Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1 Legacy 14-1 adidas 2626 80-6 93% 14 MI
2 TAV 16-Black yun 2592 82-9 90% 16 TX
3 A5 16-Gabe 2590 87-2 98% 16 GA
4 WAVE 15-Brennan 2559 64-6 91% 15 CA
5 Legacy 15-1 adidas 2550 81-7 92% 15 MI
6 Dal Skyline 14-Royal-erin 2534 82-5 94% 14 TX
7 A5 13-Karen 2532 78-14 85% 13 GA
8 TAV 17-Black jon 2522 71-5 93% 17 TX
9 Dal Skyline 15-Royal-ryan 2521 67-11 86% 15 TX
10 MADFROG 15-N green 2508 70-10 88% 15 TX
11 Club V 17-Prodigy reed 2497 66-7 90% 17 UT
12 SC Rockstar LOVB 17-Angel 2492 36-6 86% 17 CA
13 DYNASTY 14-Black 2478 61-10 86% 14 KS
14 AJV 15 adidas 2477 67-12 85% 15 TX
15 OT 15-T randy 2472 63-12 84% 15 FL
16 OT 17-T aaron 2466 67-11 86% 17 FL
17 Dal Skyline 16-Royal-paul 2465 54-14 79% 16 TX
18 WAVE 16-Scott 2461 54-15 78% 16 CA
19 Boiler Jrs 14-O gold 2453 78-25 76% 14 IN
20 Circle City 16-Purple 2449 74-5 94% 16 IN
21 WPVC 17-Armour black 2448 74-8 90% 17 FL
22 Circle City 14-Purple 2446 66-17 80% 14 IN
23 A5 14 Helen 2445 71-23 76% 14 GA
24 H Skyline 15 Royal 2440 59-16 79% 15 TX
25 ARIZONA STORM 15 THUNDER 2431 63-20 76% 15 AZ
26 Madfrog 13-N green 2426 51-5 89% 13 TX
27 KC Power 15-1 2424 44-11 80% 15 KS
28 Tribe 14-Vktry cardinal 2416 64-12 84% 14 FL
29 Alamo 16-Premier 2409 67-17 80% 16 TX
30 Legacy 17-1 adidas 2406 71-15 83% 17 MI
31 ARIZONA STORM 17 THUNDER 2399 61-20 75% 17 AZ
32 ID Crush 16 Bower 2399 71-15 83% 16 ID
33 Circle City 15-Purple 2397 63-23 73% 15 IN
34 Top Select 14 Elite 2397 61-22 73% 14 FL
35 Metro 14-Travel 2396 63-16 80% 14 DC
36 MN Select 16-1 2396 67-19 78% 16 MN
37 SC Rockstar 15-Carlos 2395 48-14 77% 15 CA
38 Absolute 14-Black 2393 56-17 77% 14 CA
39 Top Select 15 Elite 2391 70-18 80% 15 FL
40 Surfside 13-Pv elite 2389 56-14 80% 13 CA
41 Elevation 14-Case 2389 47-16 75% 14 OH
42 Boiler Jrs 15-O gold 2385 73-25 74% 15 IN
43 AZ Sky 17 Gold 2385 64-20 76% 17 AZ
44 NKYVC 16-1 tsunami 2385 55-23 71% 16 KY
45 Adversity 16-Adidas 2385 47-23 67% 16 IL
46 SC Rockstar LOVB 18-Amir 2385 30-0 100% 18 CA
47 ARIZONA STORM 16 THUNDER 2383 56-22 72% 16 AZ
48 DYNASTY 15-Black 2383 54-17 76% 15 KS
49 H Skyline 16-Royal 2379 50-27 65% 16 TX
50 COAST 13-1 tina 2378 60-4 94% 13 CA
1234Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.