2025-2026 Season — Page 37 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1801 | SBVC Boys 14 Molten | 1550 | 15-19 | 44% | 14 | CA |
| 1802 | Meraki VB 17-1 | 1550 | 13-22 | 37% | 17 | NH |
| 1803 | NEW SPORTS 16U | 1549 | 3-0 | 100% | 16 | UT |
| 1804 | Salt City Boys 16 Whitney | 1549 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | UT |
| 1805 | Club 1 B 18-Royal | 1549 | 25-27 | 48% | 18 | IL |
| 1806 | Ozark Boys 18-1 | 1549 | 11-7 | 61% | 18 | AR |
| 1807 | Sporting Albany Boys 14 | 1549 | 22-12 | 65% | 14 | NY |
| 1808 | RUVBC 17 Phoenix | 1549 | 30-32 | 48% | 17 | IL |
| 1809 | Absolute 14-Blue | 1549 | 25-33 | 43% | 14 | CA |
| 1810 | Cincy Elite 14-1 | 1549 | 20-19 | 51% | 14 | OH |
| 1811 | VOLTAGE 15-Alexis | 1549 | 2-1 | 67% | 15 | |
| 1812 | SNVF 14-Glacier peak | 1549 | 16-21 | 43% | 14 | WA |
| 1813 | Exodus VBC 18-1 | 1548 | 1-2 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 1814 | The HBC 18-S sail on sailor/americanpie | 1548 | 2-0 | 100% | 18 | CA |
| 1815 | OVBC 11-Purple | 1548 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 1816 | Mentor 15 | 1548 | 4-12 | 25% | 15 | CA |
| 1817 | GJ 14-Elite boys | 1548 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | FL |
| 1818 | 204 18-Gold | 1547 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | |
| 1819 | 513VB Boys 14-2 | 1547 | 15-12 | 56% | 14 | OH |
| 1820 | FALLS 14 | 1547 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | WI |
| 1821 | Chaos Boys 18U National | 1547 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | OR |
| 1822 | MVC 14-Black | 1547 | 27-22 | 55% | 14 | AZ |
| 1823 | ARVC 16-Black adidas | 1547 | 7-13 | 35% | 16 | NM |
| 1824 | Upontop Boys 16-Elite | 1547 | 31-26 | 54% | 16 | FL |
| 1825 | Red Rock Boys 15-1 | 1547 | 23-28 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 1826 | 352 Elite VB 16-Royal | 1547 | 13-8 | 62% | 16 | FL |
| 1827 | OMNI 12-1 national | 1546 | 6-12 | 33% | 12 | CA |
| 1828 | CJVA Boys 15-Black | 1546 | 12-13 | 48% | 15 | NJ |
| 1829 | Balboa 14-White | 1546 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 1830 | MKE Sting 13-2 | 1546 | 28-20 | 58% | 13 | WI |
| 1831 | Uno Boys 14 Elite | 1546 | 33-35 | 48% | 14 | IL |
| 1832 | SBS 11-N | 1546 | 2-1 | 50% | 11 | |
| 1833 | 573 Missouri Juniors G16-3 | 1546 | 7-2 | 64% | 16 | |
| 1834 | Academy Boys West 18-1 | 1546 | 21-24 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 1835 | Sky High 15-Clark | 1545 | 17-9 | 65% | 15 | IL |
| 1836 | PREVA 15-Jerry | 1545 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | PR |
| 1837 | Aspire 16 Hulk | 1545 | 9-22 | 29% | 16 | AZ |
| 1838 | The St. James Boys 18-W | 1545 | 27-25 | 52% | 18 | VA |
| 1839 | Warren Sixpack 17-4 | 1545 | 17-10 | 63% | 17 | NJ |
| 1840 | BAVC 17-2 boys | 1545 | 22-29 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 1841 | Church&Dodge 14 | 1545 | 3-0 | 100% | 14 | IL |
| 1842 | SCVC 17-Erika | 1545 | 2-6 | 25% | 17 | CA |
| 1843 | The St. James 12 Navy | 1545 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | VA |
| 1844 | SMBC Islands 18-S | 1544 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 1845 | Salt City Boys 18-N city t | 1544 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | UT |
| 1846 | MCVC 18 | 1544 | 11-8 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 1847 | Aloha 17-1 gold | 1544 | 17-24 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 1848 | SF Elite 15 Ryan | 1544 | 22-27 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 1849 | Mintonette Sports 15-1 | 1544 | 34-38 | 47% | 15 | OH |
| 1850 | Warren Sixpack 13-1 | 1544 | 20-24 | 44% | 13 | NJ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.