2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | DYNASTY 15-Black | 2377 | 54-17 | 76% | 15 | KS |
| 52 | Tribe 16-Vktry cardinal | 2375 | 57-20 | 74% | 16 | FL |
| 53 | Nebraska ONE 17 Synergy | 2373 | 45-11 | 80% | 17 | NE |
| 54 | Dallas Skyline 13-Royal | 2373 | 51-6 | 88% | 13 | TX |
| 55 | AZ Sky 14 Gold | 2373 | 57-31 | 65% | 14 | AZ |
| 56 | 1st Alliance 16-Gold | 2371 | 46-18 | 72% | 16 | IL |
| 57 | Vision 17 Gold | 2370 | 70-19 | 79% | 17 | CA |
| 58 | GP 14 National | 2365 | 74-34 | 69% | 14 | FL |
| 59 | FaR Out 14-Black | 2364 | 59-15 | 80% | 14 | MI |
| 60 | MAVS 14-Elite | 2363 | 43-17 | 72% | 14 | KS |
| 61 | WAVE 17-Juliana | 2360 | 50-13 | 79% | 17 | CA |
| 62 | WAVE 14-Juliana | 2358 | 45-9 | 83% | 14 | CA |
| 63 | BSVBC 16-Black | 2357 | 55-11 | 83% | 16 | IL |
| 64 | A5 17-Calvin | 2356 | 49-34 | 59% | 17 | GA |
| 65 | DYNASTY 13-Black | 2355 | 63-11 | 85% | 13 | KS |
| 66 | HJV 16-Elite | 2355 | 51-23 | 69% | 16 | TX |
| 67 | TAV 18-Black jason | 2355 | 50-5 | 91% | 18 | TX |
| 68 | A5 15-Kelly | 2355 | 60-25 | 71% | 15 | GA |
| 69 | SC Rockstar LOVB 18-Amir | 2351 | 52-7 | 88% | 18 | CA |
| 70 | MKE Sting 16-Gold | 2350 | 57-26 | 69% | 16 | WI |
| 71 | H Skyline 14-Royal | 2347 | 41-30 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 72 | MADFROG 14-N green | 2345 | 61-14 | 81% | 14 | TX |
| 73 | AP 17-Adidas | 2344 | 42-20 | 68% | 17 | TX |
| 74 | Club Sand 15-Leão | 2340 | 67-18 | 79% | 15 | UT |
| 75 | Metro Volleyball Club 16-Travel | 2339 | 67-16 | 81% | 16 | DC |
| 76 | MN Select 17-1 | 2337 | 58-14 | 81% | 17 | MN |
| 77 | Munciana 17-Samurai | 2336 | 16-4 | 80% | 17 | IN |
| 78 | Arete 13-Navy telos | 2334 | 57-9 | 86% | 13 | TX |
| 79 | AZ REV 17 Premier | 2333 | 55-22 | 71% | 17 | AZ |
| 80 | FaR Out 15-Black | 2332 | 54-19 | 74% | 15 | MI |
| 81 | 1st Alliance 17-Gold | 2331 | 42-18 | 70% | 17 | IL |
| 82 | KC Power 17-1 | 2331 | 37-13 | 74% | 17 | KS |
| 83 | ARIZONA STORM 14 THUNDER | 2331 | 53-26 | 67% | 14 | AZ |
| 84 | TAV Houston 16-Black | 2327 | 48-22 | 69% | 16 | TX |
| 85 | HJV 17-Elite | 2326 | 44-33 | 57% | 17 | TX |
| 86 | Elevation 15-Ed | 2325 | 39-18 | 68% | 15 | OH |
| 87 | Metro Volleyball Club 17-Travel | 2321 | 58-18 | 76% | 17 | DC |
| 88 | Vision 14-Gold | 2321 | 46-21 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 89 | Iowa Premier 16-1 | 2321 | 51-27 | 65% | 16 | IA |
| 90 | Legacy 16-1 adidas | 2320 | 51-24 | 68% | 16 | MI |
| 91 | Northern Lights 16-1 | 2319 | 64-31 | 67% | 16 | MN |
| 92 | D Skyline 15-Royal-david | 2318 | 50-21 | 70% | 15 | TX |
| 93 | CVC 13-Black | 2316 | 54-14 | 79% | 13 | OH |
| 94 | South County 16-Nina | 2316 | 44-25 | 64% | 16 | UT |
| 95 | Top Select 17 Elite | 2315 | 59-19 | 76% | 17 | FL |
| 96 | Paramount VBC 16 Maureen | 2313 | 62-15 | 81% | 16 | VA |
| 97 | NPJ 18 Forefront | 2312 | 66-6 | 92% | 18 | OR |
| 98 | Rockwood Thunder 15-Elite | 2311 | 59-23 | 71% | 15 | MO |
| 99 | Circle City 13-Purple | 2311 | 69-12 | 85% | 13 | IN |
| 100 | PVA 16 ELITE | 2309 | 38-25 | 60% | 16 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.