2025-2026 Season — Page 38 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | Mintonette Sports 15-1 | 1544 | 34-38 | 47% | 15 | OH |
| 1852 | Warren Sixpack 13-1 | 1544 | 20-24 | 44% | 13 | NJ |
| 1853 | HPSTL B15-White | 1544 | 33-29 | 53% | 15 | MO |
| 1854 | EVRC 16 W | 1543 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | WI |
| 1855 | Epic 11-Adidas | 1543 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | WI |
| 1856 | Sideout 16 JT | 1543 | 12-20 | 38% | 16 | NJ |
| 1857 | Team Momentum B17-Orange | 1543 | 35-31 | 53% | 17 | MO |
| 1858 | Wasatch 17-1 | 1543 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | UT |
| 1859 | Beach Cities 14-Black | 1543 | 23-22 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 1860 | TTVBC 16U | 1543 | 15-12 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 1861 | TNT Boys 17-Arsenal | 1543 | 17-19 | 47% | 17 | PA |
| 1862 | SPVB 16-Charlie | 1543 | 34-24 | 59% | 16 | IL |
| 1863 | Junior Bisons 17 | 1542 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | |
| 1864 | EXILE East 18-1 | 1542 | 13-9 | 54% | 18 | PA |
| 1865 | United Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1542 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | IL |
| 1866 | Vital Demons 18-1 | 1542 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | AZ |
| 1867 | VOLTAGE 18-1 | 1541 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | |
| 1868 | Legacy 16-National boys | 1541 | 36-33 | 52% | 16 | |
| 1869 | WSA Gators 16-Premier boys | 1541 | 24-29 | 45% | 16 | FL |
| 1870 | Emerald Rain Boys 16 E | 1541 | 17-17 | 50% | 16 | WA |
| 1871 | Guahan Boys 18-S | 1541 | 4-1 | 80% | 18 | |
| 1872 | EXCELL 15-2 | 1541 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | SC |
| 1873 | Elevation 15-Timber boys | 1541 | 12-19 | 39% | 15 | CO |
| 1874 | OCVC 15 Slunks | 1541 | 16-44 | 27% | 15 | CA |
| 1875 | NEVBC Boys 18.2 | 1541 | 20-14 | 59% | 18 | CT |
| 1876 | 417 Juniors G16-2 | 1541 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 1877 | Eastside 18-Herron | 1541 | 21-16 | 57% | 18 | OH |
| 1878 | Chicago Elite B 17-Nike | 1540 | 34-22 | 61% | 17 | IL |
| 1879 | MNJRSB 18-1 | 1540 | 18-19 | 49% | 18 | MN |
| 1880 | Boston United Boys 17-N 1 | 1540 | 5-13 | 28% | 17 | MA |
| 1881 | Xcel 15-Red | 1540 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | |
| 1882 | Club W 18-Black | 1540 | 31-35 | 47% | 18 | WI |
| 1883 | SoFLO 14 | 1540 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | FL |
| 1884 | Flight Academy 15 | 1540 | 15-18 | 45% | 15 | OH |
| 1885 | Snipers 16 | 1540 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | NV |
| 1886 | 118 14-Mac | 1540 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 1887 | Empowered B17-Black | 1540 | 30-34 | 47% | 17 | IN |
| 1888 | Genesis Athletics Club Kelowna 14-Boys leviathan | 1540 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 1889 | TI Elite 18-1 | 1539 | 12-21 | 36% | 18 | IN |
| 1890 | Warriors TOVC 13-Wilmer | 1539 | 10-7 | 59% | 13 | PR |
| 1891 | Sidewinder 17-2 | 1539 | 14-24 | 37% | 17 | AZ |
| 1892 | PEVA Boys 18 Elite | 1539 | 21-18 | 54% | 18 | PA |
| 1893 | Spike Milwaukee B16 | 1539 | 32-24 | 57% | 16 | WI |
| 1894 | SCVC 16-Austin | 1539 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | CA |
| 1895 | SCVC 15-Alex | 1538 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | CA |
| 1896 | MN Select Boys 16-2 | 1538 | 29-19 | 60% | 16 | MN |
| 1897 | MVVC YB 12 Josh | 1538 | 12-6 | 67% | 12 | CA |
| 1898 | BORINQUEN COQUI 17-2m | 1538 | 11-19 | 37% | 17 | PR |
| 1899 | Impact 14 | 1538 | 2-1 | 67% | 14 | OR |
| 1900 | Adversity VBC 14 Adidas | 1538 | 40-34 | 54% | 14 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.