2025-2026 Season — Page 4 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 151 | AJV 16-Adidas | 2251 | 46-24 | 66% | 16 | TX |
| 152 | Omni 15-N1 | 2251 | 54-21 | 72% | 15 | AZ |
| 153 | Legacy 12-1 adidas | 2251 | 52-11 | 83% | 12 | MI |
| 154 | SC Rockstar 16-Carlos | 2250 | 55-31 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 155 | Mintonette Sports 17-1 | 2250 | 47-28 | 63% | 17 | OH |
| 156 | AVC CLE 17-Red | 2249 | 44-34 | 56% | 17 | OH |
| 157 | MADFROG 16-N green | 2248 | 43-18 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 158 | Kairos 17 Alpha | 2248 | 42-18 | 70% | 17 | SD |
| 159 | SC Rockstar 14-Libby | 2247 | 46-16 | 74% | 14 | CA |
| 160 | Sky High Adidas 17 Elite | 2246 | 50-19 | 72% | 17 | IL |
| 161 | NORCO 17-Black | 2246 | 54-20 | 73% | 17 | CO |
| 162 | GJ 15 ADIDAS | 2245 | 53-17 | 76% | 15 | FL |
| 163 | Premier Nebraska 15 Gold | 2243 | 36-17 | 68% | 15 | NE |
| 164 | Munciana 15-Blue | 2242 | 51-24 | 68% | 15 | IN |
| 165 | OT 14-T jody | 2242 | 50-26 | 66% | 14 | FL |
| 166 | Northern Lights 14-1 | 2242 | 54-33 | 62% | 14 | MN |
| 167 | Dal Skyline 16-Royal-jimmy | 2241 | 44-24 | 65% | 16 | TX |
| 168 | NKYVC 17-1 tsunami | 2240 | 55-24 | 70% | 17 | KY |
| 169 | FH 14-1 ikaika ac/as | 2239 | 35-13 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 170 | PVA 14-Elite | 2239 | 42-24 | 64% | 14 | MO |
| 171 | Paramount VBC 17 Nick | 2238 | 65-20 | 76% | 17 | VA |
| 172 | TVC 18-Black | 2238 | 38-14 | 73% | 18 | OH |
| 173 | Mintonette Sports 15-1 | 2238 | 44-33 | 57% | 15 | OH |
| 174 | HPSTL 16 Royal | 2237 | 42-26 | 61% | 16 | MO |
| 175 | 407 15-Orange | 2237 | 63-30 | 68% | 15 | FL |
| 176 | IA UTD 16-Elite timmerman | 2237 | 50-23 | 68% | 16 | |
| 177 | Premier Nebraska 14 Gold | 2236 | 35-17 | 67% | 14 | NE |
| 178 | SynergyForce 15-1 natl | 2236 | 50-22 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 179 | ARVC 13-Black adidas | 2235 | 60-10 | 86% | 13 | NM |
| 180 | ARIZONA STORM 13 THUNDER | 2235 | 66-24 | 73% | 13 | AZ |
| 181 | OT 16-O semei | 2235 | 50-26 | 66% | 16 | FL |
| 182 | Tri-State Elite 15-Blue | 2234 | 45-24 | 65% | 15 | OH |
| 183 | PowerPlex 13-Allen | 2233 | 67-7 | 91% | 13 | IA |
| 184 | KIVA 13-Red | 2232 | 55-17 | 76% | 13 | KY |
| 185 | ARIZONA STORM 18 THUNDER | 2232 | 56-13 | 81% | 18 | AZ |
| 186 | Munciana 18 Samurai | 2231 | 47-5 | 90% | 18 | IN |
| 187 | Drive Nation 17-Red | 2230 | 27-20 | 57% | 17 | TX |
| 188 | ONE Volleyball 13-1 | 2230 | 71-27 | 72% | 13 | GA |
| 189 | CUVC 17 Open | 2229 | 45-26 | 63% | 17 | NC |
| 190 | MKE Sting 13 Gold | 2229 | 67-20 | 77% | 13 | WI |
| 191 | AVC CLE 16-Red | 2229 | 41-21 | 66% | 16 | OH |
| 192 | FORZA1 NORTH 17-One | 2227 | 36-28 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 193 | Elevation 12-Farley | 2227 | 41-6 | 87% | 12 | OH |
| 194 | K2 16 Elite | 2226 | 69-24 | 74% | 16 | TN |
| 195 | MKE Sting 15 Gold | 2226 | 58-26 | 69% | 15 | WI |
| 196 | Circle City 17-Purple | 2224 | 44-24 | 65% | 17 | IN |
| 197 | ARVC 16-Black adidas | 2223 | 47-16 | 75% | 16 | NM |
| 198 | Kairos 14 Alpha | 2223 | 37-28 | 57% | 14 | SD |
| 199 | SA Elite 17-1 navy | 2222 | 56-18 | 76% | 17 | TX |
| 200 | Jax Skyline 15-Royal | 2222 | 56-27 | 67% | 15 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.