2025-2026 Season — Page 5 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | MKE Sting 13 Gold | 2224 | 67-20 | 77% | 13 | WI |
| 202 | MKE Sting 15 Gold | 2224 | 58-26 | 69% | 15 | WI |
| 203 | Circle City 17-Purple | 2224 | 44-24 | 65% | 17 | IN |
| 204 | ARIZONA STORM 18 THUNDER | 2224 | 56-13 | 81% | 18 | AZ |
| 205 | ARVC 14-Black adidas | 2223 | 53-18 | 75% | 14 | NM |
| 206 | Legacy 14-2 adidas | 2222 | 64-19 | 77% | 14 | MI |
| 207 | SC Rockstar 15-Stevi | 2221 | 40-28 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 208 | 1United 13-N blue | 2220 | 42-23 | 65% | 13 | TX |
| 209 | SA Elite 17-1 navy | 2220 | 56-18 | 76% | 17 | TX |
| 210 | EXCEL 14-National white | 2220 | 55-4 | 93% | 14 | TX |
| 211 | Vaqueras 14-F gilbert | 2218 | 28-5 | 85% | 14 | PR |
| 212 | PVA 17 ELITE | 2218 | 36-26 | 58% | 17 | MO |
| 213 | LV 15 Avoli | 2217 | 57-21 | 73% | 15 | TX |
| 214 | Absolute 16-Black | 2217 | 47-31 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 215 | Club V 14-Prodigy silver | 2217 | 54-35 | 61% | 14 | UT |
| 216 | SC Rockstar 13-Lance | 2215 | 48-18 | 73% | 13 | CA |
| 217 | Jax Skyline 14-Royal | 2215 | 60-26 | 70% | 14 | FL |
| 218 | 3DGE 17-1 gold | 2215 | 39-23 | 63% | 17 | PA |
| 219 | COAST 15-1 luis | 2215 | 41-27 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 220 | EXCEL 14-National red | 2214 | 50-23 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 221 | OT 15-T jenn | 2213 | 73-14 | 84% | 15 | FL |
| 222 | MAVS 12 Elite | 2212 | 47-11 | 81% | 12 | KS |
| 223 | Sky High Adidas 16 Elite | 2212 | 66-18 | 79% | 16 | IL |
| 224 | Carolina Rogue 16-Black | 2212 | 39-26 | 60% | 16 | SC |
| 225 | AP 13-Adidas | 2211 | 51-25 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 226 | A5 15-Victor | 2210 | 64-26 | 71% | 15 | GA |
| 227 | ID Crush 17 Bower | 2210 | 64-31 | 67% | 17 | ID |
| 228 | Aspire 17 Alpha | 2209 | 44-38 | 54% | 17 | AZ |
| 229 | PVA 15 ELITE | 2208 | 42-24 | 64% | 15 | MO |
| 230 | KIVA 16-Red | 2208 | 46-21 | 69% | 16 | KY |
| 231 | HEAT 15-Elite | 2207 | 63-19 | 77% | 15 | FL |
| 232 | Ozark Juniors 16 Premier | 2204 | 59-24 | 71% | 16 | AR |
| 233 | Stars 14-Sean | 2204 | 74-16 | 82% | 14 | SC |
| 234 | WAVE 12-Binh | 2203 | 53-9 | 85% | 12 | CA |
| 235 | ID Crush 15 Yett | 2201 | 59-23 | 72% | 15 | ID |
| 236 | TAV 15-Black jason | 2201 | 38-26 | 59% | 15 | TX |
| 237 | PCVC 15 Nalu | 2200 | 36-22 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 238 | Vision 13-Gold | 2200 | 52-25 | 68% | 13 | CA |
| 239 | Circle City 15-Black | 2200 | 54-22 | 71% | 15 | IN |
| 240 | DYNASTY 12-Black | 2200 | 49-11 | 82% | 12 | KS |
| 241 | COAST 17-1 | 2200 | 6-3 | 67% | 17 | CA |
| 242 | Aspire 15 Alpha | 2199 | 54-30 | 64% | 15 | AZ |
| 243 | EXCEL 16-National red | 2198 | 33-31 | 51% | 16 | TX |
| 244 | Madfrog 15-N white | 2196 | 52-7 | 85% | 15 | TX |
| 245 | SPVB 17-Elite | 2194 | 15-7 | 68% | 17 | IL |
| 246 | Premier Nebraska 16 Gold | 2194 | 34-22 | 61% | 16 | NE |
| 247 | Munciana 14 Chipmunks | 2194 | 46-23 | 67% | 14 | IN |
| 248 | Paramount VBC 14 Jaz | 2192 | 44-20 | 69% | 14 | VA |
| 249 | TAV Houston 17-Black b | 2192 | 49-21 | 70% | 17 | TX |
| 250 | Tribe 13-Elite cardinal | 2192 | 48-18 | 73% | 13 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.