2025-2026 Season — Page 38 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | United Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1542 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | IL |
| 1852 | TI Elite 16-1 | 1541 | 22-26 | 46% | 16 | IN |
| 1853 | Warren Sixpack 13-1 | 1541 | 20-24 | 44% | 13 | NJ |
| 1854 | Impact Boys 18-Red kj | 1541 | 10-12 | 45% | 18 | NV |
| 1855 | Legacy Volleyball Club 17-Premier | 1541 | 7-5 | 58% | 17 | NY |
| 1856 | Shakopee Boys VB Club 14-1 | 1540 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | MN |
| 1857 | Genesis Athletics Club Kelowna 14-Boys leviathan | 1540 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 1858 | Flight Academy 15 | 1540 | 15-18 | 45% | 15 | OH |
| 1859 | Chicago Elite B 17-Nike | 1540 | 34-22 | 61% | 17 | IL |
| 1860 | NEVBC Boys 18.2 | 1540 | 20-14 | 59% | 18 | CT |
| 1861 | 118 14-Mac | 1540 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 1862 | SoFLO 14 | 1539 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | FL |
| 1863 | TI Elite 18-1 | 1539 | 12-21 | 36% | 18 | IN |
| 1864 | Elevation 15-Timber boys | 1539 | 12-19 | 39% | 15 | CO |
| 1865 | The HBC 17-S sail on sailor/americanpie | 1539 | 2-13 | 13% | 17 | CA |
| 1866 | Snipers 16 | 1539 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | NV |
| 1867 | Adversity VBC 14 Adidas | 1539 | 40-34 | 54% | 14 | IL |
| 1868 | Infinity Royals 14-L | 1539 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | MN |
| 1869 | SMBC West 16-Molten c | 1538 | 17-19 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 1870 | Warriors TOVC 13-Wilmer | 1538 | 10-7 | 59% | 13 | PR |
| 1871 | Impact 14 | 1538 | 2-1 | 67% | 14 | MN |
| 1872 | Sidewinder 17-2 | 1538 | 14-24 | 37% | 17 | AZ |
| 1873 | Eastside 18-Herron | 1538 | 21-16 | 57% | 18 | OH |
| 1874 | Vital Demons 18-1 | 1538 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | AZ |
| 1875 | MN Select Boys 16-2 | 1538 | 29-19 | 60% | 16 | MN |
| 1876 | Oasis 16-Black | 1538 | 17-8 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 1877 | PEVA Boys 18 Elite | 1538 | 21-18 | 54% | 18 | PA |
| 1878 | HPSTL B15-White | 1538 | 33-29 | 53% | 15 | MO |
| 1879 | MVVC YB 12 Josh | 1538 | 12-6 | 67% | 12 | CA |
| 1880 | Pipeline 14-Black | 1538 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 1881 | Big Wave Riders 15 | 1538 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | MA |
| 1882 | Houston Skyline Juniors 17-Lynbrook | 1537 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | TX |
| 1883 | 18U Tommy RG 18-4 | 1537 | 3-1 | 75% | 18 | PR |
| 1884 | WAVE 16-Spring andy | 1537 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 1885 | West Edge 18 Storm | 1537 | 11-7 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 1886 | 315 VC 16-1 | 1536 | 5-3 | 50% | 16 | NY |
| 1887 | TNT Boys 14-Blast | 1536 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | PA |
| 1888 | HI Bred VBC 18-Kane select | 1536 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | HI |
| 1889 | Emerald Coast 18-Boys | 1536 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | FL |
| 1890 | Balboa Bay 13-White | 1536 | 18-23 | 44% | 13 | CA |
| 1891 | Nfinity VBC 17-South bay | 1535 | 15-20 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 1892 | Sportime 17-Quogue | 1535 | 19-22 | 46% | 17 | NY |
| 1893 | Team Colorado 16-Green | 1535 | 18-17 | 51% | 16 | CO |
| 1894 | Kinnect 16 Forest | 1535 | 18-15 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 1895 | Club W 18-Black | 1535 | 31-35 | 47% | 18 | WI |
| 1896 | AVA 16-Boys (AH) | 1535 | 11-7 | 61% | 16 | HI |
| 1897 | NOC 16-Green | 1535 | 20-39 | 34% | 16 | CA |
| 1898 | Ignite Volleyball Club 18-National | 1535 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 1899 | TopFlight 17 Alpha | 1535 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | FL |
| 1900 | MINIESCAED 10-1 | 1535 | 3-2 | 60% | 10 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.