 Ronin 18-Sakura 1528 4-3 57% 18
1763 Preds 16-Boys fire 1528 3-7 30% 16
1764 Westside VBC 17-Green 1527 13-9 59% 17 CA
1765 CHAOS BOYS 14U GOLD 1527 3-1 75% 14 OR
1766 Cyclones Boys 17-B 1527 23-31 40% 17 IL
1767 Red Rock 15-Chip - redwood city 1527 5-3 63% 15 CA
1768 Boston United Boys 18-1 1527 17-19 47% 18 MA
1769 TI Elite 16-1 1527 12-15 44% 16 OH
1770 Tyrants 15-Blue 1527 21-20 51% 15 CA
1771 SASVBC 13-Keali'i 1527 4-2 67% 13 HI
1772 Wasatch 17-1 1527 6-2 75% 17 UT
1773 TVC 18-1s 1527 20-13 61% 18 IN
1774 Big Wave Riders 15 1527 4-4 50% 15
1775 OMNI 15-2 elite 1526 22-21 51% 15 CA
1776 BAVC 16-3 boys 1526 17-13 57% 16 CA
1777 SC Legends 16-Nike 1526 14-16 47% 16 CA
1778 TNT Boys 17-Firestorm 1526 2-3 40% 17 PA
1779 Vengeance 16-Lawrence 1526 16-12 57% 16 OH
1780 GSEVC 16-Boys regional 1526 6-5 55% 16 NJ
1781 Ballhawks 18-2 1526 3-2 60% 18 ON
1782 FALLS 14 1526 16-11 59% 14 WI
1783 CYVBC Surge 16-Black 1525 4-2 67% 16 OH
1784 Chicago Elite SS 14 1525 5-1 71% 14 IL
1785 Dinamite 17-1 1525 9-7 56% 17 CA
1786 Rancho 15-Black 1525 7-5 58% 15 CA
1787 Maui Mana 18-35 1525 4-3 57% 18 HI
1788 SHABO 18-1 1525 12-13 48% 18 MN
1789 The HBC 16-BLACK 1525 10-19 34% 16 CA
1790 SCB 16-S francisco 1525 8-15 35% 16 LA
1791 Bay Area Eagles 16-U jhunel 1525 2-3 40% 16 CA
1792 NW Jrs 18-Ua slate 1525 5-3 63% 18 WA
1793 BigSky 17-Challenger 1525 3-2 60% 17
1794 NKYVC 17-3 typhoon 1524 4-2 67% 17 KY
1795 Liberty Belles 16-S 1524 4-2 67% 16 PA
1796 OPVC 14-Hanson 1524 4-2 67% 14 OH
1797 SEIVB 17-Elite 1524 4-2 67% 17 IN
1798 LIV 17-Royal bhrycen 1524 5-2 71% 17 CA
1799 FVC 16-1 1524 3-2 60% 16
1800 RUVBC 17 Phoenix 1524 24-30 44% 17
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.