Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 39 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1901 SCVC 15-Alex 1538 2-6 25% 15 CA
1902 Infinity Royals 14-L 1538 20-10 67% 14 MN
1903 TI Elite 16-1 1537 22-26 46% 16 IN
1904 18U Tommy RG 18-4 1537 3-1 75% 18 PR
1905 MKE Sting 11-White 1537 0-0 0% 11 WI
1906 Legacy Boys 16 Elite 1537 36-26 58% 16 MI
1907 Ignite VBCF Boys 15 National 1537 27-23 54% 15 AZ
1908 808 Athletic Club 16-S zac 1537 19-19 50% 16 HI
1909 WAVE 16-Spring andy 1537 6-3 67% 16 CA
1910 VOLTAGE 16-Sonja 1537 5-3 63% 16
1911 Kinnect 16 Forest 1536 18-15 55% 16 CA
1912 315 VC 16-1 1536 5-3 50% 16 NY
1913 NF 18 Cobalt 1536 17-29 35% 18 NY
1914 NJ RONIN 14-Sword 1536 6-4 55% 14 NJ
1915 Sportime 15-Quogue 1536 10-6 63% 15 NY
1916 Sportime 17-Quogue 1536 19-22 46% 17 NY
1917 TNT Boys 14-Blast 1536 2-3 40% 14 PA
1918 NM Cactus VBC 13-1 1536 4-3 57% 13
1919 PEVC 17-Boys 1536 12-12 50% 17
1920 SNVF 18-Mount baker 1536 7-23 23% 18 WA
1921 Cicero Elite B 18-Purple 1535 10-7 59% 18 IL
1922 Oregon Premier Adidas 18-National 1535 2-3 40% 18 OR
1923 Fireballs 11 1535 2-1 50% 11
1924 Fusion 17-Green 1535 17-20 46% 17 CA
1925 MINIESCAED 10-1 1535 3-2 60% 10 PR
1926 310VBC 16-Boys 1535 11-7 61% 16 CA
1927 Pipeline 14-1 1535 3-4 43% 14 IL
1928 Core 17 Elite 1535 18-17 51% 17 CA
1929 TopFlight 17 Alpha 1535 4-1 80% 17 NV
1930 SLAM 18-S blue 1535 16-15 52% 18 HI
1931 HI Bred VBC 18-Kane select 1535 14-6 70% 18 HI
1932 WPVC Boys 18-Armour white 1534 4-7 36% 18 FL
1933 Forza - Boys 16-Blk 1534 45-30 58% 16 IL
1934 Victory 14-Black 1534 18-16 53% 14 AZ
1935 MVVC B 17-National 1534 35-40 47% 17 CA
1936 Emerald Coast 18-Boys 1534 0-0 0% 18 FL
1937 Sky High 16-Chin 1534 24-9 73% 16 IL
1938 Velocity 17-2 national 1534 11-25 31% 17 PA
1939 SPORTIME 15-2 1534 9-19 32% 15 NY
1940 West Edge 18 Storm 1534 11-7 61% 18 CA
1941 Cicero Elite B 16-Purple 1533 13-4 76% 16 IL
1942 Pipeline 14-Black 1533 17-12 59% 14 IL
1943 True North B 16-White 1533 5-5 50% 16
1944 Balboa Bay 13-White 1533 18-23 44% 13 CA
1945 Providence Junior Pilots Volleyball Club 14-Boys 1533 0-0 0% 14
1946 Team Colorado 16-Green 1533 18-17 51% 16 CO
1947 Philly Boys 18 1533 7-6 50% 18 PA
1948 OVBC 10-Purple 1533 0-0 0% 10
1949 VVA 12-Shaver 1533 13-23 36% 12 MO
1950 STORM 17-Black 1533 3-6 33% 17 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.