Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 38 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1851 United Volleyball Club 17-1 1542 3-4 43% 17 IL
1852 TI Elite 16-1 1541 22-26 46% 16 IN
1853 Warren Sixpack 13-1 1541 20-24 44% 13 NJ
1854 Impact Boys 18-Red kj 1541 10-12 45% 18 NV
1855 Legacy Volleyball Club 17-Premier 1541 7-5 58% 17 NY
1856 Shakopee Boys VB Club 14-1 1540 0-0 0% 14 MN
1857 Genesis Athletics Club Kelowna 14-Boys leviathan 1540 0-0 0% 14
1858 Flight Academy 15 1540 15-18 45% 15 OH
1859 Chicago Elite B 17-Nike 1540 34-22 61% 17 IL
1860 NEVBC Boys 18.2 1540 20-14 59% 18 CT
1861 118 14-Mac 1540 6-4 60% 14 CA
1862 SoFLO 14 1539 1-3 25% 14 FL
1863 TI Elite 18-1 1539 12-21 36% 18 IN
1864 Elevation 15-Timber boys 1539 12-19 39% 15 CO
1865 The HBC 17-S sail on sailor/americanpie 1539 2-13 13% 17 CA
1866 Snipers 16 1539 4-2 67% 16 NV
1867 Adversity VBC 14 Adidas 1539 40-34 54% 14 IL
1868 Infinity Royals 14-L 1539 20-10 67% 14 MN
1869 SMBC West 16-Molten c 1538 17-19 47% 16 CA
1870 Warriors TOVC 13-Wilmer 1538 10-7 59% 13 PR
1871 Impact 14 1538 2-1 67% 14 MN
1872 Sidewinder 17-2 1538 14-24 37% 17 AZ
1873 Eastside 18-Herron 1538 21-16 57% 18 OH
1874 Vital Demons 18-1 1538 2-5 29% 18 AZ
1875 MN Select Boys 16-2 1538 29-19 60% 16 MN
1876 Oasis 16-Black 1538 17-8 68% 16 CA
1877 PEVA Boys 18 Elite 1538 21-18 54% 18 PA
1878 HPSTL B15-White 1538 33-29 53% 15 MO
1879 MVVC YB 12 Josh 1538 12-6 67% 12 CA
1880 Pipeline 14-Black 1538 17-12 59% 14 IL
1881 Big Wave Riders 15 1538 0-0 0% 15 MA
1882 Houston Skyline Juniors 17-Lynbrook 1537 2-5 29% 17 TX
1883 18U Tommy RG 18-4 1537 3-1 75% 18 PR
1884 WAVE 16-Spring andy 1537 6-3 67% 16 CA
1885 West Edge 18 Storm 1537 11-7 61% 18 CA
1886 315 VC 16-1 1536 5-3 50% 16 NY
1887 TNT Boys 14-Blast 1536 2-3 40% 14 PA
1888 HI Bred VBC 18-Kane select 1536 14-6 70% 18 HI
1889 Emerald Coast 18-Boys 1536 0-0 0% 18 FL
1890 Balboa Bay 13-White 1536 18-23 44% 13 CA
1891 Nfinity VBC 17-South bay 1535 15-20 43% 17 CA
1892 Sportime 17-Quogue 1535 19-22 46% 17 NY
1893 Team Colorado 16-Green 1535 18-17 51% 16 CO
1894 Kinnect 16 Forest 1535 18-15 55% 16 CA
1895 Club W 18-Black 1535 31-35 47% 18 WI
1896 AVA 16-Boys (AH) 1535 11-7 61% 16 HI
1897 NOC 16-Green 1535 20-39 34% 16 CA
1898 Ignite Volleyball Club 18-National 1535 0-0 0% 18 CA
1899 TopFlight 17 Alpha 1535 4-1 80% 17 FL
1900 MINIESCAED 10-1 1535 3-2 60% 10 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.