College Club Women's State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
27 BC 44.44 3 5 1 U Victoria
26 Tennessee 44.44 3 5 1 U Tennessee
28 Arizona 43.78 5 8 1 U Arizona
29 Connecticut 43.45 9 10 1 U Connecticut
30 Alabama 42.11 5 7 1 Auburn U
31 Indiana 40.73 5 6 1 Butler
32 New Jersey 40.01 7 8 1 Rutgers U
33 Nebraska 39.76 4 6 1 Creighton U
34 Kentucky 38.9 5 6 1 U Kentucky
35 South Carolina 32.68 5 7 U South Carolina
36 Rhode Island 30.69 5 5 U Rhode Island
37 District of Columbia 27.11 5 6 American U
38 Idaho 26.42 3 3 Ricks Co
39 North Dakota 23.99 3 4 North Dakota St
40 South Dakota 23.91 3 4 U South Dakota
41 New Hampshire 22.33 3 3 Dartmouth
42 Louisiana 22.26 3 3 Louisiana St
43 Nevada 21.99 2 2 UNLV
44 Mississippi 21.92 1 2 U Mississippi
45 Montana 21.78 2 3 Montana St U
46 Vermont 20.97 2 2 U Vermont
47 West Virginia 19.78 2 2 W Virginia
48 Maine 18.51 3 3 U Maine
49 Wyoming 14.35 1 1 U Wyoming
← Previous1234

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.