2025-2026 Season — Page 5 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | City 17-Gold | 2222 | 38-28 | 57% | 17 | CA |
| 202 | ARVC 14-Black adidas | 2221 | 53-18 | 75% | 14 | NM |
| 203 | Stars 15 Bing | 2220 | 71-17 | 81% | 15 | SC |
| 204 | EXCEL 14-National white | 2219 | 55-4 | 93% | 14 | TX |
| 205 | COAST 17-1 ozhan | 2219 | 33-24 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 206 | Alliance 16-Ren | 2219 | 53-26 | 67% | 16 | TN |
| 207 | Legacy 14-2 adidas | 2219 | 64-19 | 77% | 14 | MI |
| 208 | Absolute 16-Black | 2219 | 47-31 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 209 | SC Rockstar 15-Stevi | 2218 | 40-28 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 210 | Alliance 15-Ren | 2218 | 50-18 | 74% | 15 | TN |
| 211 | MAVS 12 Elite | 2216 | 47-11 | 81% | 12 | KS |
| 212 | Jax Skyline 14-Royal | 2215 | 60-26 | 70% | 14 | FL |
| 213 | Club V 14-Prodigy silver | 2214 | 54-35 | 61% | 14 | UT |
| 214 | PVA 17 ELITE | 2214 | 36-26 | 58% | 17 | MO |
| 215 | Vaqueras 14-F gilbert | 2214 | 28-5 | 85% | 14 | PR |
| 216 | Stars 14-Sean | 2213 | 74-16 | 82% | 14 | SC |
| 217 | LV 15 Avoli | 2213 | 57-21 | 73% | 15 | TX |
| 218 | OT 15-T jenn | 2212 | 73-14 | 84% | 15 | FL |
| 219 | COAST 15-1 luis | 2211 | 41-27 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 220 | 1United 13-N blue | 2210 | 42-23 | 65% | 13 | TX |
| 221 | SC Rockstar 13-Lance | 2209 | 48-18 | 73% | 13 | CA |
| 222 | EXCEL 14-National red | 2207 | 50-23 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 223 | KIVA 16-Red | 2204 | 46-21 | 69% | 16 | KY |
| 224 | Carolina Rogue 16-Black | 2204 | 39-26 | 60% | 16 | SC |
| 225 | Aspire 17 Alpha | 2204 | 44-38 | 54% | 17 | AB |
| 226 | DYNASTY 12-Black | 2203 | 49-11 | 82% | 12 | KS |
| 227 | MKE Sting 14-Black | 2203 | 66-22 | 75% | 14 | WI |
| 228 | AP 13-Adidas | 2203 | 46-22 | 68% | 13 | TX |
| 229 | ID Crush 17 Bower | 2202 | 64-31 | 67% | 17 | ID |
| 230 | LOVB 17-Angel | 2202 | 26-6 | 81% | 17 | MI |
| 231 | VCNebraska 14-Elite | 2201 | 25-12 | 68% | 14 | NE |
| 232 | Vision 13-Gold | 2200 | 52-25 | 68% | 13 | CA |
| 233 | TAV 15-Black jason | 2200 | 38-26 | 59% | 15 | TX |
| 234 | Sky High Adidas 16 Elite | 2199 | 66-18 | 79% | 16 | IL |
| 235 | EXCEL 16-National red | 2199 | 33-31 | 51% | 16 | TX |
| 236 | Ozark Juniors 16 Premier | 2199 | 59-24 | 71% | 16 | AR |
| 237 | PVA 15 ELITE | 2199 | 42-24 | 64% | 15 | MO |
| 238 | Aspire 15 Alpha | 2198 | 54-30 | 64% | 15 | AB |
| 239 | A5 15-Victor | 2198 | 64-26 | 71% | 15 | GA |
| 240 | WAVE 12-Binh | 2198 | 53-9 | 85% | 12 | CA |
| 241 | HEAT 15-Elite | 2197 | 63-19 | 77% | 15 | FL |
| 242 | Circle City 15-Black | 2196 | 54-22 | 71% | 15 | IN |
| 243 | PCVC 15 Nalu | 2196 | 36-22 | 62% | 15 | BC |
| 244 | COAST 17-1 | 2195 | 6-3 | 67% | 17 | CA |
| 245 | 3DGE 17-1 gold | 2194 | 39-23 | 63% | 17 | PA |
| 246 | Premier Nebraska 16 Gold | 2193 | 34-22 | 61% | 16 | NE |
| 247 | ID Crush 15 Yett | 2193 | 59-23 | 72% | 15 | ID |
| 248 | Munciana 14 Chipmunks | 2192 | 46-23 | 67% | 14 | IN |
| 249 | Tribe 13-Elite cardinal | 2192 | 48-18 | 73% | 13 | FL |
| 250 | TAV Houston 17-Black b | 2191 | 49-21 | 70% | 17 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.