Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 4 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is MADFROG 15-N green with a 2441 Elo rating and 62-9 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
151 MADFROG 17-N green 2166 46-13 78% 17 TX
152 Panda VBC 13-1 2165 9-6 60% 13 CA
153 IMGA Ascender Elite 18-1 2165 46-12 79% 18 FL
154 407 15-Orange 2164 54-28 66% 15 FL
155 Iowa Premier 16-1 2162 36-20 64% 16
156 PSVA 18-Black anna 2160 17-1 94% 18 FL
157 Dallas Skyline 16-Royal-paul 2160 8-1 89% 16 TX
158 OT 16-T jp 2160 34-19 64% 16 FL
159 Premier Nebraska 18 Gold 2158 28-4 88% 18 NE
160 TAV 15-Black jason 2158 32-15 68% 15 TX
161 Wildfire 13-N open 2157 9-8 53% 13 FL
162 FaR Out 18-Black 2156 37-9 80% 18 MI
163 NKYVC 18-1 tsunami 2155 34-15 69% 18 KY
164 Aspire 15 Alpha 2155 43-24 64% 15 AB
165 Arizona Storm 15-Thunder 2154 7-2 78% 15 AZ
166 Alliance 16-Ren 2154 44-19 70% 16 TN
167 Omni 14-N1 2153 59-12 83% 14 AZ
168 Munciana 15-Blue 2153 41-19 68% 15 IN
169 AP 17-Adidas 2153 32-13 71% 17 TX
170 Stars 17 ALex 2153 48-16 75% 17 SC
171 Madfrog 12-N green 2153 52-2 96% 12 TX
172 Absolute 17-Black 2152 50-10 83% 17 CA
173 EXCEL 14-National red 2151 47-17 73% 14 TX
174 Pohaku 18-1 2151 34-18 65% 18 KS
175 ARVC 13-Black adidas 2151 50-3 94% 13 NM
176 GP 14 National 2150 50-27 65% 14 FL
177 Actyve 15-Navy 2150 37-13 74% 15 CA
178 SynergyForce 15-1 natl 2150 34-13 72% 15 CA
179 FaR Out 15-Black 2150 41-15 73% 15 MI
180 AVC CLE 15-Red 2149 44-13 77% 15 OH
181 MiElite 16-Mizuno 2149 36-17 68% 16 MI
182 Circle City 17-Purple 2146 34-19 64% 17 IN
183 TAV Houston 17-Black b 2146 43-18 70% 17 TX
184 Premier Nebraska 14 Gold 2145 25-12 68% 14 NE
185 Triangle 15-Black 2145 41-17 71% 15 NC
186 IA UTD 16-Elite timmerman 2145 40-15 73% 16
187 Miami Hype 17-Prime1 2145 41-22 65% 17 FL
188 Tribe 17-Vktry cardinal 2145 40-16 71% 17 FL
189 MKE Sting 18 Gold 2145 31-20 61% 18 WI
190 TAV 13-Black jon 2144 33-14 70% 13 TX
191 Circle City 18-Purple 2142 46-20 70% 18 IN
192 OT 14-T jody 2142 40-15 73% 14 FL
193 MKE Sting 13 Gold 2142 53-15 78% 13 WI
194 SC Rockstar 16-Carlos 2142 44-24 65% 16 CA
195 A5 13-1 karen 2142 8-1 89% 13 GA
196 South County 15-Darice 2141 42-10 81% 15 RI
197 1st Alliance 18 Gold 2140 31-21 60% 18 IL
198 Tstreet 17-Hayden 2138 34-13 72% 17 NV
199 Elevation 12-Farley 2138 28-3 90% 12 OH
200 Vision 14-Gold 2137 32-17 65% 14 CA
← Previous1234567Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.