Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 4 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
151 AVC CLE 17-Red 2255 44-34 56% 17 OH
152 SC Rockstar 16-Carlos 2252 55-31 64% 16 CA
153 Absolute 17-Black 2252 55-16 77% 17 CA
154 Kairos 17 Alpha 2251 42-18 70% 17 SD
155 AJV 16-Adidas 2251 46-24 66% 16 TX
156 MADFROG 16-N green 2251 43-18 70% 16 TX
157 Mintonette Sports 17-1 2251 47-28 63% 17 OH
158 Sky High Adidas 17 Elite 2250 50-19 72% 17 IL
159 Legacy 12-1 adidas 2250 52-11 83% 12 MI
160 PVA 14-Elite 2249 42-24 64% 14 MO
161 NORCO 17-Black 2248 54-20 73% 17 CO
162 GJ 15 ADIDAS 2247 53-17 76% 15 FL
163 Premier Nebraska 15 Gold 2246 36-17 68% 15 NE
164 SC Rockstar 14-Libby 2246 46-16 74% 14 CA
165 OT 14-T jody 2245 50-26 66% 14 FL
166 Premier Nebraska 14 Gold 2245 35-17 67% 14 NE
167 Paramount VBC 17 Nick 2244 65-20 76% 17 VA
168 Dal Skyline 16-Royal-jimmy 2244 44-24 65% 16 TX
169 Northern Lights 14-1 2244 60-33 65% 14 MN
170 HPSTL 16 Royal 2243 42-26 61% 16 MO
171 Munciana 15-Blue 2243 51-24 68% 15 IN
172 TVC 18-Black 2242 38-14 73% 18 OH
173 407 15-Orange 2242 63-30 68% 15 FL
174 OT 16-O semei 2242 50-26 66% 16 FL
175 IA UTD 16-Elite timmerman 2240 56-24 70% 16 IA
176 CUVC 17 Open 2240 45-26 63% 17 NC
177 NKYVC 17-1 tsunami 2240 55-24 70% 17 KY
178 Drive Nation 17-Red 2238 27-20 57% 17 TX
179 Munciana 18 Samurai 2238 47-5 90% 18 IN
180 Mintonette Sports 15-1 2238 44-33 57% 15 OH
181 Tri-State Elite 15-Blue 2238 45-24 65% 15 KY
182 FORZA1 NORTH 17-One 2237 36-28 56% 17 CA
183 AVC CLE 16-Red 2235 41-21 66% 16 OH
184 SynergyForce 15-1 natl 2233 50-22 69% 15 CA
185 Stars 15 Bing 2233 71-17 81% 15 SC
186 K2 16 Elite 2231 69-24 74% 16 TN
187 ARVC 13-Black adidas 2231 60-10 86% 13 NM
188 ARIZONA STORM 13 THUNDER 2231 66-24 73% 13 AZ
189 PowerPlex 13-Allen 2230 73-7 91% 13 IA
190 ONE Volleyball 13-1 2229 71-27 72% 13 GA
191 ARVC 16-Black adidas 2229 47-16 75% 16 NM
192 KIVA 13-Red 2228 55-17 76% 13 KY
193 Elevation 12-Farley 2227 41-6 87% 12 OH
194 Kairos 14 Alpha 2227 37-28 57% 14 SD
195 Areté 14-Navy telos 2227 56-16 78% 14 TX
196 City 17-Gold 2226 38-28 57% 17 CA
197 Alliance 15-Ren 2225 50-18 74% 15 TN
198 COAST 17-1 ozhan 2225 33-24 58% 17 CA
199 Alliance 16-Ren 2224 53-26 67% 16 TN
200 Jax Skyline 15-Royal 2224 56-27 67% 15 FL
← Previous1234567Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.