Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 5 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
201 MKE Sting 13 Gold 2224 67-20 77% 13 WI
202 MKE Sting 15 Gold 2224 58-26 69% 15 WI
203 Circle City 17-Purple 2224 44-24 65% 17 IN
204 ARIZONA STORM 18 THUNDER 2224 56-13 81% 18 AZ
205 ARVC 14-Black adidas 2223 53-18 75% 14 NM
206 Legacy 14-2 adidas 2222 64-19 77% 14 MI
207 SC Rockstar 15-Stevi 2221 40-28 59% 15 CA
208 1United 13-N blue 2220 42-23 65% 13 TX
209 SA Elite 17-1 navy 2220 56-18 76% 17 TX
210 EXCEL 14-National white 2220 55-4 93% 14 TX
211 Vaqueras 14-F gilbert 2218 28-5 85% 14 PR
212 PVA 17 ELITE 2218 36-26 58% 17 MO
213 LV 15 Avoli 2217 57-21 73% 15 TX
214 Absolute 16-Black 2217 47-31 60% 16 CA
215 Club V 14-Prodigy silver 2217 54-35 61% 14 UT
216 SC Rockstar 13-Lance 2215 48-18 73% 13 CA
217 Jax Skyline 14-Royal 2215 60-26 70% 14 FL
218 3DGE 17-1 gold 2215 39-23 63% 17 PA
219 COAST 15-1 luis 2215 41-27 60% 15 CA
220 EXCEL 14-National red 2214 50-23 68% 14 TX
221 OT 15-T jenn 2213 73-14 84% 15 FL
222 MAVS 12 Elite 2212 47-11 81% 12 KS
223 Sky High Adidas 16 Elite 2212 66-18 79% 16 IL
224 Carolina Rogue 16-Black 2212 39-26 60% 16 SC
225 AP 13-Adidas 2211 51-25 67% 13 TX
226 A5 15-Victor 2210 64-26 71% 15 GA
227 ID Crush 17 Bower 2210 64-31 67% 17 ID
228 Aspire 17 Alpha 2209 44-38 54% 17 AZ
229 PVA 15 ELITE 2208 42-24 64% 15 MO
230 KIVA 16-Red 2208 46-21 69% 16 KY
231 HEAT 15-Elite 2207 63-19 77% 15 FL
232 Ozark Juniors 16 Premier 2204 59-24 71% 16 AR
233 Stars 14-Sean 2204 74-16 82% 14 SC
234 WAVE 12-Binh 2203 53-9 85% 12 CA
235 ID Crush 15 Yett 2201 59-23 72% 15 ID
236 TAV 15-Black jason 2201 38-26 59% 15 TX
237 PCVC 15 Nalu 2200 36-22 62% 15 CA
238 Vision 13-Gold 2200 52-25 68% 13 CA
239 Circle City 15-Black 2200 54-22 71% 15 IN
240 DYNASTY 12-Black 2200 49-11 82% 12 KS
241 COAST 17-1 2200 6-3 67% 17 CA
242 Aspire 15 Alpha 2199 54-30 64% 15 AZ
243 EXCEL 16-National red 2198 33-31 51% 16 TX
244 Madfrog 15-N white 2196 52-7 85% 15 TX
245 SPVB 17-Elite 2194 15-7 68% 17 IL
246 Premier Nebraska 16 Gold 2194 34-22 61% 16 NE
247 Munciana 14 Chipmunks 2194 46-23 67% 14 IN
248 Paramount VBC 14 Jaz 2192 44-20 69% 14 VA
249 TAV Houston 17-Black b 2192 49-21 70% 17 TX
250 Tribe 13-Elite cardinal 2192 48-18 73% 13 FL
← Previous12345678Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.