Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 5 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is MADFROG 15-N green with a 2441 Elo rating and 62-9 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
201 1United 13-N blue 2136 36-18 67% 13 TX
202 Club V 14-Prodigy silver 2136 41-26 61% 14 UT
203 Sideout 15-N artem 2135 66-4 94% 15 NJ
204 Northern Lights 14-1 2134 40-22 65% 14 MN
205 MODE 15 National 2134 43-12 78% 15 WA
206 RAGE 16 GARREN 2133 41-21 66% 16 CA
207 South County 16-Nina 2132 33-16 67% 16 RI
208 MADFROG 16-N green 2132 38-14 73% 16 TX
209 GVA 14-Pink 2131 22-0 100% 14
210 MADFROG 18-N green 2130 33-15 69% 18 TX
211 Premier Nebraska 16 Gold 2129 27-14 66% 16 NE
212 AVC CLE 16-Red 2129 31-17 65% 16 OH
213 Triangle 17-Black 2129 40-13 75% 17 NC
214 D Skyline 16-Royal-jimmy 2128 21-15 58% 16
215 H Skyline 14-Royal 2127 19-22 46% 14 TX
216 OPU 14-1 2127 54-16 77% 14 FL
217 OT 15-O christian 2127 37-21 64% 15 FL
218 PineappleHP 14U 2126 34-20 63% 14 IN
219 Dallas Skyline 17-Royal-sean 2126 5-4 56% 17 TX
220 A5 15-Victor 2126 43-20 68% 15 GA
221 Areté 16-Navy telos 2126 24-14 63% 16 TX
222 CPA 18 Benson 2126 22-11 67% 18 WA
223 OK Charge 14-Ua 2125 45-5 90% 14 OK
224 AZ REV 18 Premier 2125 48-15 76% 18 AZ
225 Elevation 15-Ed 2125 28-12 70% 15 OH
226 Metro VBC 16-Travel 2125 7-1 88% 16 DC
227 EXCEL 12-National red 2124 47-11 81% 12 TX
228 VVA 16-Rosen 2123 42-14 75% 16 CA
229 TAV Houston 16-Black 2123 37-16 70% 16 TX
230 Legacy 12-1 adidas 2122 39-9 81% 12 MI
231 Top Select 15-Top blue 2121 46-20 70% 15 FL
232 MN Select 17-1 2121 40-12 77% 17 MN
233 Absolute 16-Black 2120 34-30 53% 16 CA
234 KC Power 16-1 2119 27-20 57% 16 KS
235 COAST 18-1 victor 2118 37-16 70% 18 CA
236 A5 18-Boba 2118 62-8 89% 18 GA
237 AZ Sky 18 Gold 2117 46-22 68% 18 AZ
238 Tribe 16-Vktry navy 2117 49-9 84% 16 FL
239 ARVC 14-Black adidas 2115 37-13 74% 14 NM
240 MKE Sting 14-Black 2114 56-17 77% 14 WI
241 COAST 14-1 said 2114 24-13 65% 14 CA
242 AVC CLE 17-Red 2114 37-27 58% 17 OH
243 Vision 15-Gold 2114 33-16 67% 15 CA
244 OK Charge 13-Ua 2114 31-10 76% 13 OK
245 EC Power KOP 18-Black 2113 31-19 62% 18 PA
246 Areté 14-Navy telos 2112 30-11 73% 14 TX
247 MADFROG 15-N black 2112 50-14 78% 15 TX
248 AZ REV 15 Premier 2112 37-26 59% 15 AZ
249 A5 16-Stephen 2111 46-14 77% 16 GA
250 Premier Nebraska 18-1 2111 7-2 78% 18 NE
← Previous12345678Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.