Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 4 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
151 AJV 16-Adidas 2251 46-24 66% 16 TX
152 Omni 15-N1 2251 54-21 72% 15 AZ
153 Legacy 12-1 adidas 2251 52-11 83% 12 MI
154 SC Rockstar 16-Carlos 2250 55-31 64% 16 CA
155 Mintonette Sports 17-1 2250 47-28 63% 17 OH
156 AVC CLE 17-Red 2249 44-34 56% 17 OH
157 MADFROG 16-N green 2248 43-18 70% 16 TX
158 Kairos 17 Alpha 2248 42-18 70% 17 SD
159 SC Rockstar 14-Libby 2247 46-16 74% 14 CA
160 Sky High Adidas 17 Elite 2246 50-19 72% 17 IL
161 NORCO 17-Black 2246 54-20 73% 17 CO
162 GJ 15 ADIDAS 2245 53-17 76% 15 FL
163 Premier Nebraska 15 Gold 2243 36-17 68% 15 NE
164 Munciana 15-Blue 2242 51-24 68% 15 IN
165 OT 14-T jody 2242 50-26 66% 14 FL
166 Northern Lights 14-1 2242 54-33 62% 14 MN
167 Dal Skyline 16-Royal-jimmy 2241 44-24 65% 16 TX
168 NKYVC 17-1 tsunami 2240 55-24 70% 17 KY
169 FH 14-1 ikaika ac/as 2239 35-13 73% 14 TX
170 PVA 14-Elite 2239 42-24 64% 14 MO
171 Paramount VBC 17 Nick 2238 65-20 76% 17 VA
172 TVC 18-Black 2238 38-14 73% 18 OH
173 Mintonette Sports 15-1 2238 44-33 57% 15 OH
174 HPSTL 16 Royal 2237 42-26 61% 16 MO
175 407 15-Orange 2237 63-30 68% 15 FL
176 IA UTD 16-Elite timmerman 2237 50-23 68% 16
177 Premier Nebraska 14 Gold 2236 35-17 67% 14 NE
178 SynergyForce 15-1 natl 2236 50-22 69% 15 CA
179 ARVC 13-Black adidas 2235 60-10 86% 13 NM
180 ARIZONA STORM 13 THUNDER 2235 66-24 73% 13 AZ
181 OT 16-O semei 2235 50-26 66% 16 FL
182 Tri-State Elite 15-Blue 2234 45-24 65% 15 OH
183 PowerPlex 13-Allen 2233 67-7 91% 13 IA
184 KIVA 13-Red 2232 55-17 76% 13 KY
185 ARIZONA STORM 18 THUNDER 2232 56-13 81% 18 AZ
186 Munciana 18 Samurai 2231 47-5 90% 18 IN
187 Drive Nation 17-Red 2230 27-20 57% 17 TX
188 ONE Volleyball 13-1 2230 71-27 72% 13 GA
189 CUVC 17 Open 2229 45-26 63% 17 NC
190 MKE Sting 13 Gold 2229 67-20 77% 13 WI
191 AVC CLE 16-Red 2229 41-21 66% 16 OH
192 FORZA1 NORTH 17-One 2227 36-28 56% 17 CA
193 Elevation 12-Farley 2227 41-6 87% 12 OH
194 K2 16 Elite 2226 69-24 74% 16 TN
195 MKE Sting 15 Gold 2226 58-26 69% 15 WI
196 Circle City 17-Purple 2224 44-24 65% 17 IN
197 ARVC 16-Black adidas 2223 47-16 75% 16 NM
198 Kairos 14 Alpha 2223 37-28 57% 14 SD
199 SA Elite 17-1 navy 2222 56-18 76% 17 TX
200 Jax Skyline 15-Royal 2222 56-27 67% 15 FL
← Previous1234567Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.