Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 5 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
201 City 17-Gold 2222 38-28 57% 17 CA
202 ARVC 14-Black adidas 2221 53-18 75% 14 NM
203 Stars 15 Bing 2220 71-17 81% 15 SC
204 EXCEL 14-National white 2219 55-4 93% 14 TX
205 COAST 17-1 ozhan 2219 33-24 58% 17 CA
206 Alliance 16-Ren 2219 53-26 67% 16 TN
207 Legacy 14-2 adidas 2219 64-19 77% 14 MI
208 Absolute 16-Black 2219 47-31 60% 16 CA
209 SC Rockstar 15-Stevi 2218 40-28 59% 15 CA
210 Alliance 15-Ren 2218 50-18 74% 15 TN
211 MAVS 12 Elite 2216 47-11 81% 12 KS
212 Jax Skyline 14-Royal 2215 60-26 70% 14 FL
213 Club V 14-Prodigy silver 2214 54-35 61% 14 UT
214 PVA 17 ELITE 2214 36-26 58% 17 MO
215 Vaqueras 14-F gilbert 2214 28-5 85% 14 PR
216 Stars 14-Sean 2213 74-16 82% 14 SC
217 LV 15 Avoli 2213 57-21 73% 15 TX
218 OT 15-T jenn 2212 73-14 84% 15 FL
219 COAST 15-1 luis 2211 41-27 60% 15 CA
220 1United 13-N blue 2210 42-23 65% 13 TX
221 SC Rockstar 13-Lance 2209 48-18 73% 13 CA
222 EXCEL 14-National red 2207 50-23 68% 14 TX
223 KIVA 16-Red 2204 46-21 69% 16 KY
224 Carolina Rogue 16-Black 2204 39-26 60% 16 SC
225 Aspire 17 Alpha 2204 44-38 54% 17 AB
226 DYNASTY 12-Black 2203 49-11 82% 12 KS
227 MKE Sting 14-Black 2203 66-22 75% 14 WI
228 AP 13-Adidas 2203 46-22 68% 13 TX
229 ID Crush 17 Bower 2202 64-31 67% 17 ID
230 LOVB 17-Angel 2202 26-6 81% 17 MI
231 VCNebraska 14-Elite 2201 25-12 68% 14 NE
232 Vision 13-Gold 2200 52-25 68% 13 CA
233 TAV 15-Black jason 2200 38-26 59% 15 TX
234 Sky High Adidas 16 Elite 2199 66-18 79% 16 IL
235 EXCEL 16-National red 2199 33-31 51% 16 TX
236 Ozark Juniors 16 Premier 2199 59-24 71% 16 AR
237 PVA 15 ELITE 2199 42-24 64% 15 MO
238 Aspire 15 Alpha 2198 54-30 64% 15 AB
239 A5 15-Victor 2198 64-26 71% 15 GA
240 WAVE 12-Binh 2198 53-9 85% 12 CA
241 HEAT 15-Elite 2197 63-19 77% 15 FL
242 Circle City 15-Black 2196 54-22 71% 15 IN
243 PCVC 15 Nalu 2196 36-22 62% 15 BC
244 COAST 17-1 2195 6-3 67% 17 CA
245 3DGE 17-1 gold 2194 39-23 63% 17 PA
246 Premier Nebraska 16 Gold 2193 34-22 61% 16 NE
247 ID Crush 15 Yett 2193 59-23 72% 15 ID
248 Munciana 14 Chipmunks 2192 46-23 67% 14 IN
249 Tribe 13-Elite cardinal 2192 48-18 73% 13 FL
250 TAV Houston 17-Black b 2191 49-21 70% 17 TX
← Previous12345678Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.