2025-2026 Season · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legacy 14-1 adidas | 2626 | 80-6 | 93% | 14 | MI |
| 2 | TAV 16-Black yun | 2592 | 82-9 | 90% | 16 | TX |
| 3 | A5 16-Gabe | 2590 | 87-2 | 98% | 16 | GA |
| 4 | WAVE 15-Brennan | 2559 | 64-6 | 91% | 15 | CA |
| 5 | Legacy 15-1 adidas | 2550 | 81-7 | 92% | 15 | MI |
| 6 | Dal Skyline 14-Royal-erin | 2534 | 82-5 | 94% | 14 | TX |
| 7 | A5 13-Karen | 2532 | 78-14 | 85% | 13 | GA |
| 8 | TAV 17-Black jon | 2522 | 71-5 | 93% | 17 | TX |
| 9 | Dal Skyline 15-Royal-ryan | 2521 | 67-11 | 86% | 15 | TX |
| 10 | MADFROG 15-N green | 2508 | 70-10 | 88% | 15 | TX |
| 11 | Club V 17-Prodigy reed | 2497 | 66-7 | 90% | 17 | UT |
| 12 | SC Rockstar LOVB 17-Angel | 2492 | 36-6 | 86% | 17 | CA |
| 13 | DYNASTY 14-Black | 2478 | 61-10 | 86% | 14 | KS |
| 14 | AJV 15 adidas | 2477 | 67-12 | 85% | 15 | TX |
| 15 | OT 15-T randy | 2472 | 63-12 | 84% | 15 | FL |
| 16 | OT 17-T aaron | 2466 | 67-11 | 86% | 17 | FL |
| 17 | Dal Skyline 16-Royal-paul | 2465 | 54-14 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 18 | WAVE 16-Scott | 2461 | 54-15 | 78% | 16 | CA |
| 19 | Boiler Jrs 14-O gold | 2453 | 78-25 | 76% | 14 | IN |
| 20 | Circle City 16-Purple | 2449 | 74-5 | 94% | 16 | IN |
| 21 | WPVC 17-Armour black | 2448 | 74-8 | 90% | 17 | FL |
| 22 | Circle City 14-Purple | 2446 | 66-17 | 80% | 14 | IN |
| 23 | A5 14 Helen | 2445 | 71-23 | 76% | 14 | GA |
| 24 | H Skyline 15 Royal | 2440 | 59-16 | 79% | 15 | TX |
| 25 | ARIZONA STORM 15 THUNDER | 2431 | 63-20 | 76% | 15 | AZ |
| 26 | Madfrog 13-N green | 2426 | 51-5 | 89% | 13 | TX |
| 27 | KC Power 15-1 | 2424 | 44-11 | 80% | 15 | KS |
| 28 | Tribe 14-Vktry cardinal | 2416 | 64-12 | 84% | 14 | FL |
| 29 | Alamo 16-Premier | 2409 | 67-17 | 80% | 16 | TX |
| 30 | Legacy 17-1 adidas | 2406 | 71-15 | 83% | 17 | MI |
| 31 | ARIZONA STORM 17 THUNDER | 2399 | 61-20 | 75% | 17 | AZ |
| 32 | ID Crush 16 Bower | 2399 | 71-15 | 83% | 16 | ID |
| 33 | Circle City 15-Purple | 2397 | 63-23 | 73% | 15 | IN |
| 34 | Top Select 14 Elite | 2397 | 61-22 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 35 | Metro 14-Travel | 2396 | 63-16 | 80% | 14 | DC |
| 36 | MN Select 16-1 | 2396 | 67-19 | 78% | 16 | MN |
| 37 | SC Rockstar 15-Carlos | 2395 | 48-14 | 77% | 15 | CA |
| 38 | Absolute 14-Black | 2393 | 56-17 | 77% | 14 | CA |
| 39 | Top Select 15 Elite | 2391 | 70-18 | 80% | 15 | FL |
| 40 | Surfside 13-Pv elite | 2389 | 56-14 | 80% | 13 | CA |
| 41 | Elevation 14-Case | 2389 | 47-16 | 75% | 14 | OH |
| 42 | Boiler Jrs 15-O gold | 2385 | 73-25 | 74% | 15 | IN |
| 43 | AZ Sky 17 Gold | 2385 | 64-20 | 76% | 17 | AZ |
| 44 | NKYVC 16-1 tsunami | 2385 | 55-23 | 71% | 16 | KY |
| 45 | Adversity 16-Adidas | 2385 | 47-23 | 67% | 16 | IL |
| 46 | SC Rockstar LOVB 18-Amir | 2385 | 30-0 | 100% | 18 | CA |
| 47 | ARIZONA STORM 16 THUNDER | 2383 | 56-22 | 72% | 16 | AZ |
| 48 | DYNASTY 15-Black | 2383 | 54-17 | 76% | 15 | KS |
| 49 | H Skyline 16-Royal | 2379 | 50-27 | 65% | 16 | TX |
| 50 | COAST 13-1 tina | 2378 | 60-4 | 94% | 13 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.