Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 37 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1801 SBVC Boys 14 Molten 1550 15-19 44% 14 CA
1802 Meraki VB 17-1 1550 13-22 37% 17 NH
1803 NEW SPORTS 16U 1549 3-0 100% 16 UT
1804 Salt City Boys 16 Whitney 1549 9-6 60% 16 UT
1805 Club 1 B 18-Royal 1549 25-27 48% 18 IL
1806 Ozark Boys 18-1 1549 11-7 61% 18 AR
1807 Sporting Albany Boys 14 1549 22-12 65% 14 NY
1808 RUVBC 17 Phoenix 1549 30-32 48% 17 IL
1809 Absolute 14-Blue 1549 25-33 43% 14 CA
1810 Cincy Elite 14-1 1549 20-19 51% 14 OH
1811 VOLTAGE 15-Alexis 1549 2-1 67% 15
1812 SNVF 14-Glacier peak 1549 16-21 43% 14 WA
1813 Exodus VBC 18-1 1548 1-2 33% 18 CA
1814 The HBC 18-S sail on sailor/americanpie 1548 2-0 100% 18 CA
1815 OVBC 11-Purple 1548 0-0 0% 11
1816 Mentor 15 1548 4-12 25% 15 CA
1817 GJ 14-Elite boys 1548 2-3 40% 14 FL
1818 204 18-Gold 1547 3-2 60% 18
1819 513VB Boys 14-2 1547 15-12 56% 14 OH
1820 FALLS 14 1547 19-13 59% 14 WI
1821 Chaos Boys 18U National 1547 3-4 43% 18 OR
1822 MVC 14-Black 1547 27-22 55% 14 AZ
1823 ARVC 16-Black adidas 1547 7-13 35% 16 NM
1824 Upontop Boys 16-Elite 1547 31-26 54% 16 FL
1825 Red Rock Boys 15-1 1547 23-28 45% 15 CA
1826 352 Elite VB 16-Royal 1547 13-8 62% 16 FL
1827 OMNI 12-1 national 1546 6-12 33% 12 CA
1828 CJVA Boys 15-Black 1546 12-13 48% 15 NJ
1829 Balboa 14-White 1546 0-0 0% 14 CA
1830 MKE Sting 13-2 1546 28-20 58% 13 WI
1831 Uno Boys 14 Elite 1546 33-35 48% 14 IL
1832 SBS 11-N 1546 2-1 50% 11
1833 573 Missouri Juniors G16-3 1546 7-2 64% 16
1834 Academy Boys West 18-1 1546 21-24 47% 18 CA
1835 Sky High 15-Clark 1545 17-9 65% 15 IL
1836 PREVA 15-Jerry 1545 5-3 63% 15 PR
1837 Aspire 16 Hulk 1545 9-22 29% 16 AZ
1838 The St. James Boys 18-W 1545 27-25 52% 18 VA
1839 Warren Sixpack 17-4 1545 17-10 63% 17 NJ
1840 BAVC 17-2 boys 1545 22-29 43% 17 CA
1841 Church&Dodge 14 1545 3-0 100% 14 IL
1842 SCVC 17-Erika 1545 2-6 25% 17 CA
1843 The St. James 12 Navy 1545 0-0 0% 12 VA
1844 SMBC Islands 18-S 1544 0-0 0% 18
1845 Salt City Boys 18-N city t 1544 4-2 67% 18 UT
1846 MCVC 18 1544 11-8 58% 18 CA
1847 Aloha 17-1 gold 1544 17-24 41% 17 CA
1848 SF Elite 15 Ryan 1544 22-27 45% 15 CA
1849 Mintonette Sports 15-1 1544 34-38 47% 15 OH
1850 Warren Sixpack 13-1 1544 20-24 44% 13 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.