Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 38 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1851 Mintonette Sports 15-1 1544 34-38 47% 15 OH
1852 Warren Sixpack 13-1 1544 20-24 44% 13 NJ
1853 HPSTL B15-White 1544 33-29 53% 15 MO
1854 EVRC 16 W 1543 30-16 65% 16 WI
1855 Epic 11-Adidas 1543 0-0 0% 11 WI
1856 Sideout 16 JT 1543 12-20 38% 16 NJ
1857 Team Momentum B17-Orange 1543 35-31 53% 17 MO
1858 Wasatch 17-1 1543 6-2 75% 17 UT
1859 Beach Cities 14-Black 1543 23-22 51% 14 CA
1860 TTVBC 16U 1543 15-12 56% 16 CA
1861 TNT Boys 17-Arsenal 1543 17-19 47% 17 PA
1862 SPVB 16-Charlie 1543 34-24 59% 16 IL
1863 Junior Bisons 17 1542 3-2 60% 17
1864 EXILE East 18-1 1542 13-9 54% 18 PA
1865 United Volleyball Club 17-1 1542 3-4 43% 17 IL
1866 Vital Demons 18-1 1542 2-5 29% 18 AZ
1867 VOLTAGE 18-1 1541 3-5 38% 18
1868 Legacy 16-National boys 1541 36-33 52% 16
1869 WSA Gators 16-Premier boys 1541 24-29 45% 16 FL
1870 Emerald Rain Boys 16 E 1541 17-17 50% 16 WA
1871 Guahan Boys 18-S 1541 4-1 80% 18
1872 EXCELL 15-2 1541 5-2 71% 15 SC
1873 Elevation 15-Timber boys 1541 12-19 39% 15 CO
1874 OCVC 15 Slunks 1541 16-44 27% 15 CA
1875 NEVBC Boys 18.2 1541 20-14 59% 18 CT
1876 417 Juniors G16-2 1541 0-0 0% 16
1877 Eastside 18-Herron 1541 21-16 57% 18 OH
1878 Chicago Elite B 17-Nike 1540 34-22 61% 17 IL
1879 MNJRSB 18-1 1540 18-19 49% 18 MN
1880 Boston United Boys 17-N 1 1540 5-13 28% 17 MA
1881 Xcel 15-Red 1540 5-3 63% 15
1882 Club W 18-Black 1540 31-35 47% 18 WI
1883 SoFLO 14 1540 1-3 25% 14 FL
1884 Flight Academy 15 1540 15-18 45% 15 OH
1885 Snipers 16 1540 4-2 67% 16 NV
1886 118 14-Mac 1540 6-4 60% 14 CA
1887 Empowered B17-Black 1540 30-34 47% 17 IN
1888 Genesis Athletics Club Kelowna 14-Boys leviathan 1540 0-0 0% 14
1889 TI Elite 18-1 1539 12-21 36% 18 IN
1890 Warriors TOVC 13-Wilmer 1539 10-7 59% 13 PR
1891 Sidewinder 17-2 1539 14-24 37% 17 AZ
1892 PEVA Boys 18 Elite 1539 21-18 54% 18 PA
1893 Spike Milwaukee B16 1539 32-24 57% 16 WI
1894 SCVC 16-Austin 1539 5-2 71% 16 CA
1895 SCVC 15-Alex 1538 2-6 25% 15 CA
1896 MN Select Boys 16-2 1538 29-19 60% 16 MN
1897 MVVC YB 12 Josh 1538 12-6 67% 12 CA
1898 BORINQUEN COQUI 17-2m 1538 11-19 37% 17 PR
1899 Impact 14 1538 2-1 67% 14 OR
1900 Adversity VBC 14 Adidas 1538 40-34 54% 14 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.