Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 37 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1801 Club 1 B 18-Royal 1547 25-27 48% 18 IL
1802 Academy 14-R blue 1547 19-12 61% 14 IN
1803 Ronin 18-Sakura 1547 4-3 57% 18 MA
1804 MEVBC/CT STARS 17-1 1547 11-15 42% 17 CT
1805 Aspire 16 Hulk 1547 9-22 29% 16 AZ
1806 OMNI 12-1 national 1547 6-12 33% 12 CA
1807 Spike Milwaukee B16 1547 32-24 57% 16 WI
1808 NC Power & Sand 18-Black 1547 6-4 60% 18 NC
1809 Salt City Boys 17-Chapman 1547 4-3 57% 17 UT
1810 Fireballs 11 1547 2-1 50% 11 MO
1811 SPVB 15-Bravo 1547 38-20 66% 15 IL
1812 Molten 12-Black 1546 23-15 61% 12 AZ
1813 WC Aces - 18-Diamonds 1546 38-34 53% 18 IL
1814 Upontop Boys 16-Elite 1546 31-26 54% 16 FL
1815 Sky High Adidas B14-2 1546 35-22 61% 14 IL
1816 GSL 17-Elite jackson 1546 19-10 66% 17 UT
1817 Ignite AZ 18-Boys national 1546 23-26 47% 18 AZ
1818 Church&Dodge 14 1546 3-0 100% 14 IL
1819 FALLS 14 1546 19-13 59% 14 WI
1820 513VB Boys 14-2 1546 15-12 56% 14 OH
1821 Red Rock Boys 15-1 1545 23-28 45% 15 CA
1822 PREVA 15-Jerry 1545 5-3 63% 15 PR
1823 SPORTIME 15-2 1545 9-19 32% 15 NY
1824 Uno Boys 14 Elite 1545 33-35 48% 14 IL
1825 Illiana Juniors Volleyball Club 18-1 1545 2-5 29% 18 IL
1826 Cincy Elite 14-1 1545 20-19 51% 14 OH
1827 Warren Sixpack 17-4 1545 17-10 63% 17 NJ
1828 SMBC Islands 18-S 1545 0-0 0% 18 CA
1829 Team Momentum B17-Orange 1545 35-31 53% 17 MO
1830 Aloha 17-2 blue 1545 23-18 56% 17 CA
1831 808 Athletic Club 16-S zac 1544 19-19 50% 16 HI
1832 NPJ Seattle Boys 17 1544 17-13 57% 17 WA
1833 CJVA Boys 15-Black 1544 12-13 48% 15 NJ
1834 Mintonette Sports 15-1 1544 34-38 47% 15 OH
1835 SPVB 16-Charlie 1544 34-24 59% 16 IL
1836 TNT Boys 17-Arsenal 1544 17-19 47% 17 PA
1837 Fusion 17-Green 1544 17-20 46% 17 CA
1838 SPORTIME VBC 15-4 1544 10-5 67% 15 NY
1839 NF 18 Cobalt 1543 17-29 35% 18 NY
1840 Core 17 Elite 1543 18-17 51% 17 CA
1841 Guahan Boys 18-S 1543 4-1 80% 18 HI
1842 BAVC 17-2 allan 1543 0-0 0% 17 CA
1843 Sideout 16 JT 1543 12-20 38% 16 NY
1844 Ozark Boys 18-1 1543 11-7 61% 18 AR
1845 Emerald Rain Boys 16 E 1542 17-17 50% 16 WA
1846 TTVBC 16U 1542 15-12 56% 16 CA
1847 BORINQUEN COQUI 17-2m 1542 11-19 37% 17 PR
1848 Legacy 16-National boys 1542 36-33 52% 16 MI
1849 Sky High 15-Clark 1542 17-9 65% 15 IL
1850 United Volleyball Club 17-1 1542 3-4 43% 17 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.