2025-2026 Season — Page 39 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1901 | SCVC 15-Alex | 1538 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | CA |
| 1902 | Infinity Royals 14-L | 1538 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | MN |
| 1903 | TI Elite 16-1 | 1537 | 22-26 | 46% | 16 | IN |
| 1904 | 18U Tommy RG 18-4 | 1537 | 3-1 | 75% | 18 | PR |
| 1905 | MKE Sting 11-White | 1537 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | WI |
| 1906 | Legacy Boys 16 Elite | 1537 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | MI |
| 1907 | Ignite VBCF Boys 15 National | 1537 | 27-23 | 54% | 15 | AZ |
| 1908 | 808 Athletic Club 16-S zac | 1537 | 19-19 | 50% | 16 | HI |
| 1909 | WAVE 16-Spring andy | 1537 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 1910 | VOLTAGE 16-Sonja | 1537 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | |
| 1911 | Kinnect 16 Forest | 1536 | 18-15 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 1912 | 315 VC 16-1 | 1536 | 5-3 | 50% | 16 | NY |
| 1913 | NF 18 Cobalt | 1536 | 17-29 | 35% | 18 | NY |
| 1914 | NJ RONIN 14-Sword | 1536 | 6-4 | 55% | 14 | NJ |
| 1915 | Sportime 15-Quogue | 1536 | 10-6 | 63% | 15 | NY |
| 1916 | Sportime 17-Quogue | 1536 | 19-22 | 46% | 17 | NY |
| 1917 | TNT Boys 14-Blast | 1536 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | PA |
| 1918 | NM Cactus VBC 13-1 | 1536 | 4-3 | 57% | 13 | |
| 1919 | PEVC 17-Boys | 1536 | 12-12 | 50% | 17 | |
| 1920 | SNVF 18-Mount baker | 1536 | 7-23 | 23% | 18 | WA |
| 1921 | Cicero Elite B 18-Purple | 1535 | 10-7 | 59% | 18 | IL |
| 1922 | Oregon Premier Adidas 18-National | 1535 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | OR |
| 1923 | Fireballs 11 | 1535 | 2-1 | 50% | 11 | |
| 1924 | Fusion 17-Green | 1535 | 17-20 | 46% | 17 | CA |
| 1925 | MINIESCAED 10-1 | 1535 | 3-2 | 60% | 10 | PR |
| 1926 | 310VBC 16-Boys | 1535 | 11-7 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 1927 | Pipeline 14-1 | 1535 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | IL |
| 1928 | Core 17 Elite | 1535 | 18-17 | 51% | 17 | CA |
| 1929 | TopFlight 17 Alpha | 1535 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | NV |
| 1930 | SLAM 18-S blue | 1535 | 16-15 | 52% | 18 | HI |
| 1931 | HI Bred VBC 18-Kane select | 1535 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | HI |
| 1932 | WPVC Boys 18-Armour white | 1534 | 4-7 | 36% | 18 | FL |
| 1933 | Forza - Boys 16-Blk | 1534 | 45-30 | 58% | 16 | IL |
| 1934 | Victory 14-Black | 1534 | 18-16 | 53% | 14 | AZ |
| 1935 | MVVC B 17-National | 1534 | 35-40 | 47% | 17 | CA |
| 1936 | Emerald Coast 18-Boys | 1534 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | FL |
| 1937 | Sky High 16-Chin | 1534 | 24-9 | 73% | 16 | IL |
| 1938 | Velocity 17-2 national | 1534 | 11-25 | 31% | 17 | PA |
| 1939 | SPORTIME 15-2 | 1534 | 9-19 | 32% | 15 | NY |
| 1940 | West Edge 18 Storm | 1534 | 11-7 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 1941 | Cicero Elite B 16-Purple | 1533 | 13-4 | 76% | 16 | IL |
| 1942 | Pipeline 14-Black | 1533 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 1943 | True North B 16-White | 1533 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | |
| 1944 | Balboa Bay 13-White | 1533 | 18-23 | 44% | 13 | CA |
| 1945 | Providence Junior Pilots Volleyball Club 14-Boys | 1533 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 1946 | Team Colorado 16-Green | 1533 | 18-17 | 51% | 16 | CO |
| 1947 | Philly Boys 18 | 1533 | 7-6 | 50% | 18 | PA |
| 1948 | OVBC 10-Purple | 1533 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 1949 | VVA 12-Shaver | 1533 | 13-23 | 36% | 12 | MO |
| 1950 | STORM 17-Black | 1533 | 3-6 | 33% | 17 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.